scholarly journals Retrospective review of work-related injuries sustained by foreign workers: a single centre experience over 10 years

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e042427
Author(s):  
Yong Jing Daniel Quek ◽  
Shilpa Vijayasrinivasan ◽  
Aishwarya Narayanan ◽  
Kum Ying Tham
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Foreign Students ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Foreign Workers ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Revised Trauma Score ◽  
Discharged Patients ◽  
Minor Injuries ◽  
Extremity Injuries

ObjectivesTo investigate current patterns of work-related injuries sustained by foreign workers in Singapore and compare them to a decade ago. Secondary aim to analyse usefulness of selected trauma scores in this context.DesignRetrospective review of trauma registry of a single centre, from 1 April to 30 June 2015. Data compared with those from similar study performed at same centre in 2004.SettingEmergency department (ED) of 1500-bedded acute urban public hospital in Singapore.Participants1094 foreign workers with work-related injuries were included. Tourists, foreign students, non-work-related injuries, re-attendances for the same condition were excluded.ResultsMean age of participants was 32.8 years (SD 7.8), 90.0% were men. ED attendance was lowest on Sundays. Mechanism of injury: blunt (78.2%), penetrating (19.2%), burns (2.6%). Compared to 2004, 5% of foreign workers required admission (vs 19.6% in 2004, p≤0.0001), 8.0% underwent day or inpatient surgical procedures (vs 13.2% in 2004, p≤0.0001), 41.6% were referred to specialist outpatient clinics (vs 27.6% in 2004, p≤0.0001), 12.5% were referred to primary care follow-up (vs 29.9% in 2004, p≤0.0001). Mean duration of sick days was 4.3 (vs 5.1 in 2004, p≤0.0001). Of admitted patients, 49.1% had extremity injuries and 36.3% had head and neck injuries. Mean Injury Severity Score (ISS) for admitted patients was 3.64 (SD 3.1) (vs 4.3 (SD 5.5) in 2004, p=0.39). Mean Revised Trauma Score (RTS) for admitted patients was 7.74 (SD 0.39) (vs 7.8 (SD 0.2) in 2004, p=0.07). Of discharged patients, 48.9% had extremity injuries and 48.9% had external injuries. There was no death.ConclusionCompared to 2004, there were fewer major/fatal work-related injuries and an increased proportion of minor injuries. ISS and RTSs were of limited use in this setting.

Decision-Making in the Scheduling of Endovascular Treatment after Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Haemorrhage: A Retrospective Single Centre Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 879-885 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.J. Downer ◽  
M. Cellerini ◽  
R.A. Corkill ◽  
S. Lalloo ◽  
W. Küker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Intervention ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Arteriovenous Malformation ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Endovascular Intervention ◽  
Brain Arteriovenous Malformation ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Significant Difference

The appropriate timing for endovascular intervention after brain arteriovenous malformation (bAVM) rupture is not known. This paper aims to determine factors that lead to early endovascular intervention and to investigate whether early intervention has the same complication rate as late intervention in a single centre. All patients who underwent endovascular treatment for a ruptured bAVM at our institution in the period January 2007 and July 2010 were included in this retrospective observational study. Of 50 patients, 33 had early endovascular intervention, defined as within 30 days of haemorrhage and the remaining 17 patients had endovascular treatment at day 30 or beyond. A greater proportion of patients treated within the first 30 days were in neurointensive care preoperatively (51.5% vs. 23.5%, p=0.07). A ‘high-risk’ angioarchitectural feature was identified in more patients who had acute intervention (78.8% vs. 11.8%, p<0.0001) and targeted embolization was also more frequent in this group (48.5% vs. 5.9%, p=0.004). Nidal aneurysms, venous varices and impaired venous outflow (venous stenosis) were the principal ‘high risk’ features. Clinically apparent complications occurred in 10.8% of procedures with permanent neurological deficit in 3.6%. There was no directly procedure-related mortality. There was no statistically significant difference in the complication rate of early procedures compared with delayed interventions (12.5% vs. 7.4%, p=0.71). Greater initial injury severity and the presence of high-risk lesion characteristics are the factors that lead to early endovascular intervention. Early intervention is associated with a higher complication rate, but this difference is not statistically significant.

