Diagnostic accuracy of three clinical dehydration scales: a systematic review

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (4) ◽  
pp. 383-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Falszewska ◽  
Hania Szajewska ◽  
Piotr Dziechciarz
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Low Income ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
High Income ◽  
Low Income Countries ◽  
Severe Dehydration ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability

ObjectiveTo systematically assess the diagnostic accuracy of the Clinical Dehydration Scale (CDS), the WHO Scale and the Gorelick Scale in identifying dehydration in children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE).DesignThree databases, two registers of clinical trials and the reference lists from identified articles were searched for diagnostic accuracy studies in children with AGE. The index tests were the CDS, WHO Scale and Gorelick Scale, and reference standard was the percentage loss of body weight. The main analysed outcomes were the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (LR) and negative LR.ResultsTen studies were included. In high-income countries, the CDS provided a moderate-to-large increase in the post-test probability of predicting moderate to severe (≥6%) dehydration (positive LR 3.9–11.79), but it was of limited value for ruling it out (negative LR 0.55–0.71). In low-income countries, the CDS showed limited value both for ruling in and ruling out moderate-to-severe dehydration. In both settings, the CDS showed poor diagnostic accuracy for ruling in or out no dehydration (<3%) or some dehydration (3%–6%). The WHO Scale showed no or limited value in assessing dehydration in children with diarrhoea. With one exception, the included studies did not confirm the diagnostic accuracy of the Gorelick Scale.ConclusionLimited evidence suggests that the CDS can help in ruling in moderate-to-severe dehydration (≥6%) in high-income settings only. The WHO and Gorelick Scales are not helpful for assessing dehydration in children with AGE.

The diagnostic accuracy of wrist cineradiography in diagnosing scapholunate dissociation

2013 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. S. I. Sulkers ◽  
N. W. L. Schep ◽  
M. Maas ◽  
C. M. A. M. van der Horst ◽  
J. C. Goslings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Scapholunate Ligament ◽  
Scapholunate Dissociation ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability

Ruptures of the scapholunate ligament (SLL) may cause carpal instability, also known as scapholunate dissociation (SLD). SLD may lead to osteoarthritis of the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine the diagnostic value of wrist cineradiography in detecting SLD. All cineradiographic studies made during a 24 year period were retrieved. All patients who underwent the confirmation method (arthroscopy and/or arthrotomy) and cineradiography were included. In total, 84 patients met the inclusion criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy for detecting SLD were calculated for radiography and cineradiography. Cineradiography had a sensitivity of 90%, a specificity of 97%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 0.93 in detecting SLD. Radiography had a sensitivity of 81%, a specificity of 80%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 0.81. Cineradiography has a high diagnostic value for diagnosing SLDs. A positive cineradiography markedly increases the post-test probability of SLD.

scholarly journals Component-Resolved Diagnosis of Hazelnut Allergy in Children

Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 640
Author(s):  
Carlo Caffarelli ◽  
Carla Mastrorilli ◽  
Angelica Santoro ◽  
Massimo Criscione ◽  
Michela Procaccianti
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Food Challenge ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Childhood And Adolescence ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Food Challenges ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability

Hazelnuts commonly elicit allergic reactions starting from childhood and adolescence, with a rare resolution over time. The definite diagnosis of a hazelnut allergy relies on an oral food challenge. The role of component resolved diagnostics in reducing the need for oral food challenges in the diagnosis of hazelnut allergies is still debated. Therefore, three electronic databases were systematically searched for studies on the diagnostic accuracy of specific-IgE (sIgE) on hazelnut proteins for identifying children with a hazelnut allergy. Studies regarding IgE testing on at least one hazelnut allergen component in children whose final diagnosis was determined by oral food challenges or a suggestive history of serious symptoms due to a hazelnut allergy were included. Study quality was assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. Eight studies enrolling 757 children, were identified. Overall, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve and diagnostic odd ratio of Cor a 1 sIgE were lower than those of Cor a 9 and Cor a 14 sIge. When the test results were positive, the post-test probability of a hazelnut allergy was 34% for Cor a 1 sIgE, 60% for Cor a9 sIgE and 73% for Cor a 14 sIgE. When the test results were negative, the post-test probability of a hazelnut allergy was 55% for Cor a 1 sIgE, 16% for Cor a9 sIgE and 14% for Cor a 14 sIgE. Measurement of IgE levels to Cor a 9 and Cor a 14 might have the potential to improve specificity in detecting clinically tolerant children among hazelnut-sensitized ones, reducing the need to perform oral food challenges.

scholarly journals Predicting Severe/Critical Outcomes in Patients With SARS-CoV2 Pneumonia: Development of the prediCtion seveRe/crItical ouTcome in COVID-19 (CRITIC) Model

