scholarly journals POS1039 PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 793-794
Author(s):  
J. Kessler ◽  
M. Chouk ◽  
T. Ruban ◽  
C. Prati ◽  
D. Wendling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Beneficial Effects ◽  
Increased Risk

Background:The beneficial effects of physical activity (PA) have been demonstrated in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis on disease and co-morbidities while they are not clearly established in psoriatic arthritis.Objectives:Thus, the aim of this study was, on the basis of a systematic review of the literature, (i) to assess the level of physical activity in these patients and (ii) to determine the effects of physical activity on joint and extra articular symptoms and on well-being.Methods:The research strategy was performed on Pubmed, Cochrane,and PEDro databases using the following keywords: “psoriatic arthritis AND physical activity” without restriction. Articles published in English before October 2019 were identified and selected according to the PRISMA methodology by two independent investigators. In case of disagreement, a third investigator was interviewed. To be included in the qualitative synthesis, the studies had to meet the PICOS criteria.Results:Among the 259 studies identified, 13 were finally included. 241 were excluded because they did not address the topic or were not in English and 5 were duplicated. Two epidemiological studies revealed that 17 and 68 % of patients comply with WHO recommendations for the general population in terms of physical activity. The main explanations expressed by patients are; a lack of promotion of physical activity by the rheumatologist and the fear of pain during the movement also called “kinesiophobia”. Among the three prospective randomized clinical trials, one of them showed a significant 20% reduction in the BASDAI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease) and a 25% reduction in pain. Fatigue was significantly reduced by 15% following a physical activity protocol on a cyclergometer for 11 weeks. Muscle strength and maximum VO2 were significantly improved after participation in the physical activity protocol in two of the clinical trials. Four retrospective studies evaluated the effect of physical activity on the risk of enthesitis or dactylitis. None were associated with an increased risk of enthesitis. However, physical activity was found to be a risk factor for structural remodelling of the Achilles tendon. And, avoiding physical activity seems to be a protective factor against the risk of enthesitis. On the other hand, the three clinical trials did not mention any increase in the disease’s activity score. Finally, the effects of four rehabilitation programs have been evaluated in psoriatic arthritis and other inflammatory rheumatism. The beneficial effects were modest and concerned the reduction of pain for all the programs and of fatigue for two of the programs.Conclusion:The studies showed a beneficial effect of physical activity on disease activity, on well-being and on comorbidities. The data on the risk of enthesitis are reassuring. Further investigations are necessary to confirm these results and to precise the modalities of exercise.Table 1.PICOS criteria according to PRISMA methodology.ParticipantsAdults > 18 years old,Psoriatic Arthritis defined to CASPAR classification criteria (2006) or Moll Wright criteria (1973)InterventionAny type of physical activity regardless of intensity and durationComparisonControl group (not mandatory)OutcomesLevel of physical activityDisease activity scoreComorbiditiesStudy designNo restrictionDisclosure of Interests:None declared.

scholarly journals Potential relation of cardiovascular risk factors to disease activity in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 1759720X2110337
Author(s):  
Iván Ferraz-Amaro ◽  
Javier Rueda-Gotor ◽  
Fernanda Genre ◽  
Alfonso Corrales ◽  
Ricardo Blanco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Axial Spondyloarthritis ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Activity Measurements ◽  
Beta Coefficient

Background: Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) patients are known to have a higher prevalence of several comorbidities, including, among others, an increased risk of atherosclerosis, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the sum of traditional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors is related to disease characteristics, such as disease activity, in patients with axSpA. Methods: A cross-sectional study that encompassed 804 patients with axSpA was conducted. Patients were assessed for the presence of five traditional CV risk factors (diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity, and smoking status), and disease activity measurements. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to evaluate whether the number of classic CV risk factors was independently associated with specific features of the disease, to include disease activity. Results: A multivariable analysis showed that Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score–C reactive protein (ASDAS-CRP) activity score was significantly higher in patients with 1 [beta coefficient 0.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.1–0.5), p = 0.001] and ⩾2 [beta coefficient 0.5 (95% CI 0.3–0.7), p = 0.000] CV risk factors compared with those without CV risk factors. Similarly, patients with 1 [OR 2.00 (95%CI 0.99–4.02), p = 0.053] and ⩾2 [OR 3.39 (95%CI 1.82–6.31), p = 0.000] CV risk factors had a higher odds ratio for the presence of high disease activity compared with the zero CV category. The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) activity score was significantly associated with the number of CV risk factors, being higher in patients with more CV risk factors. These relationships showed a CV risk factor-dependent effect being beta coefficients and ORs higher for the effect of ⩾2 over 1 CV risk factor. Conclusion: Among patients with axSpA, as the number of traditional CV risk factors increased, disease activity similarly increases in an independent manner.

EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TOFACITINIB IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS IN REAL CLINICAL PRACTICE

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (3) ◽  
pp. 268-275
Author(s):  
E. Yu. Loginova ◽  
Yu. L. Korsakova ◽  
E. E. Gubar ◽  
P. L. Karpova ◽  
T. V. Korotaeva
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Clinical Manifestations ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Number Of Patients

Objective: to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of the targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) tofacitinib (TOFA; Yakvinus®) in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) at 12 and 24 weeks after starting treatment. To define the place of TOFA in the therapy of PsA patients. Subjects and methods. Examinations were made in 41 patients (17 men and 24 women) with active PsA and an insufficient response to previous treatment with synthetic DMARDs and/or biological agents (BA). Before starting therapy, the median disease activity for psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA) and disease activity score (DAS28) were 44.2 [37.8; 55.3] and 5.5 [4.7; 6.1], respectively. TOFA tablets were prescribed at a dose of 5 mg twice daily for 24 weeks with possible dose escalation to 10 mg twice daily after 12 weeks. At the beginning of the investigation, at 12 and 24 weeks, the investigators assessed disease activity and TOFA therapy efficiency of according to DAPSA, DAS28 and minimal disease activity (MDA) criteria: tender joint count ≤1, swollen joint count ≤1, a psoriasis area severity index (PASI) ≤1 or body surface area (BSA) ≤3%, pain intensity ≤15 mm, patient global assessment ≤20 mm, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) ≤0.5, and enthesitis ≤1. They also determined the number of patients who had achieved remission (DAPSA ≤4, DAS28 score <2.6), low disease activity (DAPSA 5-14, ≤2.6, DAS28 <3.2) or MDA (5 out of the 7 criteria) during TOFA therapy at 24-week follow-up. The safety of therapy was evaluated by analyzing the drug-induced adverse events (AE): the frequency, severity and time of their occurrence were studied. Results and discussion. At 24 weeks after initiation of TOFA therapy, there was a significant decrease of median DAPSA and DAS28 values as compared to baseline, to 11 [4.3; 17.3] and 2.6 [1.7; 3.4] respectively. The median Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) also significantly decreased from 6 [4.2; 7] and 3.8 [2.8; 4.4] to 1.4 [0.6; 3.2] and 1.5 [1; 2.1] respectively. The median BSA was significantly reduced from 3 [1; 5] to 0.5 [0.1; 2]. At 24 weeks after initiation of TOFA therapy, DAPSA and DAS28 low disease activity/remission were achieved by 38.5/23.1% and 17.9/53.9% of patients, respectively. Fifteen (38.5%) patients achieved MDA. 38 (92.7%) of the 41 patients completed a full TOFA therapy cycle. Two patients dropped out of the investigation due to ineffective therapy and one due to AE (diarrhea occurring up to 10 times daily, headache, elevated blood pressure, and lacrimation). At 24 weeks, 14 (34.2%) patients reported to have AE. The most common AE noted in 7 (17.1%) patients were infections: acute respiratory viral infection (n=3), fever (n=2), and folliculitis (n=2). In addition, two patients had diarrhea and two had headache. Conclusion. TOFA is an effective drug for the treatment of PsA patients with moderate or high inflammatory activity, has a significant effect on all clinical manifestations of PsA and has a satisfactory safety profile.

scholarly journals Interventions to Ameliorate the Psychosocial Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Children—A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 2361
Author(s):  
Katharina Boldt ◽  
Michaela Coenen ◽  
Ani Movsisyan ◽  
Stephan Voss ◽  
Eva Rehfuess ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Health Management ◽  
Psychosocial Interventions ◽  
Well Being ◽  
World Health ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Psychosocial Effects ◽  
Global Database ◽  
Study Protocols

The aim of this study was to identify interventions targeting children and their caregivers to reduce psychosocial problems in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic and comparable outbreaks. The review was performed using systematic literature searches in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and COVID-19-specific databases, including the CDC COVID-19 Research Database, the World Health Organisation (WHO) Global Database on COVID-19 Research and the Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register, ClinicalTrials.gov, the EU Clinical Trials Register and the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS) up to 25th September 2020. The search yielded 6657 unique citations. After title/abstract and full text screening, 11 study protocols reporting on trials planned in China, the US, Canada, the UK, and Hungary during the COVID-19 pandemic were included. Four interventions targeted children ≥10 years directly, seven system-based interventions targeted the parents and caregivers of younger children and adolescents. Outcome measures encompassed mainly anxiety and depressive symptoms, different dimensions of stress or psychosocial well-being, and quality of supportive relationships. In conclusion, this systematic review revealed a paucity of studies on psychosocial interventions for children during the COVID-19 pandemic. Further research should be encouraged in light of the expected demand for child mental health management.

