Third-line chemotherapy in platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian, fallopian tube, and primary peritoneal carcinoma patients

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 804-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tangjitgamol ◽  
H. T. See ◽  
S. Manusirivithaya ◽  
C. F. Levenback ◽  
D. M. Gershenson ◽  
...  

Ovarian carcinoma is a malignant disease with a high rate of recurrence, necessitating repeated chemotherapy treatments. We conducted a retrospective study in patients with platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant ovarian, fallopian tubes and primary peritoneal carcinoma patients treated at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center. We evaluated the responses, progression-free intervals, and overall survival duration of 51 patients after third-line chemotherapy treatment. The overall response rate was 16% (eight cases) with 2% complete response rate (one case) and 14% partial response rate (seven cases). Stable disease was achieved in 31% (16 cases). The progression-free intervals of 24 patients who had response and stable disease was 7.4 months (range, 1.4–18.4 months). The median overall survival of all patients was 15.8 months (95% CI, 8.1–23.4 months). The median survival duration of eight responders was not significantly different from that of 43 nonresponders, 18.9 months (95% CI, 2.4–35.4 months) versus 15.8 months (95% CI, 6.4–25.2 months), respectively (P = 0.73). In conclusion, third-line chemotherapy in our study results in a modest response and prolongation of progression-free interval without obvious impact on survival. The decision to utilize third-line chemotherapy will be a balance of the limited efficacy, toxicity of the agents, and the expertise of the clinician.

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 804-814 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Tangjitgamol ◽  
H. T. See ◽  
S. Manusirivithaya ◽  
C. F. Levenback ◽  
D. M. Gershenson ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 787-793 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen A. Welch ◽  
Hal W. Hirte ◽  
Laurie Elit ◽  
Russel J. Schilder ◽  
Lisa Wang ◽  
...  

Objectives:Antiangiogenic strategies have demonstrated efficacy in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Sorafenib is a novel multitargeted kinase inhibitor with antiangiogenic activity. Gemcitabine has known activity against EOC. A phase 1 clinical trial of this combination suggested activity in ovarian cancer with no dose-limiting toxicity. This phase 2 study was designed to examine the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and sorafenib in patients with recurrent EOC.Methods:Patients with recurrent EOC after platinum-based chemotherapy and who had subsequently received up to 3 prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 intravenous [IV]) was administered weekly for 7 of 8 weeks in the first cycle, then weekly for 3 weeks of each subsequent 4-week cycle. Sorafenib (400 mg p.o. bid) was given continuously. The primary end point for this trial was objective response rate by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Secondary endpoints included Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) CA-125 response, time to progression, overall survival, and toxicity.Results:Forty-three patients were enrolled, and 33 completed at least 1 cycle. Two patients had a partial response (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors objective response rate = 4.7%). Ten patients (23.3%) maintained response or stable disease for at least 6 months. GCIG CA-125 response was 27.9%. The median time to progression was 5.4 months, and the median overall survival was 13.0 months. Hematologic toxicity was common but manageable. The most common nonhematologic adverse events were hand-foot syndrome, fatigue, hypokalemia, and diarrhea.Conclusion:This trial of gemcitabine and sorafenib in recurrent EOC did not meet its primary efficacy end point, but the combination was associated with encouraging rates of prolonged stable disease and CA-125 response.


Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1289-1289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Overman ◽  
Lei Feng ◽  
Barbara Pro ◽  
Peter McLaughlin ◽  
Mark Hess ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: FL3 is a subcategory of follicular lymphomas that is challenging in that it behaves aggressively like large cell lymphomas. If treated with CHOP, however it has a clinical course of relapse and treatment failure similar to grade 1–2 follicular lymphoma. We looked at the outcome of FL3 patients treated with RCHOP, combining rituximab with CHOP. There are no large study reports of this regimen’s results in FL3 to our knowledge. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 45 patients with follicular grade 3 lymphoma who were treated with rituximab and the combination of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC). Response rate (RR), failure-free survival (FFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated and a historical comparison to 111 CHOP only treated patients was made. Results: The International Prognostic Index (IPI) distribution was: 47% Low, 36% Low-Intermediate, 13% High-intermediate, and 4% High-risk. The complete response rate was 96%. Forty-four out of 45 patients are still alive. Median follow-up is 3.5 years. The 3-year FFS rate according to IPI was 80% (95% CI: 64% to 100%) in low risk, 81% in low-intermediate (95% CI 64% to 100%), and was 50% (95% CI: 25% to 100%) in high-intermediate/high-risk patient group. The addition of rituximab to CHOP improved both 5-year FFS, 71% (95% CI: 58% to 87%) compared to 44% of CHOP alone (95% CI: 36% to 55%) with p-value of 0.019 and 5-year OS, 98% (95% CI: 93% to 100%) compared to 75% (95% CI: 67% to 84) with p-valule of 0.0034. The addition of rituximab to CHOP improve the FFS compared to CHOP alone when subgroups of IPI were analyzed and compared (p=.002) Conclusion: The addition of rituximab to CHOP provided a high response rate and excellent early survival. Poor risk patients continue to demonstrate a high rate of failure despite the use of rituximab.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1028-1028
Author(s):  
Stefania Paolini ◽  
Emanuela Ottaviani ◽  
Sarah Parisi ◽  
Federica Salmi ◽  
Barbara Lama ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1028 Poster Board I-50 Background: Outcome of elderly acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients is dismal. Targeted-therapies might improve current results by overcoming drug-resistance and reducing toxicity. In particular, the farnesyl-transferase inhibitor Tipifarnib (Zarnestra®), and the proteasome inhibitor Bortezomib (Velcade®), appeared synergistic in AML cells ex vivo, and their association was shown to be safe in vivo in a phase I trial by our group. Aim We conduced a phase II study aiming to assess efficacy and toxicity of Tipifarnib-Bortezomib association in AML patients >18 years, unfit for conventional therapy, or >60 years, in relapse. Furthermore, we aimed to identify biological features potentially predictive of clinical response. In particular, we focused on the RASGRP1/APTX ratio, which was previously found to be effective in predicting treatment response in patients treated with Tipifarnib alone. Methods: Bortezomib (1.0 mg/m2) was administered as weekly infusion for three consecutive weeks (days 1, 8, 15). Tipifarnib was administered at dose of 300-600 mg BID for 21 consecutive days. Response was assessed at the end of each cycle (28 days). Patients' withdrawn was planned in case of progression or stable disease after six cycles. Real-time quantitative-PCR (q-PCR) was used for RASGRP1/APTX quantification. Results: Eighty patients were enrolled (47 male). Median age was 71 years (43-89) and WBC at diagnosis was 4.2 × 109/L (0.5- 42.1). Thirty-two out of 80 patients had a secondary-AML, 14 had a high risk cytogenetic and 42 were previously untreated. Seventy-five patients actually initiated the treatment, 62 completed at least the first cycle while 13 early dropped out for non-leukemia related adverse event. Nine patients achieved complete remission (CR), 1 patients obtained a partial response (PR) and in 2 cases an hematological improvement (HI) was documented for an overall response rate (ORR) of 19%. Eighteen had progressive disease (PD) and the remaining showed stable disease (SD). Median time to response was 112 days, corresponding to 4 cycles (range 2-14). Marrow response (CR+PR) was significantly associated with overall survival (OS) (p<0.0001). RASGRP1/APTX was evaluated before treatment initiation on bone marrow (BM) and/or peripheral blood (PB). The median RASGRP/APTX value on BM was 15.3 (15-19.8) in responder patients and 2.2 (0.5-25.9) in non responders, respectively (p=0.00006). Its median value on PB was 31.6 (19.3-35.5) in responders and 6.4 (0.5-27.1) in non responders, respectively (p=0.00001). Interestingly, no marrow responses were recorded in patients with marrow RASGRP1/APTX ratio <8, while the response rate was 43% in patients with RASGRP1/APTX >8 (p<0.0001). Finally, RASGRP1/APTX levels significantly correlated with OS (p=0.001) with a median OS of 490 days and 162 days in patients with RASGRP1/APTX >8 and <8 respectively. Conversely, there was no correlation between cytogenetics, secondary AML, previous treatment and response or overall survival. Toxicity was overall mild, the most common adverse event being febrile neutropenia. Permanent treatment interruption due to Tipifarnib-Bortezomib related adverse events occurred in 13/75 (17%) of patients. With a median follow-up of 122 days (range 9-737), 57/75 (76%) patients are dead and 18/75 (24%) are alive, six of which in CR. Conclusion: We conclude that the clinical efficacy of the combination Tipifarnib-Bortezomib was similar to what reported for Tipifarnib alone. However, noteworthy, we could confirm that the RASGPR1/APTX BM or PB level is an effective predictor of response. Though higher RASGRP1/APTX is relatively rare (∼10% of cases), Tipifarnib (±Bortezomib) may represent an important option in a subset of high risk/frail AML patients. Acknowledgments: Supported by BolognAIL, AIRC, European LeukemiaNET, COFIN, FIRB 2006, Fondazione del Monte di Bologna e Ravenna. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5151-5151
Author(s):  
Y. Loriot ◽  
C. Massard ◽  
A. Plantade ◽  
B. Escudier ◽  
A. Chauchereau ◽  
...  

