scholarly journals Operative Treatment of Isolated Meniscus Injuries in Adolescent Patients: A Meta-Analysis and Review

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gina M. Mosich ◽  
Virginia Lieu ◽  
Edward Ebramzadeh ◽  
Jennifer J. Beck
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Meniscus Repair ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Adolescent Population ◽  
Meniscus Tears ◽  
Adolescent Patients

Context: With the rise in sports participation and increased athleticism in the adolescent population, there is an ever-growing need to better understand adolescent meniscus pathology and treatment. Objective: To better understand the operative management of meniscus tears in the adolescent population. Data Sources: A systematic review of PubMed (MEDLINE) and Google Scholar was performed for all archived years. Study Selection: Studies that reported on isolated meniscus tears in adolescent patients (age, 10-19 years) were included. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Level of Evidence: Level 4. Data Extraction: Two authors reviewed and extracted data from studies that fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Results: Nine studies on isolated meniscus tears in adolescent patients were found, with level of evidence ranging from 3 to 4. These studies evaluated a total of 373 patients (248 males, 125 females) and 390 knees. Seven studies were published between 1979 and 2000, all of which discuss meniscectomy as the primary treatment. Two studies were published after 2000 and report on meniscus repair surgery. The mean patient age was 14.4 years. A total of 308 meniscectomies and 64 meniscus repairs were performed. Follow-up ranged from 1.8 to 30 years (mean, 10.8 years). A 37% retear rate was reported for patients undergoing meniscus repair. Different outcome measures were used for meniscectomy versus meniscus repair. Three studies evaluating meniscectomy reported Tapper-Hoover scores, showing 54 patients with an excellent result, 58 with good, 57 with fair, and 23 with poor results. Conclusion: A shift in the management of isolated adolescent meniscal tears is reflected in the literature, with a recent increase in operative repair. This is likely secondary to poor outcomes after meniscectomy reflected in long-term follow-up studies. The current literature highlights the need for improved description of tear patterns, standardized reporting of outcome measures, and improved study methodologies to help guide orthopaedic surgeons on operative treatment of meniscal tears in adolescent patients.

scholarly journals Treatment of Pectoralis Major Tendon Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (7_suppl6) ◽  
pp. 2325967120S0041
Author(s):  
Blake Bodendorfer ◽  
Brian McCormick ◽  
David Wang ◽  
Christine Conroy ◽  
Caroline Fryar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Pectoralis Major ◽  
Isokinetic Strength ◽  
Tendon Tears

Objectives: The incidence of pectoralis major tendon tears is rising, and repair is generally considered, but there is a paucity of comparative data to demonstrate the superiority of operative treatment. We sought to compare the outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of pectoralis major tendon tears. We hypothesized that repair would result in superior outcomes compared to nonoperative treatment. Methods: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was completed using MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase and Web of Science databases. English-language studies were included with a minimum of 6 months average follow-up and 5 cases per study. Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies was utilized to assess the quality of the existing literature. Meta-analysis of pooled mechanisms of injury and outcomes was completed. Pooled effect-sizes were calculated from random effects models. Continuous variables were assessed using mixed model analysis with the individual study designated as a random effect and the desired treatment for comparison as a fixed effect. Bivariate frequency data was transformed using the Freeman-Tukey log-linear transformation for variance stabilization and then assessed using a mixed model with a study-level random effect and subsequently back-transformed. Significance was set at P<.05. Results: Twenty-three articles with 664 injuries met the inclusion criteria for comparison (Figure 1). All patients were male with 63.2% of injuries occurring during weight training, with an average age of 31.48 years and follow-up of 37.02 months. Included studies had moderately high methodological quality. Operative treatment was significantly superior to nonoperative treatment with a relative improvement of functional outcome by 0.70 (P=.027), full isometric strength by 77.07% (P<.001), isokinetic strength by 28.86% (P<.001) compared to the uninjured arm, cosmesis satisfaction by 13.79% (P=.037), and resting deformity by 98.85% (P<.001) (Table 1). There was an overall complication rate of 14.21%, including a 3.08% rate of rerupture, for operative treatment. Conclusion: Pectoralis major tendon repair resulted in significantly superior outcomes as compared to nonoperative treatment with an associated 14.21% complication rate. There was a statistically significant improvement in functional outcome, isokinetic strength, isometric strength, cosmesis, and resting deformity. [Figure: see text][Table: see text]

Unstimulated high-sensitive thyroglobulin is a powerful prognostic predictor in patients with thyroid cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Giovanella ◽  
Marco Castellana ◽  
Pierpaolo Trimboli
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Prognostic Performance ◽  
Clinical Scenarios ◽  
High Level ◽  
Operating Points

