scholarly journals Intracranial arterial stenosis in Caucasian versus Chinese patients with TIA and minor stroke: two contemporaneous cohorts and a systematic review

2021 ◽  
pp. jnnp-2020-325630
Author(s):  
Xinyi Leng ◽  
Robert Hurford ◽  
Xueyan Feng ◽  
Ka Lung Chan ◽  
Frank J Wolters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Hong Kong ◽  
Vascular Risk Factor ◽  
Vascular Risk Factors ◽  
Arterial Stenosis ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Vascular Risk ◽  
Intracranial Arterial Stenosis ◽  
Different Populations

BackgroundIntracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) is an important cause of stroke worldwide. Separate reports in Caucasians and Asians with stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) have suggested lower ICAS prevalence in Caucasians, but there has been no direct comparisons of the two ethnic groups with the same criteria to define ICAS.MethodsAcute minor stroke or TIA patients in two cohorts respectively recruiting patients in Oxford (2011–2018, predominantly Caucasians) and Hong Kong (2011–2015, predominantly Chinese) were compared. ICAS was defined as ≥50% stenosis/occlusion in any major intracranial artery in MR/CT angiography. Prevalence, distribution and risk factors of ICAS were compared between the two cohorts. We also systematically reviewed literature on ICAS prevalence in stroke/TIA patients in different populations.ResultsAmong 1287 patients from Oxford and 691 from Hong Kong (mean age 69 vs 66), ICAS prevalence was higher in Chinese than in Caucasians (43.0% vs 20.0%; OR 3.02; 95% CI 2.47 to 3.70; p<0.001), independent of age (age-adjusted OR 3.73; 95% CI 3.00 to 4.63; p<0.001) and vascular risk factors (multivariable-adjusted OR 3.21; 95% CI 2.56 to 4.02; p<0.001). This ethnic difference was greater (p interaction=0.005) at age <70 years (OR 5.33; 95% CI 3.79 to 7.50; p<0.001) than at ≥70 years (OR 2.81; 95% CI 2.11 to 3.74; p<0.001). ICAS prevalence increased with age and with vascular risk factors in both cohorts, with equivalent prevalence in Chinese aged <60 years and Caucasians aged ≥80, and in Chinese with no vascular risk factor and Caucasians with two vascular risk factors. ICAS locations also differed between Chinese and Caucasian patients.ConclusionsChinese are more susceptible to ICAS than Caucasians, with an earlier onset age and a higher prevalence, independent of vascular risk factors.

Abstract 82: Differences Between Caucasians and Asians in Intracranial Arterial Stenosis Among TIA and Minor Stroke Patients: Comparisons of Two Contemporary Cohorts

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinyi Leng ◽  
Robert Hurford ◽  
Xueyan Feng ◽  
Ka Lung Chan ◽  
Linxin Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Ct Angiography ◽  
Interobserver Agreement ◽  
Arterial Stenosis ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Intracranial Arterial Stenosis ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Background: Despite numerous reports indicating ethnic difference in intracranial arterial stenosis (ICAS) between Caucasians and Asians, there has been no direct comparison in disease burden and clinical correlates of ICAS in stroke patients in the two populations with the same criteria to define ICAS. Methods: Acute minor stroke or transient ischemic attack patients who received cerebral MR/CT angiography exam in two cohorts were analyzed: Oxford Vascular Study (OXVASC, 2011-2018) with predominantly Caucasians, and the Chinese University of Hong Kong (CUHK) stroke registry (2011-2015) with predominantly Chinese. ICAS was defined as ≥50% stenosis in any major intracranial artery in MR/CT angiography. Interobserver agreement between 2 investigators for presence of ICAS was assessed in 50 cases with Cohen’s kappa. We compared the burden and risk factors of ICAS in the two cohorts. Results: Overall, 1,287 patients from OXVASC (mean age 69 years) and 640 from the CUHK cohort (mean age 66 years) were analyzed. Interobserver agreement for presence of ICAS was good (kappa=0.82). Prevalence of ICAS was significantly higher in Chinese than in Caucasians: 43.6% in the CUHK cohort versus 20.0% in OXVASC (crude OR 3.10; age-adjusted OR 3.81, 95% CI 3.06-4.75; p<0.001). Mean ages of patients with ICAS in the two cohorts were 75 and 68 years, respectively. The difference between Caucasians and Chinese in ICAS prevalence was smaller in those aged ≥70 years (28.1% versus 51.9%) than those <70 years (9.8% versus 38.0%) (Figure). ICAS shared similar risk factors in the two cohorts, including older age, and history of hypertension and diabetes. Conclusions: Chinese are more susceptible to ICAS, with an earlier onset age than Caucasians, but the ICAS burden in Caucasians was higher than previously estimated, especially in older patients.

