scholarly journals Guideline-directed medical therapy in elderly patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e030514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Won-Woo Seo ◽  
Jin Joo Park ◽  
Hyun Ah Park ◽  
Hyun-Jai Cho ◽  
Hae-Young Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Very Elderly ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Reduced Risk ◽  
Ras Inhibitors

Objectives and designGuideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) with renin–angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and beta-blockers has improved survival in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). As clinical trials usually do not include very old patients, it is unknown whether the results from clinical trials are applicable to elderly patients with HF. This study was performed to investigate the clinical characteristics and treatment strategies for elderly patients with HFrEF in a large prospective cohort.SettingThe Korean Acute Heart Failure (KorAHF) registry consecutively enrolled 5625 patients hospitalised for acute HF from 10 tertiary university hospitals in Korea.ParticipantsIn this study, 2045 patients with HFrEF who were aged 65 years or older were included from the KorAHF registry.Primary outcome measurementAll-cause mortality data were obtained from medical records, national insurance data or national death records.ResultsBoth beta-blockers and RAS inhibitors were used in 892 (43.8%) patients (GDMT group), beta-blockers only in 228 (11.1%) patients, RAS inhibitors only in 642 (31.5%) patients and neither beta-blockers nor RAS inhibitors in 283 (13.6%) patients (no GDMT group). With increasing age, the GDMT rate decreased, which was mainly attributed to the decreased prescription of beta-blockers. In multivariate analysis, GDMT was associated with a 53% reduced risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.57) compared with no GDMT. Use of beta-blockers only (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.73) and RAS inhibitors only (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.71) was also associated with reduced risk. In a subgroup of very elderly patients (aged ≥80 years), the GDMT group had the lowest mortality.ConclusionsGDMT was associated with reduced 3-year all-cause mortality in elderly and very elderly HFrEF patients.Trial registration numberNCT01389843.

scholarly journals SO057BETA-BLOCKERS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH REDUCED MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH HEART FAILURE WITH REDUCED EJECTION FRACTION AND ADVANCED CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE: COHORT STUDY

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edouard L Fu ◽  
Alicia Uijl ◽  
Friedo W Dekker ◽  
Lars H Lund ◽  
Gianluigi Savarese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Beta Blocker ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background and Aims Beta-blockers reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) were underrepresented in landmark trials. We evaluated if beta-blockers are associated with improved survival in patients with HFrEF and advanced CKD. Method We identified 3906 persons with an ejection fraction <40% and advanced CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2) enrolled in the Swedish Heart Failure Registry during 2001-2016. The associations between beta-blocker use, 5-year all-cause mortality, and the composite of time to cardiovascular (CV) mortality/first HF hospitalization were assessed by multivariable Cox regression. Analyses were adjusted for 36 variables, including demographics, laboratory measures, comorbidities, medication use, medical procedures, and socioeconomic status. To assess consistency, the same analyses were performed in a positive control cohort of 12,673 patients with moderate CKD (eGFR <60-30 mL/min/1.73m2). Results The majority (89%) of individuals with HFrEF and advanced CKD received treatment with beta-blockers. Median (IQR) age was 81 (74-86) years, 36% were women and median eGFR was 26 (20-28) mL/min/173m2. During 5 years of follow-up, 2086 (53.4%) individuals had a subsequent HF hospitalization, and 2954 (75.6%) individuals died, of which 2089 (70.1%) due to cardiovascular causes. Beta-blocker use was associated with a significant reduction in 5-year all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76-0.96)] and CV mortality/HF hospitalization (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.77-0.98). The magnitude of the associations between beta-blocker use and outcomes was similar to that observed for HFrEF patients with mild/moderate CKD, with adjusted HRs for all-cause mortality and CV mortality/HF hospitalization of 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.91) and 0.88 (95% CI 0.82-0.96), respectively. Conclusion Despite lack of trial evidence, the use of beta-blockers in patients with HFrEF and advanced CKD was high in routine Swedish care, and was independently associated with reduced mortality to the same degree as HFrEF with moderate CKD.

