scholarly journals Patient-reported outcomes and safety in patients undergoing synovial biopsy: comparison of ultrasound-guided needle biopsy, ultrasound-guided portal and forceps and arthroscopic-guided synovial biopsy techniques in five centres across Europe

RMD Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. e000799 ◽  
Author(s):  
Søren Andreas Just ◽  
Frances Humby ◽  
Hanne Lindegaard ◽  
Laurent Meric de Bellefon ◽  
Patrick Durez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Corticosteroid Therapy ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Synovial Biopsy ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Biopsy Procedure ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Biopsy Methods

BackgroundWe present a European multicenter study, comparing safety data and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) from patients undergoing synovial biopsy using ultrasound-guided needle biopsy (US-NB), ultrasound-guided portal and forceps (US-P&F) or arthroscopic-guided (AG) procedures.ObjectivesTo describe safety and PRO data on joint indices of pain, stiffness and swelling before and after biopsy, procedural discomfort, joint status compared with before biopsy and willingness to undergo a second biopsy for each technique and compare the three techniques. To evaluate the impact on PRO and safety data of corticosteroid therapy as part of the biopsy procedure and sequential biopsy procedures.MethodsData were collected on the day of biopsy and 7–14 days postprocedure. Joint pain, swelling and stiffness indices were recorded as 0–100  mm Visual Analogue Scale; qualitative outcome variables on five-point Likert scales. Groups were compared with linear regression, adjusting for disease activity, corticosteroid therapy and prebiopsy PRO value and accounting for repeated measurements.ResultsA total of 524 synovial biopsy procedures were documented (402 US-NB, 65 US-P&F and 57 AGSB). There were eight adverse events (1.5%) with no difference between biopsy methods (p=0.55). All PROs were improved 2  weeks postprocedure, and there were no differences in postbiopsy change in PROs between biopsy methods. Corticosteroid administration, whether intramuscular (n=62) or intra-articular (n=38), did not result in more adverse events (p=0.81) and was associated with reduction in postbiopsy swelling (p<0.01). Sequential biopsy procedures (n=103 patients) did not result in more adverse events (p=0.61) or worsening in PRO data.ConclusionOverall, our results do not suggest a significant difference in safety or patient tolerability between US-NB, US-P&F and AGSB sampling. Further, corticosteroid therapy as part of the biopsy procedure and sequential biopsies is safe and well tolerated in patients.

scholarly journals Electronic patient-reported outcomes and machine learning in predicting immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanna Iivanainen ◽  
Jussi Ekstrom ◽  
Henri Virtanen ◽  
Vesa V. Kataja ◽  
Jussi P. Koivunen
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Early Detection ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Accuracy Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Auc Value

Abstract Background Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have introduced novel immune-related adverse events (irAEs), arising from various organ systems without strong timely dependency on therapy dosing. Early detection of irAEs could result in improved toxicity profile and quality of life. Symptom data collected by electronic (e) patient-reported outcomes (PRO) could be used as an input for machine learning (ML) based prediction models for the early detection of irAEs. Methods The utilized dataset consisted of two data sources. The first dataset consisted of 820 completed symptom questionnaires from 34 ICI treated advanced cancer patients, including 18 monitored symptoms collected using the Kaiku Health digital platform. The second dataset included prospectively collected irAE data, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) class, and the severity of 26 irAEs. The ML models were built using extreme gradient boosting algorithms. The first model was trained to detect the presence and the second the onset of irAEs. Results The model trained to predict the presence of irAEs had an excellent performance based on four metrics: accuracy score 0.97, Area Under the Curve (AUC) value 0.99, F1-score 0.94 and Matthew’s correlation coefficient (MCC) 0.92. The prediction of the irAE onset was more difficult with accuracy score 0.96, AUC value 0.93, F1-score 0.66 and MCC 0.64 but the model performance was still at a good level. Conclusion The current study suggests that ML based prediction models, using ePRO data as an input, can predict the presence and onset of irAEs with a high accuracy, indicating that ePRO follow-up with ML algorithms could facilitate the detection of irAEs in ICI-treated cancer patients. The results should be validated with a larger dataset. Trial registration Clinical Trials Register (NCT3928938), registration date the 26th of April, 2019

scholarly journals Linguistic validation of the simplified Chinese version of the US National Cancer Institute’s patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE™)

