scholarly journals Acute subdural haematoma in the elderly: to operate or not to operate? A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following surgery

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e050786
Author(s):  
Susruta Manivannan ◽  
Robert Spencer ◽  
Omar Marei ◽  
Isaac Mayo ◽  
Omar Elalfy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Subdural Haematoma ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
Acute Subdural Haematoma ◽  
Level Of Evidence

ObjectivesAcute subdural haematoma (ASDH) is a devastating pathology commonly found on CT brain scans of patients with traumatic brain injury. The role of surgical intervention in the elderly has been increasingly questioned due to its associated morbidity and mortality. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to quantify the mortality and functional outcomes associated with surgical management of ASDH in the elderly was performed.Design/settingA multidatabase literature search between January 1990 and May 2020, and meta-analysis of proportions was performed to quantify mortality and unfavourable outcome (Glasgow Outcome scale 1–3; death/ severe disability) rates.ParticipantsStudies reporting patients aged 60 years or older.InterventionsCraniotomy, decompressive craniectomy, conservative management.Outcome measuresMortality and functional outcomes (discharge, long-term follow-up (LTFU)).Results2572 articles were screened, yielding 21 studies for final inclusion and 15 for meta-analysis. Pooled estimates of mortality were 39.83% (95% CI 32.73% to 47.14%; 10 studies, 308/739 patients, I2=73%) at discharge and 49.30% (95% CI 42.01% to 56.61%; 10 studies, 277/555 patients, I2=63%) at LTFU. Mean duration of follow-up was 7.1 months (range 2–12 months). Pooled estimate of percentage of poor outcomes was 81.18% (95% CI 75.61% to 86.21%; 6 studies, 363/451 patients, I2=45%) at discharge, and 79.25% (95% CI 72.42% to 85.37%; 8 studies, 402/511 patients, I2=66%) at LTFU. Mean duration of follow-up was 6.4 months (range 2–12 months). Potential risk factors for poor outcome included age, baseline functional status, preoperative neurological status and imaging parameters.ConclusionsOutcomes following surgical evacuation of ASDH in patients aged 60 years and above are poor. This constitutes the best level of evidence in the current literature that surgical intervention for ASDH in the elderly carries significant risks, which must be weighed against benefits.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020189508.

Unstimulated high-sensitive thyroglobulin is a powerful prognostic predictor in patients with thyroid cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Giovanella ◽  
Marco Castellana ◽  
Pierpaolo Trimboli
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Prognostic Performance ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
High Level ◽  
Operating Points

Abstract Background Differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) has an excellent prognosis and the role of high-sensitive thyroglobulin measured during levothyroxine (ON-T4 hs-Tg) testing to discriminate patients with structural from not-evidence of disease (SED and NED, respectively) has been investigated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the performance of ON-T4 hs-Tg in two clinical scenarios considering its negative predictive value (NPV) as primary outcome: (1) diagnostic performance of Tg when undetectable value and NED status are simultaneously demonstrated; (2) prognostic performance of undetectable Tg in predicting NED in the subsequent follow-up. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019125092). PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL and Web of Science were searched until February 12, 2019. Original articles reporting data on SED/NED in patients with detectable/undetectable ON-T4 hs-Tg were selected. Summary operating points were estimated using a random-effects model. Results Out of 1413 retrieved papers, 10 studies evaluating 1796 patients were included. Participants were outpatients diagnosed with DTC, treated with near-total (NTx) or total thyroidectomy (TTx) with or without radioactive iodine (RAI). The NPV of ON-T4 hs-Tg for diagnostic and prognostic performance was 99.4% (95% CI 98.9–99.9; I2 = 13%) and 99.4% (95% CI 98.8–100; I2 = 0%), respectively. Conclusions Our findings show that ON-T4 hs-Tg is an excellent diagnostic tool and prognostic factor to rule-out SED. A high level of evidence is provided to decrease the intensity and frequency of follow-up in those DTC patients having undetectable high-sensitive Tg.

scholarly journals Neurological and functional outcomes of subdural hematoma evacuation in patients over 70 years of age