scholarly journals Vascular risk at younger ages most strongly associates with current and future brain volume

Neurology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 91 (16) ◽  
pp. e1479-e1486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew P. Pase ◽  
Kendra Davis-Plourde ◽  
Jayandra J. Himali ◽  
Claudia L. Satizabal ◽  
Hugo Aparicio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Brain Volume ◽  
Vascular Risk Factor ◽  
Vascular Risk Factors ◽  
Vascular Risk ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Strength Of Association ◽  
Risk Factor Burden

ObjectiveGiven the potential therapeutic effect of vascular disease control timing to reduce dementia risk, we investigated the age-related influences of vascular risk factor burden on brain structure throughout the lifespan.MethodsWe studied participants from the community-based prospective Framingham Heart Study. Overall vascular risk factor burden was calculated according to the Framingham Stroke Risk Profile, a validated algorithm that predicts stroke risk. Brain volume was estimated by MRI. We used cross-sectional data to examine how the strength of association between vascular risk factor burden and brain volume changed across each age decade from age 45–54 years through to 85–94 years (N = 2,887). Second, we leveraged up to 40 years of longitudinal data to determine how the strength of association between vascular risk factor burden and brain volume changed when vascular risk factors were examined at progressively earlier ages (N = 7,868).ResultsIn both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses, higher vascular risk factor burden was associated with lower brain volume across each age decade. In the cross-sectional analysis, the strength of this association decreased with each decade of advancing age (p for trend < 0.0001). In longitudinal analysis, the strength of association between vascular risk factor burden and brain volume was stronger when vascular risk factors were measured at younger ages. For example, vascular risk factor burden was most strongly associated with lower brain volume in later life when vascular risk factors were measured at age 45 years.ConclusionVascular risk factors at younger ages appear to have detrimental effects on current and future brain volume.

scholarly journals Racial Differences in Vascular Risk Factors and Outcomes of Patients With Intracranial Atherosclerotic Arterial Stenosis

Stroke ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 719-725 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salina P. Waddy ◽  
George Cotsonis ◽  
Michael J. Lynn ◽  
Michael R. Frankel ◽  
Seemant Chaturvedi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Racial Differences ◽  
Vascular Risk Factors ◽  
Arterial Stenosis ◽  
Vascular Risk

scholarly journals Normative video head impulse test data in subjects with and without vascular risk factors

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Hansson ◽  
Jonatan Salzer
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
Vascular Risk Factor ◽  
Vascular Risk Factors ◽  
Healthy Adults ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Head Impulse Test ◽  
Video Head Impulse Test ◽  
Vascular Risk ◽  
Head Impulse