Psoriatic arthritis and physical activity: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Kessler ◽  
Mickael Chouk ◽  
Timothy Ruban ◽  
Clément Prati ◽  
Daniel Wendling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Psoriatic Arthritis

scholarly journals OP0008 DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF AN ALTERNATIVE ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS DISEASE ACTIVITY SCORE WHEN PATIENT GLOBAL ASSESSMENT IS UNAVAILABLE

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 6-6
Author(s):  
A. Ortolan ◽  
S. Ramiro ◽  
F. A. Van Gaalen ◽  
T. K. Kvien ◽  
R. B. M. Landewé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Psychometric Properties ◽  
Global Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Patient Global Assessment ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Low Disease Activity

Background:Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is a composite index measuring disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). It includes questions from the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI), Patient Global Assessment (PGA), and inflammation biomarkers. However, ASDAS calculation is not always possible because PGA is sometimes not collected.Objectives:To develop an alternative ASDAS to be used in research settings when PGA is unavailable.Methods:Longitudinal data from 4 axSpA cohorts and 2 RCTs were combined. Observations were randomly split in a development (N=1026) and a validation cohort (N=1059). Substitutes of PGA by BASDAI total score, single or combined individual BASDAI questions, and a constant value, were considered. In the development cohort, conversion factors for each substitute were defined by Generalized Estimating Equations. Validation was performed in the validation cohort according to the OMERACT filter, taking into consideration: 1) Truth (agreement with original-ASDAS in the continuous score, by intraclass correlation coefficient -ICC- and in disease activity states, by weighted kappa) 2) Discrimination (standardized mean difference –SMD- of ASDAS scores between high/low disease activity states defined by external anchors e.g Patient Acceptable Symptom State –PASS-; agreement -kappa- in the % of patients reaching ASDAS improvement criteria according to alternative vs. original formulae) 3) Feasibility.Results:Taking all psychometric properties into account and comparing the different formulae (Table), alternative-ASDAS using BASDAI total as PGA replacement proved to be: 1) truthful (agreement with original-ASDAS: ICC=0.98, kappa=0.90); 2) discriminative: it could discriminate between high/low disease activity states (e.g. scores between PASS no/yes: SMD=1.37 versus original-ASDAS SMD=1.43) and was sensitive to change (agreement with original-ASDAS in major improvement/clinically important improvement criteria: kappa=0.93/0.88; 3) feasible (BASDAI total often available; conversion coefficient≈1).Table.Psychometric properties of alternative ASDAS formulaeConclusion:Alternative-ASDAS using BASDAI total score as PGA replacement is the most truthful, discriminative and feasible instrument. This index enables ASDAS calculation in existing cohorts without PGA.Disclosure of Interests:Augusta Ortolan: None declared, Sofia Ramiro: None declared, Floris A. van Gaalen: None declared, Tore K. Kvien Grant/research support from: Received grants from Abbvie, Hospira/Pfizer, MSD and Roche (not relevant for this abstract)., Consultant of: Have received personal fees from Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lily, Hospira/Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Orion Pharma, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Sanofi and Mylan (not relevant for this abstract)., Paid instructor for: Have received personal fees from Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lily, Hospira/Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Orion Pharma, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Sanofi and Mylan (not relevant for this abstract)., Speakers bureau: Have received personal fees from Abbvie, Biogen, BMS, Celltrion, Eli Lily, Hospira/Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Orion Pharma, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Sanofi and Mylan (not relevant for this abstract)., Robert B.M. Landewé Consultant of: AbbVie; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly & Co.; Galapagos NV; Novartis; Pfizer; UCB Pharma, Pedro M Machado Consultant of: PMM: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, Speakers bureau: PMM: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche and UCB, Adeline Ruyssen-Witrand Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Astrid van Tubergen Consultant of: Novartis, Caroline Bastiaenen: None declared, Désirée van der Heijde Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cyxone, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli-Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, UCB Pharma; Director of Imaging Rheumatology BV

scholarly journals POS0241 VALIDATION OF THE ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS DISEASE ACTIVITY SCORE WITH A QUICK QUANTITATIVE C-REACTIVE PROTEIN ASSAY (ASDAS-QCRP) IN PATIENTS WITH AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS (AXSPA): A PROSPECTIVE, NATIONAL, MULTICENTER STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 342.1-342
Author(s):  
F. Proft ◽  
J. Schally ◽  
H. C. Brandt ◽  
J. Brandt-Juergens ◽  
G. R. Burmester ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Disease Activity Score ◽  
High Disease Activity ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Inactive Disease ◽  
Treat To Target ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Low Disease Activity ◽  
Reactive Protein

