scholarly journals Study protocol of a phase 1 clinical trial establishing the safety of intrapleural administration of liposomal curcumin: curcumin as a palliative treatment for malignant pleural effusion (IPAL-MPE)

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e047075
Author(s):  
Ashleigh Jean Hocking ◽  
Alexandra L Farrall ◽  
Sarah Newhouse ◽  
Peter Sordillo ◽  
Kim Greco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Study Protocol ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Malignant Pleural Effusion ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Intrapleural Administration

IntroductionThis is a phase 1, open-label, single-centre, uncontrolled, dose-escalation study to evaluate the feasibility, tolerability and pharmacokinetic profiles of a single dose of liposomal curcumin, administered via an existing tunnelled indwelling pleural catheter (TIPC) directly to the tumour site in individuals with diagnoses of malignant pleural effusion. Primarily, we aim to determine a maximum tolerated dose of liposomal curcumin administered via this method.Methods and analysisWe will use a 3+3 expanded cohort for predefined dose-escalation levels or until a predefined number of dose-limiting toxicities are reached. Participants will be administered a single dose of liposomal curcumin (LipoCurc, SignPath Pharma) via their existing TIPC as a sequential enrolling case series with the following dose cohorts: 100, 200 and 300 mg/m2. Primary endpoints are determination of the maximum tolerated dose within the predetermined dose range, and determination of the feasibility of intrapleural administration of liposomal curcumin via an existing TIPC. Secondary endpoints include determination of the safety and tolerability of intrapleural administration of liposomal curcumin, median overall survival, effects on quality of life and on feelings of breathlessness, and the pharmacokinetics and concentrations of curcumin from the plasma and the pleural fluid. Important inclusion criteria include age ≥18 years, an existing TIPC, a pleural biopsy or pleural fluid cytology-proven diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion and for whom no antitumour therapy of proven benefit is available or has been previously declined, eastern cooperative group performance status <2.Ethics and disseminationThe study protocol has been approved by the Southern Adelaide Local Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC) (approval number: HREC/20/SAC/11). Study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, and presented at conferences, in field of medical oncology and respiratory medicine.Trial registration numberACTRN12620001216909.Protocol version numberV.1.0.

scholarly journals 70. A PHASE 1–2 CLINICAL TRIAL OF EO1001, A NOVEL IRREVERSIBLE pan-ErbB INHIBITOR WITH PROMISING BRAIN PENETRATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii14-ii15
Author(s):  
Helen Wheeler ◽  
Jeffrey Bacha ◽  
Sarath Kanekal ◽  
Harry Pedersen ◽  
Neil Sankar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Erbb Receptors ◽  
Brain Penetration ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Erbb Family ◽  
Cns Disease

Abstract CNS metastasis has become a prominent driver of morbidity and mortality in recent years as new targeted therapies have improved systemic outcomes. Mutations in the ErbB family of kinases are known oncodrivers in many of these cancers. ErbB family member “crosstalk” is associated with rapid development acquired resistance to ErbB TKIs. The development of agents targeting multiple ErbB receptors has shown promise but has been limited by toxicity and poor brain penetration. EO1001 is a first-in-class, oral, brain penetrating, irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor with superior CNS penetration targeting ErbB1, ErbB2 and ErbB4. Preclinical data suggests a favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profile and promising activity against ErbB-driven cancers in patient-derived xenograft models. Male or female adult participants with confirmed ErbB-positive cancer, including patients with CNS involvement, who have progressed after standard of care therapy, with adequate bone marrow, renal and liver function are eligible. An accelerated dose-escalation design is employed. One subject per dose cohort will be recruited until drug related toxicity (≥G2) is observed in the first dosing cycle, after which dose escalation will revert to a 3 + 3 design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Dose Escalation: Cycle 1: Patients will receive a single dose EO1001 on day 1 and single dose pharmacokinetics will be performed. Beginning on day 8, EO1001 will be administered once daily for 21 days; multi-dose pharmacokinetics will be performed. Cycles 2–6: Oral EO1001 will be administered once daily in continuous 28-day cycles for up to 20 weeks. MTD Expansion: Oral EO1001 will be administered once daily at the MTD in continuous 28-day cycles for up to 6 cycles (24 weeks). Toxicity is assessed based on NCI CCTCAEv5 and tumor response will be assessed by RECIST 1.1 or RANO for CNS disease. CNS exposure is evaluated in patients via CSF collection with confirmed CNS disease involvement.