Prognostic value of global longitudinal layer specific strain for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Johnsen ◽  
M Sengeloev ◽  
P Joergensen ◽  
N Bruun ◽  
D Modin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Echocardiographic Parameters

Abstract Background Novel echocardiographic software allows for layer-specific evaluation of myocardial deformation by 2-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Endocardial, epicardial- and whole wall global longitudinal strain (GLS) may be superior to conventional echocardiographic parameters in predicting all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Purpose The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of endocardial-, epicardial- and whole wall GLS in patients with HFrEF in relation to all-cause mortality. Methods We included and analyzed transthoracic echocardiographic examinations from 1,015 patients with HFrEF. The echocardiographic images were analyzed, and conventional and novel echocardiographic parameters were obtained. A p value in a 2-sided test <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Cox proportional hazards regression models were constructed, and both univariable and multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated. Results During a median follow-up time of 40 months, 171 patients (16.8%) died. A lower endocardial (HR 1.17; 95% CI (1.11–1.23), per 1% decrease, p<0.001), epicardial (HR 1.20; 95% CI (1.13–1.27), per 1% decrease, p<0.001), and whole wall (HR 1.20; 95% CI (1.14–1.27), per 1% decrease, p<0.001) GLS were all associated with higher risk of death (Figure 1). Both endocardial (HR 1.12; 95% CI (1.01–1.23), p=0.027), epicardial (HR 1.13; 95% CI (1.01–1.26), p=0.040) and whole wall (HR 1.13; 95% CI (1.01–1.27), p=0.030) GLS remained independent predictors of mortality in the multivariable models after adjusting for significant clinical parameters (age, sex, total cholesterol, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, ischemic cardiomyopathy, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and diabetes) and conventional echocardiographic parameters (left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction, LV mass index, left atrial volume index, deceleration time, E/e', E-velocity, E/A ratio and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion). No other echocardiographic parameters remained an independent predictors after adjusting. Furthermore, endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS had the highest C-statistics of all the echocardiographic parameters. Conclusion Endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS are independent predictors of all-cause mortality in patients with HFrEF. Furthermore, endocardial, epicardial and whole wall GLS were superior prognosticators of all-cause mortality compared with all other echocardiographic parameters. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Herlev and Gentofte Hospital

scholarly journals Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Co-existing Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: Time to Revisit the Management Guidelines?

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 91 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Baher ◽  
Nassir F Marrouche ◽  
◽  
◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Catheter Ablation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Rhythm Control ◽  
Pharmacological Interventions ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Heart Failure Hospitalisation

AF in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is common and is associated with an increased risk of stroke, heart failure hospitalisation and all-cause mortality. Rhythm control of AF in this population has been traditionally limited to the use of antiarrhythmic drugs. Clinical trials assessing superiority of pharmacological rhythm control over rate control have been largely disappointing. Catheter ablation has emerged as a viable alternative to pharmacological rhythm control in symptomatic AF and has enjoyed significant technological advancements over the past decade. Recent clinical trials have suggested that catheter ablation is superior to pharmacological interventions in patients with co-existing AF and HFrEF. In this article, we will review the therapeutic options for AF in patients with HFrEF in the context of the latest clinical trials beyond the current established guidelines.

Abstract 14099: Beta-blockers Reduce Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure or Ischemic Heart Disease and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Ruzieh ◽  
Aaron Baugh ◽  
lama jebbawi ◽  
Andrew J Foy
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Ischemic Heart Disease ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Risk Of Mortality ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Reduced Risk

Introduction: In patients with heart failure (HF) and ischemic heart disease (IHD), beta-blockers (BB) are associated with improved mortality. However, in patients with co-morbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), this drug class is less utilized due to concerns about an unfavorable impact on the morbidity and mortality. Patients with COPD and heart disease have higher mortality than those with heart disease alone. There is a need to clarify the safety of BB in this population. Objective: To assess the effect of BB therapy on mortality in patients with heart disease and COPD. Methods: We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE and PubMed inception until May 30, 2020 to identify articles of BB use in patients with COPD. The risk ratio (RR) of mortality with BB use was calculated using the Mantel Haenszel random effect model. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager Web (RevMan Web). A two-sided p value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 16 studies were included in this meta-analysis, comprising 133,538 patients (44,893 received BB, 88,381 received no control drug, and 264 received placebo). BB use was associated with reduced risk of mortality overall (14.8% vs. 19.9%, RR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57 - 0.79), in patients with IHD (18.6% vs. 26.6%, RR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.50 - 0.82), and in patients with HF (8.1% vs. 23.6%, RR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41 - 0.75), Figure. BB were used to treat hypertension in one study, and it was associated with reduced risk of mortality (6.2% vs. 13.4%, RR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.28 - 0.78). In contrast, βB use was not associated with statistically significant reduced risk of mortality when given without a specified cardiovascular indication (25.0% vs. 32.5%, RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.59 - 1.15), figure. Conclusion: Beta-blockers are associated with improved mortality in patients with HF or IHD and COPD. A diagnosis of COPD should not preclude treatment with beta-blockers, as previous concerns likely over-stated risk.

