671 Update of a systematic review and meta-analysis studying the association between antibiotic use and clinical outcomes of non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A708-A708
Author(s):  
Pierre-Alain Bandinelli ◽  
Julie Cervesi ◽  
Clément Le Bescop ◽  
Renaud Buffet ◽  
Jean De Gunzburg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Time Window ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Forest Plot ◽  
Antibiotic Exposure ◽  
Hazard Ratios

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been shown to improve patients‘ clinical outcomes in a variety of cancers, but with variable efficacy. Prior research has also suggested that systemic antibiotic (ABX) exposure may impact the intestinal microbiota and result in suboptimal ICI treatment outcomes. Our team published a systematic review and meta-analysis showing that ABX use could indeed decrease the survival of patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and treated with ICIs.1 The present abstract aims at updating this meta-analysis by incorporating new studies that have been published in the period ranging from September 2019 to August 2020.MethodsMedline (through PubMed), the Cochrane Library and major oncology conferences proceedings were systematically searched to identify studies assessing the impact of ABX use on the clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. Studies were found eligible for inclusion when they mentioned a hazard ratio (HR) or Kaplan–Meier curves for overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) based on antibiotic exposure. Pooled HRs for OS and PFS and HRs for OS and PFS according to different time windows for ABX exposure were calculated.Results6 eligible new studies were identified between September 2019 and August 2020 while 3 other studies were updated with new information. Altogether, 27 studies reported data for OS (6,436 patients, 826 of whom coming from new studies) and 24 for PFS (3,751 patients, 786 of whom coming from new studies). The pooled HR was 1.75 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.38–2.23) for OS and 1.57 (95% CI: 1.28–1.92) for PFS, confirming a significantly reduced survival in patients with NSCLC exposed to ABX. The detailed analysis in subgroups based on the time window of exposure (figure 1, figure 2) suggests that the deleterious effect of ABX is stronger when the exposition happens shortly before and after the initiation of the ICI treatment.Abstract 671 Figure 1Forest plot of hazard ratios for overall survival of patients diagnosed with NSCLC and exposed to antibiotics versus not exposed to antibiotics, according to the time window of antibiotic exposureAbstract 671 Figure 2Forest plot of hazard ratios for progression-free survival of patients diagnosed with NSCLC and exposed to antibiotics versus not exposed to antibiotics, according to the time window of antibiotic exposureConclusionsThe update of the meta-analysis confirms the previously reported deleterious effect of ABX on ICI treatment outcomes, taking into account the latest publications in the field. The topic deserves further research to uncover if the effect will stand with 1st line use of ICI together with chemotherapies and/or other approved combinations, elucidate the mechanisms at stake and improve care of patients.ReferencesLurienne L, Cervesi J, Duhalde L, de Gunzburg J, Andremont A, Zalcman G, et al. NSCLC immunotherapy efficacy and antibiotic use: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Oncol 2020;15:1147–1159.

scholarly journals 191. The impact of antibiotic use on clinical outcomes in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S101-S101
Author(s):  
Maria Tsikala Vafea ◽  
Neel Belani ◽  
Kendra Vieira ◽  
Dimitrios Farmakiotis
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Experimental Models ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Observational studies and experimental models suggest that use of antibiotics close to the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can negatively affect tumor response and patient survival. This observation may be attributed to microbiome dysbiosis and the resultant suppression of host immune response against neoplastic cells. Methods We conducted a systematic search of PUBMED and EMBASE databases and references of articles retrieved. We included studies published between 1/1/17 and 2/1/20, which evaluated the association between antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in cancer patients treated with ICI. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and progressive disease (PD) rate. We performed a study-level random-effects meta-analysis with pooling of hazards ratios (HR) for OS, PFS, and odds ratios (OR) for RR and PD (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020166473). Results We included 41 studies with a total of 10,857 patients. The most common malignancies were lung cancer (59.7%), melanoma (23.1%), renal cell and urothelial carcinomas (8.1%). OS and PFS were shorter, RR lower, and PD higher in patients receiving antibiotics, both in univariate analyses and after adjustment for other confounders. Heterogeneity was significant for all outcomes, less so for adjusted OS and PFS (Table). To our knowledge, this is the largest meta-analysis on the association between antibiotic use and efficacy of ICI, and the only one to address RR and PD to-date. Association between antibiotics and clinical outcomes. Conclusion We demonstrated a significant association between antibiotic use and unfavorable clinical outcomes in patients with cancer receiving ICI. Such patients may be an important target group for antibiotic stewardship interventions. The high heterogeneity across all outcomes underscores the need for more detailed, patient-level studies with stratification by host, antibacterial and cancer treatment factors. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

scholarly journals Prognostic role of pretreatment blood lymphocyte count in patients with solid tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiawen Zhao ◽  
Weijia Huang ◽  
Yongxian Wu ◽  
Yihuan Luo ◽  
Bo Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Lymphocyte Count ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Cancer Type ◽  
Hazard Ratios