scholarly journals Desempenho dos ajustes do Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): revisão integrativa

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (spe) ◽  
pp. 138-146 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiane de Alencar Domingues ◽  
Lilia de Souza Nogueira ◽  
Cristina Helena Costanti Settervall ◽  
Regina Marcia Cardoso de Sousa
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Revised Trauma Score ◽  
Trauma Score ◽  
Trauma And Injury

RESUMO Objetivo identificar estudos que realizaram ajustes na equação do Trauma and InjurySeverity Score (TRISS) e compararam a capacidade discriminatória da equação modificada com a original. Método Revisão integrativa de pesquisas publicadas entre 1990 e 2014 nas bases de dados LILACS, MEDLINE, PubMed e SciELO utilizando-se a palavra TRISS. Resultados foram incluídos 32 estudos na revisão. Dos 67 ajustes de equações do TRISS identificados, 35 (52,2%) resultaram em melhora na acurácia do índice para predizer a probabilidade de sobrevida de vítimas de trauma. Ajustes dos coeficientes do TRISS à população de estudo foram frequentes, mas nem sempre melhoraram a capacidade preditiva dos modelos analisados. A substituição de variáveis fisiológicas do Revised Trauma Score (RTS) e modificações do Injury Severity Score (ISS) na equação original tiveram desempenho variado. A mudança na forma de inclusão da idade na equação, assim como a inserção do gênero, comorbidades e mecanismo do trauma apresentaram tendência de melhora do desempenho do TRISS. Conclusão Diferentes propostas de ajustes no TRISS foram identificadas nesta revisão e indicaram, principalmente, fragilidades do RTS no modelo original e necessidade de alteração da forma de inclusão da idade na equação para melhora da capacidade preditiva do índice.

scholarly journals Motorcycle crashes and upper extremity trauma

SICOT-J ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 8
Author(s):  
Erin Cravez ◽  
Kelsey A. Rankin ◽  
Nathaniel Ondeck ◽  
Lee Yaari ◽  
Michael Leslie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Severe Injuries ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Extremity Injuries ◽  
Motorcycle Crashes

Objectives: Upper extremity injuries following motorcycle crashes (MCC) incur increased healthcare costs and rehabilitation needs. We aim to characterize the epidemiology of MCC upper extremity injuries and identify factors that influence the severity of and cost of care for upper extremity injuries. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 571 patients with upper extremity injuries after MCC at a level 1 trauma center from 2002 to 2013. We collected data pertaining to demographics, helmet use, toxicology, bony injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), hospital length of stay (LOS), and cost. Continuous variables were compared using t-test or Wilcoxon rank test, depending on data distribution, and dichotomous variables were compared using Pearson’s chi-squared or Fisher’s exact tests. Regression models were used to evaluate the effect of intoxication or helmets on injury location, severity, cost of care, and LOS. Results: The incidence of MCC upper extremity injury was 47.5%, with hand and forearm fractures the most common injuries (25.5% and 24.7% of total injuries). Intoxicated patients were more likely to have a high cost of care (p = 0.012), extended LOS (p = 0.038), plastic surgery involvement in their care (p = 0.038), but fewer upper extremity bony injuries (p = 0.019). Non-helmeted patients sustained less upper extremity bony injuries (p < 0.001) and upper extremity soft tissue injuries (p = 0.001), yet more severe injuries (ISS ≥ 30, p = 0.006 and GCS < 9, p < 0.01) than helmeted patients. Conclusion: Upper extremity injuries are common in motorcyclists. Despite vital protection for the brain and maxillofacial injury, helmeted MCC patients have an increased incidence of upper extremity injuries compared to non-helmeted patients, but overall have less severe injuries. Intoxicated patients have fewer upper extremity bony injuries, but the higher cost of care, and extended LOS. Therefore, even with the increased risk of injury helmets may expose to the upper extremity, helmets reduced overall morbidity and mortality. In addition to mandatory helmet laws, we advocate for further development of safety equipment focusing specifically on the prevention of upper extremity injuries.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Protective Equipment Used Among Motorbike Riders