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Salaffi ◽  
Marina Carotti ◽  
Marco Di Carlo ◽  
Luca Ceccarelli ◽  
Massimo Galli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prediction Model ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Clinical Laboratory ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Predictive Variables ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability

Objective: To create a prediction model of the risk of severe/critical disease in patients with Coronavirus disease (COVID-19).Methods: Clinical, laboratory, and lung computed tomography (CT) severity score were collected from patients admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia and considered as independent variables for the risk of severe/critical disease in a logistic regression analysis. The discriminative properties of the variables were analyzed through the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and included in a prediction model based on Fagan's nomogram to calculate the post-test probability of severe/critical disease. All analyses were conducted using Medcalc (version 19.0, MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium).Results: One hundred seventy-one patients with COVID-19 pneumonia, including 37 severe/critical cases (21.6%) and 134 mild/moderate cases were evaluated. Among all the analyzed variables, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was that with the highest relative importance (p = 0.0001), followed by CT severity score (p = 0.0002), and age (p = 0.0009). The optimal cut-off points for the predictive variables resulted: 3 for CCI [sensitivity 83.8%, specificity 69.6%, positive likelihood ratio (+LR) 2.76], 69.9 for age (sensitivity 94.6%, specificity 68.1, +LR 2.97), and 53 for CT severity score (sensitivity 64.9%, specificity 84.4%, +LR 4.17).Conclusion: The nomogram including CCI, age, and CT severity score, may be used to stratify patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

scholarly journals Hip aspiration culture: analysing data from a single operator series investigating periprosthetic joint infection

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 165-170
Author(s):  
Connor J. Barker ◽  
Alan Marriot ◽  
Munir Khan ◽  
Tamsin Oswald ◽  
Samuel J. Tingle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Periprosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Comparison Results ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Single Operator ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability

Abstract. Introduction: We undertook this study to know the sensitivity, specificity and post-test probabilities of hip aspiration when diagnosing periprosthetic hip infections. We also examined “dry tap” (injection with saline and aspiration) results and aspiration volumes. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients aspirated for suspected periprosthetic joint infection between July 2012 and October 2016. All aspirations were carried out by one trained surgical care practitioner (SCP). All aspirations followed an aseptic technique and fluoroscopic guidance. Aspiration was compared to tissue biopsy taken at revision. Aspiration volumes were analysed for comparison. Results: Between January 2012 and September 2016, 461 hip aspirations were performed by our SCP. Of these 125 progressed to revision. We calculated sensitivity 59 % (confidence interval (CI) 35 %–82 %) and specificity 94 % (CI 89 %–98 %). Pre-test probability for our cohort was 0.14. Positive post-test probability was 0.59 and negative post-test probability 0.06. Aspiration volume for infected (n=17) and non-infected (n=108) joints was compared and showed no significant difference. Dry taps were experienced five times; in each instance the dry tap agreed with the biopsy result. Conclusions: Our data show that hip aspiration culture is a highly specific investigation for diagnosing infection but that it is not sensitive. Aspiration volume showed no significant difference between infected and non-infected groups. Each time a joint was infiltrated with saline to achieve a result, the result matched tissue sampling.

Performance of the 2016 diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia in a tertiary care pain rehabilitation setting: a diagnostic accuracy study

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karin Due Bruun ◽  
Hanne Irene Jensen ◽  
Morten Rune Blichfeldt-Eckhardt ◽  
Henrik Bjarke Vaegter ◽  
Palle Toft ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Diagnostic Criteria ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Survey Questionnaire ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy Study ◽  
Rehabilitation Centers ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Accuracy Study ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability

Abstract Objectives With the International Classification of Diseases 11th revision (classifying fibromyalgia as a primary pain disorder) soon to be implemented, the importance of pain physicians being able to identify patients with fibromyalgia is emphasized. The diagnostic criteria proposed in 2016 are based on self-reported pain distribution and symptom severity. The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the 2016 diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia applied in a population of patients with high impact chronic pain referred for pain rehabilitation. Methods The study was performed as a diagnostic accuracy study at two Danish interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation centers, including 215 participants. All participants were evaluated clinically to identify patients with fibromyalgia. The diagnosis was based on expert opinion, but the minimum requirements were: (1) pain in all four body quadrants and axially for at least three months and (2) minimum 8 of 18 positive tender points. Participants filled in the fibromyalgia survey questionnaire, the patient version of the 2016 diagnostic criteria. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and positive and negative post-test probabilities were calculated using a clinical diagnosis of fibromyalgia as the reference standard. Results Based on clinical diagnosis 45% of the participants were diagnosed with fibromyalgia; of these, only 19% had been diagnosed previously. The 2016 diagnostic criteria demonstrated a sensitivity of 88.5%, a specificity of 81.5%, a positive likelihood ratio of 4.79, a negative likelihood ratio of 0.14, a positive post-test probability of 79.4%, and a negative post-test probability of 10.2%. Conclusions Fibromyalgia was severely under-diagnosed among patients with high impact chronic pain referred to tertiary care in two pain rehabilitation centers in Denmark. The 2016 diagnostic criteria showed sufficient discriminatory properties suggesting that the fibromyalgia survey questionnaire can be used as a screening tool assisting the identification of fibromyalgia in this patient population.

