Risks of post-colonoscopic polypectomy bleeding and thromboembolism with warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants: a population-based analysis

BackgroundThere were limited data on the risk of post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) in patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). We aimed to evaluate the PPB and thromboembolic risks among DOAC and warfarin users in a population-based cohort.MethodsWe performed a territory-wide retrospective cohort study involving patients in Hong Kong from 2012 to 2020. Patients who received an oral anticoagulant and had undergone colonoscopy with polypectomy were identified. Propensity-score models with inverse probability of treatment weighting were developed for the warfarin-DOAC and between-DOAC comparisons. The primary outcome was clinically significant delayed PPB, defined as repeat colonoscopy requiring haemostasis within 30 days. The secondary outcomes were 30-day blood transfusion requirement and new thromboembolic event.ResultsApixaban was associated with lower PPB risk than warfarin (adjusted HR (aHR) 0.39, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.63, p<0.001). Dabigatran (aHR 2.23, 95% CI 1.04 to 4.77, adjusted p (ap)=0.035) and rivaroxaban (aHR 2.72, 95% CI 1.35 to 5.48, ap=0.002) were associated with higher PPB risk than apixaban. In subgroup analysis, apixaban was associated with lower PPB risk in patients aged ≥70 years and patients with right-sided colonic polyps.For thromboembolic events, apixaban was associated with lower risk than warfarin (aHR 0.22, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.45, p<0.001). Dabigatran (aHR 2.60, 95% CI 1.06 to 6.41, ap=0.033) and rivaroxaban (aHR 2.96, 95% CI 1.19 to 7.37, ap =0.013) were associated with higher thromboembolic risk than apixaban.ConclusionsApixaban was associated with a significantly lower risk of PPB and thromboembolism than warfarin, dabigatran and rivaroxaban, particularly in older patients with right-sided polyps.

Download Full-text

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Low-Dose Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

Frontiers in Pharmacology ◽

10.3389/fphar.2021.812018 ◽

2022 ◽

Vol 12 ◽

Author(s):

Sylvie Perreault ◽

Alice Dragomir ◽

Robert Côté ◽

Aurélie Lenglet ◽

Simon de Denus ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Comparative Effectiveness ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Low Dose ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Significant Risk ◽

Population Based ◽

Pharmacokinetic Data ◽

Effectiveness Endpoint

Aims: Observational studies of various dose levels of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) found that a high proportion of patients received a dose lower than the target dose tested in randomized controlled trials. There is a need to compare low-dose DOACs with warfarin or other DOACs on effectiveness and safety.Methods: Using administrative data from Quebec province, Canada, we built a cohort of new warfarin or DOAC users discharged from hospital between 2011 and 2017. We determined CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, and comorbidities for 3-year prior cohort entry. The primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (SE), and secondary outcomes included a safety composite of major bleeding (MB) events and effectiveness composite (stroke/SE, death) at 1-year follow-up. We contrasted each low-dose DOAC with warfarin or other DOACs as references using inverse probability of treatment weighting to estimate marginal Cox hazard ratios (HRs).Results: The cohort comprised 22,969 patients (mean age: 80–86). We did not find a significant risk reduction for the stroke/SE primary effectiveness endpoint for DOACs vs. warfarin; however, we observed a significantly lower risk for low-dose dabigatran vs. warfarin (HR [95%CI]: 0.59 [0.42–0.81]) for effectiveness composite, mainly due to a lower death rate. The differences in effectiveness and safety composites between low-dose rivaroxaban vs. warfarin were not significant. However, low-dose apixaban had a better safety composite (HR: 0.68 [0.53–0.88]) vs. warfarin. Comparisons of dabigatran vs. apixaban showed a lower risk of stroke/SE (HR: 0.53 [0.30–0.93]) and a 2-fold higher risk of MB. The MB risk was higher for rivaroxaban than for apixaban (HR: 1.58 [1.09–2.29]).Conclusions: The results of this population-based study suggest that low-dose dabigatran has a better effective composite than warfarin. Compared with apixaban, low-dose dabigatran had a better effectiveness composite but a worse safety profile. Low-dose apixaban had a better safety composite than warfarin and other low-dose DOACs. Given that the comparative effectiveness and safety seem to vary from one DOAC to another, pharmacokinetic data for specific populations are now warranted.

