Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma: a National Cancer Database analysis of prognostic factors and treatment outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1126-1133
Author(s):  
Mariam AlHilli ◽  
Paul Elson ◽  
Lisa Rybicki ◽  
Sudha Amarnath ◽  
Bin Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Endometrial Carcinoma ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Prognostic Groups

BackgroundUndifferentiated endometrioid endometrial carcinoma of the uterus is a rare, highly aggressive, and under-recognized subtype of endometrial cancer.ObjectiveThis study evaluates survival, prognostic factors for survival, and treatment outcomes associated with undifferentiated endometrial cancer.MethodsThe National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients with undifferentiated endometrial cancer who underwent definitive primary surgical treatment. Patients with all other histologic subtypes or incomplete treatment data were excluded. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors for survival. Points for each prognostic factor were assigned from regression coefficients in the final multivariable model and summed for a total score. Recursive partitioning analysis was used to determine cut-offs in the score to identify unique prognostic groups.ResultsAmong 349 404 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer from 2004 to 2013, 3994 (1.1%) met the criteria for diagnosis of undifferentiated endometrial cancer and 3486 had survival data. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years (interquartile range (IQR) 57–74) and 58% of patients had early stage disease. Median interval from diagnosis to surgery was 3.7 weeks (IQR 2.0–5.7). Five year overall survival was 57% (standard error (SE) 1%). Stage was the strongest predictor of survival, with a 15–20% decrement in 5 year survival for each advance in stage. Stage, age, race, and presence of comorbidities were independent predictors of survival and were used to categorize patients into five prognostic groups. Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival across most disease stages and prognostic groups. Multimodal adjuvant therapy was superior to unimodal treatment particularly in advanced stage unfavorable and very unfavorable groups.ConclusionIn women with undifferentiated endometrial cancer, survival is primarily driven by stage. Despite the poor overall prognosis of undifferentiated endometrial cancer, multimodal adjuvant therapy is a key component of treatment.

Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: A single institution’s experience.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15585-e15585
Author(s):  
Megan Preston ◽  
Georgia Anne-Lee McCann ◽  
David M. O'Malley ◽  
Christina Boutsicaris ◽  
Larry J. Copeland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Stage Disease

e15585 Background: Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) of the cervix comprise only 2% of all cervical cancers. As a result, prospective data is limited and treatment guidelines rely on literature from lung NEC. The objective of this study was to examine and report on our experience in the management of this rare, aggressive disease. Methods: This was an IRB-approved, single-institution, retrospective review. Study criteria included patients with cervical NEC diagnosed between 1990-2011. Demographic, treatment and survival data was collected. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of initial treatment until progression or death respectively, or date of last contact. Results: A total of 24 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age at diagnosis was 43. Median PFS was 13.6 months and median OS was 16.4 months. The majority of patients had advanced-stage disease (61% stage II-IV, 39% stage I). Of the 9 patients with stage I disease, 4 were treated with platinum + etoposide-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 5 were treated with initial radical surgery. Seven of the 9 patients had post-operative adjuvant therapy consisting of chemotherapy, chemo-radiation or radiation only. Seven of the 9 patients (78%) were alive at last follow-up. Of the two patients who were deceased, one had metastatic disease found at surgery and the other declined adjuvant therapy and died of recurrence. Patients with stage II-IV disease (n=15) had a median PFS and OS of 11.5 and 12.1 months, respectively. Only 2 had no evidence of disease at last encounter. The remainder died without achieving remission. Patients with metastatic disease had significantly worse survival when compared to those with loco-regional disease with a median OS of 8 vs. 28 months (p = .03), respectively. Conclusions: We report one of the largest single-institution experiences of neuroendocrine cervical cancer. Advanced-stage patients had a poor prognosis regardless of therapy. However, multi-modality therapy in early-stage disease resulted in an excellent prognosis (78% survival) for these rare, highly aggressive tumors. These findings support the goal of curative intent for early-stage disease using multi-modality therapy.