BMC Cancer ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheng KKF ◽  
S. A. Mitchell ◽  
N. Chan ◽  
E. Ang ◽  
W. Tam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
A Priori ◽  
Cognitive Interviews ◽  
Simplified Chinese ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Us ◽  
The Common ◽  
Response Choices

Abstract Background The aim of this study was to translate and linguistically validate the U.S. National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE™) into Simplified Chinese for use in Singapore. Methods All 124 items of the English source PRO-CTCAE item library were translated into Simplified Chinese using internationally established translation procedures. Two rounds of cognitive interviews were conducted with 96 cancer patients undergoing adjuvant treatment to determine if the translations adequately captured the PRO-CTCAE source concepts, and to evaluate comprehension, clarity and ease of judgement. Interview probes addressed the 78 PRO-CTCAE symptom terms (e.g. fatigue), as well as the attributes (e.g. severity), response choices, and phrasing of ‘at its worst’. Items that met the a priori threshold of ≥20% of participants with comprehension difficulties were considered for rephrasing and retesting. Items where < 20% of the sample experienced comprehension difficulties were also considered for rephrasing if better phrasing options were available. Results A majority of PRO-CTCAE-Simplified Chinese items were well comprehended by participants in Round 1. One item posed difficulties in ≥20% and was revised. Two items presented difficulties in < 20% but were revised as there were preferred alternative phrasings. Twenty-four items presented difficulties in < 10% of respondents. Of these, eleven items were revised to an alternative preferred phrasing, four items were revised to include synonyms. Revised items were tested in Round 2 and demonstrated satisfactory comprehension. Conclusions PRO-CTCAE-Simplified Chinese has been successfully developed and linguistically validated in a sample of cancer patients residing in Singapore.

scholarly journals Establishing a common metric for patient-reported outcomes in cancer patients: linking patient reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS), numerical rating scale, and patient-reported outcomes version of the common terminology criteria for adverse events (PRO-CTCAE)

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Minji K. Lee ◽  
Benjamin D. Schalet ◽  
David Cella ◽  
Kathleen J. Yost ◽  
Amy C. Dueck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information System ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Outcomes Measurement ◽  
T Score ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Measurement Information System ◽  
The Common

Abstract Background Researchers and clinicians studying symptoms experienced by people with cancer must choose from various scales. It would be useful to know how the scores on one measure translate to another. Methods Using item response theory (IRT) with the single-group design, in which the same sample answers all measures, we produced crosswalk tables linking five 0–10 numeric rating scale (NRS) and 15 items from Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE, scored on a 1–5 scale) to the T-Score metric of six different scales from the NIH Patient reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). The constructs, for which we conducted linking, include emotional distress-anxiety, emotional distress-depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain intensity, and pain interference. We tested the IRT linking assumption of construct similarity between measures by comparing item content and testing unidimensionality of item sets comprising each construct. We also investigated the correlation of the measures to be linked and, by inspecting standardized mean differences, whether the linkage is invariant across age and gender subgroups. For measures that satisfied the assumptions, we conducted linking. Results In general, an NRS score of 0 corresponded to about 38.2 on the PROMIS T-Score scale (mean = 50; SD = 10); whereas an NRS score of 10 corresponded to a PROMIS T-Score of approximately 72.7. Similarly, the lowest/best score of 1 on PRO-CTCAE corresponded to 39.8 on T-score scale and the highest/worst score of 5 corresponded to 72.0. Conclusion We produced robust linking between single item symptom measures and PROMIS short forms.

