scholarly journals Healthcare resource utilisation and costs associated with a heart failure diagnosis: a retrospective, population-based cohort study in Sweden

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. e053806
Author(s):  
Kurt Boman ◽  
Krister Lindmark ◽  
Jan Stålhammar ◽  
Mona Olofsson ◽  
Madlaina Costa-Scharplatz ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo examine healthcare resource use (HRU) and costs among heart failure (HF) patients using population data from Sweden.DesignRetrospective, non-interventional cohort study.SettingTwo cohorts were identified from linked national health registers (cohort 1, 2005–2014) and electronic medical records (cohort 2, 2010–2012; primary/secondary care patients from Uppsala and Västerbotten).ParticipantsPatients (aged ≥18 years) with primary or secondary diagnoses of HF (≥2 International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th revision classification) during the identification period of January 2005 to March 2015 were included.Outcome measuresHRU across the HF phenotypes was assessed with logistic regression. Costs were estimated based on diagnosis-related group codes and general price lists.ResultsTotal annual costs of secondary care of prevalent HF increased from SEK 6.23 (€0.60) to 8.86 (€0.85) billion between 2005 and 2014. Of 4648 incident patients, HF phenotype was known for 1715: reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF): 64.5%, preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF): 35.5%. Within 1 year of HF diagnosis, the proportion of patients hospitalised was only marginally higher for HFrEF versus HFpEF (all-cause (95% CI): 64.7% (60.8 to 68.4) vs 63.7% (60.8 to 66.5), HR 0.91, p=0.14; cardiovascular disease related (95% CI): 61.1% (57.1 to 64.8) vs 60.9% (58.0 to 63.7), HR 0.93, p=0.28). Frequency of hospitalisations and outpatient visits per patient declined after the first year. All-cause secondary care costs in the first year were SEK 122 758 (€12 890)/patient/year, with HF-specific care accounting for 69% of the costs. Overall, 10% of the most expensive population (younger; predominantly male; more likely to have comorbidities) incurred ~40% of total secondary care costs.ConclusionsHF-associated costs and HRU are high, especially during the first year of diagnosis. This is driven by high hospitalisations rates. Understanding the profile of resource-intensive patients being at younger age, male sex and high Charlson comorbidity index scores at the time of the HF diagnosis is most likely a sign of more severe disease.

Acta Naturae ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-51
Author(s):  
A. G. Ovchinnikov ◽  
T. I. Arefieva ◽  
A. V. Potekhina ◽  
A. Yu. Filatova ◽  
F. T. Ageev ◽  
...  

Heart failure withpreserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a severe disease with an often unfavorable outcome. The prevalence of HFpEF continues to increase, while effective treatment options remain elusive. All the medical strategies used toimprove the outcome in a heart failure with reduced ejection fraction proved ineffective in HFpEF, which was probably due to the different mechanisms ofdevelopment of these two types of heart failure and the diversity of the HFpEF phenotypes. According to the current paradigm of HFpEF development, a chronic mild pro-inflammatory statecauses a coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation, with further myocardial fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction progression. This inflammatory paradigm of HFpEF has been confirmed with someevidence, and suppressing the inflammation may become a novel strategy for treating and managing HFpEF. This review summarizes current concepts about a microvascular inflammation in hypertrophied myocardium and provides a translational perspective of the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory approaches in HFpEF.


2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1390-1398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren B. Cooper ◽  
Lina Benson ◽  
Robert J. Mentz ◽  
Gianluigi Savarese ◽  
Adam D. DeVore ◽  
...  

Heart ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 104 (6) ◽  
pp. 525-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki Hong Choi ◽  
Ga Yeon Lee ◽  
Jin-Oh Choi ◽  
Eun-Seok Jeon ◽  
Hae-Young Lee ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThere are conflicting results among previous studies regarding the prognosis of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) compared with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with de novo acute heart failure (AHF) or acute decompensated HF (ADHF) according to HFpEF (EF≥50%), or HFrEF (EF<40%) and to define the prognosis of patients with HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF, 40≤EF<50%).MethodsBetween March 2011 and February 2014, 5625 consecutive patients with AHF were recruited from 10 university hospitals. A total of 5414 (96.2%) patients with EF data were enrolled, which consisted of 2867 (53.0%) patients with de novo and 2547 (47.0%) with ADHF. Each of the enrolled group was stratified by EF.ResultsIn de novo, all-cause death rates were not significantly different between HFpEF and HFrEF (HFpEF vs HFrEF, 206/744 (27.7%) vs 438/1631 (26.9%), HRadj 1.15, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.38, p=0.14). However, among patients with ADHF, HFrEF had a significantly higher mortality rate compared with HFpEF (HFpEF vs HFrEF, 245/613 (40.0%) vs 694/1551 (44.7%), HRadj 1.25, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.47, p=0.007). Also, in ADHF, HFmrEF was associated with a significantly lower mortality rate within 1 year compared with HFrEF (HFmrEF vs HFrEF, 88/383 (23.0%) vs 430/1551 (27.7%), HRadj 1.31, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.65, p=0.03), but a significantly higher mortality rate after 1 year compared with HFpEF (HFmrEF vs HFpEF, 83/295 (28.1%) vs 101/469 (21.5%), HRadj 0.70, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.96, p=0.02).ConclusionsHFpEF may indicate a better prognosis compared with HFrEF in ADHF, but not in de novo AHF. For patients with ADHF, the prognosis associated with HFmrEF was similar to that of HFpEF within the first year following hospitalisation and similar to HFrEF 1  year after hospitalisation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (5) ◽  
pp. e36 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Yamamoto ◽  
Pamela M. Katz ◽  
James A.F. Bras ◽  
Leigh Anne Shafer ◽  
Alexander A. Leung ◽  
...  

Acta Naturae ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-51
Author(s):  
A. G. Ovchinnikov ◽  
T. I. Arefieva ◽  
A. V. Potekhina ◽  
A. Yu. Filatova ◽  
F. T. Ageev ◽  
...  

Heart failure withpreserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a severe disease with an often unfavorable outcome. The prevalence of HFpEF continues to increase, while effective treatment options remain elusive. All the medical strategies used toimprove the outcome in a heart failure with reduced ejection fraction proved ineffective in HFpEF, which was probably due to the different mechanisms ofdevelopment of these two types of heart failure and the diversity of the HFpEF phenotypes. According to the current paradigm of HFpEF development, a chronic mild pro-inflammatory statecauses a coronary microvascular endothelial inflammation, with further myocardial fibrosis and diastolic dysfunction progression. This inflammatory paradigm of HFpEF has been confirmed with someevidence, and suppressing the inflammation may become a novel strategy for treating and managing HFpEF. This review summarizes current concepts about a microvascular inflammation in hypertrophied myocardium and provides a translational perspective of the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory approaches in HFpEF.


Thrita ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alireza Amirzadegan ◽  
Kaveh Hosseini ◽  
Masih Tajdini ◽  
Abdolvahab Baradaran ◽  
Ali Hosseinsabet

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document