Download Full-text

458Real world persistence with direct oral anticoagulants in anticoagulation naive patients with atrial fibrillation

European Heart Journal ◽

10.1093/eurheartj/ehz747.0117 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

G Denas ◽

G Costa ◽

E Ferroni ◽

N Gennaro ◽

U Fedeli ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Myocardial Infarction ◽

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Anticoagulation Therapy ◽

Female Gender ◽

Population Based ◽

Real World Data

Abstract Introduction Anticoagulation therapy is central for the management of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Persistence with oral anticoagulation is essential to prevent thromboembolic complications. Purpose To assess persistence levels of DOACs and look for possible predictors of treatment discontinuity in NVAF patients. Methods We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study in the Veneto Region (north-eastern Italy, about 5 million inhabitants) using the regional health system databases. Naïve patients initiating direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in NVAF from July 2013 to September 2017 were included in the study. Patients were identified using Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) codes, excluding other indications for anticoagulation therapy using ICD-9CM codes. Treatment persistence was defined as the time from initiation to discontinuation of the therapy. Baseline characteristics and comorbidities associated to the persistence of therapy with DOACs were explored by means of Kaplan-Meier curves and assessed through Cox regression. Results Overall, 17920 patients initiated anticoagulation with DOACs in the study period. Most patients were older than 74 years old, while gender was almost equally represented. Comorbidities included hypertension (72%), diabetes mellitus (17%), congestive heart failure (9%), previous stroke/TIA (20%), and prior myocardial infarction (2%). After one year, the persistence to anticoagulation treatment was 82.7%, while the persistence to DOAC treatment was 72.9% with about 10% of the discontinuations being due to switch to VKAs. On multivariate analysis, factors negatively affecting persistence were female gender, younger age (<65 years), renal disease and history of bleeding. Conversely, persistence was better in patients with hypertension, previous cerebral ischemic events, and previous acute myocardial infarction. Persistence to DOAC therapy Conclusion This real-world data show that within 12 months, one out of four anticoagulation-naïve patients stop DOACs, while one out of five patients stop anticoagulation. Efforts should be made to correct modifiable predictors and intensify patient education.

Download Full-text

Abstract 17301: Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Compared to Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation After Cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Circulation ◽

10.1161/circ.142.suppl_3.17301 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽

Author(s):

Ali Hage ◽

Daniel Dolan ◽

Viviane G Nasr ◽

Luis Castelo-Branco ◽

Daniel Motta-Calderon ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Cardiac Surgery ◽

Hospital Readmission ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Secondary Outcome ◽

Systemic Embolization

Introduction: The evidence for use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the management of post-operative cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation (POAF) is limited and mostly founded on clinical trials that excluded this patient population. Hypothesis: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials and observational studies to evaluate the hypothesis that DOACs are safe compared to warfarin for the anticoagulation of patients with POAF. Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library for clinical trials and observational studies comparing DOAC with warfarin in patients ≥18 years old who had post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation. Primary outcomes included stroke, systemic embolization, bleeding, and mortality, with secondary outcome of hospital readmission. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: We found 3 clinical trials, 1 prospective and 12 retrospective cohort studies eligible for inclusion with a total of 10,538 patients (3,207 DOAC patients and 7,331 warfarin patients). The meta-analysis for the primary outcomes showed significantly lower risk of stroke with DOAC use (6 studies, 7143 patients, RR 0.64; 95% CI 0.50 to 0.81, I2: 0.0%) compared to warfarin, a trend towards lower risk of systemic embolization (4 studies, 7289 patients, RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.01, I2: 31.99%) and similar risks of bleeding (14 studies, 10182 patients, RR 0.91; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.10, I2: 26.6%) and mortality (12 studies, 9843 patients, relative risk [RR] 1.01; 95% CI 0.74 to 1.37, I2: 26.5%) The secondary outcome of hospital readmission had similar risk between groups. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that DOACs, compared to warfarin, in the management of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery is associated with lower risk of stroke and a strong trend for lower risk of systemic embolization, and no evidence of increased risk for hospital readmission, bleeding or mortality.