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 44-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxanne Stiles ◽  
Clint Benge ◽  
P.J. Stiles ◽  
Fanglong Dong ◽  
Jeanette Ward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Protective Equipment ◽  
Safety Equipment ◽  
Hospital Outcomes ◽  
Equipment Usage ◽  
Level I

Introduction. This study compared outcomes between patientsinjured at a motorbike track, which requires riders to follow safetyequipment guidelines, and those involved in recreational riding wheresafety equipment usage is voluntary. Methods. A retrospective review was conducted of all patients presentingwith motorbike-related injuries at an American College ofSurgeons verified level-I trauma center between January 1, 2009 andDecember 31, 2013. Data collected included demographics, injurydetails, safety equipment use, hospitalization details, and dischargedisposition. Comparisons were made regarding protective equipmentusage. Results. Among the 115 patients admitted, more than half (54.8%, n =63) were injured on a motorbike track, and 45.2% (n = 52) were injuredin a recreational setting. The majority of patients were male (93.9%),Caucasian (97.4%), and between the ages of 18 to 54 (64.4%). Helmetusage was higher among track riders (95.2%, n = 60) than recreationalriders (46.2%, n = 24, p < 0.0001). Comparisons of injury severity andoutcomes between those who wore protective equipment and thosewho did not were not significant. Conclusions. Even though track riders wore protective equipmentmore than recreational riders, there was no difference between thegroups regarding injury severity or hospital outcomes. These resultssuggested that motocross riders should not rely on protective equipmentas the only measure of injury prevention.Kans J Med 2018;11(2):44-47.

Helicopter Transport Use for Trauma Patients Is Decreasing Significantly Nationwide but Remains Overutilized

2018 ◽  
Vol 84 (10) ◽  
pp. 1630-1634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Navpreet K. Dhillon ◽  
Nikhil T. Linaval ◽  
Kavita A. Patel ◽  
Christos Colovos ◽  
Ara Ko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Injury Severity ◽  
Data Bank ◽  
The United States ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Effective Utilization ◽  
National Trauma ◽  
National Trauma Data Bank ◽  
Minor Injuries ◽  
Helicopter Transportation ◽  
Rapid Transfer

Rapid transfer of trauma patients to a trauma center for definitive management is essential to increase survival. The utilization of helicopter transportation for this purpose remains heavily debated. The purpose of this study was to characterize the trends in helicopter transportations of trauma patients in the United States over the last decade. Subjects with a primary mode of either ground or helicopter transportation were selected from the National Trauma Data Bank datasets 2007 to 2015. Over this period, the proportion of patients transported by a helicopter decreased significantly in a linear fashion from 17 per cent in 2007 to 10.2 per cent in 2015 ( P < 0.001). The overall mortality of this population was 7.6 per cent and remained unchanged over the study period ( P = 0.545). Almost 3 of 10 subjects (29.4%) transported by a helicopter had an Injury Severity Score <9. The proportion of elderly (>65 years) patients requiring helicopter transportation increased by 69.1 per cent, whereas their associated mortality decreased by 21.5 per cent. The use of a helicopter for the transportation of trauma patients has significantly decreased over the last decade without any significant change in mortality, possibly indicating more effective utilization of available resources. Overtriage of patients with minor injuries remained relatively unchanged.

scholarly journals A single centre retrospective review of testosterone deficiency in germ cell cancer patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. v325
Author(s):  
L.S. Gibbs ◽  
G.L. Gullick ◽  
E. Allison ◽  
S. Brand ◽  
A. Addeo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Retrospective Review ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Germ Cell Cancer ◽  
Testosterone Deficiency ◽  
Single Centre