scholarly journals Viewpoint: Diagnosis in primary care: probabilistic reasoning

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce Arroll ◽  
GM Allan ◽  
C Raina Elley ◽  
Tim Kenealy ◽  
James McCormack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
False Positive ◽  
Probabilistic Reasoning ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Low Prevalence ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability ◽  
Rule Out

This article develops the concept of probabilistic reasoning as one of the techniques clinicians use in making a diagnosis. We develop the concept that every question and every examination is a diagnostic test ultimately leading to a rule in or rule out of a diagnosis. We also develop the concept of pre-test probability pointing out that false positive tests are an issue in low-prevalence settings and false negative tests are a problem. Investigative tests work best in medium-prevalence settings. The purpose of taking a history and conducting an examination is to increase the pre-test probability to a point where either treatment is commenced or more expensive/time-consuming/dangerous tests are indicated. Pre-test probabilities on their own can be used to rule out conditions. We also show how pre-test probabilities relate to the Fagan nomogram which enables visualisation of large changes in post-test probabilities which can lead to treatment/further investigation. KEYWORDS: Likelihood ratio; pre-test and post-test probability; diagnostic accuracy; probabilistic reasoning

scholarly journals How Helpful Is aEEG? Context and User Experience Matter

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda G. Sandoval Karamian ◽  
Courtney J. Wusthoff
Keyword(s):  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Negative Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Neonatal Seizure ◽  
Neonatal Seizures ◽  
Extreme Prematurity ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability

Objective The aim of the study is to model amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) utility to diagnose seizures in common clinical scenarios. Study Design Using reported neonatal seizure prevalence and aEEG sensitivities and specificities, likelihood ratios (LRs) and post-test probabilities were calculated to quantify aEEG utility to diagnose seizures in three typical clinical scenarios. Results Prevalence data supported pretest probabilities for neonatal seizures of 0.4 in neonatal hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), 0.27 in bacterial meningitis, and 0.05 in extreme prematurity. Reported sensitivity of 85% and specificity of 90% for seizures with expert aEEG interpretation yielded a positive likelihood ratio (LR+) of 8.7 and a negative likelihood ratio (LR−) of 0.17. Reported sensitivity of 65% and specificity of 70% with intermediate interpretation yielded LR+ 2.17 and LR− 0.5. Reported sensitivity of 40% and sensitivity of 50% with inexperienced interpretation gave LR+ 0.8 and LR− 1.2. These translate the ability to move pretest to post-test probability highly dependent on user expertise. For HIE, a pretest probability of seizure of 0.4 moves to a post-test probability of 0.85 when aEEG is positive for seizures by expert interpretation, and down to 0.1 when aEEG is negative. In contrast, no useful information was gained between pretest and post-test probability by aEEG interpreted as negative or positive for seizure at the inexperienced user level. Similarly, in the models of meningitis or extreme prematurity, incremental information gained from aEEG ranged widely based on interpreter experience. Conclusion aEEG is most useful to screen for neonatal seizures when used in conditions with high seizure prevalence, and when interpretation has a sensitivity and specificity as reported for expert users. In contrast, aEEG can become negligible in providing meaningful clinical information when applied in conditions having lower seizure prevalence or when interpretation has low accuracy. Appropriate patient selection and high quality interpretation are essential for aEEG utility in neonatal seizure detection. Key Points

scholarly journals The Diagnostic Accuracy of Сoronary Сomputed Tomography Angiography in the Diagnosis of Stable Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Aged 70 Years and Older