5151 Background: There is currently no standard of care for patients (pts) with HRPC and disease progression after docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Platin compounds have demonstrated activity in this setting and in vitro evidence of synergy between carboplatin and etoposide has previously been reported. A significant proportion of advanced HRPC exhibit neuroendocrine features but there are limited data on whether these patients should be treated differently or not. Methods: Pts with HRPC who experienced failure after first-line docetaxel-based chemotherapy were prospectively treated with carboplatin (AUC 5 day 1) and etoposide (80 mg/m2 day 1 to 3), repeated every 3 weeks as second-line chemotherapy. The response rate (defined as a serum PSA decline of = 50%), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using consensus criteria (Bubley JCO 1999). Pain relief was evaluated using a visual analogic scale. Serum chromogranin A and neurone specific enolase (NSE) levels were measured at baseline. Toxicity was evaluated according to NCI criteria. Results: Forty-one HRPC pts, previously treated with docetaxel with (n=24) or without (n=17) estramustine, prospectively received carboplatin-etoposide as second-line chemotherapy. A PSA response was obtained in 9 pts (22%). Pain relief was achieved in 18 pts (45%). Median progression-free survival was 9 weeks and median overall survival was 19 months. Toxicity included grade 3–4 anemia in 25% and febrile neutropenia in 2%. Biological neuroendocrine features (e.g. elevated baseline serum chromogranin A and NSE) were not associated with response or PFS. The response rate was 18% and 31% in pts with normal and elevated baseline chromogranin A, respectively. Conclusions: The carboplatin-etoposide regimen is active and well-tolerated as second-line chemotherapy after docetaxel-based chemotherapy in HRPC patients. Activity was detected in both tumors with and without neuroendocrine features. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 469-469
Author(s):  
Xiaoying Zhao ◽  
Chen Chen Wang ◽  
Wen Zhang ◽  
Xiaodong Zhu ◽  
Weijian Guo ◽  
...  