Pretrauma Functional Independence Measure Score Predicts Survival in Geriatric Trauma

2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. 559-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Fletcher ◽  
Eric Bradburn ◽  
Christopher Baker ◽  
Bryan Collier ◽  
Mark Hamill ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass Index ◽  
Injury Severity Score ◽  
Trauma Patient ◽  
Severity Score ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Functional Independence Measure ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Geriatric Trauma ◽  
Revised Trauma Score ◽  
Trauma Score

The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) is used by rehabilitation professionals to access disability. The FIM score combines both motor and cognitive parameters to assess a patient's level of required assistance in performing activities of daily living (ADL). The geriatric trauma patient is becoming an increasingly important cohort for trauma services. FIM has been shown to predict discharge outcomes and those at high risk for falls. We hypothesized pretrauma FIM scores may predict survival in the geriatric trauma population. This was a retrospective study of patients 65 years and older that were admitted to our Level I trauma center from July 1, 2006 to July 1, 2012. A total 941 patients underwent stepwise regression to identify those factors predicting survival. Age, Injury Severity Score, revised trauma score, body mass index, and pretrauma FIM scores (12-point scale) were studied. The primary outcome was survival. Statistical significance reached at P value <0.05. Multiple logistic regression analysis was then performed. A total of 1315 patients were identified and complete data were available on 941 patients. Mean age was 78 (SD ± 8.2), mean Injury Severity Score was 13(SD ± 8.7), and mean body mass index was 26. Overall mortality was 11 per cent. The odds ratio of survival was 3.532 (95% confidence interval = 2.191–5.718) times greater for every 1-point increase in the preadmission FIM expression score. Glasgow Coma Scale, revised trauma score, gender, and pretrauma FIM expression scores were predictive of survival in the geriatric trauma patient. Pretrauma FIM expression can be used to predict survival in the elderly trauma victim. Further study is needed to establish the role of FIM as part of trauma scoring systems.

scholarly journals Validation of the Pediatric Physiological and Anatomical Triage Score in Pediatric Patients with Burn Injuries

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (s1) ◽  
pp. s61-s61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiaki Toida ◽  
Takashi Muguruma ◽  
Ichiro Takeuchi ◽  
Naoto Morimura
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Vital Signs ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Priority Ranking ◽  
Life Saving ◽  
Revised Trauma Score ◽  
Trauma Score ◽  
Accuracy Of Prediction

Introduction:Triaging plays an important role in providing suitable care to the largest number of casualties in a disaster setting. We developed the Pediatric Physiological and Anatomical Triage score (PPATS) as a new secondary triage method.Aim:This study was performed to validate the accuracy of the PPATS in pediatric patients with burn injuries.Methods:A retrospective review of pediatric patients with burn injuries younger than 15 years old registered in the Japan Trauma Databank from 2004 to 2016 was conducted. The PPATS, which was assigned scores from 0 to 22, was calculated based on vital signs, anatomical abnormalities, and need for life-saving intervention. The PPATS categorized the patients by their priority and defined the intensive care unit (ICU)-indicated patients as those with PPARSs more than 6. This study compared the accuracy of prediction of ICU-indicated patients between the PPATS and Triage Revised Trauma Score (TRTS).Results:Among 87 pediatric patients, 62 (71%) were admitted to the ICU. The median age was 3 years (interquartile range: 1 to 9 years old). The sensitivity and specificity of the PPATS were 74% and 36%, respectively. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve was not different between the PPTAS [0.51 (95% confidence interval: -0.51–1.48) and the TRTS [0.51 (-1.17–1.62), p=0.57]. Regression analysis showed a significant association between the PPATS and the Injury Severity Score (ISS) (r2=0.39, p<0.01). On the other hand, there is no association between the TRTS and the ISS (r2=0.00, p=0.79).Discussion:The accuracy of the PPATS was not superior to that of current secondary-triage methods. However, the PPATS had the advantage of objectively determining the triage priority ranking based on the severity of the pediatric patients with burn injuries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document