scholarly journals Progress towards using community context with clinical data in primary care

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e000028 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Angier ◽  
Elizabeth A Jacobs ◽  
Nathalie Huguet ◽  
Sonja Likumahuwa-Ackman ◽  
Stephanie Robert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Equity ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Community Context ◽  
Community Level ◽  
Patient Health ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Combined Data ◽  
Improve Health

Community-level factors have significant impacts on health. There is renewed enthusiasm for integrating these data with electronic health record (EHR) data for use in primary care to improve health equity in the USA. Thus, it is valuable to reflect on what has been published to date. Specifically, we comment on: (1) recommendations about combining community-level factors in EHRs for use in primary care; (2) examples of how these data have been combined and used; and (3) the impact of using combined data on healthcare, patient health and health equity. We found publications discussing the potential of combined data to inform clinical care, target interventions, track population health and spark community partnerships with the goal of reducing health disparities and improving health equity. Although there is great enthusiasm and potential for using these data to inform primary care, there is little evidence of improved healthcare, patient health or health equity.

Digital disparities: designing telemedicine systems with a health equity aim

2021 ◽  
pp. emermed-2020-210896
Author(s):  
Margaret Samuels-Kalow ◽  
Todd Jaffe ◽  
Kori Zachrison
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Disparities ◽  
Health Equity ◽  
Digital Literacy ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Acute Care Setting ◽  
Clinical Environments ◽  
Improve Health

The use of telemedicine has grown immensely during the COVID-19 pandemic. Telemedicine provides a means to deliver clinical care while limiting patient and provider exposure to the COVID-19. As such, telemedicine is finding applications in a variety of clinical environments including primary care and the acute care setting and the array of patient populations who use telemedicine continues to grow. Yet as telehealth becomes ubiquitous, it is critical to consider its potential to exacerbate disparities in care. Challenges accessing technology and digital literacy, for example, disproportionately impact older patients and those living in poverty. When implemented with the consideration of health disparities, telemedicine provides an opportunity to address these inequities. This manuscript explores potential mechanisms by which telemedicine may play a role in exacerbating or ameliorating disparities in care. We further describe a framework and suggested strategies with which to implement telemedicine systems to improve health equity.

scholarly journals Detection of mental disorders with the Patient Health Questionnaire in primary care settings in Nigeria

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olawale O. Ogunsemi ◽  
Francis A. Oluwole ◽  
Festus Abasiubong ◽  
Adebayo R. Erinfolami ◽  
Olufemi E. Amoran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Primary Health Care ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Patient Health Questionnaire ◽  
Health Questionnaire ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
Primary Health ◽  
Patient Health ◽  
The Impact

Mental disorders lead to difficulties in social, occupational and marital relations. Failure to detect mental disorder denies patients potentially effective treatment. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and nature of mental disorders at the primary care settings and the recognition of these disorders by the attending physicians. Over a period of eight weeks, consecutive and consenting patients who attended three randomly selected primary health care facilities in Sagamu Local Government Area of Ogun state were recruited and administered a questionnaire that included a socio-demographic section and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ). A total of 412 subjects took part in the study. Subject age ranged from 18-90 years with a mean age of 52.50±21.08 years. One hundred and seventy-six (42.7%) of the subjects were males. A total of 120 (29.1%) of the subjects had depressive disorder, 100 (24.3%) had anxiety disorder, 196 (47.6%) somatoform disorder and 104 (25.2%) met the criteria for an alcohol related problem. The PHC physicians were only able to diagnose disorders relating to mental health in 52 (12.6%) of the subjects. Health and work situations accounted for more than three-quarters of the causes of stress experienced by the subjects. We conclude that there is a high prevalence of mental disorders among patients seen in primary care settings and that a significant proportion of them are not recognized by the primary care physicians. Stress relating to health, work and financial problems is common among primary health care attendees. Physicians in primary health care should be alert to the possibility and the impact of undetected psychiatric morbidity.

Primary care and all-cause mortality in urban China: a mixed-level analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quan Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mortality Risk ◽  
Health Care Access ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Urban China ◽  
Community Level ◽  
Promoting Effect ◽  
Primary Care Supply ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background There is still a lack of evidence focusing on primary care supply in developing countries where the educational achievement of primary care practitioners is relatively low. Objectives By using a nationally representative longitudinal and prospective cohort study, this study examined whether primary care supply, measured by the availability and the number of community health centres (CHCs), was associated with 4-year mortality risk among community-dwelling participants aged 45 and above in urban China. Methods Using the 2011 and 2015 waves of the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Survey (CHARLS), we conducted a longitudinal mixed-level logistic analysis to study the impact of the availability and the number of CHC on 4-year follow-up mortality risk, after adjusting community- and individual-level covariates. Results Individuals living in communities with CHC were 31% less likely to die during the 4-year follow-up (P < 0.05) conditional on community-level characteristics, including the basic facilities availability, population size and physical area, and individuals’ socio-demographic and health characteristics and health behaviours. Also, an increased number of community-level CHC was shown to decrease residents’ 4-year mortality risk significantly (odds ratio = 0.82, P < 0.05). Furthermore, the association was more pronounced among adults aged 65 and above. Conclusion This study provides additional evidence of the health-promoting effect of primary care supply among urban residents in China. Improving primary care coverage in China should be necessary to improve health care access, thus promoting population health.

