Patterns of Adjuvant Therapy for Endometrial Cancer: Single Institutional Experience in Thailand

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 665-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siriwan Tangjitgamol ◽  
Jakkapan Khunnarong ◽  
Kanyarat Katanyoo ◽  
Sunamchok Srijaipracharoen ◽  
Thaovalai Thavaramara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Poor Performance Status

AimThe aim of this study was to evaluate the use of adjuvant therapy and treatment outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer (EMC).MethodsPatients with EMC treated in the institution were identified. Data collected were age, stage of disease, histopathology, and adjuvant therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were studied.ResultsThe median age of 383 patients was 57 years (30–86 years). Majority had early-stage diseases (76.5%), endometrioid histopathology (87.2%), and high-grade tumors (74.9%). Less than half (44.4%) had adjuvant therapy. Pelvic radiation was the most common type of adjuvant treatment. We found that 25.7% of stages III to IV patients did not have adjuvant therapy (mainly from old age or poor performance status). On the other hand, 21.5% of patients with stage IA had adjuvant treatment (owing to risk factors or other synchronous cancers). The 5-year PFS and 5-year OS (95% confidence interval) were 84.3% (80.5%–88.1%) and 81.2% (77.1%–85.4%), respectively. Significant prognostic factors for survival by univariable analyses were stage, tumor grade, and histopathology. By multivariable analyses, significant prognostic factors were stage, tumor grade (only for OS), histopathology, and adjuvant therapy. Focusing on stage and adjuvant therapy, we found that the PFS and OS of early-stage patients who had or did not have adjuvant therapy were not significantly different, whereas the PFS and OS of advanced-stage patients who had adjuvant treatment were significantly higher than the PFS and OS of those who did not have adjuvant treatment.ConclusionsThe use of adjuvant therapy for patients with EMC was not according to the standard recommendation in all patients for many reasons. The benefit of adjuvant therapy was demonstrated in advanced- but not in early-stage cancer.

Chemotherapy Reduces Para-aortic Node Recurrences in Endometrial Cancer With Positive Pelvic and Unknown Para-aortic Nodes

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 263-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giorgio Bogani ◽  
Antonella Cromi ◽  
Maurizio Serati ◽  
Edoardo Di Naro ◽  
Nicoletta Donadello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Aortic Area ◽  
Disease Free

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate how the administration of different adjuvant therapies influences the risk for developing recurrences in the para-aortic area in endometrial cancer (EC) with positive pelvic and unknown para-aortic nodes.MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the data of 58 patients with EC affected by stage IIIC1 who had undergone pelvic but not para-aortic lymphadenectomy from January 1, 1990 to December 31, 2011. Survival outcomes within the first 5 years after surgery were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier model.ResultsChemotherapy plus radiotherapy, chemotherapy only, and external radiotherapy only were administered in 12 (23%), 18 (34%), and 23 (43%) patients, respectively. Five (9%) patients, who were selected to forego adjuvant therapy due to poor performance status, were excluded from the analysis. Disease-free and overall survivals assessed at 5 years were 54%, and 61%, respectively. All para-aortic recurrences were observed among the patients with endometrioid EC, whereas no cases of para-aortic recurrences were found in patients with nonendometrioid histology (5/36 (14%) vs 0/17 (0%); P = 0.16); the latter were more likely to develop distant (hematogenous, peritoneal, and distant lymphatic) recurrences (P = 0.09). Type of adjuvant therapy was the only factor influencing para-aortic failure: chemotherapy (± radiotherapy) reduced the rate of para-aortic node recurrence in comparison with pelvic radiotherapy as a sole modality (P = 0.01). However, adjuvant therapy did not influence the 5-year survival outcomes (P > 0.05).ConclusionsIn the absence of local treatment (ie, para-aortic lymphadenectomy and radiotherapy), the administration of chemotherapy seems effective in reducing recurrences in the para-aortic area among patients with stage IIIC1 endometrioid EC.

