scholarly journals 191. The impact of antibiotic use on clinical outcomes in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S101-S101
Author(s):  
Maria Tsikala Vafea ◽  
Neel Belani ◽  
Kendra Vieira ◽  
Dimitrios Farmakiotis
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Experimental Models ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Observational studies and experimental models suggest that use of antibiotics close to the administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) can negatively affect tumor response and patient survival. This observation may be attributed to microbiome dysbiosis and the resultant suppression of host immune response against neoplastic cells. Methods We conducted a systematic search of PUBMED and EMBASE databases and references of articles retrieved. We included studies published between 1/1/17 and 2/1/20, which evaluated the association between antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in cancer patients treated with ICI. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and progressive disease (PD) rate. We performed a study-level random-effects meta-analysis with pooling of hazards ratios (HR) for OS, PFS, and odds ratios (OR) for RR and PD (PROSPERO ID: CRD42020166473). Results We included 41 studies with a total of 10,857 patients. The most common malignancies were lung cancer (59.7%), melanoma (23.1%), renal cell and urothelial carcinomas (8.1%). OS and PFS were shorter, RR lower, and PD higher in patients receiving antibiotics, both in univariate analyses and after adjustment for other confounders. Heterogeneity was significant for all outcomes, less so for adjusted OS and PFS (Table). To our knowledge, this is the largest meta-analysis on the association between antibiotic use and efficacy of ICI, and the only one to address RR and PD to-date. Association between antibiotics and clinical outcomes. Conclusion We demonstrated a significant association between antibiotic use and unfavorable clinical outcomes in patients with cancer receiving ICI. Such patients may be an important target group for antibiotic stewardship interventions. The high heterogeneity across all outcomes underscores the need for more detailed, patient-level studies with stratification by host, antibacterial and cancer treatment factors. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Impact of corticosteroids use on efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients: A meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15234-e15234
Author(s):  
Jiarui Li ◽  
Kaili Yang ◽  
Lin Zhao ◽  
Chunmei Bai ◽  
Zhao Sun
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Detrimental Impact

e15234 Background: Corticosteroids are commonly used for management of cancer-related symptoms or immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, given the inhibitory effects of corticosteroids on a broad range of immune responses, it is presumed that the use of these agents may affect the clinical outcomes of ICIs. This meta-analysis aims to explore the impact of corticosteroids use on the efficacy of ICIs in cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a search covering electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL), conference abstracts (ASCO and ESMO) and reference lists to identify relevant studies. Studies that reported clinical outcomes of patients with corticosteroids administration before and/or after the initiation of ICIs treatment were eligible for evaluation. The primary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The random-effects model was utilized to synthesize the effect sizes of individual studies. Results: The initial literature search identified 1,900 records. After study selection, a total of 15 studies with 14,123 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. Corticosteroids use significantly reduced PFS (HR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.30–2.61; P = 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.18–1.68; P < 0.001) in cancer patients treated with ICIs. In subgroup analysis, corticosteroids use for cancer-related symptoms was associated with a shorter PFS (HR = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.40–2.78; P < 0.001) and OS (HR = 1.88; 95% CI: 1.25–2.83; P = 0.003), but their use for irAEs did not show a detrimental impact on OS (HR = 1.05; 95% CI: 0.77–1.44; P = 0.740). Conclusions: This meta-analysis indicated that corticosteroids use might hinder the efficacy of ICIs in cancer patients. The indications of corticosteroids use should be strictly controlled during the course of immunotherapy.

scholarly journals How to Choose a Survival Period? The Impact of Antibiotic Use on OS or PFS in NSCLC Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 153303382110334
Author(s):  
Hua Chen ◽  
Ke-dong Han ◽  
Zhi-jiang He ◽  
Yi-sheng Huang
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Nsclc Patients ◽  
The Impact

Background: The development of immunotherapy has dramatically changed the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. The negative association of antibiotics on the clinical activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with NSCLC is well known. Methods: PubMed, Embase, and Medline databases were searched until January 11, 2020. We included retrospective studies of ICIs (e.g., PD-1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4). The clinical outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and subgroup and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results: Our results indicated that the use of antibiotics reduced the survival of NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. The pooled HRs of PFS and OS were HR = 1.41 (95% CI = 1.23-1.61; P < 0.001) and HR = 2.16 (95% CI = 1.79-2.60; P < 0.001). We divided the studies into 5 subgroups according to antibiotic exposure time. Subgroup analysis showed that the patients that were administered antibiotics [−60 days; 0 days] or [−30 days; 0 days] before the initiation of ICIs treatment had a poorer OS rate, whereas those patients that were administered antibiotics [0 days; 30 days] after the initiation of ICIs treatment had a poorer PFS rate. In summary, ATB treatment in patients [−60 days; +30 days] near the initiation of ICIs treatment significantly reduced the survival in NSCLC patients. Conclusion: Our results indicated that ATB use is negatively associated with survival in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs immunotherapy. Similar studies involving a larger sample of cases are still being published. This meta-analysis identified that the timing of ATB treatment in NSCLC patients receiving ICIs immunotherapy has different effects on the OS and PFS of these patients. ATB treatment prior to the initiation of ICIs treatment affects OS, whereas ATB treatment after the initiation of ICIs treatment affects PFS.

scholarly journals Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and age in cancer patients

Immunotherapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 587-603 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan-zhang Huang ◽  
Peng Gao ◽  
Yong-xi Song ◽  
Jing-xu Sun ◽  
Xiao-wan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Comparable Efficacy ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Meta Regression Analysis ◽  
The Impact