Background:According to international recommendations, the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) is the preferred score for assessing disease activity in axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) [1]. However, routine determination of C-reactive protein (CRP) to calculate ASDAS values takes hours to days. This limits the use of ASDAS in clinical routine and clinical trials and hinders the implementation of treat-to-target approaches in axSpA. Whereas quick quantitative CRP (qCRP) tests allow CRP assessment within a few minutes. In a pilot project the performance of qCRP-based ASDAS assessment (ASDAS-qCRP) was already investigated in a single center study of 50 newly diagnosed, bDMARD-naïve axSpA patients with promising results [2].Objectives:To validate the ASDAS-qCRP in a prospective, multicenter study of axSpA patients in a typical axSpA cohort with an appropriate sample size.Methods:The study was conducted in five centers in Germany. Consecutive adult (≥ 18 years) axSpA patients were included. In addition to a rheumatological assessment, including patient reported outcomes (PROs), routine CRP and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were measured in the local labs. Additionally, a qCRP testing with the „QuikRead go instrument“ (Aidian Oy, Finland) was performed at the study center (measurement range 0.5 - 200 mg/l for hematocrit concentrations of 40 – 45%). Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, cross tabulation and weighted Cohen´s kappa comparing disease activity categories, Bland-Altman plots and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for ASDAS-CRP and ASDAS-qCRP.Results:In this study 251 axSpA patients were included between January and September 2020 (mean age: 38.4 years; mean disease duration: 6.2 years, 159 patients (63.3%) were male, 211 (84.1%) HLA-B27 positive and 195 (77.7%) were classified as radiographic axSpA). 143 patients (57.0%) were treated with bDMARDs. CRP and qCRP showed mean values of 2.12 and 2.17 mg/l, respectively. With the ASDAS-qCRP, 242 patients (96.4%) were assigned to the same disease activity category as compared to the ASDAS based on the conventional lab CRP measurement (Table 1). Weighted Cohen´s kappa was 0.966 (95%CI: 0.943; 0.988). ICC for ASDAS-CRP- and ASDAS-qCRP-values was 0.997 (95%CI: 0.994; 0.999). The agreement of ASDAS-qCRP and ASDAS-CRP is shown in a Bland-Altman plot (Figure 1).Table 1.Disease activity categories by ASDAS-qCRP vs. ASDAS-CRPASDAS-qCRP (n = 251)Inactive Disease(< 1.3)Low Disease Activity (1.3 - < 2.1)High Disease Activity (2.1 - 3.5)Very high Disease Activity (> 3.5)ASDAS-CRPInactive Disease(< 1.3)56 (22.3%)2 (0.8%)Low Disease Activity (1.3 - < 2.1)62 (24.7%)7 (2.8%)High Disease Activity (2.1 - 3.5)97 (38.6%)Very high Disease Activity (> 3.5)27 (10.8%)The fields highlighted in red indicate that disease activity categories do not match.ASDAS = Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, CRP = C-reactive protein, qCRP = quick quantitative CRPConclusion:The ASDAS-qCRP and ASDAS-CRP showed an almost perfect agreement on the assignment to disease activity categories (96%) with the important advantage of time. With ASDAS-qCRP, rheumatologists could base their clinical decision-making on a disease activity measurement by using a composite score immediately. ASDAS-qCRP, therefore, can be integrated in clinical routine and clinical trials in the future and may facilitate implementation of the treat-to-target concept in axial SpA.References:[1]Smolen JS, et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 Jan; 77(1):3-17.[2]Proft F, et al. Joint Bone Spine. 2019 Jul 29.Figure 1.Bland-Altman plot for ASDAS-qCRP and ASDAS-CRPAcknowledgements:The authors would like to deeply thank Braun T, Doerwald C, Deter N, Höppner C, Lackinger J, Lorenz C, Lunkwitz K, Mandt B, Sron S and Zernicke J for their practical support and coordinating the study.Funding statement: The AQUA study was supported by an unrestricted research grant from Novartis. Testing kits were provided free of charge from Aidian Oy, Finland.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Sexual health and COVID-19: protocol for a scoping review