Download Full-text

Examination of the Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Comparison to Warfarin in an Obese Population

Journal of Pharmacy Technology ◽

10.1177/87551225211064113 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 875512252110641

Author(s):

Rachel M. Watson ◽

Carmen B. Smith ◽

Erica F. Crannage ◽

Laura M. Challen

Keyword(s):

Primary Outcome ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Efficacy And Safety ◽

Class Iii ◽

Vein Thrombosis ◽

Class Iii Obesity ◽

Recurrent Vte ◽

The Individual ◽

Deep Vein

Background: While commonly prescribed today, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have historically been avoided in patients with class III obesity or a weight >120 kg due to limited literature regarding the efficacy and safety in this population. Objective: The overall objective was to examine the effectiveness of DOACs compared to warfarin in a population with obesity. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) or atrial fibrillation and a body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m2 from August 1, 2015, to August 1, 2020, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Patients receiving a DOAC were matched in a 1:2 ratio to warfarin. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke or recurrent VTE. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of the primary outcome, hospitalization for bleed, and the primary outcome in patients with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2. Results: A total of 162 patients were included, with 54 and 108 in the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively. Baseline BMI was similar between groups (45.7 kg/m2 for DOACs vs 43.8 kg/m2 for warfarin), with approximately 70% of patients having a BMI ≥40 kg/m2. The primary outcome occurred in 1 patient (1.9%) in the DOAC group and 2 patients (1.9%) in the warfarin group. The DOAC group had a higher, nonsignificant incidence of bleeding (5.6% vs 0.9%, P = 0.11). There was no difference between groups in incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), or stroke in patients with a BMI ≥40 kg/m2. Conclusion: DOACs may be as efficacious as warfarin in the prevention of stroke or recurrent VTE in patients with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m2. Prospective, randomized trials are warranted to further assess the efficacy and safety of DOACs in this population.

Download Full-text

Bleeding Risk in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Warfarin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood-2019-123870 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽

pp. 3672-3672 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Yimin Pearl Wang ◽

Rohan Kehar ◽

Alla Iansavitchene ◽

Alejandro Lazo-Langner

Keyword(s):

Major Bleeding ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Observational Studies ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Factor Xa ◽

