scholarly journals Locked 90°-double plating of scapular spine fracture after reverse shoulder arthroplasty with union and good outcome despite plate adjacent acromion fracture

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. e234727
Author(s):  
Stefan Bauer ◽  
Aurélien Traverso ◽  
Gilles Walch
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Open Reduction ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Union Rate ◽  
Non Union ◽  
Good Outcome ◽  
Acromion Fracture ◽  
Scapular Spine ◽  
Double Plating

We report the case of a 74-year-old woman who sustained a scapular spine (SS) fracture after a fall 4 weeks after reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locked 90°-double plating resulted in union of the SS fracture with a good outcome (subjective shoulder value: 80%; Constant score 67; 1 year) despite of an adjacent lateral acromion fracture 3 weeks after ORIF. This is the second description in the literature of a successful double plate ORIF with union of an SS fracture after RSA. SS fractures are known to lead to poor RSA outcomes with a high mal-union rate and non-union rate. We describe the positioning of the plates and technical steps for successful ORIF to avoid complications, discuss the aftercare and report the outcome.

scholarly journals Double plating is associated with higher fixation strength than single plating in osteoporotic fractures of the scapular spine: a biomechanical study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Christoph Katthagen ◽  
Julia Sußiek ◽  
Andre Frank ◽  
Jens Wermers ◽  
Benedikt Schliemann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Failure Load ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Fixation Strength ◽  
Osteoporotic Bone ◽  
Spine Fractures ◽  
Test Protocol ◽  
Machine Failure ◽  
Scapular Spine ◽  
Double Plating

Abstract Introduction The number of atraumatic stress fractures of the scapular spine associated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty is increasing. At present, there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment strategy. Due to the already weakened bone, fractures of the scapular spine require a high fixation stability. Higher fixation strength may be achieved by double plating. The aim of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical principles of double plating in comparison to single plating for scapular spine fractures. Methods In this study, eight pairs (n = 16) of human shoulders were randomised pairwise into two groups. After an osteotomy at the level of the spinoglenoid notch, one side of each pair received fracture fixation with a single 3.5 LCP (Locking Compression Plate) plate. The contralateral scapular spine was fixed with a 3.5 LCP and an additional 2.7 LCP plate in 90–90 configuration. The biomechanical test protocol consisted of 700 cycles of dynamic loading and a load-to-failure test with a servohydraulic testing machine. Failure was defined as macroscopic catastrophic failure (screw cut-out, plate breakage). The focus was set on the results of specimens with osteoporotic bone quality. Results In specimens with an osteoporotic bone mineral density (BMD; n = 12), the mean failure load was significantly higher for the double plate group compared to single plating (471 N vs. 328 N; p = 0.029). Analysis of all specimens (n = 16) including four specimens without osteoporotic BMD revealed no significant differences regarding stiffness and failure load (p > 0.05). Conclusion Double plating may provide higher fixation strength in osteoporotic bone in comparison to a single plate alone. This finding is of particular relevance for fixation of scapular spine fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Level of evidence Controlled laboratory study.

scholarly journals Scapular spine base fracture with long outside-in superior or posterior screws with reverse shoulder arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 141-146
Author(s):  
Osman Nuri Eroğlu ◽  
Buğra Hüsemoğlu ◽  
Onur Başçı ◽  
Mustafa Özkan ◽  
Hasan Havıtçıoğlu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Failure Load ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Fresh Cadaver ◽  
Acromion Fracture ◽  
Scapular Spine ◽  
Spine Fixation

Background: The purpose of the present study was to determine how long superior screws alone or in combination with posterior placement of metaglene screws protruding and penetrating into the scapular spine in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty affect the strength of the scapular spine in a fresh cadaveric scapular model.Methods: Seven fresh cadaver scapulas were allocated to the control group (short posterior and superior screws) and seven scapulas to the study group (spine base fixation with a 4-inch-long superior screw, three with both long superior and long posterior screws).Results: The failure load was lower in the spine fixation group (long screw [869 N] vs. short screw [1,123 N]); however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (p>0.05). All outside-in long superior or superior plus posterior screws failed due to scapular spine base fracture; failures in the short screw group were due to acromion fracture. An additional posterior outside-in screw failed to significantly decrease the failure load of the acromion spine.Conclusions: The present study highlights the significance of preventing a cortical breach or an outside-in configuration when a superior or posterior screw is inserted into the scapular spine base.

scholarly journals Causes of acromion and scapular spine fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis and literature review

2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (12) ◽  
pp. 2673-2681
Author(s):  
Richard W. Nyffeler ◽  
Bartu Altioklar ◽  
Philipp Bissig
Keyword(s):  
Bone Quality ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Spine Fractures ◽  
Poor Bone Quality ◽  
Significant Deterioration ◽  
Scapular Spine