scholarly journals CTNI-08. A PHASE 1–2 CLINICAL TRIAL OF EO1001, A NOVEL IRREVERSIBLE PAN-ErbB INHIBITOR WITH PROMISING BRAIN PENETRATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii42-ii43
Author(s):  
Helen Wheeler ◽  
Jeffrey Bacha ◽  
Dennis Brown ◽  
Sarath Kanekal ◽  
Neil Sankar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Rapid Development ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Acquired Resistance ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Erbb Receptors ◽  
Brain Penetration ◽  
Once Daily

Abstract Mutations causing errant ErbB activation are implicated in many cancers, including tumors correlated with high incidence of CNS metastasis. ErbB family member “crosstalk” is associated with rapid development acquired resistance to ErbB TKIs, particularly in advanced disease. The development of agents targeting multiple ErbB receptors has shown promise but has been limited by toxicity and poor brain penetration. EO1001 is a first-in-class, oral, brain penetrating, irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor. Preclinical data suggests a favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profile and promising activity against ErbB-driven cancers in patient-derived xenograft models. EO1001 is being advanced into first-in-man studies under the Australia Clinical Trials Notification (CTN) scheme (ANZCTR Reg.#ACTRN12320000589343p). METHODS: Adult patients with confirmed ErbB-positive cancer, including patients with CNS involvement, who have progressed after standard of care therapy, with adequate bone marrow, renal and liver function are eligible. Toxicity is assessed by NCI CCTCAEv5 and tumor response is assessed by RECISTv1.1. CNS exposure is evaluated in in select patients with confirmed CNS disease involvement via CSF collection. An accelerated dose-escalation design is employed. One subject per dose cohort will be recruited until drug related toxicity (≥ G2) is observed, after which dose escalation will revert to a 3 + 3 design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). DOSE ESCALATION: Cycle 1: Patients will receive a single dose EO1001 on day 1 and single dose pharmacokinetics will be performed. Beginning on day 8, EO1001 will be administered once daily for 21 days; multi-dose pharmacokinetics will be performed. Cycles 2–6: Oral EO1001 will be administered once daily in continuous 28-day cycles for up to 20 weeks. MTD EXPANSION: Oral EO1001 will be administered once daily at the MTD in continuous 28-day cycles for up to 6 cycles (24 weeks). An update on the progress of this trial will be presented.

scholarly journals Mebendazole and temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas: Results of a phase 1 clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary L Gallia ◽  
Matthias Holdhoff ◽  
Henry Brem ◽  
Avadhut D Joshi ◽  
Christine L Hann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Plasma Levels ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
High Grade Gliomas ◽  
Expansion Cohort

Abstract Background Mebendazole is an anthelmintic drug introduced for human use in 1971 that extends survival in preclinical models of glioblastoma and other brain cancers. Methods A single center dose escalation and safety study of mebendazole in 24 patients with newly diagnosed high-grade gliomas (HGG) in combination with temozolomide was conducted. Patients received mebendazole in combination with adjuvant temozolomide after completing concurrent radiation plus temozolomide. Dose escalation levels were 25, 50, 100 and 200 mg/kg/day of oral mebendazole. A 15-patient expansion cohort was conducted at the maximum tolerated dose of 200 mg/kg/day. Trough plasma levels of mebendazole were measured at 4, 8 and 16 weeks. Results Twenty-four patients (18 glioblastoma, 6 anaplastic astrocytoma) were enrolled with median age of 49.9 years. Four patients (at 200 mg/kg) developed elevated grade 3 ALT and/or AST after one month, which reversed with lower dosing or discontinuation. Plasma levels of mebendazole were variable but generally increased with dose. Kaplan Meier analysis showed a 21-month median survival with 43% of patients alive at two years and 25% at 3 and 4 years. Median progression free survival (PFS) from the date of diagnosis for 17 patients taking more than one month of mebendazole was 13.1 months (95% Confidence Interval: 8.8 to 14.6 months) but for seven patients who received less than one month of mebendazole PFS was 9.2 months (95% CI: 5.8 -13.0 months). Conclusion Mebendazole at doses up to 200 mg/kg demonstrated long-term safety and acceptable toxicity. Further studies are needed to determine mebendazole’s efficacy in patients with HGG.