Patterns of Adjuvant Therapy for Endometrial Cancer: Single Institutional Experience in Thailand

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 665-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siriwan Tangjitgamol ◽  
Jakkapan Khunnarong ◽  
Kanyarat Katanyoo ◽  
Sunamchok Srijaipracharoen ◽  
Thaovalai Thavaramara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Poor Performance Status

AimThe aim of this study was to evaluate the use of adjuvant therapy and treatment outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer (EMC).MethodsPatients with EMC treated in the institution were identified. Data collected were age, stage of disease, histopathology, and adjuvant therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were studied.ResultsThe median age of 383 patients was 57 years (30–86 years). Majority had early-stage diseases (76.5%), endometrioid histopathology (87.2%), and high-grade tumors (74.9%). Less than half (44.4%) had adjuvant therapy. Pelvic radiation was the most common type of adjuvant treatment. We found that 25.7% of stages III to IV patients did not have adjuvant therapy (mainly from old age or poor performance status). On the other hand, 21.5% of patients with stage IA had adjuvant treatment (owing to risk factors or other synchronous cancers). The 5-year PFS and 5-year OS (95% confidence interval) were 84.3% (80.5%–88.1%) and 81.2% (77.1%–85.4%), respectively. Significant prognostic factors for survival by univariable analyses were stage, tumor grade, and histopathology. By multivariable analyses, significant prognostic factors were stage, tumor grade (only for OS), histopathology, and adjuvant therapy. Focusing on stage and adjuvant therapy, we found that the PFS and OS of early-stage patients who had or did not have adjuvant therapy were not significantly different, whereas the PFS and OS of advanced-stage patients who had adjuvant treatment were significantly higher than the PFS and OS of those who did not have adjuvant treatment.ConclusionsThe use of adjuvant therapy for patients with EMC was not according to the standard recommendation in all patients for many reasons. The benefit of adjuvant therapy was demonstrated in advanced- but not in early-stage cancer.

scholarly journals Tumor Characteristics and Treatment Outcomes of Older Women with Breast Cancer in Jordan

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hikmat Abdel-Razeq ◽  
Fadwa Abdel Rahman ◽  
Hanan Al-Masri ◽  
Hazem Abdulelah ◽  
Mahmoud Abu Nasser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Tumor Characteristics ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Stage Disease

Abstract Background : Less than 10% of newly diagnosed breast cancer in our region are diagnosed in women 70 years or older. Treatment plans of such patients is less clear and have poor outcomes. In this paper, we describe clinical presentation, tumor characteristics and treatment outcomes in such patients. Methods : Consecutive patients aged 65 years or older with pathologically-confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer were included. Medical records and hospital databases were searched for patients’ characteristics and treatment outcomes. Results : A total of 553 patients, median age 70 (range: 65-91) years, were included. On presentation, 114 (20.6%) patients had metastatic disease and was mostly visceral (81; 71.1%). Patients with non-metastatic disease had poor pathological features including node-positive in 244 (55.6%), GIII in 170 (38.7%) and lymphovascular invasion in 173 (39.4%). Patients were treated less aggressively; 144 (32.8%) patients with early-stage disease and 98 (86.0%) with metastatic disease never had chemotherapy. After a median follow up of 45 months, 5-year overall survival for the whole group was 67.6%. Survival was better for patients with non-metastatic disease (78.8% vs. 25.4%, P<0.001) and for those with node-negative compared to node-positive disease (85.4% vs. 74.1%, P=0.002). On Cox regression, only positive lymph nodes were associated with poor outcome in patients with non-metastatic disease (Hazard Ratio [HR], 1.75; 95% CI: 1.006-3.034, P=0.048). Conclusions : Older Jordanian women with breast cancer present with more aggressive features and advanced-stage disease that reflect poorly on treatment outcomes. Because of comorbidities and poor performance status, some patients were not aggressively treated.

Characteristics of early-stage endometrial cancer and factors that influence disease recurrence.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17567-e17567
Author(s):  
Su Yun Chung ◽  
Janice Shen ◽  
Nina Kohn ◽  
Jennifer Hernandez ◽  
Marina Frimer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Myometrial Invasion ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
Early Stage Endometrial Cancer