Abstract Purpose Fractures of the acromion and the scapular spine are serious complications after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. They concern about 4 to 5% of the patients and always result in a significant deterioration of shoulder function. Different causes have been taken into consideration, particularly stress or fatigue fractures. The purpose of the present study was to analyse our own cases and to discuss the causes reported in the literature. Methods We reviewed our shoulder arthroplasty registry and the consultation reports of the last ten years. The charts and radiographs of all patients who had a post-operative fracture of the acromion or the scapular spine were carefully examined and the results were compared with those of an age- and gender-matched control group. Results Twelve patients with an average age of 79 years sustained a fracture of the acromion (n = 6) or the scapular spine (n = 6). The time interval between the operation and the fracture averaged 26 months and ranged from three weeks to 70 months. Eight patients (67%) had a trauma. Seven of them reported a fall on the corresponding shoulder and one a heavy blow on the acromion. The four non-traumatic fractures were attributed to poor bone quality. All 12 patients had immediate pain and difficulty to actively elevate the affected arm. The time interval between the fracture and its diagnosis averaged ten weeks (0 to 10 months). At final follow-up, all patients could reach their face and refused further surgery. Two patients rated their result as good, six as acceptable and four as poor. Conclusions Our study cannot support the hypothesis that most acromion and scapular spine fractures after RSA are the result of increased tension in the deltoid or stress fractures. In our series, the majority of the fractures were related to a fall. Implantation of a reverse prosthesis exposes the acromion and makes it more vulnerable to direct trauma. Non-traumatic fractures were associated with poor bone quality.

scholarly journals Glenoid loosening and migration in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (4) ◽  
pp. 461-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Lädermann ◽  
A. J. Schwitzguebel ◽  
T. B. Edwards ◽  
A. Godeneche ◽  
L. Favard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Range Of Movement ◽  
Original Cohort ◽  
Glenoid Loosening

Aims The aim of this study was to report the outcomes of different treatment options for glenoid loosening following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) at a minimum follow-up of two years. Patients and Methods We retrospectively studied the records of 79 patients (19 men, 60 women; 84 shoulders) aged 70.4 years (21 to 87) treated for aseptic loosening of the glenosphere following RSA. Clinical evaluation included pre- and post-treatment active anterior elevation (AAE), external rotation, and Constant score. Results From the original cohort, 29 shoulders (35%) were treated conservatively, 27 shoulders (32%) were revised by revision of the glenosphere, and 28 shoulders (33%) were converted to hemiarthroplasty. At last follow-up, conservative treatment and glenoid revision significantly improved AAE, total Constant score, and pain, while hemiarthroplasty did not improve range of movement or clinical scores. Multivariable analysis confirmed that conservative treatment and glenoid revision achieved similar improvements in pain (glenoid revision vs conservative, beta 0.44; p = 0.834) but that outcomes were significantly worse following hemiarthroplasty (beta -5.00; p = 0.029). Conclusion When possible, glenoid loosening after RSA should first be treated conservatively, then by glenosphere revision if necessary, and last by salvage hemiarthroplasty Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:461–469.

scholarly journals Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty, Deltopectoral Approach vs. Anterosuperior Approach: An Overview of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paraskevas Georgoulas ◽  
Aliki Fiska ◽  
Athanasios Ververidis ◽  
Georgios I. Drosos ◽  
Evanthia Perikleous ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tear ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Clinical Effectiveness ◽  
Surgical Approaches ◽  
Cuff Tear ◽  
Scapular Spine ◽  
Deltopectoral Approach

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become an optimal treatment for numerous orthopedic entities, such as rotator cuff tear arthropathies, pseudoparalysis, fracture sequelae, acute fractures, failed arthroplasties, osteoarthritis, and rheumatoid arthritis, and is linked with relief of topical pain and regaining of functionality. Presently, RSA has been conducted through anterosuperior (AS) or deltopectoral (DP) approach. The aim of the study was to discuss both approaches and to examine broadly their features to render a comparison in terms of clinical effectiveness. An electronic search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases was performed, using combinations of the following keywords: RSA, DP approach, AS approach, notching, and cuff tear arthropathy. A total of 61 studies were found, and 16 relevant articles were eventually included. Currently published literature has not shown significant diversities in the clinical course due to approach preference; risk of instability seems to be greater in DP approach, while regarding scapular notching and fracture rates the findings were conflicted. In addition, the AS approach has been associated with decreased risk of acromial and scapular spine fractures. In conclusion, both surgical approaches have shown similar clinical outcomes and effectiveness concerning pain and restoring range of motion (ROM) in rotator cuff tear arthropathies. In the future, further investigations based on large-scale well-designed studies are required to address clinical gaps allowing in-depth comparison of both approaches.

scholarly journals Bipolar lateralization in reverse shoulder arthroplasty for avoidance of scapular notching

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-212
Author(s):  
Patric Raiss ◽  
Rainer Neumann
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Scapular Notching ◽  
Neck Shaft Angle ◽  
Shoulder Flexion