Abstract Purpose There is a paucity of age- and vascular risk factor-stratified video head impulse test (vHIT) vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) data in the literature. The aim of this study was to investigate the vHIT VOR properties in healthy subjects of different ages and subjects with vascular risk factors. Methods This was a prospective observational single-center study at a tertiary referral university hospital in northern Sweden. Healthy participants and subjects with vascular risk factors were investigated with a floor standing external camera vHIT device. Age-stratified mean VOR gain among healthy adults and between group gain and gain asymmetry differences were calculated. Results We included eighty-eight healthy adults with a mean (range) age of 50 (22–85) years and n = 48 stroke ward patients with vascular risk factors (but without vestibular disease) with a mean (range) age of 74 (42–92) years. The mean VOR gain of horizontal canals decreased at higher ages in healthy subjects (r = − 0.32, p < 0.01, n = 167 canals). The age-stratified mean (SD) VOR gains were < 30 years: 0.98 (0.07), 30–39 years: 0.97 (0.07), 40–49 years: 0.98 (0.06), 50–59 years: 0.99 (0.06), 60–69 years: 0.93 (0.08), ≥ 70 years: 0.89 (0.15). No consistent differences between healthy subjects and subjects with vascular risk factors were seen except for a trend towards more pronounced gain asymmetries in the latter group. Conclusions Age, but not vascular risk factors influence VOR gain. Age-adjusted vHIT-measurements may be useful in acute vertigo stroke risk differentiation.

scholarly journals The comparison of traditional vascular risk factor between hemorrhagic and non-hemorrhagic stroke

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 5-8
Author(s):  
Rizaldy Taslim Pinzon ◽  
Rosa De Lima Renita Sanyasi ◽  
Andre Dharmawan Wijono
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Protective Factor ◽  
Hemorrhagic Stroke ◽  
Sample Size Calculation ◽  
Vascular Risk Factor ◽  
Vascular Risk Factors ◽  
Vascular Risk ◽  
Significance Level ◽  
Stroke Registry

Background: Understanding about risk factors of stroke based on its pathology is very important. Previous study about the vascular risk factors in patients with stroke in Indonesia is very limited.Aims and Objective: Measure the comparison between traditional vascular risk factors in patients with hemorrhagic stroke and non-hemorrhagic (ischemic) stroke.Materials and Methods: This was a nested case-control study using secondary data from electronic medical record and electronic stroke registry of Bethesda Hospital Yogyakarta Indonesia. The stroke was diagnosed with standard way by well-trained neurologist and confirmed with CT Scan. The traditional risk factors were defined systematically. We used Dupont Power and Sample Size calculation software and StatCal EpiInfo software with significance level 0,05.Result: The data of 200 subjects consisted of 100 patients with hemorrhagic stroke and 100 patients with non-hemorrhagic stroke. Hypertension was main vascular risk factor in both Group but it was more common in hemorrhagic stroke (OR: 2,528, 95% CI: 0,069 ; 0,316, p < 0,002). Dyslipidemia was a protective factor against hemorrhagic stroke (OR: 0,147, 95% CI: 1,415 ; 4,516, p < 0,001). Diabetes was more common in ischemic stroke compared with hemorrhagic stroke (68% and 32%) respectively.Conclusion: Hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes were modifiable traditional vascular risk factors which significantly had effect on stroke. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.8(6) 2017 5-8

scholarly journals Predictors for carotid and femoral artery intima-media thickness in a non-diabetic sleep clinic cohort

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252569
Author(s):  
Christopher Lambeth ◽  
Rita Perri ◽  
Sharon Lee ◽  
Manisha Verma ◽  
Nicole Campbell-Rogers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Intervention Study ◽  
Intima Media Thickness ◽  
Vascular Risk Factor ◽  
Vascular Risk Factors ◽  
Vascular Risk ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Media Thickness ◽  
Continuous Positive Pressure