e17567 Background: Early-stage endometrial cancer (EEC) with FIGO stage I-II generally has a favorable prognosis and overall survival (OS). However, up to 10% of EEC patients (pts) relapse and risk factors for recurrence remain unclear. We evaluated clinical and histopathologic characteristics of EEC and correlated them with OS and recurrence free survival (RFS) through a single-center retrospective analysis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review on 511 pts with EEC identified by our cancer registry from 1/1/2009 to 12/31/2019. The two main histologic groups were endometrioid adenocarcinomas (E) and other subtypes (O) including carcinosarcoma, undifferentiated, and clear cell carcinomas. Papillary serous histology was excluded. Histopathologic and clinical findings recorded included age, FIGO stage and grade, tumor size, presence of recurrence, adjuvant therapies received, percent of myometrial invasion (MI), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI). OS and RFS were estimated, and each predictor was compared using the log-rank test. The association between OS and each continuous characteristic was examined using the Cox proportional hazards model. Factors significantly associated with OS and RFS in the univariable analysis (p < 0.05) were included in a multivariable analysis to examine the joint effects of those factors on survival. Results: A total of 511 cases were reviewed. The analysis included 501 pts (E = 485, O = 16), of which 47 had recurrent disease (E = 45, O = 2) and 17 had died without recurring (E = 15, O = 2) as of their last follow-up. Overall median age was 63 years. Factors significantly associated with recurrence in the multivariable analysis were FIGO grade, (Hazard Ratios (HR): Grade 2 vs 1: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.06-3.58, p = 0.0320, Grade 3 vs 1: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.50-5.52, p = 0.0015), LVI (HR: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.10-3.75, p = 0.0244), and greater than 50% of MI (HR: 3.15, 95% CI: 1.35-7.36, p = 0.0080). The overall RFS was 92% and 86% at three and five years, respectively. On univariate analysis, among pts with a measurable tumor size (n = 446), larger tumors were not significantly associated with OS (p = 0.65) but was associated with increased recurrence (HR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.10-1.37, for a unit increase, p = 0.0003). On univariate analysis, pts who received adjuvant therapy were more likely to recur (p = 0.0002) with RFS of 86% and 76% at three and five years respectively, versus RFS of 94% and 90%, for those who did not. Conclusions: We confirmed the clinical and histopathologic characteristics that are currently considered to increase risk of recurrence in EEC. On multivariate analysis, risk of recurrence was associated with FIGO grades 2 and 3, presence of LVI, and > 50% MI. A limitation of this study is the lack of molecular analysis. Further molecular stratification may help us identify the subset of pts who are at high risk of recurrence, enabling customized adjuvant therapy in EEC.

scholarly journals Adjuvant therapy for early stage, endometrial cancer with lymphovascular space invasion: Is there a role for chemotherapy?

2020 ◽  
Vol 156 (3) ◽  
pp. 568-574 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna L. Beavis ◽  
Ting-Tai Yen ◽  
Rebecca L. Stone ◽  
Stephanie L. Wethington ◽  
Caitlin Carr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Early Stage Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Lymphovascular Space Invasion

scholarly journals Are omentectomy and lymphadenectomy necessary in patients with apparently early-stage malignant ovarian germ cell tumors?

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 398-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beijiao Qin ◽  
Wenyan Xu ◽  
Yanfang Li
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Yolk Sac ◽  
Immature Teratoma ◽  
Yolk Sac Tumor ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Early Stage Disease

ObjectiveTo evaluate the role of omentectomy and lymphadenectomy in the treatment of clinically apparent early-stage malignant ovarian germ cell tumors.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 245 patients with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (yolk sac tumor, dysgerminoma, and immature teratoma) and with clinically early-stage disease, who were treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between January 1, 1970 and December 31, 2017. The survival of patients who underwent either omentectomy or lymphadenectomy, or both (omentectomy/lymphadenectomy group) was compared with that of patients who did not undergo omentectomy or lymphadenectomy (non-omentectomy/lymphadenectomy group).ResultsSixty patients were diagnosed with yolk sac tumor, 74 with dysgerminoma, and 111 with immature teratoma. Of these 245 patients, 216 patients had stage I disease, 28 patients had stage II, and 1 patient had stage IIIA. There were 190 patients who underwent omentectomy and/or lymphadenectomy and 55 patients in the non-omentectomy/lymphadenectomy group, respectively. In the omentectomy/lymphadenectomy group, 112 patients underwent both omentectomy and lymphadenectomy, 71 underwent omentectomy only, and 7 underwent lymphadenectomy only. Two hundred and fourteen of 245 patients (87.3%) received post-operative chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 73 months (range 1–388). The 10-year overall survival rates in the omentectomy/lymphadenectomy group and non-omentectomy/lymphadenectomy groups were 96.8% and 100%, respectively (p=0.340). Multivariate analysis evaluating all potential prognostic factors showed that omentectomy and lymphadenectomy are not prognostic factors for survival.ConclusionsOmentectomy and lymphadenectomy do not appear to improve survival and may be omitted in patients with clinically apparent early-stage malignant ovarian germ cell tumors.