469 Background: Patients with gastroenterpancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) have a very poor prognosis. And the role of the second-line therapy remains unknown. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 11 patients with gastroenteropancreatic NEC after failure of first-line chemotherapy in the last two years in our cancer center. Data examined included clinical and pathological characteristics at the time of diagnosis, efficacy and safety. Results: Median age was 51 (17-64) years old. Most were male (81.8%). Tumor origin included pancreas (6pts, 54.5%), colon-rectum (3pts, 27.3%), one stomach and one liver. Metastatic disease was evident at diagnosis in all patients (liver metastases: 100%, celiac lymph nodes: 72.7%, bone: 18.2%, pleural effusion and peritoneal metastasis: 18.2%). Median Ki-67 index was 80%. Etoposide-cisplatin combinations as first line chemotherapy were administered in 8 (72.7%) patients and 2 (18.2%) capecitabine based regimen and 1(9.1%) gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel. All patients received the FOLFIRI regimen with a median number of 8 (3-36) courses. Three patients (27.3%) had partial response, 4 (36.4%) stable disease, and 4 (36.4 %%) tumor progression. But in 6 patients received the FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab, disease control rate was 66.7%, 3 (50.0%) partial response, 1(16.7%) stable disease. The median PFS in all 11 pts was 3.77 (1.77-24.07) months, in 6pts with bevacizumab was 4.77(1.83-24.07) months. The most severe toxicities was grade 3 neutropenia (27.2%), the other adverse effects were mild to moderate, including mild anemia, transient transferase elevation and proteinuria. Conclusions: FOLFIRI regimen is a potentially effective and safe chemotherapy given as second-line in patients with NEC. Additional anti-VEGF therapy with bevacizumab may improve the disease control and PFS time.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 829-829
Author(s):  
Jacqueline N. Chu ◽  
Jin G. Choi ◽  
Sassan Ostvar ◽  
James A. Torchia ◽  
Kerry Lynn Reynolds ◽  
...  

829 Background: Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who have failed chemotherapy have shown response to checkpoint blockade. We investigate optimal third-line treatment in MSI-H mCRC with regard to overall survival, quality of life years gained (QALYs), and cost-effectiveness. Methods: A Markov Model was created for a base case of a 57 year old man with MSI-H mCRC refractory to two lines of chemotherapy. Treatments compared were nivolumab, nivolumab with ipilimumab, and trifluridine/tipiracil. Patients could remain stable, progress to fourth-line chemotherapy or palliative care, experience drug toxicity, die from age/sex mortality, or die from cancer over their simulated lifetimes. Transitions between health states were based on the CheckMate 142 and RECOURSE trials. Outcomes were survival or unadjusted life years, QALYs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The willingness to pay threshold was $100,000/QALY. Results: Nivolumab with ipilimumab was the most effective strategy as it yielded more unadjusted life-years (4.24) and QALYs (2.53) compared to nivolumab (3.95 LY, 2.33 QALYs) and trifluridine/tipiracil (0.74 LY, 0.07 QALYs). However, nivolumab with ipilimumab was not cost-effective compared to nivolumab and neither treatment strategy was cost-effective compared to trifluridine/tipiracil. Sensitivity analysis found nivolumab monotherapy could be cost-effective with decrease in drug cost to $2000/dose. Conclusions: Our modeling analysis finds that both single and dual checkpoint blockade yield significantly increased overall survival and QALYs for MSI-H mCRC compared to third-line chemotherapy, but were not cost-effective because of nivolumab cost. Decreases in drug pricing and/or duration of maintenance nivolumab could make nivolumab monotherapy cost-effective. [Table: see text]


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 450-450
Author(s):  
Nicha Wongjarupong ◽  
Mohamed Abdelrahim Muddathir Hassan ◽  
Cristobal T. Sanhueza ◽  
Mindy L. Hartgers ◽  
Fatima Hassan ◽  
...  

