P08 Serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP or NT-BNP) testing and monitoring in patients with heart failure (HF): the challenges of setting up and analysing a population based cohort study in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD)

2016 ◽  
Vol 70 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A57.1-A57
Author(s):  
T McDonagh ◽  
BC Reeves ◽  
M Pufulete ◽  
R Maishman ◽  
L Dreyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure

scholarly journals Natriuretic peptide referral thresholds and heart failure diagnosis: population-based cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Taylor ◽  
J.M Ordonez-Mena ◽  
S Lay-Flurrie ◽  
C Goyder ◽  
N Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Negative Predictive Value ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
National Level ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Nice Guideline

Abstract Background Natriuretic peptide (NP) testing is recommended by both the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for people presenting with symptoms of heart failure (HF) in primary care. However, ESC and NICE guidelines suggest different NP referral thresholds: ESC recommend referral at a lower NP level (BNP≥35pg/ml / NT-proBNP≥125pg/ml) compared to NICE (BNP≥100pg/ml/NT-proBNP≥400pg/ml). Purpose We aimed to evaluate NP test performance for HF diagnosis for ESC and NICE guideline-defined thresholds. Methods Population-based cohort study using linked primary and secondary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink in England between 1st January 2000 and 31st December 2018. Participants were adults aged 45 years and above with a NP result: 74,233 had a BNP and 155,347 had a NT-proBNP measurement. The main outcome measures were diagnostic performance of NP test (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value) by threshold. Results A total of 229,580 patients had a NP test and 21,102 (9.2%) were diagnosed with HF. The ESC NT-proBNP threshold of 125pg/ml had a sensitivity of 94.6% (94.2 to 95.0) and specificity of 50.0% (49.7 to 50.3) compared to sensitivity of 81.7% (81.0 to 82.3) and specificity of 80.3% (80.0 to 80.5) for the NICE NT-proBNP 400pg/ml threshold. For both guidelines, nearly all patients with a NP level below the threshold did not have HF (negative predictive value ESC 98.9% (98.8 to 99.0) and NICE 97.7% (97.6 to 97.8). Similar performance was found for BNP. Conclusions The performance of NP testing is dependent on the guideline-specified threshold for referral. In 100 people with HF, using the NICE threshold would falsely reassure 18 patients, whereas the lower ESC threshold would miss just 5 people but twice as many patients would be referred for diagnostic assessment. The optimal NP threshold for referral for HF diagnosis will depend on the healthcare setting. The trade-off between missing HF cases and overwhelming diagnostic services needs to be determined at a national level. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Institute for Health Research

scholarly journals Examining the risk of depression or self-harm associated with incretin-based therapies used to manage hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. e023830 ◽  
Author(s):  
John-Michael Gamble ◽  
Eugene Chibrikov ◽  
William K Midodzi ◽  
Laurie K Twells ◽  
Sumit R Majumdar
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Primary Study ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Self Harm ◽  
The Uk ◽  
New Onset

ObjectivesTo compare population-based incidence rates of new-onset depression or self-harm in patients initiating incretin-based therapies with that of sulfonylureas (SU) and other glucose-lowering agents.DesignPopulation-based cohort study.SettingPatients attending primary care practices registered with the UK-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).ParticipantsUsing the UK-based CPRD, we identified two incretin-based therapies cohorts: (1) dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i)-cohort, consisting of new users of DPP-4i and SU and (2) glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA)-cohort, consisting of new users of GLP-1RA and SU, between January 2007 and January 2016. Patients with a prior history of depression, self-harm and other serious psychiatric conditions were excluded.Main outcome measuresThe primary study outcome comprised a composite of new-onset depression or self-harm. Unadjusted and adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to quantify the association between incretin-based therapies and depression or self-harm. Deciles of High-Dimensional Propensity Scores and concurrent number of glucose-lowering agents were used to adjust for potential confounding.ResultsWe identified new users of 6206 DPP-4i and 22 128 SU in the DPP-4i-cohort, and 501 GLP-1RA and 16 409 SU new users in the GLP-1RA-cohort. The incidence of depression or self-harm was 8.2 vs 11.7 events/1000 person-years in the DPP-4i-cohort and 18.2 vs 13.6 events/1000 person-years in the GLP-1RA-cohort for incretin-based therapies versus SU, respectively. Incretin-based therapies were not associated with an increased or decreased incidence of depression or self-harm compared with SU (DPP-4i-cohort: unadjusted HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.96; adjusted HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.13; GLP-1RA-cohort: unadjusted HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.58; adjusted HR 1.25, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.50). Consistent results were observed for other glucose-lowering comparators including insulin and thiazolidinediones.ConclusionsOur findings suggest that the two incretin-based therapies are not associated with an increased or decreased risk of depression or self-harm.

scholarly journals Natriuretic peptide level at heart failure diagnosis and risk of hospitalisation and death in England 2004–2018

Heart ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. heartjnl-2021-319196
Author(s):  
Clare J Taylor ◽  
Sarah L Lay-Flurrie ◽  
José M Ordóñez-Mena ◽  
Clare R Goyder ◽  
Nicholas R Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Natriuretic Peptide ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Practice Research ◽  
Clinical Practice Research Datalink ◽  
Related Hospitalisation ◽  
One Year ◽  
Heart Failure Diagnosis ◽  
The Impact

ObjectiveHeart failure (HF) is a malignant condition requiring urgent treatment. Guidelines recommend natriuretic peptide (NP) testing in primary care to prioritise referral for specialist diagnostic assessment. We aimed to assess association of baseline NP with hospitalisation and mortality in people with newly diagnosed HF.MethodsPopulation-based cohort study of 40 007 patients in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink in England with a new HF diagnosis (48% men, mean age 78.5 years). We used linked primary and secondary care data between 1 January 2004 and 31 December 2018 to report one-year hospitalisation and 1-year, 5-year and 10-year mortality by NP level.Results22 085 (55%) participants were hospitalised in the year following diagnosis. Adjusted odds of HF-related hospitalisation in those with a high NP (NT-proBNP >2000 pg/mL) were twofold greater (OR 2.26 95% CI 1.98 to 2.59) than a moderate NP (NT-proBNP 400–2000 pg/mL). All-cause mortality rates in the high NP group were 27%, 62% and 82% at 1, 5 and 10 years, compared with 19%, 50% and 77%, respectively, in the moderate NP group and, in a competing risks model, risk of HF-related death was 50% higher at each timepoint. Median time between NP test and HF diagnosis was 101 days (IQR 19–581).ConclusionsHigh baseline NP is associated with increased HF-related hospitalisation and poor survival. While healthcare systems remain under pressure from the impact of COVID-19, research to test novel strategies to prevent hospitalisation and improve outcomes—such as a mandatory two-week HF diagnosis pathway—is urgently needed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document