scholarly journals A first-in-human, phase 1 study of the NEDD8 activating enzyme E1 inhibitor TAS4464 in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noboru Yamamoto ◽  
Toshio Shimizu ◽  
Kan Yonemori ◽  
Shigehisa Kitano ◽  
Shunsuke Kondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Function ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Enzyme Inhibitor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Open Label Phase

SummaryBackground This open-label, phase 1 study investigated TAS4464, a potent NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor, in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors (JapicCTI-173,488; registered 13/01/2017). The primary objective was dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs). Maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was investigated using an accelerated titration design. Methods The starting 10-mg/m2 dose was followed by an initial accelerated stage (weekly dosing; n = 11). Based on liver function test (LFT) results, a 14-day, 20-mg/m2 dose lead-in period was implemented (weekly dosing with lead-in; n = 6). Results Abnormal LFT changes and gastrointestinal effects were the most common treatment-related adverse events (AEs). DLTs with 56-mg/m2 weekly dosing occurred in 1/5 patients; five patients had grade ≥ 2 abnormal LFT changes at 40- and 56-mg/m2 weekly doses. Further dose escalation ceased because of the possibility of severe abnormal LFT changes occurring. DLTs with weekly dosing with lead-in occurred in 1/5 patients at a 56-mg/m2 dose; MTD could not be determined because discontinuation criteria for additional enrollment at that particular dose level were met. As no further enrollment at lower doses occurred, dose escalation assessment was discontinued. Serious treatment-related AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, and DLTs were all related to abnormal LFT changes, suggesting that TAS4464 administration could affect liver function. This effect was dose-dependent but considered reversible. Complete or partial responses to TAS4464 were not observed; one patient achieved prolonged stable disease. Conclusions MTD could not be determined due to TAS4464 effects on liver function. Further evaluation of the mechanism of NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor-induced abnormal liver function is required. Trial registration number JapicCTI-173,488 (registered with Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center). Registration date 13 January 2017

scholarly journals CEA and ADA in Pleural Fluid for Differential Malignant Pleural Effusion and Tuberculous Pleural Effusion

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianhong Yu ◽  
Qirui Cai
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Malignant Pleural Effusion ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Diagnostic Model ◽  
Diagnostic Efficacy ◽  
Tuberculous Pleural Effusion ◽  
Diagnostic Models ◽  
Independent Risk Factors

Abstract Objective This study aimed to establish a predictive model based on the clinical manifestations and laboratory findings in pleural fluid of patients with pleural effusion for the differential diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) and tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE). Methods Clinical data and laboratory indices of pleural fluid were collected from patients with malignant pleural effusion and tuberculous pleural effusion in Zigong First People's Hospital between January 2019 and June 2020，and were compared between the two groups. Independent risk factors or Independent protective factors for malignant pleural effusion were investigated using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic performance of factors with independent effects, and combined diagnostic models were established based on two or more factors with independence effect. ROC curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic ability of each model, and the fit of the eath model was measured using Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Results Patients with MPE were older than those with TPE, the rate of fever of patients with MPE was lower than that of patients with TPE, and these differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), cytokeratin-19 fragment antigen (CYFRA21-1), cancer antigen 125 (CA125), and glucose (GLU) levels in the pleural fluid were higher, but total protein (TP), albumin (ALB) and Adenosine deaminase (ADA) levels in the pleural fluid were lower in MPE patients than in TPE patients, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, CEA and NSE levels in the pleural fluid were independent risk factors for MPE, whereas ADA levels in pleural fluid and fever were independent protective factors for MPE. The differential diagnostic value of pleural fluid CEA and pleural fluid ADA for MPE and TPE were higher than that of pleural fluid NSE（p<0.05） and the area under the ROC curve was 0.901, 0.892, and 0.601, respectively. Four different binary logistic diagnostic models were established based on pleural fluid CEA combined with pleural fluid NSE, pleural fluid ADA or ( and ) fever. Among them, the model established with the combination of pleural fluid CEA and pleural fluid ADA (logit (P) = 0.513 + 0.457*CEA-0.101*ADA) had the highest diagnostic value for malignant pleural effusion, and its predictive accuracy was high with an area under the ROC curve of 0.968 [95% confidence interval (0.947, 0.988)]. But the diagnostic efficacy of the diagnostic model could not be improved by adding pleural fluid NSE and fever. Conclusion The model established with the combination of CEA and ADA in the pleural fluid has a high differential diagnostic value for malignant pleural effusion and tuberculous pleural effusion, and NSE in the pleural fluid and fever cannot improve the diagnostic efficacy of the diagnostic model.

