scholarly journals Prevalence and clinical implications of persistent or exertional cardiopulmonary symptoms following SARS-CoV-2 infection in 3597 collegiate athletes: a study from the Outcomes Registry for Cardiac Conditions in Athletes (ORCCA)

2021 ◽  
pp. bjsports-2021-104644
Author(s):  
Bradley J Petek ◽  
Nathaniel Moulson ◽  
Aaron L Baggish ◽  
Stephanie A Kliethermes ◽  
Manesh R Patel ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo assess the prevalence and clinical implications of persistent or exertional cardiopulmonary symptoms in young competitive athletes following SARS-CoV-2 infection.MethodsThis observational cohort study from the Outcomes Registry for Cardiac Conditions in Athletes included 3597 US collegiate athletes after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Clinical characteristics, advanced diagnostic testing and SARS-CoV-2-associated sequelae were compared between athletes with persistent symptoms >3 weeks, exertional symptoms on return to exercise and those without persistent or exertional symptoms.ResultsAmong 3597 athletes (mean age 20 years (SD, 1 year), 34% female), data on persistent and exertional symptoms were reported in 3529 and 3393 athletes, respectively. Persistent symptoms >3 weeks were present in 44/3529 (1.2%) athletes with 2/3529 (0.06%) reporting symptoms >12 weeks. Exertional cardiopulmonary symptoms were present in 137/3393 (4.0%) athletes. Clinical evaluation and diagnostic testing led to the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2-associated sequelae in 12/137 (8.8%) athletes with exertional symptoms (five cardiac involvement, two pneumonia, two inappropriate sinus tachycardia, two postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome and one pleural effusion). No SARS-CoV-2-associated sequelae were identified in athletes with isolated persistent symptoms. Of athletes with chest pain on return to exercise who underwent cardiac MRI (CMR), 5/24 (20.8%) had probable or definite cardiac involvement. In contrast, no athlete with exertional symptoms without chest pain who underwent CMR (0/20) was diagnosed with probable or definite SARS-CoV-2 cardiac involvement.ConclusionCollegiate athletes with SARS-CoV-2 infection have a low prevalence of persistent or exertional symptoms on return to exercise. Exertional cardiopulmonary symptoms, specifically chest pain, warrant a comprehensive evaluation.

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Sharp ◽  
C Patient ◽  
J Pickett ◽  
M Belham

Abstract Background The syndrome of inappropriate sinus tachycardia (IST) is well recognized and affects ∼1% of the population. We believe IST in pregnancy is a relatively frequent yet under-recognized phenomenon that may represent a distinct arrhythmia. To date, there are only three case reports in the literature. Purpose To further understand the natural history of IST in pregnancy, and to explore maternal outcomes. Methods A retrospective, observational cohort analysis. Results 19 pregnant women presented to our institute with a definitive diagnosis of IST (as defined by task force criteria) between January 2016 and January 2017. Symptom onset was 4–36 weeks gestation (mean 20 weeks). Of those in their second or subsequent pregnancy (n=8), 50% described symptoms compatible with IST in previous pregnancies. 42% attended the emergency department on ≥1 occasion with symptoms of IST. 32% required hospital admission. 26% required pharmacological therapy (beta-blockers in all). There were no maternal deaths, instances of heart failure or acute coronary syndrome, no thromboembolic or haemorrhagic complications during pregnancy. Rates of Caesarean section were similar to the background rate of our unit; however, rates of induction were notably elevated (58% vs 25%), with 55% of these women being induced purely for symptoms of IST. Following delivery, symptoms resolved within one week for 17 of the women in the cohort, 1 had symptoms resolve after 4 month and 1 had persistent symptoms as she became pregnant again. Conclusion IST in pregnancy likely represents a distinct arrhythmia; the majority of individuals here had symptoms only during pregnancy, which resolved rapidly postpartum. Additionally, half of the women in a second or subsequent pregnancy had suffered IST symptoms during previous pregnancies, with no symptoms in between pregnancies. It is biologically plausible and may represent an exaggerated cardio-autonomic response to the physiological changes of pregnancy such as increased sympathetic tone and change in baroreceptor reflex sensitivity. Recognition of the condition is important given it is associated with significant morbidity, the distressing nature of symptoms leading to high rates of hospitalization and induction of labour. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


2021 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 147997312110022
Author(s):  
Kevin Cares-Marambio ◽  
Yessenia Montenegro-Jiménez ◽  
Rodrigo Torres-Castro ◽  
Roberto Vera-Uribe ◽  
Yolanda Torralba ◽  
...  