Introduction The impact of sleep disordered breathing (SDB) on arterial intima-media thickness (IMT), a surrogate measure for cardiovascular disease, remains uncertain, in part because of the potential for non-SDB vascular risk factor interactions. In the present study, we determined predictors for common carotid (CCA) and femoral (CFA) artery IMT in an adult, sleep clinic cohort where non-SDB vascular risk factors (particularly diabetes) were eliminated or controlled. Methods We recruited 296 participants for polysomnography (standard SDB severity metrics) and CCA/CFA ultrasound examinations, followed by a 12 month vascular risk factor minimisation (RFM) and continuous positive pressure (CPAP) intervention for participants with a range of SDB severity (RFM Sub-Group, n = 157; apnea hyponea index [AHI]: 14.7 (7.2–33.2), median [IQR]). Univariable and multivariable linear regression models determined independent predictors for IMT. Linear mixed effects modelling determined independent predictors for IMT change across the intervention study. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results Age, systolic blood pressure and waist:hip ratio were identified as non-SDB predictive factors for CCA IMT and age, weight and total cholesterol:HDL ratio for CFA IMT. No SDB severity metric emerged as an independent predictor for either CCA or CFA IMT, except in the RFM Sub-Group, where a 2-fold increase in AHI predicted a 2.4% increase in CFA IMT. Across the intervention study, CCA IMT decreased in those who lost weight, but there was no CPAP use interaction. CFA IMT, however, decreased by 12.9% (95%CI 6.8, 18.7%, p = 0.001) in those participants who both lost weight and used CPAP > = 4hours/night. Conclusion We conclude that SDB severity has little impact on CCA IMT values when non-SDB vascular risk factors are minimised or not present. This is the first study, however, to suggest a potential linkage between SDB severity and CFA IMT values. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12611000250932 and ACTRN12620000694910.

scholarly journals Cognition in the First Year After a Minor Stroke, Transient Ischemic Attack, or Mimic Event and the Role of Vascular Risk Factors

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Korinne Nicolas ◽  
Christopher Levi ◽  
Tiffany-Jane Evans ◽  
Patricia T. Michie ◽  
Parker Magin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Transient Ischemic Attack ◽  
Vascular Risk Factors ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
First Year ◽  
Vascular Risk ◽  
Ischemic Attack ◽  
A Minor

scholarly journals The effect of vascular risk factor burden on the severity of COVID-19 illness, a retrospective cohort study

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Houwei Du ◽  
◽  
Xiaobin Pan ◽  
Nan Liu ◽  
Junnian Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Vascular Risk Factor ◽  
Vascular Risk Factors ◽  
Hospital Treatment ◽  
Vascular Risk ◽  
Laboratory Findings ◽  
Increasing Risk ◽  
Risk Factor Burden

Abstract Background Patients with cardiovascular comorbidities are at high risk of poor outcome from COVID-19. However, how the burden (number) of vascular risk factors influences the risk of severe COVID-19 disease remains unresolved. Our aim was to investigate the association of severe COVID-19 illness with vascular risk factor burden. Methods We included 164 (61.8 ± 13.6 years) patients with COVID-19 in this retrospective study. We compared the difference in clinical characteristics, laboratory findings and chest computed tomography (CT) findings between patients with severe and non-severe COVID-19 illness. We evaluated the association between the number of vascular risk factors and the development of severe COVID-19 disease, using a Cox regression model. Results Sixteen (9.8%) patients had no vascular risk factors; 38 (23.2%) had 1; 58 (35.4%) had 2; 34 (20.7%) had 3; and 18 (10.9%) had ≥4 risk factors. Twenty-nine patients (17.7%) experienced severe COVID-19 disease with a median (14 [7–27] days) duration between onset to developing severe COVID-19 disease, an event rate of 4.47 per 1000-patient days (95%CI 3.10–6.43). Kaplan-Meier curves showed a gradual increase in the risk of severe COVID-19 illness (log-rank P < 0.001) stratified by the number of vascular risk factors. After adjustment for age, sex, and comorbidities as potential confounders, vascular risk factor burden remained associated with an increasing risk of severe COVID-19 illness. Conclusions Patients with increasing vascular risk factor burden have an increasing risk of severe COVID-19 disease, and this population might benefit from specific COVID-19 prevention (e.g., self-isolation) and early hospital treatment measures.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document