2013 ◽  
Vol 04 (03) ◽  
pp. 250-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Mulligan ◽  
Bethwel Raore ◽  
Shuling Liu ◽  
Jeffrey J Olson
Keyword(s):  
Functional Status ◽  
Subdural Hematoma ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
Common Disease ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Grading Scale ◽  
Burr Holes

ABSTRACT Background: Subdural hematoma (SDH) is a common disease entity treated by neurosurgical intervention. Although the incidence increases in the elderly population, there is a paucity of studies examining their surgical outcomes. Objectives: To determine the neurological and functional outcomes of patients over 70 years of age undergoing surgical decompression for subdural hematoma. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data on 45 patients above 70 years who underwent craniotomy or burr holes for acute, chronic or mixed subdural hematomas. We analyzed both neurological and functional status before and after surgery. Results: Forty-five patients 70 years of age or older were treated in our department during the study period. There was a significant improvement in the neurological status of patients from admission to follow up as assessed using the Markwalder grading scale (1.98 vs. 1.39; P =0.005), yet no improvement in functional outcome was observed as assessed by Glasgow Outcome Score. Forty-one patients were admitted from home, however only 20 patients (44%) were discharged home, 16 (36%) discharged to nursing home or rehab, 6 (13%) to hospice and 3 (7%) died in the postoperative period. Neurological function improved in patients who were older, had a worse pre-operative neurological status, were on anticoagulation and had chronic or mixed acute and chronic hematoma. However, no improvement in functional status was observed. Conclusion: Surgical management of SDH in patients over 70 years of age provides significant improvement in neurological status, but does not change functional status.

scholarly journals Acute Versus Delayed Surgical Intervention in Multiligament Knee Injuries: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596712110278
Author(s):  
Ryan S. Marder ◽  
Husain Poonawala ◽  
Jorge I. Pincay ◽  
Frank Nguyen ◽  
Patrick F. Cleary ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Knee Injuries ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Multiligament Knee Injuries ◽  
Level 2

Background: The optimal timing of surgical intervention for multiligament knee injuries remains controversial. Purpose: To review the clinical and functional outcomes after acute and delayed surgical intervention for multiligament knee injuries. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: We performed a search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from inception to September 2020. Eligible studies reported on knee dislocations, multiligament knee injuries, or bicruciate ligament injuries in adult patients (age, ≥18 years). In addition to comparing outcomes between acute and delayed surgical intervention groups, we conducted 3 subgroup analyses for outcomes within isolated knee injuries, knee injuries with concomitant polytrauma/fractures, and high-level (level 2) studies. Results: Included in the analysis were 31 studies, designated as evidence level 2 (n = 3), level 3 (n = 8), and level 4 (n = 20). These studies reported on 2594 multiligament knee injuries sustained by 2585 patients (mean age, 25.1-65.3 years; mean follow-up, 12-157.2 months). At the latest follow-up timepoint, the mean Lysholm (n = 375), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) (n = 286), and Tegner (n = 129) scores for the acute surgical intervention group were 73.60, 67.61, and 5.06, respectively. For the delayed surgical intervention group, the mean Lysholm (n = 196), IKDC (n = 172), and Tegner (n = 74) scores were 85.23, 72.32, and 4.85, respectively. The mean Lysholm (n = 323), IKDC (n = 236), and Tegner (n = 143) scores for our isolated subgroup were 83.7, 74.8, and 5.0, respectively. By comparison, the mean Lysholm (n = 270), IKDC (n = 236), and Tegner (n = 206) scores for the polytrauma/fractures subgroup were 83.3, 64.5, and 5.0, respectively. Conclusion: The results of our systematic review did not elucidate whether acute or delayed surgical intervention produced superior clinical and functional outcomes. Although previous evidence has supported acute surgical intervention, future prospective randomized controlled trials and matched cohort studies must be completed to confirm these findings.

scholarly journals Behavioral interventions for sleep disturbances in children with neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