Bleeding Risk ◽

Risk Of Bleeding ◽

Significant Difference

Introduction: The standard oral anticoagulant therapy administered to non-valvular AF patients has typically been Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) particularly warfarin. In recent years, Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) including Direct Thrombin Inhibitors (DTI) and Direct Factor Xa inhibitors (FXa inhibitors) have become an alternative to warfarin. Randomized trials comparing warfarin and DOACs showed comparable effectiveness without significant additional major bleeding risk. However, bleeding events in RCTs may differ from those in daily use due to the routine exclusion of patients with a higher risk of bleeding from many studies. We aimed to assess bleeding risk between DOACs and warfarin in AF patients in observational studies and we also sought to determine differences between patients that were experienced or naïve to oral anticoagulants. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in the OVID MEDLINE® and EMBASE® electronic databases. Observational studies and randomized control trials (RCT) from 1990 to January 2019 were retrieved and examined by two independent reviewers. A pooled effect hazard ratio (HR) was calculated using a random effects model using the generic inverse variance method. Subgroup analyses according to previous exposure to anticoagulants, study type, funding type and DOAC type were conducted. The primary outcome was major bleeding risk. The secondary outcome was clinically relevant non-major bleeding. All studies must have used an established or validated definition of major bleeding. Results: The initial literature search identified 3359 potentially eligible citations. After primary screening, 150 articles were eligible for full text review and there were 35 studies including 2,356,201 patients that met the inclusion criteria. Overall, patients on DOACs were less likely to experience a bleeding event compared to warfarin (HR 0.78, 95%CI 0.71, 0.85, P<0.001). The results were consistent when analyzing patients receiving DTIs or FXa inhibitors (DTI: HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.67,0.87; FXa inhibitors: HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69,0.89). However, among patients receiving factor Xa inhibitors, there was a significant difference in the risk of bleeding according to individual drug. Among patients receiving rivaroxaban the risk of bleeding was similar to warfarin (HR 0.98, 95%CI 0.91,1.06, p=0.60) whereas in those receiving apixaban there was a 40% reduction in the risk of bleeding compared to warfarin (HR 0.60, 95%CI 0.50,0.71, p<0.001) (Figure 1). Three studies reported information according to previous anticoagulant exposure. The overall pooled hazard ratio was 0.68 (95% CI 0.55, 0.82 p<0.001) in favor of patients on DOACs. In the subgroup analysis of previous anticoagulant use, the risk of bleeding was lower for DOACs compared to warfarin in both the experienced population (HR 0.70, 95%CI 0.51, 0.96) and the naïve population (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47,0.87). However, heterogeneity was moderate to high among both subgroups. Conclusion: This review and meta-analysis of observational studies including over 2.3 million patients showed that overall DOACs have a lower risk of major bleeding and clinically relevant non-major bleeding compared to warfarin. Most importantly, although the pooled effect estimate did not differ between DTIs and FXa inhibitors, among patients receiving FXa inhibitors there was a significant difference between individual agents. Patients on apixaban had a significantly lower risk of bleeding compared to warfarin in contrast to patients on rivaroxaban who had a similar risk. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation Patients With Concomitant Hyperthyroidism

The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism ◽

10.1210/clinem/dgaa050 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 105 (9) ◽

pp. 2893-2904

Author(s):

Yi-Hsin Chan ◽

Lung-Sheng Wu ◽

Lai-Chu See ◽

Jia-Rou Liu ◽

Shang-Hung Chang ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Randomized Clinical Trials ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Study Groups ◽

Research Database ◽

Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Asian Patients

Abstract Objective Patients with hyperthyroidism were excluded from the randomized clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Methods We performed a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. We enrolled 3213 and 1181 NVAF patients with hyperthyroidism who were taking DOACs and warfarin, respectively, from June 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017. We also enrolled 53 591 and 16 564 NVAF patients without hyperthyroidism, taking DOACs and warfarin, respectively. We used propensity score stabilized weights (PSSWs) to balance covariates across the study groups. We also used 1:4 matching on both taking DOACs, with (n = 3213) and without hyperthyroidism (n = 12 852); and both taking warfarin, with (n = 1181) and without hyperthyroidism (n = 4724). Results After PSSW, DOAC had a comparable risk of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism (IS/SE) and a lower risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65; 95% confidential interval [CI], 0.44–0.96; P = 0.0295) than warfarin among patients with hyperthyroidism. There were comparable risks of IS/SE and major bleeding between those patients with and without hyperthyroidism. However, among patients taking warfarin, those with hyperthyroidism had a lower risk of IS/SE than those without hyperthyroidism (HR 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43–0.86; P = 0.0050). Conclusion Among NVAF Asian patients with concomitant hyperthyroidism, DOACs may be an effective and safer alternative to warfarin. Thromboprophylaxis with DOACs may be considered for such patients, and it is important to validate this finding in further prospective study.