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Navin Kumar ◽  
Kamila Janmohamed ◽  
Kate Nyhan ◽  
Laura Forastiere ◽  
Wei-Hong Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Sexual Health ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Grey Literature ◽  
Well Being ◽  
World Health ◽  
Original Research ◽  
Scoping Reviews

Abstract Background Global responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have exposed and exacerbated existing socioeconomic and health inequities that disproportionately affect the sexual health and well-being of many populations, including people of color, ethnic minority groups, women, and sexual and gender minority populations. Although there have been several reviews published on COVID-19 and health disparities across various populations, none has focused on sexual health. We plan to conduct a scoping review that seeks to fill several of the gaps in the current knowledge of sexual health in the COVID-19 era. Methods A scoping review focusing on sexual health and COVID-19 will be conducted. We will search (from January 2020 onwards) CINAHL, Africa-Wide Information, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase, Gender Studies Database, Gender Watch, Global Health, WHO Global Literature on Coronavirus Disease Database, WHO Global Index Medicus, PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Sociological Abstracts. Grey literature will be identified using Disaster Lit, Google Scholar, governmental websites, and clinical trials registries (e.g., ClinicalTrial.gov, World Health Organization, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and International Standard Randomized Controlled Trial Number Registry). Study selection will conform to the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers’ Manual 2015 Methodology for JBI Scoping Reviews. Only English language, original studies will be considered for inclusion. Two reviewers will independently screen all citations, full-text articles, and abstract data. A narrative summary of findings will be conducted. Data analysis will involve quantitative (e.g., frequencies) and qualitative (e.g., content and thematic analysis) methods. Discussion Original research is urgently needed to mitigate the risks of COVID-19 on sexual health. The planned scoping review will help to address this gap. Systematic review registrations Systematic Review Registration: Open Science Framework osf/io/PRX8E

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of a single switch from etanercept originator to etanercept biosimilar in a cohort of inflammatory arthritis

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Chiara Ditto ◽  
Simone Parisi ◽  
Marta Priora ◽  
Silvia Sanna ◽  
Clara Lisa Peroni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoriatic Arthritis ◽  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Inflammatory Arthritis ◽  
Health Assessment Questionnaire ◽  
Activity Index ◽  
Health Assessment ◽  
Disease Activity Index ◽  
Clinical State ◽  
Assessment Questionnaire

Abstract AntiTNF-α biosimilars are broadly available for the treatment of inflammatory arthritis. There are a lot of data concerning the maintenance of clinical efficacy after switching from originators to biosimilars; therefore, such a transition is increasingly encouraged both in the US and Europe. However, there are reports about flares and adverse events (AE) as a non-medical switch remains controversial due to ethical and clinical implications (efficacy, safety, tolerability). The aim of our work was to evaluate the disease activity trend after switching from etanercept originator (oETA-Enbrel) to its biosimilar (bETA-SP4/Benepali) in a cohort of patients in Turin, Piedmont, Italy. In this area, the switch to biosimilars is stalwartly encouraged. We switched 87 patients who were in a clinical state of stability from oETA to bETA: 48 patients were affected by Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA),26 by Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and 13 by Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS).We evaluated VAS-pain, Global-Health, CRP, number of swollen and tender joints, Disease Activity Score on 28 joints (DAS28) for RA, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) for PsA, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Health Assessment Questionnaire for the spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-S),Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) for AS patients. 11/85 patients (12.6%) stopped treatment after switching to biosimilar etanercept. No difference was found between oETA and bETA in terms of efficacy. However, some arthritis flare and AE were reported. Our data regarding maintenance of efficacy and percentage of discontinuation were in line with the existing literature.

scholarly journals The Metabolic Syndrome and Mind-Body Therapies: A Systematic Review

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel G. Anderson ◽  
Ann Gill Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Tai Chi ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
The Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Worldwide Population ◽  
Increased Risk

The metabolic syndrome, affecting a substantial and increasing percentage of the worldwide population, is comprised of a cluster of symptoms associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and other chronic conditions. Mind-body modalities based on Eastern philosophy, such as yoga, tai chi, qigong, and meditation, have become increasingly popular worldwide. These complementary therapies have many reported benefits for improving symptoms and physiological measures associated with the metabolic syndrome. However, clinical trial data concerning the effectiveness of these practices on the syndrome as a whole have not been evaluated using a systematic and synthesizing approach. A systematic review was conducted to critically evaluate the data from clinical trials examining the efficacy of mind-body therapies as supportive care modalities for management of the metabolic syndrome. Three clinical trials addressing the use of mind-body therapies for management of the metabolic syndrome were identified. Findings from the studies reviewed support the potential clinical effectiveness of mind-body practices in improving indices of the metabolic syndrome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document