450 Background: The standard treatment for patients with gallbladder cancer is a combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin based on ABC-02 trial. However, there are no guidelines regarding treatment after first-line therapy. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and overall survival of different second-line regimens. Methods: We identified 203 patients with advanced gallbladder cancer who received palliative treatment between January 2000 and December 2015 at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. RECIST criteria was used to assess response. Results: 68 patients received second-line chemotherapy. Median age was 63 years (range: 32-86) and majority were males (60.6%). The median time from the diagnosis to the start of the second line chemotherapy was 8 (1-120) months. The most common used second-line chemotherapy were FOLFOX (14), gemcitabine alone (10), single agent fluoropyrimidine (11), gemcitabine with capecitabine (5), and capecitabine with oxaliplatin (4). There were 30 patients that received 5-fluorouracil based regimens, 20 patients received gemcitabine-based regimen, 3 patients received taxane-based regimen, and 15 patients received other types of chemotherapy. Median progression free survival and overall survival was 2.1 (1.8-2.7) and 16.7 (13.2-21.3) months respectively. There were 10 (52%), 11 (37%), 2 (67%), 5 (33%) with partial response and stable disease in 5-fluorouracil-based, gemcitabine-based, taxane-based, and others, respectively. There were no difference in PFS, with median PFS of 2.5, 2.0, 2.8 and 2.3 months, respectively (p=0.43). The overall survival were 15.7 (8.9-40.2), 15.0 (10.7-21.3), 40.3 (22.0-47.0), and 20.4 (9.2-30.7) months, respectively (p=0.83). There were 27 patients that received single agent chemotherapy and 41 patients that received combined regimen. There were 17 (42%) patients and 13 (48%) patients with partial response or stable disease in single and combined regimen. There were no differences in progression free survival and overall survival between single and multi agent chemotherapy. Conclusions: In this largest single institution study, second-line chemotherapy regimens for gallbladder cancer provided benefit in select patients and there is an urgent need to develop more active therapeutic regimens.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15016-e15016
Author(s):  
Ning Li ◽  
Wenying Deng ◽  
Guifang Zhang ◽  
Yanwei Guo ◽  
Yijie Ma ◽  
...  

e15016 Background: Although regorafenib and fruquintinib have been recommended as the third-line treatment for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the median survival time of mCRC is still only for 4-8 months and the low response rate and unpleasant side effects limit their use in Chinese patients. Apatinib, an oral VEGFR-2 inhibitor, has been approved as a third line treatment in metastatic gastric cancer. In addition, apatinib has demonstrated good safety, tolerability, and efficacy in the treatment of advanced solid tumors. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with S-1 in the treatment of refractory mCRC. Methods: In this prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II study, patients after failure of second-line chemotherapy were enrolled and took apatinib (250mg, daily) combined with S-1 (standard dose). The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) and the second endpoint was response rate and overall survival time. Results: From December 2017, 22 patients (14 male) with a median age of 56y (range: 34-71 y) were enrolled and eligible for evaluation of the PFS, response rate and safety. The median PFS was 105d (95% CI: 79.01-130.98). two patients (9%) achieved partial response, 15 (68.18%) achieved stable disease, and 5 (22.72%) were progressive disease. The objective response rate and the disease control rate were 9% and 77.27%, respectively. Median overall survival was not reached. The common adverse effects were abnormal liver function (7/22; 31.81%), leukopenia (5/22; 22.72%) and thrombocytopenia (4/22; 18.18%). The incidence for grade 3-4 side effect was very low. One patient experienced grade 3 proteinuria and there were no toxic deaths. Conclusions: This preliminary result indicated that apatinib combined with S-1 may extend the PFS in mCRC, with well-tolerated toxicities, making it a promising therapeutic target for mCRC treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT03397199 .


2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 123-128 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. Jaaback ◽  
L. Ludeman ◽  
N. L. Clayton ◽  
L. Hirschowitz

The relative incidence of primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPCa) and advanced (FIGO stage III or IV) ovarian serous carcinoma (AOSCa) was assessed over 5 years at a UK cancer center, and the sociodemographic, clinical, and survival data were compared. There were 23 women with PPCa and 55 with AOSCa. The ratio of PPCa:AOSCa was higher than previously reported. No statistical difference was found between the two groups with regard to age (mean 64.43 vs 64.07 years, P= 0.9), parity (1.6 vs 1.8, P= 1.0), personal/family history of another malignancy (although five patients with AOSCa but none with PPCa had personal histories of breast cancer), or serum CA125, CA19.9, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. Similar numbers in both groups had malignant ascites, although 5.8% of patients with AOSCa but none with PPCa had negative cytology. Tumor grade, stage, treatment, and survival were similar (median 586 vs 641 days, P= 0.66). This analysis of the largest published UK series of patients with PPCa does not support previous reports that patients with PPCa are older than those with AOSCa and have a worse prognosis; it suggests that both groups have similar sociodemographic characteristics, clinical profiles, and survival.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document