Abstract Introduction Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has become a well-established treatment option for multiple disorders of the shoulder joint. In recent years, implant designs and configurations have been modified in order to improve function and avoid complications. Lateralization on the glenoid and the humeral side has been described to improve function and decrease radiographic scapular notching. Data on the clinical and radiographic results of bipolar lateralization in RSA are lacking. Methods In 38 cases, RSA was performed using an uncemented humeral short-stem component with a 145° neck–shaft angle in combination with bone lateralization on the glenoid side (Bony Increased-Offset Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty, BIO-RSA; Wright Medical Inc., Memphis, TN, USA). Mean follow-up was 19 months (range 12–34 months). Patients were followed clinically using the Constant score as well as range of motion for shoulder flexion and external rotation. Radiographs in two different plains were analyzed for implant seating and the occurrence of scapular notching. Results There was a significant increase in all measured clinical parameters. Forward flexion increased from a mean of 75° preoperatively to 151° postoperatively, and mean Constant score increased from 21 to 71 points postoperatively (p < 0.001). Glenoid notching of grade 1 according to Sirveuax was observed in 3 out of 35 cases (9%); no grade 2, 3, or 4 notching was present. Revision surgery was necessary in one case (3%). Conclusion RSA with bipolar lateralization leads to excellent clinical outcomes, low complication rates, and low rates of radiographic scapular notching. Longer follow-up and prospective randomized trials are needed. Level of evidence Level IV.

How common are acromial and scapular spine fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty?

2019 ◽  
Vol 101-B (6) ◽  
pp. 627-634 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. King ◽  
S. S. Dalton ◽  
L. V. Gulotta ◽  
T. W. Wright ◽  
B. S. Schoch
Keyword(s):  
Incidence Rate ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Inflammatory Arthritis ◽  
English Literature ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Revision Arthroplasty ◽  
Fracture Rate ◽  
Spine Fractures ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Scapular Spine

Aims Acromial fractures following reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have a wide range of incidences in reported case series. This study evaluates their incidence following RSA by systematically reviewing the current literature. Materials and Methods A systematic review using the search terms “reverse shoulder”, “reverse total shoulder”, or “inverted shoulder” was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases between 1 January 2010 and 31 March 2018. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used. Studies were included if they reported on RSA outcomes and the incidence rate of acromial and/or scapular spine fractures. The rate of these fractures was evaluated for primary RSA, revision RSA, RSA indications, and RSA implant design. Results The review included 90 articles out of 686 identified after exclusions. The incidence rate of acromial and/or scapular spine fractures was 2.8% (253/9048 RSAs). The fracture rate was similar for primary and revision RSA (2.8% vs 2.1%; p = 0.4). Acromial fractures were most common after RSA for inflammatory arthritis (10.9%) and massive rotator cuff tears (3.8%). The incidence was lowest in RSA for post-traumatic arthritis (2.1%) and acute proximal humerus fractures (0%). Lateralized glenosphere design had a significantly higher rate of acromial fractures compared with medial glenosphere designs. Conclusion Based on current English literature, acromial and/or scapular spine fractures occur at a rate of 2.8% after RSA. The incidence is slightly more common after primary compared with revision arthroplasty. Also, higher rates of acromial fractures are reported in RSA performed for inflammatory arthritis and in the lateralized glenoid design. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:627–634.

scholarly journals Risk factors for instability after reverse shoulder arthroplasty

2019 ◽  
pp. 175857321986426 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincenzo Guarrella ◽  
Mikael Chelli ◽  
Peter Domos ◽  
Francesco Ascione ◽  
Pascal Boileau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Constant Score ◽  
Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Functional Results ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasties ◽  
Postoperative Instability

Background This study aims to identify risk factors related to postoperative instability after reverse shoulder arthroplasty and evaluate the modalities and results of treatments in a large series of patients, with medium to long-term follow-up. Methods Retrospective multicenter series of 1035 consecutive Grammont type reverse shoulder arthroplasties implanted between 1992 and 2010. 19.9% had a reverse shoulder arthroplasty with bony lateralization on the glenoid side. Patients were reviewed and radiographed with minimum five years’ follow-up. Results At a mean follow-up of eight years, the overall rate of postoperative instability was 3.0%. Instability was more frequent in case of reverse shoulder arthroplasty for revision surgery, in younger patients, in case of scapular notching, and tuberosity resorption. Lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasties were associated with a lower instability rate. A reoperation to restore stability was needed in 70% of cases. The improvement in Constant Score was lower in patients with unstable reverse shoulder arthroplasties when compared to stable reverse shoulder arthroplasties. Conclusions Younger patients are at higher risk for instability after Grammont type reverse shoulder arthroplasty implantation. Conversely, lateralized reverse shoulder arthroplasties resulted protective. When conservative treatment had failed, shoulder stability can be obtained with reoperation or prosthetic revision (needed in 70% of the cases), but to the price of lower functional results.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document