Transradial versus transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: analysis of 375 consecutive cases

ObjectiveTo compare transradial artery access (TRA) to the gold standard of transfemoral artery access (TFA) in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for stroke caused by anterior circulation large vessel occlusion.MethodsThe clinical outcomes, procedural speed, angiographic efficacy and safety of both techniques were analysed in 375 consecutive cases over an 18-month period in a high volume statewide neurointerventional service.ResultsThere was no significant difference in patient characteristics, stroke parameters, imaging techniques or intracranial techniques. The median time elapsed between CT scanning and reperfusion was 96.5 min (IQR 68–123) in the TFA group and 95 min (IQR 68–123) in the TRA group (p=0.456). Of 336 patients who were independent at presentation 58% (124/214) of the TFA group and 67% (82/122) of the TRA group had a modified Rankin score of 0–2 at 90-day follow-up (p=0.093). Cross-over from radial to femoral was 4.6% (4/130) compared with 1.6% cross-over from femoral to radial (4/245), but did not meet the predetermined level of statistical significance (OR 2.92, 95% CI 0.81 to 10.52), p=0.088) and did not impact median procedural speed. Adequate angiographic reperfusion, first pass reperfusion, embolisation to new territory and symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage were similar in both groups. There was a significant difference in major access site complications requiring an additional procedure. None of the TRA cases had a major access site complication but 6.5% (16/245) of the TFA cases did (p=0.003).ConclusionThis study suggests that using TRA for anterior circulation MT is fast, efficacious, safe and not inferior to the gold standard of TFA.

Download Full-text

Comparing different thrombectomy techniques in five large-volume centers: a ‘real world’ observational study

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013394 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 10 (6) ◽

pp. 525-529 ◽

Cited By ~ 24

Author(s):

Amélie Carolina Hesse ◽

Daniel Behme ◽

André Kemmling ◽

Antonia Zapf ◽

Nils Große Hokamp ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Volume ◽

Stent Retriever ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Combined Approach ◽

Large Vessel Occlusion ◽

Primary Analysis ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Significant Difference ◽

First Pass

Background and purposeThrombectomy has become the standard of care for acute ischaemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion. Aim of this study was to compare the radiological outcomes and time metrics of the various thrombectomy techniques.MethodsIn this retrospective, multicenter study we analysed the data of 450 patients with occlusion of the anterior circulation, treated in five high-volume center from 2013 to 2016. The treatment techniques were divided in three categories: first-pass use of a large-bore aspiration-catheter; first-pass use of a stent-retriever; and primary combined approach (PCA) of an aspiration-catheter and stent-retriever. Primary endpoints were successful reperfusion and groin to reperfusion time. Secondary endpoints were the number of attempts and occurrence of emboli in new territory (ENT). The primary analysis was based on the intention to treat groups (ITT).ResultsThe ITT-analysis showed significantly higher reperfusion rates, with 86% of successful reperfusion in the PCA-group compared with 73% in the aspiration group and 65% in the stent-retriever group. There was no significant difference in groin to reperfusion time regarding the used technique. The secondary analysis showed an impact of the technique on the number of attempts and the occurrence of ENTs. Lowest ENT rates and attempts were reported with the combined approach.ConclusionsThe combined first-pass deployment of a stent-retriever and an aspiration-catheter was the most effective technique for reperfusion of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. Our results correlate with the latest single-centrere studies, reporting very high reperfusion rates with PCA variations.

Download Full-text

Equivalent favorable outcomes possible after thrombectomy for posterior circulation large vessel occlusion compared with the anterior circulation: the MUSC experience

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013420 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 10 (8) ◽

pp. 735-740 ◽

Cited By ~ 19

Author(s):

Ali Alawieh ◽

Jan Vargas ◽

Raymond D Turner ◽

Aquilla S Turk ◽

M Imran Chaudry ◽

...

Keyword(s):

High Volume ◽

Female Gender ◽

Posterior Circulation ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Anatomical Location ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Good Outcome ◽