SLEEP ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalie L Phillips ◽  
Teleri Moore ◽  
Arthur Teng ◽  
Naomi Brookes ◽  
Tonya M Palermo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Disorders ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Sleep Disturbances ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Sleep Onset ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Abstract Study Objectives Sleep disturbances are common and associated with negative functional and health consequences in children with neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders (NNDDs) and represent an important potential target for behavioral interventions. This systematic review examined the efficacy of behavioral sleep interventions (BSIs) for children with NNDDs and comorbid sleep disturbances. Methods A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, and CENTRAL was conducted in April 2019. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of BSI for children with NNDDS were included. Meta-analysis and GRADE quality ratings were performed on sleep and secondary functional outcomes (cognition, academics, and behavior). Results Nine RCTs were identified (n = 690; Mage = 8.39 ± 2.64years; 71.11% male). The quality of the evidence was predominantly rated as moderate. Posttreatment improvements in sleep were found on self-reported sleep disturbances (total sleep disturbance [standardized mean difference, i.e. SMD = 0.89], night wakings [SMD = 0.52], bedtime resistance [SMD = 0.53], parasomnias [SMD = 0.34], sleep anxiety [SMD = 0.50]) and self-reported sleep patterns (sleep duration [SMD = 0.30], sleep onset duration [SMD = 0.75]) and (2) objectively measured actigraphic sleep patterns (total sleep time [MD = 18.09 min; SMD = 0.32], sleep onset latency [MD = 11.96 min; SMD = 0.41]). Improvements in sleep (self-reported, not actigraphy) were maintained at follow-up, but few studies conducted follow-up assessments resulting in low-quality evidence. Reduction in total behavioral problems (SMD = 0.48) posttreatment and attention/hyperactivity (SMD = 0.28) at follow-up was found. Changes in cognition and academic skills were not examined in any studies. Conclusions BSIs improve sleep, at least in the short term, in children with NNDDs. Benefits may extend to functional improvements in behavior. More rigorous RCTs involving placebo controls, blinded outcome assessment, longer follow-up durations, and assessment of functional outcomes are required.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears seems safe but higher level of evidence is needed: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent literature

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1946-1957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelle P. van der List ◽  
Harmen D. Vermeijden ◽  
Inger N. Sierevelt ◽  
Gregory S. DiFelice ◽  
Arthur van Noort ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Recent Literature ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Abstract Purpose To assess the outcomes of the various techniques of primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in the recent literature using a systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods PRISMA guidelines were followed. All studies reporting outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair of proximal ACL tears using primary repair, repair with static (suture) augmentation and dynamic augmentation between January 2014 and July 2019 in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were identified and included. Primary outcomes were failure rates and reoperation rates, and secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcome scores. Results A total of 13 studies and 1,101 patients (mean age 31 years, mean follow-up 2.1 years, 60% male) were included. Nearly all studies were retrospective studies without a control group and only one randomized study was identified. Grade of recommendation for primary repair was weak. There were 9 out of 74 failures following primary repair (10%), 6 out of 69 following repair with static augmentation (7%) and 106 out of 958 following dynamic augmentation (11%). Repair with dynamic augmentation had more reoperations (99; 10%), and more hardware removal (255; 29%) compared to the other procedures. All functional outcome scores were > 85% of maximum scores. Conclusions This systematic review with meta-analysis found that the different techniques of primary repair are safe with failure rates of 7–11%, no complications and functional outcome scores of > 85% of maximum scores. There was a high risk of bias and follow-up was short with 2.1 years. Prospective studies comparing the outcomes to ACL reconstruction with sufficient follow-up are needed prior to widespread implementation. Level of evidence IV.

scholarly journals Platelet-Rich Plasma Augmentation to Microfracture Provides a Limited Benefit for the Treatment of Cartilage Lesions: A Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596712091050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Boffa ◽  
Davide Previtali ◽  
Sante Alessandro Altamura ◽  
Stefano Zaffagnini ◽  
Christian Candrian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cartilage Lesions