scholarly journals The Impact of Primary Care: A Focused Review

Scientifica ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leiyu Shi
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Outcomes ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
The United States ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Care Practice ◽  
Quality Healthcare ◽  
The Usa ◽  
The Impact

Primary care serves as the cornerstone in a strong healthcare system. However, it has long been overlooked in the United States (USA), and an imbalance between specialty and primary care exists. The objective of this focused review paper is to identify research evidence on the value of primary care both in the USA and internationally, focusing on the importance of effective primary care services in delivering quality healthcare, improving health outcomes, and reducing disparities. Literature searches were performed in PubMed as well as “snowballing” based on the bibliographies of the retrieved articles. The areas reviewed included primary care definitions, primary care measurement, primary care practice, primary care and health, primary care and quality, primary care and cost, primary care and equity, primary care and health centers, and primary care and healthcare reform. In both developed and developing countries, primary care has been demonstrated to be associated with enhanced access to healthcare services, better health outcomes, and a decrease in hospitalization and use of emergency department visits. Primary care can also help counteract the negative impact of poor economic conditions on health.

scholarly journals Impact of superimposed nephrological care to guidelines-directed management by primary care physicians of patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Saudan ◽  
Belen Ponte ◽  
Nicola Marangon ◽  
Chantal Martinez ◽  
Lena Berchtold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Dialysis Initiation ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Optimal clinical care of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires collaboration between primary care physicians (PCP) and nephrologists. We undertook a randomised trial to determine the impact of superimposed nephrologist care compared to guidelines-directed management by PCPs in CKD patients after hospital discharge. Methods: Stage 3b-4 CKD patients were enrolled during a hospitalization and randomised in two arms: Co-management by PCPs and nephrologists (interventional arm) versus management by PCPs with written instructions and consultations by nephrologists on demand (standard care). Our primary outcome was death or rehospitalisation within the 2 years post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes were: urgent renal replacement therapy (RRT), decline of renal function and decrease of quality of life at 2 years. Results: From November 2009 to the end of June 2013, we randomised 242 patients. Mean follow-up was 51 + 20 months. Survival without rehospitalisation, GFR decline and elective dialysis initiation did not differ between the two arms. Quality of life was also similar in both groups . Compared to randomised patients, those who either declined to participate in the study or were previously known by nephrologists had a worse survival. Conclusion: These results do not demonstrate a benefit of a regular renal care compared to guided PCPs care in terms of survival or dialysis initiation in CKD patients. Increased awareness of renal disease management among PCPs may be as effective as a co-management by PCPs and nephrologists in order to improve the prognosis of moderate-to-severe CKD.

scholarly journals Impact of superimposed nephrological care to guidelines-directed management by primary care physicians of patients with stable chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Saudan ◽  
Belen Ponte ◽  
Nicola Marangon ◽  
Chantal Martinez ◽  
Lena Berchtold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Kidney Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Randomised Trial ◽  
Dialysis Initiation ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Optimal clinical care of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requires collaboration between primary care physicians (PCP) and nephrologists. We undertook a randomised trial to determine the impact of superimposed nephrologist care compared to guidelines-directed management by PCPs in CKD patients after hospital discharge. Methods: Stage 3b-4 CKD patients were enrolled during a hospitalization and randomised in two arms: Co-management by PCPs and nephrologists (interventional arm) versus management by PCPs with written instructions and consultations by nephrologists on demand (standard care). Our primary outcome was death or rehospitalisation within the 2 years post-randomisation. Secondary outcomes were: urgent renal replacement therapy (RRT), decline of renal function and decrease of quality of life at 2 years. Results: From November 2009 to the end of June 2013, we randomised 242 patients. Mean follow-up was 51 + 20 months. Survival without rehospitalisation, GFR decline and elective dialysis initiation did not differ between the two arms. Quality of life was also similar in both groups . Compared to randomised patients, those who either declined to participate in the study or were previously known by nephrologists had a worse survival. Conclusion: These results do not demonstrate a benefit of a regular renal care compared to guided PCPs care in terms of survival or dialysis initiation in CKD patients. Increased awareness of renal disease management among PCPs may be as effective as a co-management by PCPs and nephrologists in order to improve the prognosis of moderate-to-severe CKD.

scholarly journals “In my age, we didn’t have the computers”: Using a complexity lens to understand uptake of diabetes eHealth innovations into primary care—A qualitative study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (7) ◽  
pp. e0254157
Author(s):  
Catherine H. Yu ◽  
Maggie McCann ◽  
Joanna Sale
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Shared Decision Making ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Structured Interview ◽  
Qualitative Description ◽  
Central Component ◽  
Shared Decision ◽  
The Impact