Knowledge on the sequelae of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains limited due to the relatively recent onset of this pathology. However, the literature on other types of coronavirus infections prior to COVID-19 reports that patients may experience persistent symptoms after discharge. To determine the prevalence of respiratory symptoms in survivors of hospital admission after COVID-19 infection. A living systematic review of five databases was performed in order to identify studies which reported the persistence of respiratory symptoms in COVID-19 patients after discharge. Two independent researchers reviewed and analysed the available literature, and then extracted and assessed the quality of those articles. Of the 1,154 reports returned by the initial search nine articles were found, in which 1,816 patients were included in the data synthesis. In the pooled analysis, we found a prevalence of 0.52 (CI 0.38–0.66, p < 0.01, I 2 = 97%), 0.37 (CI 0.28–0.48, p < 0.01, I 2 = 93%), 0.16 (CI 0.10–0.23, p < 0.01, I 2 = 90%) and 0.14 (CI 0.06–0.24, p < 0.01, I 2 = 96%) for fatigue, dyspnoea, chest pain, and cough, respectively. Fatigue, dyspnoea, chest pain, and cough were the most prevalent respiratory symptoms found in 52%, 37%, 16% and 14% of patients between 3 weeks and 3 months, after discharge in survivors of hospital admission by COVID-19, respectively.


2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 460-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravindranath K. Shankarappa ◽  
Nagaraja Moorthy ◽  
Prabhavathi Bhat ◽  
Manjunath C. Nanjappa

AbstractIsolated cardiac involvement in hydatid disease is very rare. We report the case of a young adult male who presented to the emergency department with acute onset of chest pain and was surprisingly detected to have a hydatid cyst in the left ventricular myocardium. The transthoracic echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging confirmed the diagnosis. Cardiac hydatid disease should be considered in the differential diagnosis of chest pain in young individuals in the absence of conventional risk factors of atherosclerosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexa José Escudero Siosi ◽  
Hudaifa Al Ani ◽  
Antoni Chan

Abstract Case report - Introduction Coronavirus (SARS-COV-19) typically targets the respiratory tract; however extra-respiratory manifestations such as myositis and myopericarditis may be the only presenting feature. We present a patient with myopericarditis who developed sudden onset muscle weakness. CT thorax showed typical appearance of COVID-19 with an absence of respiratory symptoms. MRI of both thighs revealed diffuse symmetrical myositis. Her clinical and paraclinical abnormalities improved with the aid of steroids. We present our approach to the case and highlight that clinicians should consider myositis as another COVID-19 manifestation when reviewing the differentials. Case report - Case description A 50-year-old female, non-smoker, presented with few days history of central chest pain radiating to her back. This was exacerbated by lying down and inspiration. Associated with mild shortness of breath on exertion. She denied upper respiratory tract symptoms. Her past medical history included hypertension and myopericarditis in 2012 and 2013 requiring pericardiocentesis. In 2017 she presented with post-streptococcal erythema nodosum and reactive arthritis in left ankle. On auscultation her heart sounds were normal, and chest was clear. Initial investigations revealed a mild lymphopenia 0.63, a C-reactive protein of 11mg/L, and a raised troponin 77 and 103 on repeat. D-dimer, Chest x-ray were normal. ECHO showed trivial anterior pericardial effusion, good biventricular function. Treatment included colchicine 500 micrograms four times a day and Ibuprofen 400 mg three times a day. On her second day of admission she developed hypotensive episodes BP 75/49 mm/Hg and mild pyrexia of 37.5 degrees. Her chest pain continued. Electrocardiogram was normal, repeat echocardiogram showed stable 1.40 cm pericardial effusion. CT thorax revealed no dissection or features suggesting pulmonary sarcoidosis but ground-glass opacity changes in keeping with COVID-19. Her COVID-19 swab test came back positive. On the 4th day of admission, she complained of sudden onset of severe pain affecting her thighs, shoulders, and arms, with marked proximal lower limbs and truncal weakness. Because of this, she struggled to mobilise. There was a rapid rise in her creatine kinase from 6.423U/L (day 5) to 32.230 U/L (day 7). ALT increased to 136. MRI showed diffuse myositis with symmetrical appearances involving the anterior, medial, and posterior muscle compartments of both thighs. In view of her previous and current presentation, autoimmune screen and extended myositis immunoblot were sent and were negative. Interestingly, her clinical and paraclinical abnormalities improved dramatically after few days with no steroids initially. Case report - Discussion The identification of extra-pulmonary manifestations neurological, cardiac, and muscular have recently increased as the number of COVID-19 cases grow. This case highlights cardiac and skeletal muscle involvement could perhaps represent early or only manifestation of COVID-19. Cardiac involvement in COVID-19 commonly manifests as acute cardiac injury (8–12%), arrhythmia (8.9–16.7%) and myocarditis. In our case the cardiac MRI demonstrated evidence of myocarditis in the basal inferoseptum and apex. Myalgia and muscle weakness are among the symptoms described by patients affected by COVID-19. Some studies report the prevalence of myalgia to be between 11%-50%. The onset of symptoms and the fact that her symptoms improved rapidly led us to consider a viral myositis as the underlying cause, the viral component being COVID-19. We also considered other potential causes. There are reported cases of colchicine myopathy however this is more common in patients with renal impairment, which was absent in this case. On further examination she did not have other clinical signs or symptoms of connective tissue disease or extra muscular manifestation of autoimmune myositis. Her abnormal ALT may be derived from damaged muscle, and therefore in this context is not necessarily a specific indicator of liver disease. Interestingly abnormal liver function tests have been attributed in 16 - 53% of COVID-19 cases. Little is known about the multiple biologic characteristics of COVID-19 and there are no established clinic serological criteria for COVID-19 related myositis nor useful values/cut offs to exclude cardiac involvement in myositis, further research is therefore warranted. In conclusion, clinicians should be aware of the rare manifestation of COVID-19 and consider this in the differentials. Of course, it is important in the first instant to rule out any serious underlying disease or overlap disorder before attributing symptoms to COVID-19. Case report - Key learning points  Myositis is a rare manifestation of COVID-19 that clinicians should be aware of.Detailed medical history, examination and investigations identifies the most likely underlying cause.In the right clinical context, COVID-19 – 19 testing should be included in baseline tests of patients presenting with myositis.


Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Noor ◽  
Shannel Akhavan ◽  
Michael Leuchter ◽  
Eric H Yang ◽  
Olujimi A Ajijola

Background: Cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in cancer survivors is poorly understood. Objectives: To better characterize the clinical characteristics and types of autonomic dysfunction in this population. Methods: A retrospective analysis of cancer survivors within an academic cardio-oncology program referred for suspected autonomic dysfunction was performed. Autonomic reflex testing of adrenergic, cardiovagal, and sudomotor function was done. Patients with pre-existing autonomic dysfunction prior to their cancer diagnosis were excluded. Results: Of approximately 282 patients in the UCLA Cardio-Oncology program, twenty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-two had autonomic impairment on autonomic reflex testing. Eight patients were female, and the mean age at time of autonomic testing was 51.3 years. The average duration from cancer diagnosis to autonomic testing was 10.3 years. The reasons for referral included dizziness, tachycardia, palpitations, and syncope. The majority of patients (75%) had hematologic disorders. The most common chemotherapies administered were vinca alkaloids (54.2%), alkylating agents (66.7%), and anthracyclines (54.2%). Most patients received radiation to the thorax (66.7%) and neck (53.3%). Eleven patients had mild autonomic impairment, seven had moderate, and four had severe autonomic impairment. Dysfunction was commonly present in the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches, but most pronounced in the sympathetic system. The majority of patients were diagnosed with orthostatic hypotension (50%), inappropriate sinus tachycardia (20.8%), and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (12.5%) and had subjective improvement with treatment. Conclusion: Cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction occurs in cancer survivors, and commonly affects both the sympathetic and parasympathetic systems. Symptom recognition in patients should prompt autonomic testing and treatment where appropriate.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (55) ◽  
pp. 34-38
Author(s):  
Przemysław Mitkowski

Sinus rhythm is diagnosed based on 12-lead ecg recording. Diagnostic criteria are as follows: positive P waves in limb lead I and II and negative in aVR; PR interval of at least 120 ms; the difference of consecutive P-P interval should be less than 120 ms. A sinus rate limit is between 50-100/min. Numerous factors: physiologic, pathologic, medications, drugs and stimulants could increase sinus rate. Sinus tachycardia is also observed in inappropriate sinus tachycardia and postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome. ESC guidelines related to latter two syndrome are summarized.


2016 ◽  
Vol 119 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad M Ahsan ◽  
Tara Thompson ◽  
Chandralekha Ashangari ◽  
Amer Suleman

Background: Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS) is a form of dysautonomia that is estimated to impact between 1,000,000 and 3,000,000 Americans and millions more around the world. Patients chronically have symptoms that are worse with upright posture and that improve with recumbence. Symptoms often include orthostatic intolerance such as dizziness, fatigue, excessive sweating and many others. The aim of this study is to determine the variation of symptoms early morning after wake up and evening at 4 PM. Methods: The Autonomic nervous system questionnaire consisting of eight POTS symptoms palpitations, headaches, dizziness, shortness of breath(SOB), chest pain, weakness, blurred vision and heaviness of feet was handover to the patients at our clinic. 42 POTS patients participated in the study, participated patients had been asked to scale their symptoms early morning after wake up and evening at 4 PM. Symptoms were defined 0 as Never,1 as mild,2 as moderate,3 as severe ,4 as extreme and 5 impairing daily function and living. Results: Out of 42 POTS patients 90% are female (38/42, age 31.74±10.67) and 10% are males (4/42, age 30.75±13.20), symptoms were scaled early morning after wake up vs symptoms scaled evening at 4 pm results in mean±SD and Anova P value. Palpitations 1.69±1.32 vs 2.45±1.38 (P =0.01), Dizziness 2.40±1.38 vs 2.67±1.46 (P =0.40), Chest pain 0.93±1.02 vs 1.52±1.27 (P=0.02), SOB 1.36±1.32 vs 1.81±1.40 (P=0.13), Weakness 2.79±1.37 vs 3.12±1.38 (P=0.27), Blurred vision 1.38±1.29 vs 1.48±1.27 (P=0.73), Headaches 1.74±1.36 vs 2.52±1.38 (P =0.01), Heaviness of feet 0.95±1.19 vs 1.43±1.53 (P =0.11). Conclusion: Our study results demonstrated that the patients with POTS had significant variation in symptoms Palpitations, Chest pain, Headaches in evenings when compared to early morning after wake up.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document