Off-label use of inhaled bronchodilators in hospitalised patients in Spain: a multicentre observational study

2020 ◽  
pp. ejhpharm-2019-002171
Author(s):  
Elena Villamañán ◽  
Carmen Sobrino ◽  
Cristina Bilbao ◽  
Jaime Fernández ◽  
Alicia Herrero ◽  
...  
2009 ◽  
Vol 101 (06) ◽  
pp. 1091-1094 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Labreche ◽  
Matthew Niles ◽  
John Fanikos ◽  
Samuel Goldhaber ◽  
Steven Baroletti

SummaryFondaparinux is an antithrombotic agent with unique properties that may offer benefit to patients beyond the current approved indications. To explore the off-label use versus approved use of fondaparinux, we initiated a single-center registry of fondaparinux use. During the 25-month study period, 219 patients were prescribed fondaparinux: 157 (71.7%) for prophylaxis and 62 (28.3%) patients for the treatment of thrombosis. When fondaparinux was used for prophylaxis in our registry, 94% of patients had documentation of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Fondaparinux warrants further evaluation in patients with HIT or suspected HIT. In the meantime, its off-label use may exceed its use for FDA-approved indications.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohd Masnoon Saiyed ◽  
Tarachand Lalwani ◽  
Devang Rana

Background. In the absence of standard pediatric prescribing information, clinicians often use medicines in an off-label way. Many studies have been published across the globe reporting different rates of off-label use. There is currently no study based on Indian drug formulary.Methods. The prospective observational study included pediatric patients in ages between 0 and 12 years admitted in a tertiary care hospital. Off-label use was assessed using the National Formulary of India (NFI). Predictors of off-label use were determined by logistic regression.Results. Of the 1645 medications prescribed, 1152 (70%) were off-label based on 14 possible off-label categories. Off-label medicines were mainly due to dose difference and use in restricted age limits as indicated in NFI. Respiratory medicines (82%), anti-infectives (73%), and nervous system medicines (53%) had higher off-label use. Important predictors of off-label prescribing were pediatric patients in age of 0 to 2 years (OR 1.68, 95% CI;P<0.001) and hospital stay of six to 10 days (OR 1.91, 95% CI;P<0.001).Conclusion. Off-label prescribing is common among pediatric patients. There is need to generate more quality data on the safety and efficacy of off-label medicines to rationalize pediatric pharmacotherapy.


2020 ◽  
pp. 001857872094222
Author(s):  
Aeshah AlAzmi ◽  
Zahra Alasmari ◽  
Consuela Yousef ◽  
Ahmed Alenazi ◽  
Mohammed AlOtaibi ◽  
...  

Objective: Prescribing a drug for a child is not an easy task and requires using the best available evidence as a guide, especially when a drug is used off-label. The practice of prescribing a drug for off-label use is fairly widespread worldwide. The FDA does not regulate prescribing patterns or practices of individual practitioners and, therefore, allows off-label use. The main objective of this study is to evaluate off-label prescribing among the pediatric population in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). Method: This is a retrospective, simple random selection observational study of children (≤15 years) who visited pediatric clinics and had at least 1 drug prescribed over a 12-month period (January to December 2018). Results: A total of 865 drugs (mean 1 and SD 0.24) were prescribed to 326 children. Off-label was identified in 39.4% of the drugs with a frequency of 512 (as 1 drug may belong to more than 1 off-label category). The most common reason for off-label prescribing was related to doses that were “higher or lower than the recommended use” (48.6%), and the most frequently identified drug class prescribed for off-label use was anti-infective drugs for systemic use (39.9%). The percentage of off-label drug use was found to be higher in girls and in the age group of 1 month to 2 years ( P = .001) for both variables. In addition, a significant association was found between off label drug use and the total number of drugs prescribed, P < .001. Conclusion: The findings of this study showed a high incidence of off-label prescribing mainly related to dosing and indication. The results of this observational study support the need to establish a unified national pediatric dosing formulary guide to ensure safe drug use in pediatrics.