Download Full-text

Comparative clinical outcomes between direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin among elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in the CMS medicare population

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis ◽

10.1007/s11239-019-01838-5 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 48 (2) ◽

pp. 240-249 ◽

Cited By ~ 2

Author(s):

Alpesh Amin ◽

Allison Keshishian ◽

Oluwaseyi Dina ◽

Amol Dhamane ◽

Anagha Nadkarni ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Atrial Fibrillation ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Proportional Hazards ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards ◽

Cardiac Events ◽

Cox Proportional Hazards Models ◽

Medicare Patients ◽

Similar Risk

AbstractAtrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence increases with age; > 80% of US adults with AF are aged ≥ 65 years. Compare the risk of stroke/systemic embolism (SE), major bleeding (MB), net clinical outcome (NCO), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) among elderly non-valvular AF (NVAF) Medicare patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) vs warfarin. NVAF patients aged ≥ 65 years who initiated DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban) or warfarin were selected from 01JAN2013-31DEC2015 in CMS Medicare data. Propensity score matching was used to balance DOAC and warfarin cohorts. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the risk of stroke/SE, MB, NCO, and MACE. 37,525 apixaban–warfarin, 18,131 dabigatran–warfarin, and 55,359 rivaroxaban–warfarin pairs were included. Compared to warfarin, apixaban (HR: 0.69; 95% CI 0.59–0.81) and rivaroxaban (HR: 0.82; 95% CI 0.73–0.91) had lower risk of stroke/SE, and dabigatran (HR: 0.88; 95% CI 0.72–1.07) had similar risk of stroke/SE. Apixaban (MB: HR: 0.61; 95% CI 0.57–0.67; NCO: HR: 0.64; 95% CI 0.60–0.69) and dabigatran (MB: HR: 0.79; 95% CI 0.71–0.89; NCO: HR: 0.84; 95% CI 0.76–0.93) had lower risk of MB and NCO, and rivaroxaban had higher risk of MB (HR: 1.08; 95% CI 1.02–1.14) and similar risk of NCO (HR: 1.04; 95% CI 0.99–1.09). Compared to warfarin, apixaban had a lower risk for stroke/SE, MB, and NCO; dabigatran had a lower risk of MB and NCO; and rivaroxaban had a lower risk of stroke/SE but higher risk of MB. All DOACs had lower risk of MACE compared to warfarin.

Download Full-text

Direct Oral Anticoagulants and Timing of Hip Fracture Surgery

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm9072200 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (7) ◽

pp. 2200

Author(s):

Seth M. Tarrant ◽

Michael J. Catanach ◽

Mahsa Sarrami ◽

Matthew Clapham ◽

John Attia ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Hip Fracture ◽

Primary Outcome ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Perioperative Outcomes ◽

Surgical Timing ◽

Serious Adverse Events ◽

Hip Fracture Surgery ◽

Geriatric Hip Fracture ◽

Secondary Outcomes

Timely surgical intervention in hip fracture has been linked to improved outcomes. Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) are an emerging class of anticoagulants without evidence-based guidelines on surgical timing. This study aims to investigate how DOACs affect surgical timing and hence perioperative outcomes. A retrospective database/registry review was conducted for geriatric hip fracture patients aged 65 and over between 2011 and 2018. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included serious adverse events (SAE), transfusion and postoperative day (POD) 1 haemoglobin (Hb) levels. From a cohort of 3264 patients, 112 admitted subjects were taking DOACs; the annual proportion on DOACs increased over time. Mean time to surgery from last dose (Ts) was 2.2 (±1.0 SD) days. The primary outcome, 30-day mortality, occurred in 16 (14%) patients with secondary outcomes of SAEs in 25 (22%) patients and transfusion in 30 (27%) patients. Ts (days) did not significantly affect 30-day mortality (odds ratio (OR): 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.80–2.33; p = 0.248), SAE (hazard ratio (HR): 1.03, 95% CI: 0.70–1.52; p = 0.885), transfusion (OR: 0.72 95% CI: 0.45 to 1.16; p = 0.177) or POD 1 Hb (OR: 1.99, 95% CI: −0.59 to 4.57; p = 0.129). Timing of surgery does not influence common surgical outcomes such as 30-day mortality, SAE, transfusion, and POD1 Hb in patients taking DOACs on admission.