Abstract Background To evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment lymphocyte counts with respect to clinical outcomes in patients with solid tumors. Methods Systematic literature search of electronic databases (Pubmed, Embase and Web of Science) up to May 1, 2018 was carried out by two independent reviewers. We included Eligible studies assessed the prognostic impact of pretreatment lymphocytes and had reported hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for endpoints including overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Only English publications were included. Results A total of 42 studies comprising 13,272 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Low pretreatment lymphocyte count was associated with poor OS (HR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.16–1.39, P < 0.001, I2 = 58.5%) and PFS (HR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.15–1.40, P < 0.001, I2 = 25.7%). Subgroup analysis disaggregated by cancer type indicated that low pretreatment lymphocytes were most closely associated with poor OS in colorectal cancer followed by breast cancer and renal cancer. Conclusions Low pretreatment lymphocyte count may represent an unfavorable prognostic factor for clinical outcomes in patients with solid tumors.

scholarly journals Pharmacogenetic Association between XRCC1 Polymorphisms and Response to Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Asian Patients with NSCLC: A Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Ningning Zhang ◽  
Yushu Ouyang ◽  
Jianlan Chang ◽  
Ping Liu ◽  
Xiangyang Tian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Gene Dosage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Gene Dosage Effect ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Study Heterogeneity

Background. Platinum-based chemotherapy plays an antitumor role by damaging DNA. X-ray repair crosscomplementing protein 1 (XRCC1) participates in DNA repair and thus affects the sensitivity to platinum drugs. Two polymorphisms of XRCC1, rs25487 (Arg399Gln) and rs1799782 (Arg194Trp), have been widely studied for the association with clinical outcomes of platinum-based chemotherapy in Asian patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the results remain inconclusive. Thus, we performed the present meta-analysis. Methods. Literature search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE up to June 2019. Odds ratios (ORs) for objective response ratio (ORR), Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated to assess the association strengths between XRCC1 polymorphisms and clinical outcomes. Comparisons were performed in homozygous, heterozygous, dominant, and recessive models. Results. Finally, a total of 23 studies involving 5567 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to ArgArg of rs25487, GlnGln ( OR = 1.71 , 95% CI: 1.16-2.52, p = .007 , I 2 = 56.8 % ) and GlnArg ( OR = 1.23 , 95% CI: 1.07-1.40, p = .003 , I 2 = 29.0 % ) were associated with higher ORR. Meanwhile, GlnGln indicated a favorable OS ( HR = 0.60 , 95% CI: 0.40-0.88) and PFS ( HR = 0.64 , 95% CI: 0.46-0.90). We also found positive associations between rs1799782 and ORR in all comparison models with low between-study heterogeneity. The association strength increased with the number of variant alleles (TrpTrp vs. ArgArg: OR = 1.73 , 95% CI:1.31-2.27; TrpArg vs. ArgArg: OR = 1.28 , 95% CI: 1.06-1.55), suggesting a gene dosage effect. In addition, TrpTrp predicted a longer OS. Conclusion. Our results showed that rs25487 and rs1799782 of XRCC1 are potential markers to predict clinical outcomes of platinum-based chemotherapy in Asian patients with NSCLC.

scholarly journals Survival of Patients Treated with Antibiotics and Immunotherapy for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1458 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Petrelli ◽  
Alessandro Iaculli ◽  
Diego Signorelli ◽  
Antonio Ghidini ◽  
Lorenzo Dottorini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
The Cochrane Library ◽  
Reporting Data

Antibiotics (ABs) are common medications used for treating infections. In cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), concomitant exposure to ABs may impair the efficacy of ICIs and lead to a poorer outcome compared to AB non-users. We report here the results of a meta-analysis evaluating the effects of ABs on the outcome of patients with solid tumours treated with ICIs. PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase were searched from inception until September 2019 for observational or prospective studies reporting the prognoses of adult patients with cancer treated with ICIs and with or without ABs. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, and progression-free survival (PFS) was the secondary endpoint. The effect size was reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) and an HR > 1 associated with a worse outcome in ABs users compared to AB non-users. Fifteen publications were retrieved for a total of 2363 patients. In the main analysis (n = 15 studies reporting data), OS was reduced in patients exposed to ABs before or during treatment with ICIs (HR = 2.07, 95%CI 1.51–2.84; p < 0.01). Similarly, PFS was inferior in AB users in n = 13 studies with data available (HR = 1.53, 95%CI 1.22–1.93; p < 0.01). In cancer patients treated with ICIs, AB use significantly reduced OS and PFS. Short duration/course of ABs may be considered in clinical situations in which they are strictly needed.