Background: Microfracture is the most common first-line option for the treatment of small chondral lesions, although increasing evidence shows that the clinical benefit of microfracture decreases over time. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been suggested as an effective biological augmentation to improve clinical outcomes after microfracture. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical evidence regarding the application of PRP, documenting safety and efficacy of this augmentation technique to improve microfracture for the treatment of cartilage lesions. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A systematic review was performed in PubMed, EBSCOhost database, and the Cochrane Library to identify comparative studies evaluating the clinical efficacy of PRP augmentation to microfracture. A meta-analysis was performed on articles that reported results for visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores. Risk of bias was documented through use of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2.0 and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions assessment tools. The quality assessment was performed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines. Results: A total of 7 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis: 4 randomized controlled trials, 2 prospective comparative studies, and 1 retrospective comparative study, for a total of 234 patients. Of the 7 studies included, 4 studies evaluated the effects of PRP treatment in the knee, and 3 studies evaluated effects in the ankle. The analysis of all scores showed a difference favoring PRP treatment in knees (VAS, P = .002 and P < .001 at 12 and 24 months, respectively; IKDC, P < .001 at both follow-up points) and ankles (both VAS and AOFAS, P < .001 at 12 months). The improvement offered by PRP did not reach the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Conclusion: PRP provided an improvement to microfracture in knees and ankles at short-term follow-up. However, this improvement did not reach the MCID, and thus it was not clinically perceivable by the patients. Moreover, the overall low evidence and the paucity of high-level studies indicate further research is needed to confirm the potential of PRP augmentation to microfracture for the treatment of cartilage lesions.

scholarly journals Antenatal corticosteroids for impending late preterm (34-36+6 weeks) deliveries—A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0248774
Author(s):  
Mangesh Deshmukh ◽  
Sanjay Patole
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neonatal Resuscitation ◽  
Late Preterm ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Preterm Neonates ◽  
Antenatal Corticosteroids ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes ◽  
Level Of Evidence

Background Administration of antenatal corticosteroids (ANC) for impending preterm delivery beyond 34 weeks of gestation continues to be a controversial issue despite various guidelines for obstetricians and gynaecologists. Objective To compare outcomes following exposure to ANC for infants born between 34–36+6 weeks’ gestation. Methods A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCT) reporting neonatal outcomes after ANC exposure between 34–36+6 weeks’ gestation using Cochrane methodology. Databases including PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane Central library and Google Scholar were searched in May 2020. Primary outcomes: (1) Need for respiratory support (Mechanical ventilation, CPAP, high flow) or oxygen (2) Hypoglycemia. Secondary outcomes included respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), transient tachypnoea of newborn (TTN), need for neonatal resuscitation at birth [only in the delivery room immediately after birth (not in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)], admission to NICU, mortality and developmental follow up. Level of evidence (LOE) was summarised by GRADE guidelines. Main results Seven RCTs (N = 4144) with low to high risk of bias were included. Only one RCT was from high income countries, Meta-analysis (random-effects model) showed (1) reduced need for respiratory support [5 RCTs (N = 3844); RR = 0.68 (0.47–0.98), p = 0.04; I2 = 55%; LOE: Moderate] and (2) higher risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia [4 RCTs (N = 3604); RR = 1.61(1.38–1.87), p<0.00001; I2 = 0%; LOE: High] after ANC exposure. Neonates exposed to ANC had reduced need for resuscitation at birth. The incidence of RDS, TTN and surfactant therapy did not differ significantly. None of the included studies reported long-term developmental follow up. Conclusions Moderate quality evidence indicates that ANC exposure reduced need for respiratory support, and increased the risk of hypoglycaemia in late preterm neonates. Large definitive trials with adequate follow up for neurodevelopmental outcomes are required to assess benefits and risks of ANC in this population.

scholarly journals Operative Treatment of Isolated Meniscus Injuries in Adolescent Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina M. Mosich ◽  
Virginia Lieu ◽  
Edward Ebramzadeh ◽  
Jennifer J. Beck
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Meniscus Repair ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Adolescent Population ◽  
Meniscus Tears ◽  
Adolescent Patients