scholarly journals Feasibility and effectiveness of afatinib for poor performance status patients with EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiao-En Wu ◽  
Ching-Fu Chang ◽  
Chen-Yang Huang ◽  
Cheng-Ta Yang ◽  
Chih-Hsi Scott Kuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Abstract Background Afatinib is one of the standard treatments for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on the use of afatinib in patients with poor performance status (PS ≥ 2) are limited. This study aimed to retrospectively review the clinical outcomes and safety of afatinib treatment in EGFR-mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC patients with PS ≥ 2. Methods The data for 62 patients who were treated at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from January 2010 to August 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients’ clinicopathological features were obtained, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify possible prognostic factors. Data on adverse events were collected to evaluate general tolerance for afatinib therapy. Results Until February 2020, the objective response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 58.1% (36/62), 69.4% (43/62), 8.8 months, and 12.9 months, respectively. The absence of liver metastasis (PFS: p = 0.044; OS: p = 0.061) and good disease control (p < 0.001 for PFS and OS) were independent favorable prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Bone metastasis (p = 0.036) and dose modification (reduction/interruption, p = 0.021) were predictors of disease control. Conclusion Afatinib demonstrated acceptable efficacy and safety in the current cohort. This study provided evidence to support the use of afatinib as a first-line treatment in EGFRm+ NSCLC patients with poor PS.

Was bei Tumorpatienten mit Atemwegsstenosen die Prognose bestimmt: Erst Rekanalisierung, im Anschluss andere Therapieoptionen nicht versäumen

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 148-149
Author(s):  
Manfred Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Poor Survival ◽  
Interventional Bronchoscopy ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard Regression ◽  
One Year

Background: Malignant central airway obstruction (MCAO) occurs in 20–30% of patients with primary pulmonary malignancy. Although bronchoscopic intervention is widely performed to treat MCAO, little data exist on the prognosis of interventional bronchoscopy. Therefore, we evaluated the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of bronchoscopic interventions in patients with MCAO due to primary pulmonary malignancy. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a university hospital and included 224 patients who received interventional bronchoscopy from 2004 to 2017, excluding patients with salivary gland-type tumor. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors associated with survival after the first bronchoscopic intervention. Results: Among 224 patients, 191 (85.3%) were males, and the median age was 63 years. The most common histological type of malignancy was squamous cell carcinoma (71.0%). Technical success was achieved in 93.7% of patients. Acute complications and procedure-related death occurred in 15.6 and 1.3% of patients, respectively. The median survival time was 7.0 months, and survival rates at one year and two years were 39.7 and 28.3%, respectively. Poor survival was associated with underlying chronic pulmonary disease, poor performance status, extended lesion, extrinsic or mixed lesion, and MCAO due to disease progression and not receiving adjuvant treatment after bronchoscopic intervention. Conclusions: Interventional bronchoscopy could be a safe and effective procedure for patients who have MCAO due to primary pulmonary malignancy. In addition, we found several prognostic factors for poor survival after intervention, which will help clinicians determine the best candidates for bronchoscopic intervention.

scholarly journals Attenuated regimen of biweekly gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients aged 65 years or older with advanced pancreatic cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 175628482097491
Author(s):  
Hasan Rehman ◽  
Jeffrey Chi ◽  
Nausheen Hakim ◽  
Shreya Prasad Goyal ◽  
Coral Olazagasti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Weekly Schedule ◽  
Dose Reductions

Background: Treatment with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel confers a survival benefit over gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer (APC). However, such treatment can be associated with significant toxicities especially in older patients and carries practical disadvantages related to a weekly schedule along with financial cost. We retrospectively analyzed patients >65 years of age with APC who received a modified biweekly regimen of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel to evaluate efficacy and toxicity. Methods: Patients aged >65 years with chemo-naïve APC with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ⩽2 were studied. Patients were treated with a modified regimen of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 every 2 weeks on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle. Patients were evaluated for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with analyses performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Adverse events were recorded on the day of chemotherapy. Cancer antigen 19.9 was measured in every cycle and restaging scans were performed every two cycles. Results: A total of 73 patients (median age: 73 years; range: 66–93) were treated with biweekly gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment. The median OS and PFS were 9.1 months and 4.8 months, respectively. Around 66% of patients received growth-factor support based on American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines and no patient developed neutropenic fever. The incidences of grade ⩾3 toxicity for neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neurotoxicity were 2%, 7%, 3%, and 5%, respectively. Dose reductions of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel were required in 10% and 4% patients, respectively. Conclusion: In patients older than >65 years of age with APC, a modified regimen of biweekly gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel was found to be effective when compared with the historical control from the MPACT study. This regimen allowed for fewer dose reductions, reduced healthcare costs from additional appointments, travel-related cost, as well as a favorable side-effect profile while maintaining efficacy. Though retrospective in nature, this study underlines the need for further investigation, particularly in elderly patients with poor performance status, such as those with pancreatic cancer, and in order to combine with a third agent, such as a targeted treatment or immunotherapy.