P2630Incidence and prognostic impact of new-onset left bundle branch block in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S L Kristensen ◽  
R Roerth ◽  
P S Jhund ◽  
S Beggs ◽  
L Kober ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Bundle Branch Block ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Qrs Duration ◽  
New Onset

Abstract Background Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves survival in patients with heart failure, reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, little is known about the incidence of LBBB in HFrEF and the risk factors for developing this. We addressed these questions in the PARADIGM-HF and ATMOSPHERE trials. Methods We identified 7703 patients with a non-paced rhythm on their baseline ECG, a QRS<130 ms, and at least one follow-up ECG (done at annual visits and end of study). Patients were stratified by baseline QRS duration (≤100 ms - reference; 101–115 ms and 116–129 ms) and followed until development of QRS duration ≥130 ms with a LBBB configuration or latest available ECG. The crude LBBB incidence rate per 100 person-years (py) was identified in the three QRS duration subgroups. Additionally, we examined risk of the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, and all-cause mortality, in patients with incident LBBB vs. no incident LBBB. Results Overall, 313 of 7703 patients (4%) developed LBBB during a mean follow-up of 2.7 years, yielding an incidence rate of 1.5 per 100 py. The rate ranged from 0.9 in those with QRS ≤100 ms to 4.0 per 100 py in patients with QRS 116–129 ms. Other predictors of incident LBBB included male sex, age, lower LVEF, HF duration and absence of AF. The risk of the primary composite endpoint was higher among those who developed incident LBBB vs no incident LBBB; event rates 13.5 vs 10.0 per 100 py, yielding an adjusted HR of 1.43 (1.05–1.96). For all-cause mortality the corresponding rates were 12.6 vs 7.3 per 100 py; HR 1.55 (1.16–2.07) (Table 1). Table 1. Risk of outcomes according to incident LBBB during follow-up No. events Crude rate per 100py Adjusted* HR (95% CI) HF hospitalization or CV death   No incident LBBB 2145 10.0 (9.6–10.4) 1.00 (ref.)   Incident LBBB 43 13.5 (10.0–18.2) 1.43 (1.05–1.96) All-cause mortality   No incident LBBB 1662 7.3 (6.9–7.6) 1.00 (ref.)   Incident LBBB 48 12.6 (9.5–16.7) 1.55 (1.16–2.07) Conclusion Among patients with HFrEF, the annual incidence of new-onset LBBB (and a potential indication for CRT), was around 1.5%, ranging from 1% in those with QRS duration below 100 ms to 4% in those with QRS 116–129 ms. Incident LBBB was associated with a much higher risk of adverse outcomes, highlighting the importance of repeat ECG monitoring in patients with HFrEF. Acknowledgement/Funding Novartis

scholarly journals Left atrial pressure overload and prognosis in elderly patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction: a prospective multicenter observational study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e044605
Author(s):  
Shiro Hoshida ◽  
Koichi Tachibana ◽  
Yukinori Shinoda ◽  
Tomoko Minamisaka ◽  
Takahisa Yamada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Pressure Overload ◽  
Volume Index ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
All Cause Mortality

ObjectivesThe severity of diastolic dysfunction is assessed using a combination of several indices of left atrial (LA) volume overload and LA pressure overload. We aimed to clarify which overload is more associated with the prognosis in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).SettingA prospective, multicenter observational registry of collaborating hospitals in Osaka, Japan.ParticipantsWe enrolled hospitalised patients with HFpEF showing sinus rhythm (men, 79; women, 113). Blood tests and transthoracic echocardiography were performed before discharge. The ratio of diastolic elastance (Ed) to arterial elastance (Ea) was used as a relative index of LA pressure overload.Primary outcome measuresAll-cause mortality and admission for heart failure were evaluated at >1 year after discharge.ResultsIn the multivariable Cox regression analysis, Ed/Ea, but not LA volume index, was significantly associated with all-cause mortality or admission for heart failure (HR 2.034, 95% CI 1.059 to 3.907, p=0.032), independent of age, sex, and the serum N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level. In patients with a higher NT-proBNP level, the effect of higher Ed/Ea on prognosis was prominent (p=0.015).ConclusionsEd/Ea, an index of LA pressure overload, was significantly associated with the prognosis in elderly patients with HFpEF showing sinus rhythm.Trial registration numberUMIN000021831.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document