Abstract Background Differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) has an excellent prognosis and the role of high-sensitive thyroglobulin measured during levothyroxine (ON-T4 hs-Tg) testing to discriminate patients with structural from not-evidence of disease (SED and NED, respectively) has been investigated. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the performance of ON-T4 hs-Tg in two clinical scenarios considering its negative predictive value (NPV) as primary outcome: (1) diagnostic performance of Tg when undetectable value and NED status are simultaneously demonstrated; (2) prognostic performance of undetectable Tg in predicting NED in the subsequent follow-up. Methods This systematic review and meta-analysis were registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019125092). PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL and Web of Science were searched until February 12, 2019. Original articles reporting data on SED/NED in patients with detectable/undetectable ON-T4 hs-Tg were selected. Summary operating points were estimated using a random-effects model. Results Out of 1413 retrieved papers, 10 studies evaluating 1796 patients were included. Participants were outpatients diagnosed with DTC, treated with near-total (NTx) or total thyroidectomy (TTx) with or without radioactive iodine (RAI). The NPV of ON-T4 hs-Tg for diagnostic and prognostic performance was 99.4% (95% CI 98.9–99.9; I2 = 13%) and 99.4% (95% CI 98.8–100; I2 = 0%), respectively. Conclusions Our findings show that ON-T4 hs-Tg is an excellent diagnostic tool and prognostic factor to rule-out SED. A high level of evidence is provided to decrease the intensity and frequency of follow-up in those DTC patients having undetectable high-sensitive Tg.

scholarly journals Arthroscopic primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament tears seems safe but higher level of evidence is needed: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent literature

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 1946-1957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jelle P. van der List ◽  
Harmen D. Vermeijden ◽  
Inger N. Sierevelt ◽  
Gregory S. DiFelice ◽  
Arthur van Noort ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anterior Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Recent Literature ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

Abstract Purpose To assess the outcomes of the various techniques of primary repair of proximal anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears in the recent literature using a systematic review with meta-analysis. Methods PRISMA guidelines were followed. All studies reporting outcomes of arthroscopic primary repair of proximal ACL tears using primary repair, repair with static (suture) augmentation and dynamic augmentation between January 2014 and July 2019 in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane were identified and included. Primary outcomes were failure rates and reoperation rates, and secondary outcomes were patient-reported outcome scores. Results A total of 13 studies and 1,101 patients (mean age 31 years, mean follow-up 2.1 years, 60% male) were included. Nearly all studies were retrospective studies without a control group and only one randomized study was identified. Grade of recommendation for primary repair was weak. There were 9 out of 74 failures following primary repair (10%), 6 out of 69 following repair with static augmentation (7%) and 106 out of 958 following dynamic augmentation (11%). Repair with dynamic augmentation had more reoperations (99; 10%), and more hardware removal (255; 29%) compared to the other procedures. All functional outcome scores were > 85% of maximum scores. Conclusions This systematic review with meta-analysis found that the different techniques of primary repair are safe with failure rates of 7–11%, no complications and functional outcome scores of > 85% of maximum scores. There was a high risk of bias and follow-up was short with 2.1 years. Prospective studies comparing the outcomes to ACL reconstruction with sufficient follow-up are needed prior to widespread implementation. Level of evidence IV.

scholarly journals Platelet-Rich Plasma Augmentation to Microfracture Provides a Limited Benefit for the Treatment of Cartilage Lesions: A Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 232596712091050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelo Boffa ◽  
Davide Previtali ◽  
Sante Alessandro Altamura ◽  
Stefano Zaffagnini ◽  
Christian Candrian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Comparative Studies ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cartilage Lesions