scholarly journals A Review of Docetaxel: Its Use in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. CMT.S5191
Author(s):  
Alessandro Inno ◽  
Michele Basso ◽  
Alessandra Cassano ◽  
Carlo Barone
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Combination Regimens

Docetaxel, a member of the taxane family, promotes cell death by binding β-tubulin and has demonstrated activity against several human malignancies, both as a single agent and in combination therapy. It has been approved in Europe and the US as front-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer in combination with cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF regimen). This approval was based on the results of a pivotal study (V325) which demonstrated that the addition of docetaxel to the reference regimen of cisplatin and fluorouracil improves overall survival and progression-free survival with a better quality of life despite increased toxicity (mainly haematological). Modifications of DCF regimen have been successfully investigated as a means of making the treatment more tolerable and suitable also for elderly patients or patients with poor performance status. Emerging data from several phase II studies suggest that other docetaxel-based combination regimens with anthracyclines or irinotecan have interesting activity with acceptable toxicity profiles, but the true efficacy of these regimens needs to be assessed in large randomized phase III studies. Thus, the best docetaxel-containing regimen has yet to be identified. Docetaxel also represents a good candidate for combination with novel molecular target agents. In light of the high response rates observed in phase II-III studies, a docetaxel-based chemotherapy regimen might also be considered a treatment option as perioperative or adjuvant therapy in potentially curable gastric cancer and further studies with or without biological agents are eagerly awaited in this setting.

Undifferentiated endometrial carcinoma: a National Cancer Database analysis of prognostic factors and treatment outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (7) ◽  
pp. 1126-1133
Author(s):  
Mariam AlHilli ◽  
Paul Elson ◽  
Lisa Rybicki ◽  
Sudha Amarnath ◽  
Bin Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Endometrial Carcinoma ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Prognostic Groups

BackgroundUndifferentiated endometrioid endometrial carcinoma of the uterus is a rare, highly aggressive, and under-recognized subtype of endometrial cancer.ObjectiveThis study evaluates survival, prognostic factors for survival, and treatment outcomes associated with undifferentiated endometrial cancer.MethodsThe National Cancer Database was queried to identify patients with undifferentiated endometrial cancer who underwent definitive primary surgical treatment. Patients with all other histologic subtypes or incomplete treatment data were excluded. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to determine independent prognostic factors for survival. Points for each prognostic factor were assigned from regression coefficients in the final multivariable model and summed for a total score. Recursive partitioning analysis was used to determine cut-offs in the score to identify unique prognostic groups.ResultsAmong 349 404 women diagnosed with endometrial cancer from 2004 to 2013, 3994 (1.1%) met the criteria for diagnosis of undifferentiated endometrial cancer and 3486 had survival data. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years (interquartile range (IQR) 57–74) and 58% of patients had early stage disease. Median interval from diagnosis to surgery was 3.7 weeks (IQR 2.0–5.7). Five year overall survival was 57% (standard error (SE) 1%). Stage was the strongest predictor of survival, with a 15–20% decrement in 5 year survival for each advance in stage. Stage, age, race, and presence of comorbidities were independent predictors of survival and were used to categorize patients into five prognostic groups. Adjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival across most disease stages and prognostic groups. Multimodal adjuvant therapy was superior to unimodal treatment particularly in advanced stage unfavorable and very unfavorable groups.ConclusionIn women with undifferentiated endometrial cancer, survival is primarily driven by stage. Despite the poor overall prognosis of undifferentiated endometrial cancer, multimodal adjuvant therapy is a key component of treatment.