Kardiologiia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 28-34
Author(s):  
S. G. Kozlov ◽  
O. V. Chernova ◽  
T. N. Veselova ◽  
S. K. Ternovoy
Keyword(s):  
Chest Pain ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Positive Result ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Stable Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of сoronary сomputed tomography angiography (CCTA) in the diagnosis of stable coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients aged ≥70 years. Materials and methods: The study included 390 patients aged ≥70 years with symptoms suggested stable CAD which underwent elective coronary artery angiography (CAG). Initially the prevalence of angiographically significant CAD was estimated according to the gender and chest pain character, and identifications of patients in whom CCTA was appropriate. After that diagnostic accuracy and сost-efficiency of CCTA in the diagnosis of stable CAD in 82 patients with atypical angina and non-anginal chest pain were evaluated. Results: The prevalence of obstructive CAD in patients with typical angina was very high and they were excluded from the final analysis. Among 82 patients with atypical angina and non-anginal pain which underwent CCTA 48 (59%) patients had obstructive CAD. CСTA data matched with results of CAG in all cases. Among 34 patients that had non-obstructive CAD the results of CCTA and CAG matched in 88% cases. CCTA has sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of 100%, 88%, 92% and 100% respectively. The likelihood ratio for positive result was 8.3, likelihood ratio for negative result was 0.3. Positive result increased post-test probability of obstructive CAD from 42% to 86%, negative result reduced post-test probability of obstructive CAD to 0%. Conclusion: negative CCTA result in patients aged 70 years and older with atypical angina and non-anginal pain allows to exclude the presence of obstructive CAD.  The likelihood ratio for positive result indicates a moderately difference between the pre-test and post-test probability of the presence of obstructive CAD. In patients aged ≥70 years with atypical angina or non-anginal chest pain which have inconclusive results of functional testing or unable undergo functional testing CCTA allows to increase diagnostic yield of CAG and reduce the frequency of minor complications and diagnostic evaluation costs.

scholarly journals Best diagnostic accuracy of sepsis combining SIRS criteria or qSOFA score with Procalcitonin and Mid-Regional pro-Adrenomedullin outside ICU

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Silvia Spoto ◽  
Edoardo Nobile ◽  
Emanuele Paolo Rafano Carnà ◽  
Marta Fogolari ◽  
Damiano Caputo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Sofa Score ◽  
Consensus Conference ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Qsofa Score ◽  
No Gold Standard ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability ◽  
Score Evaluation ◽  
Sirs Criteria

Abstract Early diagnosis and treatment significantly reduce sepsis mortality. Currently, no gold standard has been yet established to diagnose sepsis outside the ICU. The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sepsis defined by SIRS Criteria of 1991, Second Consensus Conference Criteria of 2001, modified Second Consensus Conference Criteria of 2001 (obtaining SIRS Criteria and SOFA score), Third Consensus Conference of 2016, in addition to the dosage of Procalcitonin (PCT) and MR-pro-Adrenomedullin (MR-proADM). In this prospective study, 209 consecutive patients with clinical diagnosis of sepsis were enrolled (May 2014–June 2018) outside intensive care unit (ICU) setting. A diagnostic protocol could include SIRS criteria or qSOFA score evaluation, rapid testing of PCT and MR-proADM, and SOFA score calculation for organ failure definition. Using this approach outside the ICU, a rapid diagnostic and prognostic evaluation could be achieved, also in the case of negative SIRS, qSOFA or SOFA scores with high post-test probability to reduce mortality and improve outcomes.

scholarly journals Diagnostic accuracy of a fully automated multiplex celiac disease antibody panel for serum and plasma

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 1207-1217
Author(s):  
Jeff Terryberry ◽  
Jani Tuomi ◽  
Subo Perampalam ◽  
Russ Peloquin ◽  
Eric Brouwer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Celiac Disease ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Likelihood Ratios ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Biopsy Confirmation ◽  
Automated Platform ◽  
Disease Antibody ◽  
Post Test Probability ◽  
Test Probability

Abstract Background An automated multiplex platform using capillary blood can promote greater throughput and more comprehensive studies in celiac disease (CD). Diagnostic accuracy should be improved using likelihood ratios for the post-test probability of ruling-in disease. Methods The Ig_plex™ Celiac Disease Panel on the sqidlite™ automated platform measured IgA and IgG antibodies to tTG and DGP in n = 224 CD serum or plasma samples. Diagnostic accuracy metrics were applied to the combined multiplex test results for several CD populations and compared to conventional single antibody ELISA tests. Results With multiple positive antibody results, the post-test probability for ruling-in untreated and treated CD increased to over 90%. The number of samples positive for more than one antibody also increased in untreated CD to ≥90%. Measurement of all four CD antibodies generate cut-off dependent accuracy profiles that can monitor response to treatment with the gluten-free diet (GFD). Higher positive tTG and DGP antibodies are seen more frequently in confirmed CD without (81%–94%) than with GFD treatment (44%–64%). In CD lacking biopsy confirmation, overall agreement of plasma to serum was ≥98% for all antibodies, and 100% for venous to capillary plasma. Conclusions The Ig_plex Celiac Disease Panel increases the likelihood of confirming CD based on the post-test probability of disease results for multi-reactive markers. Specific positivity profiles and cut-off intervals can be used to monitor GFD treatment and likely disease progression. Using serum, venous and capillary plasma yield comparable and accurate results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document