A phase II study of atezolizumab as neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in patients (pts) with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS8580-TPS8580
Author(s):  
Dwight Hall Owen ◽  
Paul A. Bunn ◽  
Bruce E. Johnson ◽  
David J. Kwiatkowski ◽  
Mark G. Kris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Surgical Resection ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
The United States ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
End Points ◽  
Early Stage Disease

TPS8580 Background: Trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy have demonstrated an absolute survival benefit of 5% for patients with early stage disease. Atezolizumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that inhibits PD-L1 from binding to its receptors PD-1 and B7.1, thereby restoring anti-tumor immune response. In the OAK trial, a randomized phase III trial of patients with metastatic NSCLC who progressed on platinum based chemotherapy, atezolizumab improved overall survival in patients regardless of PD-L1 expression compared with docetaxel (13.8 months vs. 9.6 months, HR 0.73 [95% CI 0.62 – 0.87]) with a manageable safety profile. Methods: NCT02927301 is a phase II, open-label, single-arm study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab as a neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy in patients with Stage IB, II, or IIIA NSCLC prior to curative-intent resection. Approximately 180 patients with NSCLC will be enrolled in this study at 15 academic medical centers in the United States. The study has two parts: the primary part will evaluate the ability of neoadjuvant atezolizumab to produce pathologic responses in patients with early stage NSCLC. Atezolizumab 1200 mg IV will be given every 3 weeks for two doses. Surgical resection of tumors following treatment will allow determination of pathologic response rates and potential predictive biomarkers. Part 2 is exploratory and will evaluate atezolizumab adjuvant therapy for up to 12 months in patients who demonstrate clinical benefit in Part 1. The primary endpoint is major pathologic response rate (defined as ≤ 10% of viable tumor tissue) based on surgical resection. Secondary end points include overall response rate by status of mutation load, neoantigen score and gene expression signatures. OS and DFS are exploratory end points. This trial presents a unique opportunity to evaluate exploratory biomarkers given the availability of pre- and post-treatment biopsy specimens for assessment of evolution of immune related markers associated with response. The study opened to accrual in January 2017. Clinical trial information: NCT02927301.

Why Routine Clinical Follow-up for Patients With Early Stage Endometrial Cancer Is Not Always Necessary: A Study on Women in South Wales

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 556-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilly Aung ◽  
Robert E.J. Howells ◽  
Kenneth C.K. Lim ◽  
Emma Hudson ◽  
Peter W. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Endometrial Carcinoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Recurrence ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
South Wales

ObjectiveThis study aimed to examine the existing methods of follow-up in women who have undergone treatment of early endometrial carcinoma in South Wales and to assess if they are appropriate.DesignThis study used a retrospective analysis of follow-up data.SettingThis study was performed in the Virtual Gynaecological Oncology Centre, South Wales, United Kingdom.SampleThis study sample is composed of 552 women.MethodsData regarding follow-up were collected retrospectively from patient case notes and computerized data systems. Data were analyzed using the Pearson χ2 test, Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, and Kaplan-Meier curves.Main Outcome MeasuresThis study aimed to determine whether routine follow-up was beneficial in detecting disease recurrence and whether outcome was influenced by routine follow-up.ResultsBetween January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2010, 552 women were treated for early stage endometrial carcinoma. The 5-year survival was 81%, and the 5-year progression-free survival was 77%. Of these 552 women, 81 (15%) developed a disease recurrence; the majority (61/81 [75%]) recurred within 3 years. The median survival was 35 months compared with 47 months in patients who did not develop a recurrence. Of the 81 patients, 73 (90%) were symptomatic and only 5 patients were truly asymptomatic at follow-up. The most important and significant prognostic factor was “recurrent disease” with overall survival (hazard ratio, 2.20; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 1.75–2.65) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 2.52; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 2.09–2.95). “Asymptomatic recurrence” was not an independent predictor of outcome.ConclusionsRoutine follow-up for early endometrial cancer is not beneficial for patients because most were symptomatic at the time of detection. It does not significantly improve the outcome. We propose altering the follow-up time regimen and adopting alternative follow-up strategies for women in South Wales.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document