Targeted identification of adverse events in coronary artery disease patients based on patient-reported outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (7) ◽  
pp. 583-589
Author(s):  
Jari Heiskanen ◽  
Anna-Maija Tolppanen ◽  
Janne Martikainen ◽  
Juha Hartikainen ◽  
Heikki Miettinen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Artery Disease

scholarly journals Management of Enzalutamide Related Adverse Events for Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer by Patient Reported Outcomes

2016 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. vii78-vii79
Author(s):  
Taro Iguchi ◽  
Sayaka Yasuda ◽  
Minoru Kato ◽  
Takeshi Yamazaki ◽  
Satoshi Tamada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Patient Reported

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Cancer Clinical Trials: Measuring Symptomatic Adverse Events With the National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)

2016 ◽  
pp. 67-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Kluetz ◽  
Diana T. Chingos ◽  
Ethan M. Basch ◽  
Sandra A. Mitchell
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Patient Perspective ◽  
Cancer Clinical Trials ◽  
Cancer Therapies ◽  
Systematic Assessment ◽  
Promising Tool ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Common

Systematic capture of the patient perspective can inform the development of new cancer therapies. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are commonly included in cancer clinical trials; however, there is heterogeneity in the constructs, measures, and analytic approaches that have been used making these endpoints challenging to interpret. There is renewed effort to identify rigorous methods to obtain high-quality and informative PRO data from cancer clinical trials. In this setting, PROs are used to address specific research objectives, and an important objective that spans the product development life cycle is the assessment of safety and tolerability. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Office of Hematology and Oncology Products (OHOP) has identified symptomatic adverse events (AEs) as a central PRO concept, and a systematic assessment of patient-reported symptomatic AEs can provide data to complement clinician reporting. The National Cancer Institute’s Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) is being evaluated by multiple stakeholders, including the FDA, and is considered a promising tool to provide a standard yet flexible method to assess symptomatic AEs from the patient perspective. In this article, we briefly review the FDA OHOP’s perspective on PROs in cancer trials submitted to the FDA and focus on the assessment of symptomatic AEs using PRO-CTCAE. We conclude by discussing further work that must be done to broaden the use of PRO-CTCAE as a method to provide patient-centered data that can complement existing safety and tolerability assessments across cancer clinical trials.

scholarly journals Phase II Trial of De-Intensified Chemoradiotherapy for Human Papillomavirus–Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (29) ◽  
pp. 2661-2669 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bhishamjit S. Chera ◽  
Robert J. Amdur ◽  
Rebecca Green ◽  
Colette Shen ◽  
Gaorav Gupta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Squamous Cell ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Patient Reported

PURPOSE To report the results of a phase II clinical trial of de-intensified chemoradiotherapy for patients with human papillomavirus–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Major inclusion criteria were (1) having American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition T0-T3, N0-N2c, M0 (AJCC 8th edition T0-T3, N0-N2, M0), (2) being p16 positive, and (3) reporting minimal or remote smoking history. Treatment was limited to 60 Gy intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent intravenous cisplatin 30 mg/m2 once per week. Patients with T0-T2 N0-1 (AJCC 7th edition) did not receive chemotherapy. All patients had a 10- to 12-week post-treatment positron emission tomography/computed tomography to assess for neck dissection. The primary end point was 2-year progression-free survival. Secondary end points included 2-year local-regional control, distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival, and patient-reported outcomes (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire and the patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events). RESULTS One hundred fourteen patients were enrolled (median follow-up of 31.8 months), with 81% having a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Eighty percent of patients had 10 or fewer tobacco pack-years. Two-year local-regional control, distant metastasis-free survival, progression-free survival, and overall survival were as follows: 95%, 91%, 86%, and 95%, respectively. Mean pre- and 2-year post-treatment European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life scores were as follows: global, 79/84 (lower worse); swallowing, 8/9 (higher worse); and dry mouth, 14/45 (higher worse). Mean pre- and 2-year post-treatment patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events scores (0 to 4 scale, higher worse) were as follows: swallowing, 0.5/0.7, and dry mouth, 0.4/1.3. Thirty-four percent of patients required a feeding tube (median, 10.5 weeks; none permanent). There were no grade 3 or higher late adverse events. CONCLUSION Clinical outcomes with a de-intensified chemoradiotherapy regimen of 60 Gy intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent low-dose cisplatin are favorable in patients with human papillomavirus–associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Neither neoadjuvant chemotherapy nor routine surgery is needed to obtain favorable results with de-escalation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document