scholarly journals Survival of Patients Treated with Antibiotics and Immunotherapy for Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Petrelli ◽  
Alessandro Iaculli ◽  
Diego Signorelli ◽  
Antonio Ghidini ◽  
Lorenzo Dottorini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
The Cochrane Library ◽  
Reporting Data

Antibiotics (ABs) are common medications used for treating infections. In cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), concomitant exposure to ABs may impair the efficacy of ICIs and lead to a poorer outcome compared to AB non-users. We report here the results of a meta-analysis evaluating the effects of ABs on the outcome of patients with solid tumors treated with ICIs. PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were searched from inception until September 2019 for observational or prospective studies reporting prognosis of adult patients with cancer treated with ICIs and with or without ABs. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, and progression-free survival (PFS) was the secondary endpoint. The effect size was reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and an HR &gt; 1 associated with a worse outcome in ABs users compared to no-ABs users. Fifteen publications were retrieved for a total of 2363 patients. In the main analysis (n = 15 studies reporting data), OS was reduced in patients exposed to ABs before or during treatment with ICIs (HR = 2.07, 95%CI 1.51&ndash;2.84; P&lt;.01). Similarly, PFS was inferior in ABs users in n = 13 studies with data available (HR = 1.53, 95%CI 1.22&ndash;1.93; p&lt;.01). In cancer patients treated with ICIs, AB use significantly reduces OS and PFS. Short duration/course of ABs may be considered in clinical situations in which they are strictly needed.

Impact of corticosteroids use on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: A meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15234-e15234
Author(s):  
Jiarui Li ◽  
Kaili Yang ◽  
Lin Zhao ◽  
Chunmei Bai ◽  
Zhao Sun
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Detrimental Impact

e15234 Background: Corticosteroids are commonly used for management of cancer-related symptoms or immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, given the inhibitory effects of corticosteroids on a broad range of immune responses, it is presumed that the use of these agents may affect the clinical outcomes of ICIs. This meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of corticosteroids use on the efficacy of ICIs in cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a search covering electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL), conference abstracts (ASCO and ESMO) and reference lists to identify relevant studies. Studies that reported clinical outcomes of patients with corticosteroids administration before and/or after the initiation of ICIs treatment were eligible for evaluation. The primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The random-effects model was utilized to synthesize the effect sizes of individual studies. Results: The initial literature search identified 1,900 records. After study selection, a total of 15 studies with 14,123 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. Corticosteroids use significantly reduced PFS (HR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.30–2.61; P = 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.18–1.68; P < 0.001) in cancer patients treated with ICIs. In subgroup analysis, corticosteroids use for cancer-related symptoms was associated with a shorter PFS (HR = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.40–2.78; P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.25–2.83; P = 0.003), but their use for irAEs did not show a detrimental impact on OS (HR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.77–1.44; P = 0.740). Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicated that corticosteroids use might hinder the efficacy of ICIs in cancer patients. The indications of corticosteroids use should be strictly controlled during the course of immunotherapy.

scholarly journals How to Choose a Survival Period? The Impact of Antibiotic Use on OS or PFS in NSCLC Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382110334
Author(s):  
Hua Chen ◽  
Ke-dong Han ◽  
Zhi-jiang He ◽  
Yi-sheng Huang
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
The Impact

Background: The development of immunotherapy has dramatically changed the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. The negative association of antibiotics on the clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with NSCLC is well known. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases were searched until January 11, 2020. We included retrospective studies of ICIs (e.g., PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4). The clinical outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Our results indicated that the use of antibiotics reduced the survival of NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. The pooled HRs of PFS and OS were HR = 1.41 (95% CI = 1.23-1.61; P < 0.001) and HR = 2.16 (95% CI = 1.79-2.60; P < 0.001). We divided the studies into 5 subgroups according to antibiotic exposure time. Subgroup analysis showed that the patients that were administered antibiotics [−60 days; 0 days] or [−30 days; 0 days] before the initiation of ICIs treatment had a poorer OS rate, whereas those patients that were administered antibiotics [0 days; 30 days] after the initiation of ICIs treatment had a poorer PFS rate. In summary, ATB treatment in patients [−60 days; +30 days] near the initiation of ICIs treatment significantly reduced the survival in NSCLC patients. Conclusion: Our results indicated that ATB use is negatively associated with survival in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs immunotherapy. Similar studies involving a larger sample of cases are still being published. This meta-analysis identified that the timing of ATB treatment in NSCLC patients receiving ICIs immunotherapy has different effects on the OS and PFS of these patients. ATB treatment prior to the initiation of ICIs treatment affects OS, whereas ATB treatment after the initiation of ICIs treatment affects PFS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document