Background: Microfracture is the most common first-line option for the treatment of small chondral lesions, although increasing evidence shows that the clinical benefit of microfracture decreases over time. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been suggested as an effective biological augmentation to improve clinical outcomes after microfracture. Purpose: To evaluate the clinical evidence regarding the application of PRP, documenting safety and efficacy of this augmentation technique to improve microfracture for the treatment of cartilage lesions. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A systematic review was performed in PubMed, EBSCOhost database, and the Cochrane Library to identify comparative studies evaluating the clinical efficacy of PRP augmentation to microfracture. A meta-analysis was performed on articles that reported results for visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores. Risk of bias was documented through use of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias 2.0 and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions assessment tools. The quality assessment was performed according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation guidelines. Results: A total of 7 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis: 4 randomized controlled trials, 2 prospective comparative studies, and 1 retrospective comparative study, for a total of 234 patients. Of the 7 studies included, 4 studies evaluated the effects of PRP treatment in the knee, and 3 studies evaluated effects in the ankle. The analysis of all scores showed a difference favoring PRP treatment in knees (VAS, P = .002 and P < .001 at 12 and 24 months, respectively; IKDC, P < .001 at both follow-up points) and ankles (both VAS and AOFAS, P < .001 at 12 months). The improvement offered by PRP did not reach the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Conclusion: PRP provided an improvement to microfracture in knees and ankles at short-term follow-up. However, this improvement did not reach the MCID, and thus it was not clinically perceivable by the patients. Moreover, the overall low evidence and the paucity of high-level studies indicate further research is needed to confirm the potential of PRP augmentation to microfracture for the treatment of cartilage lesions.

scholarly journals Antenatal corticosteroids for impending late preterm (34-36+6 weeks) deliveries—A systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0248774
Author(s):  
Mangesh Deshmukh ◽  
Sanjay Patole
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Neonatal Resuscitation ◽  
Late Preterm ◽  
Respiratory Support ◽  
Preterm Neonates ◽  
Antenatal Corticosteroids ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes ◽  
Level Of Evidence

Background Administration of antenatal corticosteroids (ANC) for impending preterm delivery beyond 34 weeks of gestation continues to be a controversial issue despite various guidelines for obstetricians and gynaecologists. Objective To compare outcomes following exposure to ANC for infants born between 34–36+6 weeks’ gestation. Methods A systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCT) reporting neonatal outcomes after ANC exposure between 34–36+6 weeks’ gestation using Cochrane methodology. Databases including PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Cochrane Central library and Google Scholar were searched in May 2020. Primary outcomes: (1) Need for respiratory support (Mechanical ventilation, CPAP, high flow) or oxygen (2) Hypoglycemia. Secondary outcomes included respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), transient tachypnoea of newborn (TTN), need for neonatal resuscitation at birth [only in the delivery room immediately after birth (not in neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)], admission to NICU, mortality and developmental follow up. Level of evidence (LOE) was summarised by GRADE guidelines. Main results Seven RCTs (N = 4144) with low to high risk of bias were included. Only one RCT was from high income countries, Meta-analysis (random-effects model) showed (1) reduced need for respiratory support [5 RCTs (N = 3844); RR = 0.68 (0.47–0.98), p = 0.04; I2 = 55%; LOE: Moderate] and (2) higher risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia [4 RCTs (N = 3604); RR = 1.61(1.38–1.87), p<0.00001; I2 = 0%; LOE: High] after ANC exposure. Neonates exposed to ANC had reduced need for resuscitation at birth. The incidence of RDS, TTN and surfactant therapy did not differ significantly. None of the included studies reported long-term developmental follow up. Conclusions Moderate quality evidence indicates that ANC exposure reduced need for respiratory support, and increased the risk of hypoglycaemia in late preterm neonates. Large definitive trials with adequate follow up for neurodevelopmental outcomes are required to assess benefits and risks of ANC in this population.

scholarly journals Treatment of Pectoralis Major Tendon Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Operative and Nonoperative Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 232596711990081
Author(s):  
Blake M. Bodendorfer ◽  
Brian P. McCormick ◽  
David X. Wang ◽  
Austin M. Looney ◽  
Christine M. Conroy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Operative Treatment ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Nonoperative Treatment ◽  
Pectoralis Major ◽  
Isokinetic Strength ◽  
Tendon Tears

Background: The incidence of pectoralis major tendon tears is increasing, and repair is generally considered; however, a paucity of comparative data are available to demonstrate the superiority of operative treatment. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment of pectoralis major tendon tears. We hypothesized that repair would result in superior outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment. Methods: In accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was completed by use of MEDLINE, SPORTDiscus, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases. We included English-language studies that had a minimum of 6 months of average follow-up and 5 cases per study. The MINORS (Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies) was used to assess the quality of the existing literature. Meta-analysis of pooled mechanisms of injury and outcomes was completed. Pooled effect sizes were calculated from random-effects models. Continuous variables were assessed by use of mixed-model analysis, with the individual study designated as a random effect and the desired treatment for comparison as a fixed effect. Bivariate frequency data were transformed via the Freeman-Tukey log-linear transformation for variance stabilization and then assessed through use of a mixed model with a study level random effect and subsequently back-transformed. Significance was set at P < .05. Results: A total of 23 articles with 664 injuries met the inclusion criteria for comparison. All patients were male, with an average age of 31.48 years; 63.2% of injuries occurred during weight training, and the average follow-up was 37.02 months. Included studies had moderately high methodological quality. Operative treatment was significantly superior to nonoperative treatment, with relative improvements of functional outcome by 23.33% (0.70 improvement by Bak criteria which is scored 1-4; P = .027), full isometric strength 77.07% ( P < .001), isokinetic strength 28.86% ( P < .001) compared with the uninjured arm, cosmesis satisfaction 13.79% ( P = .037), and resting deformity 98.85% ( P < .001). The overall complication rate for operative treatment was 14.21%, including a 3.08% rate of rerupture. Conclusion: Pectoralis major tendon repair resulted in significantly superior outcomes compared with nonoperative treatment, with an associated 14.21% complication rate. Statistically significant improvements were noted in functional outcome, isokinetic strength, isometric strength, cosmesis, and resting deformity.