Background Shared decision-making is a central component of person-centred care and can be facilitated with the use of patient decision aids (PtDA). Barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making and PtDA use have been identified, yet integration of PtDAs into clinical care is limited. We sought to understand why, using the concepts of complexity science. Methods We conducted 60-minute in-depth interviews with patients with diabetes, primary care physicians, nurses and dietitians who had participated in a randomized controlled trial examining the impact of MyDiabetesPlan (an online goal-setting PtDA). Relying on a qualitative description approach, we used a semi-structured interview guide to explore participants’ experiences with using MyDiabetesPlan and how it was integrated into the clinical encounter and clinical care. Audiotapes were transcribed verbatim, then coded independently by two analysts. Findings 17 interviews were conducted (5 physicians, 3 nurses, 2 dietitians, 7 patients). Two themes were developed: (1) MyDiabetesPlan appeared to empower patients by providing tailored patient-important information which engaged them in decision-making and self-care. Patients’ use of MyDiabetesPlan was however impacted by their competing medical conditions, other life priorities and socioeconomic context. (2) MyDiabetesPlan emphasized to clinicians a patient-centred approach that helped patients assume greater ownership for their care. Clinicians’ use of MyDiabetesPlan was impacted by pre-existing clinical tools/workplans, workflow, technical issues, clinic administrative logistics and support, and time. How clinicians adapted to these barriers influenced the degree to which MyDiabetesPlan was integrated into care. Conclusions A complexity lens (that considers relationships between multiple components of a complex system) may yield additional insights to optimize integration of PtDA into clinical care. A complexity lens recognizes that shared decision-making does not occur in the vacuum of a clinical dyad (patient and clinician), and will enable us to develop a family of interventions that address the whole process, rather than individual components. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02379078.

A QUALITATIVE INVESTIGATION OF THE IMPACT OF HOME-BASED PRIMARY CARE ON FAMILY CAREGIVERS

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
E. Wool ◽  
J.L. Shotwell ◽  
J. Slaboda ◽  
A. Kozikowski ◽  
K.L. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
New York ◽  
Family Caregivers ◽  
Emotional Support ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Home Based Primary Care ◽  
Home Based ◽  
The Impact

Background: Home-based primary care (HBPC) provides team-based clinical care for homebound patients who have difficulty accessing typical outpatient care. Interdisciplinary team members also provide social and emotional support and serve as a resource for family caregivers, who often experience significant emotional stress. Objectives: This qualitative study explores the impact of HBPC on family caregivers to identify aspects of the program that caregivers find most helpful and meaningful as well as areas for improvement. Design: Semi structured recorded interviews were conducted with family caregivers of frail, elderly homebound patients. Interviews included the following topics: overall program satisfaction and suggestions for improvement. Setting: A HBPC program serving patients in Queens, Nassau and Suffolk counties in New York. Participants: Nineteen family caregivers: 13 women, 6 men; 10 were adult children; 6 were spouses, and 3 were other family members of patients in a HBPC program. Measurements: Thematic coding of all recorded transcribed interviews was prepared by 3 qualitative coders. Interrater reliability was conducted to ensure reliability across coders before themes were disseminated and discussed until consensus was achieved with the larger group of investigators. Results: Three main themes were identified: the importance of staff emotional support; the burden of caring for homebound patients; and the need for a broader range of home-based services. Multiple family members noted that the program not only had saved their loved one’s life, but had also metaphorically saved their own. Conclusions: Family caregivers value the communication and accessibility of HBPC and report that the program has a positive impact on their stress and mental health. Results can inform key aspects that need to be retained or enhanced with the expansion in HBPC programs.

scholarly journals Health benefits and economic advantages associated with increased utilization of a smoking cessation program

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santanu K Datta ◽  
Paul A Dennis ◽  
James M Davis
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Cost Savings ◽  
Companion Paper ◽  
Smoking Cessation Program ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Practice Advisory ◽  
Patient Health ◽  
The Impact

Rationale, aim & objective: The goal of this study was to examine the health and economic impacts related to increased utilization of the Duke Smoking Cessation Program resulting from the addition of two relatively new referral methods – Best Practice Advisory and Population Outreach. Materials & methods: In a companion paper ‘Comparison of Referral Methods into a Smoking Cessation Program’, we report results from a retrospective, observational, comparative effectiveness study comparing the impact of three referral methods – Traditional Referral, Best Practice Advisory and Population Outreach on utilization of the Duke Smoking Cessation Program. In this paper we take the next step in this comparative assessment by developing a Markov model to estimate the improvement in health and economic outcomes when two referral methods – Best Practice Advisory and Population Outreach – are added to Traditional Referral. Data used in this analysis were collected from Duke Primary Care and Disadvantaged Care clinics over a 1-year period (1 October 2017–30 September 2018). Results: The addition of two new referral methods – Best Practice Advisory and Population Outreach – to Traditional Referral increased the utilization of the Duke Smoking Cessation Program in Primary Care clinics from 129 to 329 smokers and in Disadvantaged Care clinics from 206 to 401 smokers. The addition of these referral methods was estimated to result in 967 life-years gained, 408 discounted quality-adjusted life-years saved and total discounted lifetime direct healthcare cost savings of US$46,376,285. Conclusion: Health systems may achieve increased patient health and decreased healthcare costs by adding Best Practice Advisory and Population Outreach strategies to refer patients to smoking cessation services.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document