Download Full-text

Direct Oral Anticoagulants or Standard Anticoagulant Therapy in Fragile Patients with Venous Thromboembolism

TH Open ◽

10.1055/s-0039-1683970 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 03 (01) ◽

pp. e67-e76 ◽

Cited By ~ 5

Author(s):

Juan López-Núñez ◽

Ricard Pérez-Andrés ◽

Pierpaolo Di Micco ◽

Sebastian Schellong ◽

Covadonga Gómez-Cuervo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Venous Thromboembolism ◽

Anticoagulant Therapy ◽

Major Bleeding ◽

Lower Risk ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Term Therapy ◽

Composite Outcome ◽

Long Term Therapy

Background The efficacy and safety of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in fragile patients (age ≥ 75 years and/or creatinine clearance levels ≤ 50 mL/min and/or body weight ≤ 50kg) with venous thromboembolism (VTE) has not been evaluated. Methods We used the RIETE database to compare the rates of the composite of VTE recurrences or major bleeding during anticoagulation in fragile patients with VTE, according to the use of DOACs or standard anticoagulant therapy. Results From January 2013 to April 2018, 24,701 patients were recruited. Of these, 10,054 (41%) were fragile. Initially, 473 fragile patients (4.7%) received DOACs and 8,577 (85%) low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). For long-term therapy, 1,298 patients (13%) received DOACs and 5,038 (50%) vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Overall, 95 patients developed VTE recurrences and 262 had major bleeding. Patients initially receiving DOACs had a lower rate of the composite outcome (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08–0.88) than those on LMWH. Patients receiving DOACs for long-term therapy had a nonsignificantly lower rate of the composite outcome (HR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.46–1.03) than those on VKAs. On multivariable analysis, patients initially receiving DOACs had a nonsignificantly lower risk for the composite outcome (HR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.11–1.15) than those on LMWH, while those receiving DOACs for long-term therapy had a significantly lower risk (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41–0.92) than those on VKAs. Conclusions Our data suggest that the use of DOACs may be more effective and safe than standard therapy in fragile patients with VTE, a subgroup of patients where the risk for bleeding is particularly high.

Download Full-text

Successful Resolution of a Large Left Atrial and Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus with Rivaroxaban

Case Reports in Cardiology ◽

10.1155/2019/6076923 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 2019 ◽

pp. 1-4 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Safwan Gaznabi ◽

Ashraf Abugroun ◽

Hasan Mahbub ◽

Enrique Campos

Keyword(s):

Left Atrial ◽

Left Atrial Appendage ◽

Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Direct Oral Anticoagulants ◽

Atrial Appendage ◽

Limited Data ◽

Successful Resolution ◽

History Of ◽

Improve Treatment Efficacy

A 79-year-old male was admitted to the hospital for acute exacerbation of heart failure. The patient had history of atrial fibrillation and was planned for cardioversion. Preprocedure transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) revealed a large multilobulated mobile thrombus in the left atrial appendage. The patient refused warfarin therapy and instead chose to take rivaroxaban. Upon outpatient follow-up, 3 months later, no visible thrombus was appreciated on repeat TEE. This case demonstrates successful resolution of left atrial and left atrial appendage thrombi with the use of rivaroxaban. At present time, limited data is available to support the use of rivaroxaban for treatment of intracardiac thrombi. This case highlights the need for further studies to investigate the outcomes and relative efficiency of use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in lysis of intracardiac thrombus. The benefits of DOACs compared to the standard of therapy could increase patient compliance, reduce length of stay, and improve treatment efficacy.

Download Full-text