Prognostic factors and effects of adjuvant therapy after pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma: Mayo Clinic experience.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15703-e15703
Author(s):  
Zhaohui Jin ◽  
Mindy L. Hartgers ◽  
Cristobal T. Sanhueza ◽  
Benny Johnson ◽  
Christopher R. Shubert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Advanced Disease ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Ampullary Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Node Metastasis ◽  
Advanced Disease Stage

e15703 Background: The aim of this study is to identify prognostic factors and effects of adjuvant therapy for patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma who had pancreatoduodenectomy. Methods: A cohort of 123 consecutive patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy for ampullary adenocarcinoma from January 1, 2006, through August 31, 2016 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. Only patients with ampullary carcinoma by pathology review were included and were histologically classified as pancreaticobiliary or intestinal subtypes. Median follow-up duration was 41.0 months. Patient survival and its correlation with patient and tumor variables were tested by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Pancreatoduodenectomy was curative-intent in 120 out of 123 patients. All 123 patients underwent radical surgery, 32 patients (26.0%) had laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy. Among 123 patients, there were 76 men (61.8%).Median age at diagnosis was 67.2 years. 54 patients (45%) without metastatic disease upon surgery had adjuvant therapy (35 patients had chemotherapy only while 19 patient also had radiation). Median overall survival (OS) was 91.8 months. Poor performance status at disease diagnosis (ECOG > = 1), old age ( > = 70 years), primary tumor infiltration (T), lymph node metastasis (N), and advanced disease stage (TNM) had a significant negative impact on survival (p < 0.05 by univariate analysis). Gender, diabetes at disease diagnosis, laparoscopic surgery approach, number of lymph nodes removed, number of positive lymph nodes, and tumor size did not influence survival. In multivariate analysis, ECOG score > = 1, adjuvant treatment, primary tumor infiltration (T) and lymph node metastasis (N) remained statistically significant. Adjuvant therapy was independently associated with improved disease free survival (P = 0.0388) and overall survival (p = 0.030) for patients with advanced disease (stage IIB and above). Conclusions: Poor performance status and advanced disease stage are associated with decreased survival in patients with ampullary adenocarcinoma. Patients with advanced disease should be considered for adjuvant chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Primary Gastric Lymphoma: Conservative Treatment Modality Is Not Inferior to Surgery for Early-Stage Disease

ISRN Oncology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatih Selçukbiricik ◽  
Deniz Tural ◽  
Olgun Elicin ◽  
Selin Berk ◽  
Mustafa Özgüroğlu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Gastric Lymphoma ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Primary Gastric Lymphoma

Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, survival rates, and treatment modalities in patients with primary gastric lymphoma (PGL). Methods. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed data from patients treated for PGL in our clinic from 1998 through 2010. Staging was performed using the Lugano Staging System. Overall and disease-free survival (OS and DFS) were calculated from the date of diagnosis. Results. We identified 79 patients. Thirty-seven patients (47%) were male. The median age at presentation was 57 (18–85) years. The median follow-up time was 41 (9–52) months. Thirty patients (38%) underwent surgery, 74 (92%) received chemotherapy, and 18 (23%) received radiotherapy. The five-year OS and DFS rates were 91.2% and 83.9%, respectively, in patients with stage I/II or IIE disease and 70.6% and 65.5%, respectively, in patients with stage IV disease ( for both rates). Treatment modality (surgical or conservative) had no impact on OS or DFS in early stages. In a multivariate analysis, poor performance status, advanced stage, and high LDH levels were significant bad prognostic factors for DFS, while advanced stage, poor performance status, and age > 60 years were significant bad prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion. Surgery provides no advantage for survival over conservative treatment; thus, conservative treatment modalities should be preferred initially at early stages of PGL.

Current and Emerging Treatments for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 468-479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Cavaliere ◽  
Carmine D`Aniello ◽  
Chiara Della Pepa ◽  
Salvatore Pisconti ◽  
Massimiliano Berretta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Special Focus ◽  
Systemic Treatments

In the last decades, the treatment of mRCC, metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma, has become more and more complex due to the approval of a great number of effective systemic treatments that have significantly improved the prognosis of patients suffering from such disease. An additional knowledge of the genetic aberrations and the molecular pathways alterations that underlie RCC, has promoted the development of several novel agents, known as target therapies (TTs). Even though TTs are not curative and all patients eventually progress, an adequate sequencing of these drugs can provide a significant benefit in terms of PFS, Progression Free Survival, and hopefully OS, Overall Survival. To date, there are few data about the optimal sequential use of the TTs hence, in clinical practice, the therapeutic strategy is chosen on the basis of the safety profile of the drug, patients medical history and the pivotal trial results, though such studies often exclude patients with poor performance status and/or severe comorbidities that we routinely see in our clinics. This review aims to provide an overview of the systemic therapies for mRCC both in the newly diagnosed patients and in the subsequent lines of treatment, with a special focus on the last advances about TTs and immunotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document