scholarly journals 17 Palliative radiotherapy

Author(s):  
Linda Bedford
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. e232385
Author(s):  
Jessica Farnan ◽  
Ellen Morrison ◽  
Derek Barrry Hennessey

Proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma is an ultra-rare, high-grade soft tissue malignancy usually presenting as a deep-seated painless mass in the proximal extremities. Most patients are diagnosed as young adults, between 20 and 40 years of age. Perineal and genital masses do occur but are extremely rare and represent a challenging tumour to diagnose and treat. Early radical excision is recommended due to its aggressive behaviour and poor prognosis. Median overall survival from initial diagnosis is 30 months. We present the case of a 22-year-old man with a left groin proximal-type epithelioid sarcoma who is sadly deceased 12 months after initial presentation despite early surgical excision, completion of both first-line and palliative chemotherapy, and palliative radiotherapy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 847-852
Author(s):  
Anna Ferrari ◽  
Marco Trevenzoli ◽  
Lolita Sasset ◽  
Elisabetta Di Liso ◽  
Toni Tavian ◽  
...  

The pandemic of SARS-CoV-2 is a serious global challenge affecting millions of people worldwide. Cancer patients are at risk for infection exposure and serious complications. A prompt diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection is crucial for the timely adoption of isolation measures and the appropriate management of cancer treatments. In lung cancer patients the symptoms of infection 19 may resemble those exhibited by the underlying oncologic condition, possibly leading to diagnostic overlap and delays. Moreover, cancer patients might display a prolonged positivity of nasopharyngeal RT-PCR assays for SARS-CoV-2, causing long interruptions or delay of cancer treatments. However, the association between the positivity of RT-PCR assays and the patient’s infectivity remains uncertain. We describe the case of a patient with non-small cell lung cancer, and a severe ab extrinseco compression of the trachea, whose palliative radiotherapy was delayed because of the prolonged positivity of nasopharyngeal swabs for SARS-CoV-2. The patient did not show clinical symptoms suggestive of active infection, but the persistent positivity of RT-PCR assays imposed the continuation of isolation measures and the delay of radiotherapy for over two months. Finally, the negative result of SARS-CoV-2 viral culture allowed us to verify the absence of viral activity and to rule out the infectivity of the patient, who could finally continue her cancer treatment.


Author(s):  
V. Batumalai ◽  
J. Descallar ◽  
G.P. Delaney ◽  
G. Gabriel ◽  
K. Wong ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (5) ◽  
pp. 635-644
Author(s):  
Jeremy Tey ◽  
Francis Ho ◽  
Wee Yao Koh ◽  
David Chia ◽  
Kiat Huat Ooi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hirofumi Sugita ◽  
Shinichi Sakuramoto ◽  
Yoshiaki Mihara ◽  
Kazuaki Matsui ◽  
Keiji Nishibeppu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Maishman ◽  
H. Sheikh ◽  
P. Boger ◽  
J. Kelly ◽  
K. Cozens ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (12) ◽  
pp. e794-e800
Author(s):  
Dina Thompson ◽  
Kimberly Cox ◽  
James Loudon ◽  
Ivan Yeung ◽  
Woodrow Wells

Purpose: Peer review of a proposed treatment plan is increasingly recognized as an important quality activity in radiation medicine. Although peer review has been emphasized in the curative setting, applying peer review for treatment plans that have palliative intent is receiving increased attention. This study reports peer review outcomes for a regional cancer center that applied routine interprofessional peer review as a standard practice for palliative radiotherapy. Methods and Materials: Peer review outcomes for palliative radiotherapy plans were recorded prospectively for patients who began radiotherapy between October 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017. Recommended and implemented changes were recorded. The content of detailed discussions was recorded to gain insight into the complexities of palliative treatment plans considered during peer review. Results: Peer review outcomes were reviewed for 1,413 treatment plans with palliative intent. The proportions of detailed discussions and changes recommended were found to be 139 (9.8%) and 29 (2.1%), respectively. The content of detailed discussions and changes recommended was categorized. Major changes represented 75.9% of recommended changes, of which 84.2% were implemented clinically. Conclusion: Many complexities exist that are specific to palliative radiotherapy. Interprofessional peer review provides a forum for these complexities to be openly discussed and is an important activity to optimize the quality of care for patients with treatment plans that have palliative intent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document