scholarly journals Release of growth factors after mechanical and chemical pleurodesis for treatment of malignant pleural effusion: a randomized control study

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (4) ◽  
pp. 386-394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aljaz Hojski ◽  
Maja Leitgeb ◽  
Anton Crnjac
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Growth Factors ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Pleural Fluid ◽  
Malignant Pleural Effusion ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor ◽  
Chemical Pleurodesis ◽  
Thoracic Drainage

Abstract Background. Growth factors are key inducers of fibrosis but can also mediate inflammatory responses resulting in increasing pleural effusion and acute respiratory distress syndrome. The primary aim of the study was to analyse growth factors release after performing chemical and mechanical pleurodesis in the first 48 hours at the patients with malignant pleural effusion. The secondary endpoints were to evaluate the effectiveness of the both pleurodeses, symptoms release and the quality of life of patients after the treatment. Patients and methods. A prospective randomized study included 36 consecutive female patients with breast carcinoma and malignant pleural effusion in an intention-to-treat analysis. We treated 18 patients by means of thoracoscopic mechanical pleurodesis and 18 patients by chemical pleurodesis with talcum applied over a chest tube. We gathered the pleural fluid and serum samples in the following 48 hours under a dedicated protocol and tested them for growth factors levels. A quality of life and visual analogue pain score surveys were also performed. Results. Median measured serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level after chemical pleurodesis was 930.68 pg/ml (95% CI: 388.22–4656.65) and after mechanical pleurodesis 808.54 pg/ml. (95% CI: 463.20-1235.13) (p = 0.103). Median pleural levels of transforming growth factor (TGF) β1 were higher after performing mechanical pleurodesis (4814.00 pg/ml [95% CI: 2726.51–7292.94]) when compared to those after performing chemical pleurodesis (1976.50 pg/ml [95% CI: 1659.82–5136.26]) (p = 0.078). We observed similar results for fibroblast growth factor (FGF) β; the serum level was higher after mechanical pleurodesis (30.45 pg/ml [95% CI: 20.40–59.42]), compared to those after chemical pleurodesis (13.39 pg/ml [95% CI: 5.04 – 74.60]) (p = 0.076). Mechanical pleurodesis was equally effective as chemical pleurodesis in terms of hospital stay, pleural effusion re-accumulation, requiring of additional thoracentesis, median overall survival, but, it shortened the mean thoracic drainage duration (p = 0.030) and resulted in a higher symptoms release and in a better quality of life (p = 0.047). Conclusions. We recorded an increase in serum VEGF levels after chemical pleurodesis, however on the contrary, an increase in the pleural fluid level of TGFβ1 and FGFβ] after mechanical pleurodesis with respect to compared group. Although the differences did not reach statistical significance, VEGF, TGFβ1 and FGFβ remain the most interesting parameters for future research. Considering the mechanisms of growth factors action, we conclude that in our study group mechanical pleurodesis might be more efficient in terms of growth factors release, thoracic drainage duration and resulted in a higher symptoms release and in a better quality of life than chemical pleurodesis.