Context: With the rise in sports participation and increased athleticism in the adolescent population, there is an ever-growing need to better understand adolescent meniscus pathology and treatment. Objective: To better understand the operative management of meniscus tears in the adolescent population. Data Sources: A systematic review of PubMed (MEDLINE) and Google Scholar was performed for all archived years. Study Selection: Studies that reported on isolated meniscus tears in adolescent patients (age, 10-19 years) were included. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Data Extraction: Two authors reviewed and extracted data from studies that fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Results: Nine studies on isolated meniscus tears in adolescent patients were found, with level of evidence ranging from 3 to 4. These studies evaluated a total of 373 patients (248 males, 125 females) and 390 knees. Seven studies were published between 1979 and 2000, all of which discuss meniscectomy as the primary treatment. Two studies were published after 2000 and report on meniscus repair surgery. The mean patient age was 14.4 years. A total of 308 meniscectomies and 64 meniscus repairs were performed. Follow-up ranged from 1.8 to 30 years (mean, 10.8 years). A 37% retear rate was reported for patients undergoing meniscus repair. Different outcome measures were used for meniscectomy versus meniscus repair. Three studies evaluating meniscectomy reported Tapper-Hoover scores, showing 54 patients with an excellent result, 58 with good, 57 with fair, and 23 with poor results. Conclusion: A shift in the management of isolated adolescent meniscal tears is reflected in the literature, with a recent increase in operative repair. This is likely secondary to poor outcomes after meniscectomy reflected in long-term follow-up studies. The current literature highlights the need for improved description of tear patterns, standardized reporting of outcome measures, and improved study methodologies to help guide orthopaedic surgeons on operative treatment of meniscal tears in adolescent patients.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of Enteral Nutritional Therapy in the Healing Process of Pressure Ulcers: A Systematic Review

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gisely Blanc ◽  
Marineli Joaquim Meier ◽  
Janislei Giseli Dorociaki Stocco ◽  
Hellen Roehrs ◽  
Karla Crozeta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Pressure Ulcers ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Healing Process ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Nutritional Therapy ◽  
Sufficient Evidence ◽  
Language Of Publication

OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effectiveness of enteral nutritional therapy (ENT) in the healing process of pressure ulcers (PU) in adults and the elderly. METHOD A systematic review whose studies were identified through the databases of Cochrane, MEDLINE/PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, and manual searches. It included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) without delimiting the period or language of publication, which addressed adults and elderly patients with pressure ulcers in a comparative treatment of enteral nutritional therapy and placebo or between enteral nutritional therapy with different compositions and dosages. RESULTS We included ten studies that considered different interventions. It resulted in more pressure ulcers healed in the groups that received the intervention. The included studies were heterogeneous with regard to patients, the type of intervention, the sample and the follow-up period, all of which made meta-analysis impossible. CONCLUSION Although the enteral nutritional therapy demonstrates a promotion of pressure ulcer healing, sufficient evidence to confirm the hypothesis was not found.

Robotic arm-assisted versus manual total hip arthroplasty

2021 ◽  
Vol 103-B (6) ◽  
pp. 1009-1020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan Ng ◽  
Paul Gaston ◽  
Philip M. Simpson ◽  
Gavin J. Macpherson ◽  
James T. Patton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Total Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Hip Arthroplasty ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Robotic Arm ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Total Hip

Aims The aims of this systematic review were to assess the learning curve of semi-active robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty (rTHA), and to compare the accuracy, patient-reported functional outcomes, complications, and survivorship between rTHA and manual total hip arthroplasty (mTHA). Methods Searches of PubMed, Medline, and Google Scholar were performed in April 2020 in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement. Search terms included “robotic”, “hip”, and “arthroplasty”. The criteria for inclusion were published clinical research articles reporting the learning curve for rTHA (robotic arm-assisted only) and those comparing the implantation accuracy, functional outcomes, survivorship, or complications with mTHA. Results There were 501 articles initially identified from databases and references. Following full text screening, 17 articles that satisfied the inclusion criteria were included. Four studies reported the learning curve of rTHA, 13 studies reported on implant positioning, five on functional outcomes, ten on complications, and four on survivorship. The meta-analysis showed a significantly greater number of cases of acetabular component placement in the safe zone compared with the mTHA group (95% confidence interval (CI) 4.10 to 7.94; p < 0.001) and that rTHA resulted in a significantly better Harris Hip Score compared to mTHA in the short- to mid-term follow-up (95% CI 0.46 to 5.64; p = 0.020). However, there was no difference in infection rates, dislocation rates, overall complication rates, and survival rates at short-term follow-up. Conclusion The learning curve of rTHA was between 12 and 35 cases, which was dependent on the assessment goal, such as operating time, accuracy, and team working. Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty was associated with improved accuracy of component positioning and functional outcome, however no difference in complication rates or survival were observed at short- to mid-term follow-up. Overall, there remains an absence of high-quality level I evidence and cost analysis comparing rTHA and mTHA. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1009–1020.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document