Aim: To evaluate the impact of age on the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in cancer patients. Materials & methods: The primary outcomes included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Subgroup, meta-regression analysis and within-trial interaction HR were conducted. Results: A total of 34 studies containing 20,511 cancer patients were included. ICI could improve the OS and PFS in patient aged <65 and ≥65 years. Patients aged <75 years treated with ICI also had favorable OS and PFS compared with the control groups. Conclusion: ICI has comparable efficacy in cancer patients aged <65 and ≥65 years. Cancer patients aged ≥75 years need more attention in the future clinical trials.

scholarly journals Comparison of RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cancers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 120
Author(s):  
Hyo Jung Park ◽  
Gun Ha Kim ◽  
Kyung Won Kim ◽  
Choong Wook Lee ◽  
Shinkyo Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Rate Ratios ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Survival Endpoint ◽  
The Impact

Despite wide recognition of iRECIST, evidence regarding the impact of iRECIST over RECIST 1.1 is lacking. We aimed to evaluate the impact of iRECIST on assessing treatment efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) over RECIST 1.1. Articles that evaluated the treatment response and outcome based on both RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST were eligible. Data regarding overall response rates (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) based on RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST, and data required to estimate individual patient data of progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted. Estimates were compared using meta-regression and pooled incidence rate ratios. The pooled difference of restricted mean survival time (RMST) of PFS between two criteria were calculated. Eleven studies with 6210 patients were analyzed. The application of iRECIST had no impact on the response-related endpoint by showing no significantly different ORR and DCR from RECIST 1.1 (pooled ORR, 23.6% and 24.7% [p = 0.72]; pooled DCR, 45.3% and 48.7% [p = 0.56] for iRECIST and RECIST 1.1, respectively) and had a minor impact on a survival endpoint by showing longer RMST of PFS than RECIST 1.1 (pooled difference, 0.46 months; 95% CI, 0.10–0.82 months; p = 0.01). Such a modest benefit of iRECIST should be considered when we design a clinical trial for immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in cancer patients of different ages: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (31) ◽  
pp. 3633-3646 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Jian Gu
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Systematic Evaluation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Older Cancer Patients

Aim: We conducted an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in different age groups. Methods: The relevant RCTs in cancer patients receiving ICIs were searched and the systematic evaluation was performed. PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for studies published till January 2019. Results: A total of 27 RCTs included 17,546 patients were available for this meta-analysis. ICIs significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in both of the younger (<65 years) and the older cancer patients (≥65 years). No significantly prolonged OS and PFS was observed among patients older than 75 years. Conclusion: ICIs could not significantly improve OS and PFS compared with controls in cancer patients aged over 75 years.

scholarly journals Results from a Meta-analysis of Combination of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 Inhibitors in Malignant Cancer Patients: Does PD-L1 Matter?

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuqian Feng ◽  
Huimin Jin ◽  
Kaibo Guo ◽  
Yuying Xiang ◽  
Yiting Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Malignant Tumors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Combination Immunotherapy

Background: Combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been widely used for clinical treatment in recent years, which has a better survival benefit. However, not all patients can derive clinical benefit from combination immunotherapy. Therefore, it is necessary to explore the biomarkers of combination immunotherapy.Methods: We retrieved articles from electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane. The statistical analysis was performed using RevMan software. Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) were the outcome indicators. In the unselect population, we compared combination therapy with other treatments. In addition, we also conducted subgroup analysis on PFS, OS and ORR according to PD-L1 status.Results: Seven studies were included in the analysis for a total of 3,515 cases. In the unselected population, we found that combination therapy has longer PFS, OS, and better ORR than other treatments for cancer patients. The longer PFS was showed in PD-L1 ≥ 5% cases (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.56–0.76; p &lt; 0.001) than PD-L1 ≥ 1% cases (HR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.66–0.79; p &lt; 0.001), while ORR and OS have not related to the status of PD-L1.Conclusion: This study supported the efficacy of combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and also showed that PFS in patients with malignant tumors is positively correlated with PD-L1 expression. Due to the limited number of trials included, more high-quality clinical randomized controlled trials should be conducted to confirm the review findings.

scholarly journals Immune-Related Adverse Events Predict the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Lung Cancer Patients: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donghui Wang ◽  
Cen Chen ◽  
Yanli Gu ◽  
Wanjun Lu ◽  
Ping Zhan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients

BackgroundImmune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been reported to be associated with the efficacy of immunotherapy. Herein, we conducted a meta-analysis to demonstrate that irAEs could predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in lung cancer patients.MethodsLiterature on the correlation between irAEs and the efficacy of immunotherapy in lung cancer patients were searched to collect the data on objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), or progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients. These data were incorporated into the meta-analysis.ResultsA total of 34 records encompassing 8,115 patients were examined in this study. The irAEs occurrence was significantly associated with higher ORR {risk ratio (RR): 2.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) [2.06–2.88], p &lt; 0.00001} and improved OS {hazard ratio (HR): 0.51, 95% CI [0.43–0.61], p &lt; 0.00001}, and PFS (HR: 0.50, 95% CI [0.44–0.57], p &lt; 0.00001) in lung cancer patients undergoing ICIs. Subgroup analysis revealed that OS was significantly longer in patients who developed dermatological (OS: HR: 0.53, 95%CI [0.42–0.65], p &lt; 0.00001), endocrine (OS: HR: 0.55, 95%CI [0.45–0.67], p &lt; 0.00001), and gastrointestinal irAEs (OS: HR: 0.58, 95%CI [0.42–0.80], p = 0.0009) than in those who did not. However, hepatobiliary, pulmonary, and high-grade (≥3) irAEs were not correlated with increased OS and PFS.ConclusionThe occurrence of irAEs in lung cancer patients, particularly dermatological, endocrine, and gastrointestinal irAEs, is a predictor of enhanced ICIs efficacy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document