CTNI-01. A PHASE 1-2 CLINICAL TRIAL OF EO1001 (APL-122), A NOVEL IRREVERSIBLE PAN-ERBB INHIBITOR WITH PROMISING BRAIN PENETRATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi58-vi58
Author(s):  
Sophia Frentzas ◽  
Gary Richardson ◽  
Jeffrey Bacha ◽  
Sarath Kanekal ◽  
Neil Sankar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Cns Metastases ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Adult Participants ◽  
Xenograft Models ◽  
Cns Penetration

Abstract CNS metastases are a prominent driver of cancer morbidity and mortality, especially as targeted therapies have improved systemic outcomes. Mutations in the ErbB/HER kinase family are known oncodrivers in many cancers. Extensive crosstalk among ErbB/HER receptors suggests that inhibition of multiple family members may benefit treatment and limit drug resistance. There is a desperate need for new agents that are more tolerable and effective in treating CNS metastases. EO1001 (APL-122) is a first-in-class, oral, irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor targeting ErbB1, ErbB2 and ErbB4 with promising CNS penetration in preclinical models. Preclinical data suggests a favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profile and activity against ErbB-driven cancers in patient-derived xenograft models. We report on a first-in-human Phase 1-2 clinical trial in progress. Adult participants with confirmed ErbB-positive cancer, including patients with CNS involvement, who have progressed after standard-of-care, with adequate bone marrow, renal and liver function are eligible. ESCALATION: One subject per dose cohort is enrolled in an accelerated dose-escalation design until drug-related toxicity (≥G2) is observed in the first cycle, after which dose escalation will revert to a 3 + 3 design to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Cycle 1: Patients receive a single oral dose of EO1001 on day 1; single-dose pharmacokinetics are measured. Beginning on day 8, EO1001 is administered once daily for 21 days; multi-dose pharmacokinetics are measured. Cycles 2-6: EO1001 is administered once daily in continuous 28-day cycles for up to 20 weeks. EXPANSION: EO1001 will be administered once daily to 20 patients at the MTD in continuous 28-day cycles for up to 6 cycles to determine a recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) for further study. Toxicity is assessed based on NCI CTCAEv5 and tumor response is assessed by RECIST 1.1. CNS exposure is evaluated in patients via CSF collection with confirmed CNS disease involvement.

Abstract 2009: ALX-0081 a Novel Anti-Thrombotic: Results of a Single-Dose Phase 1 Study in Healthy Volunteers and Further Development in Patients with Stable Angina Undergoing PCI

Circulation ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 118 (suppl_18) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jozef Bartunek ◽  
Emanuele Barbato ◽  
Josefin-Beate Holz ◽  
Kristof Vercruysse ◽  
Hans Ulrichts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Healthy Volunteers ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Stable Angina ◽  
Thrombus Formation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Wide Range

Background : ALX-0081 is a bivalent Nanobody ® based on the variable domain of naturally occurring heavy-chain only antibodies. It binds with high affinity to the A1 domain of von Willebrand Factor (vWF) and thereby blocks the interactions between platelets and vascular collagen. It selectively prevents thrombus formation under high shear stress conditions. Aim : Test ALX-0081 single IV infusions (60 minutes) dosed from 0.5mg to 12mg total in 40 male healthy volunteers in double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study and assess pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), safety and immunogenicity. Results : ALX-0081 displayed non-linear pharmacokinetic properties, following a 2 compartment model. Ristocetin induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) was analyzed as marker for PD effect with full inhibition (defined as measured levels dropping <10%) observed at ALX-0081 concentrations of ~ 400ng/ml. All subjects dosed ≥ 2mg achieved full RIPA inhibition at 1h post-dosing for maximum of 12h. ALX-0081 treatment was well tolerated and safe, no signs of bleeding were reported and no immunogenic response was detected. Target related mild and transient reductions of vWF and FVIII plasma levels were observed and all events were fully reversible. Phase Ib study design : double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled, multiple ascending dose study. ALX-0081 added to standard anti-thrombotic regimen (ASA, clopidogrel, UFH) in patients with stable angina undergoing elective PCI. Single-dose escalation will be followed by multiple dosing (up to 4 doses in 24h). Dose escalation will be guided by safety and efficacy marker. Endpoints: safety, pharmacological profile, biomarker (RIPA, RICO and ACT) and early clinical outcome (MACE, IMR, molecular marker). Conclusion : ALX-0081 can be administered safely over a wide range of dose-regimen. First results of the phase Ib study in stable angina patients will be presented.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document