Meniscus Repair in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review of Treatment Approaches, Meniscal Healing, and Outcomes

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (06) ◽  
pp. 490-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márcio Balbinotti Ferrari ◽  
Colin P. Murphy ◽  
João Luiz Ellera Gomes
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Meniscal Repair ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
Meniscal Healing ◽  
Anterior Cruciate

AbstractAlthough the consequences of traumatic meniscus tears and the importance of meniscal repair are well-established in adults, the same cannot be said for the young population. Better evidence regarding the outcomes following traumatic meniscal tears in children would improve our understanding of this increasing pathology and help define important factors in deciding the best treatment option. A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines using the Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE Ovid, and MEDLINE PubMed databases. Inclusion criteria were as follows: studies reporting the outcomes of meniscal repair in patients 18 years old or younger, with a minimum mean follow-up of 12 months, Portuguese, Spanish, or English languages, and human studies including 10 or more patients. Our search identified 2,534 individual titles. After application of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 8 studies were included, evaluating 287 patients with repaired meniscal tears. All eight studies were classified as level of evidence IV. The mean methodological index for nonrandomized studies score was 8.6 ± 1.4. Meniscal repair included all meniscal zones and tear patterns. Anterior cruciate ligament tear was the most common associated injury. The all-inside and inside-out techniques were predominantly reported. The majority of the patients reported good to excellent outcomes and had clinical signals of meniscal healing; meniscectomies following meniscal repair were performed in just 44 cases. In conclusion, meniscal tears in pediatrics are not uncommon. Repairs of this injury were associated with good to excellent outcomes in most patients, regardless of the injury pattern, zone, or technique. Reported complications were minimal; however, higher quality studies are needed to confirm the findings of this systematic review. This is a systematic review study with Level IV.

scholarly journals Acute subdural haematoma in the elderly: to operate or not to operate? A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes following surgery

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e050786
Author(s):  
Susruta Manivannan ◽  
Robert Spencer ◽  
Omar Marei ◽  
Isaac Mayo ◽  
Omar Elalfy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Subdural Haematoma ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
Acute Subdural Haematoma ◽  
Level Of Evidence

ObjectivesAcute subdural haematoma (ASDH) is a devastating pathology commonly found on CT brain scans of patients with traumatic brain injury. The role of surgical intervention in the elderly has been increasingly questioned due to its associated morbidity and mortality. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature to quantify the mortality and functional outcomes associated with surgical management of ASDH in the elderly was performed.Design/settingA multidatabase literature search between January 1990 and May 2020, and meta-analysis of proportions was performed to quantify mortality and unfavourable outcome (Glasgow Outcome scale 1–3; death/ severe disability) rates.ParticipantsStudies reporting patients aged 60 years or older.InterventionsCraniotomy, decompressive craniectomy, conservative management.Outcome measuresMortality and functional outcomes (discharge, long-term follow-up (LTFU)).Results2572 articles were screened, yielding 21 studies for final inclusion and 15 for meta-analysis. Pooled estimates of mortality were 39.83% (95% CI 32.73% to 47.14%; 10 studies, 308/739 patients, I2=73%) at discharge and 49.30% (95% CI 42.01% to 56.61%; 10 studies, 277/555 patients, I2=63%) at LTFU. Mean duration of follow-up was 7.1 months (range 2–12 months). Pooled estimate of percentage of poor outcomes was 81.18% (95% CI 75.61% to 86.21%; 6 studies, 363/451 patients, I2=45%) at discharge, and 79.25% (95% CI 72.42% to 85.37%; 8 studies, 402/511 patients, I2=66%) at LTFU. Mean duration of follow-up was 6.4 months (range 2–12 months). Potential risk factors for poor outcome included age, baseline functional status, preoperative neurological status and imaging parameters.ConclusionsOutcomes following surgical evacuation of ASDH in patients aged 60 years and above are poor. This constitutes the best level of evidence in the current literature that surgical intervention for ASDH in the elderly carries significant risks, which must be weighed against benefits.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020189508.

Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Complication Rates With Best- and Worst-Case Analyses for Rerupture Rates

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652199828
Author(s):  
Dexter Seow ◽  
Youichi Yasui ◽  
James D.F. Calder ◽  
John G. Kennedy ◽  
Christopher J. Pearce
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Nonsurgical Treatment ◽  
Case Scenario ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Worst Case

Background: An acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) is a common injury. The controversy that has surrounded the optimal treatment options for AATRs warrants an updated meta-analysis that is comprehensive, accounts for loss to follow-up, and utilizes the now greater number of available studies for data pooling. Purpose: To meta-analyze the rates of all complications after the treatment of AATRs with a “best-case scenario” and “worst-case scenario” analysis for rerupture rates that assumes that all patients lost to follow-up did not or did experience a rerupture, respectively. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Two authors performed a systematic review of the PubMed and Embase databases according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines on February 17, 2020. The included studies were assessed in terms of the level of evidence, quality of evidence, and quality of the literature. A meta-analysis by fixed-effects models was performed if heterogeneity was low ( I2 < 25%) and by random-effects models if heterogeneity was moderate to high ( I2≥ 25%). Results: Surgical treatment was significantly favored over nonsurgical treatment for reruptures. Nonsurgical treatment was significantly favored over surgical treatment for complications other than reruptures, notably infections. Minimally invasive surgery was significantly favored over open repair for complications other than reruptures (no difference for reruptures), in particular for minor complications. Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrated that surgical treatment was superior to nonsurgical treatment in terms of reruptures. However, the number needed to treat analysis produced nonmeaningful values for all treatment options, except for surgical versus nonsurgical treatment and minimally invasive surgery versus open repair. No single treatment option was revealed to be profoundly favorable with respect to every complication. The results of this meta-analysis can guide clinicians and patients in their treatment decisions that should be made jointly and on a case-by-case basis.

Risk Factors for Ramp Lesions of the Medial Meniscus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652098681
Author(s):  
Kyle N. Kunze ◽  
Joshua Wright-Chisem ◽  
Evan M. Polce ◽  
Nicholas N. DePhillipo ◽  
Robert F. LaPrade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cruciate Ligament ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Anterior Tibial Translation ◽  
Meniscal Tears ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Male Sex ◽  
Tibial Translation

Background: Failure to appropriately identify and repair medial meniscal ramp lesions at the time of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) may result in increased anterior tibial translation and internal rotation, increasing the risk for graft failure. Knowledge of the risk factors leading to the development of ramp lesions may enhance clinicians’ vigilance in specific ACL-deficient populations and subsequently repair of these lesions at the time of ACLR. Purpose: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of factors tested for associations with ramp lesions and to determine which were significantly associated with the presence of ramp lesions. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: PubMed, OVID/Medline, and Cochrane databases were queried in April 2020. Data pertaining to study characteristics and reported risk factors for ramp lesions were recorded. DerSimonian-Laird binary random-effects models were constructed to quantitatively evaluate the association between risk factors and ramp lesions by generating effect estimates in the form of odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs. Qualitative analysis was performed to describe risk factors that were variably reported. Results: The review included 12 studies with 8410 patients. The overall pooled prevalence of ramp lesions was 21.9% (range, 9.0%-41.7%). A total of 45 risk factors were identified, of which 8 were explored quantitatively. There was strong evidence to support that posteromedial tibial edema on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.27-3.56; P = .004), age <30 years (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.23-3.22; P = .002), and complete ACL tears (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.41-6.20; P = .004) were risk factors for ramp lesions. There was moderate evidence to support that male sex (OR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.36-1.83; P < .001) and concomitant lateral meniscal tears (OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.11-2.13; P = .009) were risk factors for ramp lesions. Chronic ACL injury (≥24 months) demonstrated minimal evidence as a risk factor (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.14-1.74; P = .001). No significant associations were determined between contact injury or revision ACLR and the presence of ramp lesions. Conclusion: Significant associations between male sex, age <30 years, posteromedial tibial edema on MRI, concomitant lateral meniscal tears, complete ACL tears, injury chronicity, and the presence of ramp lesions were found. Contact injury and revision ACLR were not significantly associated with the presence of ramp lesions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document