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 22-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laetitia Albertini ◽  
Mickael Soletchnik ◽  
Anais Razurel ◽  
Johana Cohen ◽  
Frédéric Bidegain ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4103-4103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Christophe Ianotto ◽  
Françoise Boyer-Perrard ◽  
Jean-Loup Demory ◽  
Jerome Rey ◽  
Lydia Roy ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4103 Background: The moderate effect of most palliative treatments in primary and secondary myelofibrosis (MF), in addition to the limited possibilities of allogeneic stem cell transplantation, has incited physicians to look for alternative treatments. Since 1987, several studies have suggested that interferon may be beneficial in the treatment of MF. However, important hematological and general limiting toxicities frequently occur in MF patients (pts), leading to rapid treatment discontinuation in more than 50% of pts. Better results were recently reported in a small series of 13 MF pts treated with Peg-Interferon-α2a (Ianotto et al., Br J Haematol, 2009). The present study aimed to collect data of pts with primary and secondary MF treated with Peg-Interferon-α2a in French centers members of the FIM (French Intergroup of Myeloproliferative disorders) and GEM (Groupe d'Etudes des Myelofibroses) groups, to better assess tolerance and efficacy of this form of interferon in MF. Patients and Methods: Between Dec 2006 and Feb 2010, 39 MF pts treated with Peg-Interferon-α2a were registered from 10 different French centers affiliated to FIM and GEM groups. Age of pts ranged from 41 to 81 years, 21 were men and 18 women. Sixteen pts had primary MF, 13 had post-PV and 10 post-ET MF, respectively. Twenty-five patients (64%) were JAK2V617F positive. Twenty-eight patients had previously received other cytoreductive treatment. Clinical and biological parameters were collected at diagnosis and every 3 months. Responses were assessed according to the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) criteria. Analyses were performed in July 2010, after a median follow-up of 18 months (range: 3 – 42 months). Results: Among the 28 patients with splenomegaly, we observed 10 responses (36%) including 7 complete and 3 partial responses. Fourteen patients had constitutional symptoms which resolved in 8 of them (57%). Seven of 15 patients (47%) with an initial hemoglobin level below 100 g/L achieved complete response (CR). Three of 8 (37%) transfused pts became transfusion-independent. Twenty-two patients had abnormal WBC count which normalized in 13 of them (59%). Platelet count was abnormal in 27 patients, and 14 (52%) achieved CR with Peg-Interferon-α2a treatment. The evolution of the JAK2V617F allele burden is currently under investigation and will be presented at the meeting. The initial median dose of Peg-Interferon-α2a effectively received was 103 μ g/wk, further decreased to a median of 85 μ g/wk after one year. At time of analysis, treatment was stopped in 11/39 (28%) pts due to side effects, inefficacy or hematologic evolution. Conclusion: In this observational study, we found higher efficacy and better tolerance of interferon than previously reported in patients with primary or secondary MF. Such results were possibly due to a better tolerance of the pegylated form used, and to the low-dose schedule applied by the physicians. Our results suggest at least that Peg-Interferon-α2a should be considered as a possible therapeutic option in selected MF patients. Future clinical trials in MF will hopefully involve combinations of low dose Peg-Interferon-α2a with JAK2-inhibitors or immunomodulatory agents in order to improve tolerability and increase efficacy. Disclosures: Off Label Use: This is an observational study of the off-label use of peg-Interferon-alfa2a in myelofibrosis.


2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (S1) ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
B. Novak Sarotar ◽  
N. Segrec ◽  
P. Pregelj

Objectives:Antipsychotic medications are registered for the use in psychosis, mania and agitation. the aim of our study was to assess the off-label use of atypical antipsychotics (AA) at the Crisis Intervention Unit (CIU).Methods:Hospital records of 280 patients that were treated at the CIU in year 2007 were included to the observational study. Patients were screened for diagnosis (ICD-10), gender, age, suicidal behaviour and for prescribed psychotropic medications. Off-label use of atypical antipsychotics for diagnoses other than psychosis was evaluated.Results:Most hospitalised patients suffered for stress related disorders: adjustment disorder F43.2 (34%), acute stress disorder F 43.0 (2%), mixed anxiety-depression disorder F41.2 (19%), depression (24%), anxiety disorders (4%) and other disorders (17%). Patients were treated with antidepressants (92%), benzodiazepines (55%), hypnotics (44%) and mood stabilising drugs (9%) during their stay at the CIU. at discharge from hospital benzodiazepines (31%) and hypnotics (12%) were prescribed in lower percentages. 51% of patients received AA at least once during their stay at the CIU, 49% received AA for off-label use and it was prescribed for most of the hospital stay (for 87% of the time). Average daily CPU at admission to the hospital was 107.52 and at the discharge it was 100.33. No significant differences were noted among the different diagnoses for off-label AA use.Conclusions:Atypical antipsychotics are widely used for indications other than psychosis, even though the long-term effects of their use are not yet known and safety issues remain to be examined further.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document