Posterior Group ◽

Significant Difference

IntroductionIn acute ischemic stroke (AIS), posterior circulation large vessel occlusions (LVOs) have been associated with poorer outcomes compared with anterior circulation LVOs. The outcomes of anterior versus posterior circulation thrombectomy for LVOs were compared at a high volume center employing a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT).MethodsWe retrospectively studied a database of AIS cases that underwent ADAPT thrombectomy for LVOs. Cases were grouped by anatomical location of thrombectomy (posterior vs anterior circulation), and analysis was performed on both entire sample size.ResultsA total of 436 AIS patients (50.2% women, mean age 67.3 years) underwent ADAPT thrombectomy for LVO during the study period, of whom 13% of had posterior circulation thrombectomy. Patients with posterior circulation thrombectomy did not show a significant difference in preprocedural variables, including age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), and onset to groin time, compared with anterior circulation (P>0.05). There were also no differences in procedural variables between the two groups. Patients in the posterior group were found to have a similar likelihood of good outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0—2) at 90 days compared with the anterior group (42.9% vs 43.2%, respectively), and a small but not significant increase in mortality at 90 days. Multilogistic regression analysis showed that the anatomical location (anterior vs posterior) was not an independent predictor of good outcome or mortality after thrombectomy. Prominent predictors of outcome/mortality included age, female gender, procedure time, and baseline NIHSS.ConclusionsOur findings demonstrate that when patients are carefully selected for thrombectomy, those with posterior circulation LVOs can achieve similar outcomes compared with anterior circulation thrombectomy, indicating comparable safety and efficacy profiles.

Download Full-text

A Comparison of Mechanical Thrombectomy in the M1 and M2 Segments of the Middle Cerebral Artery: A Review of 585 Consecutive Patients

Interventional Neurology ◽

10.1159/000475535 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 6 (3-4) ◽

pp. 191-198 ◽

Cited By ~ 21

Author(s):

Pervinder Bhogal ◽

Philipp Bücke ◽

Muhammad AlMatter ◽

Oliver Ganslandt ◽

Hansjörg Bäzner ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ischaemic Stroke ◽

Middle Cerebral Artery ◽

Cerebral Artery ◽

Intracranial Haemorrhage ◽

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

Outcome Data ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Computed Tomographic ◽

Significant Difference

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy for anterior-circulation large-vessel occlusion has shown benefit; however, the question of whether this technique is safe and effective in the distal vasculature remains unanswered. We sought to compare the outcome data from mechanical thrombectomy of the M2 branches of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) with those of the M1 segment. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of patients with acute ischaemic stroke undergoing mechanical thrombectomy of isolated M1 or M2 branches of the MCA between August 2008 and August 2016. Results: We identified 585 patients, 479 with M1 occlusions and 106 with M2 occlusions. The average age was 72 ± 12.8 and 68 ± 13.8 years, respectively (p = 0.007). The baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomographic (ASPECT) score was similar in both cohorts, but patients with M1 occlusions presented with higher mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores of 15.7 compared to 11.8 (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the average procedure time for each cohort; fewer thrombectomy attempts were required in the M2 cohort (2.3 vs. 1.8, p = 0.0004), but the overall time to recanalization was longer in the M2 cohort (353 vs. 399 min, p < 0.001). Similar rates of successful reperfusion (Thrombolysis in Ischaemic Stroke score [TICI] ≥2b 88.5 vs. 90.5%, p = 0.612) were seen, but food outcome (modified Rankin Scale ≤2) was lower in M1 occlusions (37.2 vs. 54.3%, p < 0.001). Rates of symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage were similar. Conclusion: Good clinical outcomes can be achieved for both groups with no significant differences in procedure length, final TICI recanalization rates or intracranial haemorrhage between the M1 and M2 cohorts.

Download Full-text

Transradial approach for mechanical thrombectomy in anterior circulation large-vessel occlusion

Neurosurgical FOCUS ◽

10.3171/2017.1.focus16525 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 42 (4) ◽

pp. E13 ◽

Cited By ~ 50

Author(s):

Samir Sur ◽

Brian Snelling ◽

Priyank Khandelwal ◽

Justin M. Caplan ◽

Eric C. Peterson ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

Large Vessel ◽

Access Site ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Transradial Approach ◽

First Pass ◽

Institutional Experience ◽

Stent Retrievers ◽

The Right

OBJECTIVE The goals of this study were to describe the authors' recent institutional experience with the transradial approach to anterior circulation large-vessel occlusions (LVOs) in acute ischemic stroke patients and to report its technical feasibility. METHODS The authors reviewed their institutional database to identify patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy via a transradial approach over the 2 previous years, encompassing their experience using modern techniques including stent retrievers. RESULTS Eleven patients were identified. In 8 (72%) of these patients the right radial artery was chosen as the primary access site. In the remaining patients, transfemoral access was initially attempted. Revascularization (modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia [mTICI] score ≥ 2b) was achieved in 10 (91%) of 11 cases. The average time to first pass with the stent retriever was 64 minutes. No access-related complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS Transradial access for mechanical thrombectomy in anterior circulation LVOs is safe and feasible. Further comparative studies are needed to determine criteria for selecting the transradial approach in this setting.

Download Full-text

Influence of prior intravenous thrombolysis on outcome after failed mechanical thrombectomy: ETIS registry analysis

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017867 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. neurintsurg-2021-017867

Author(s):

Claire Rozes ◽

Benjamin Maier ◽

Benjamin Gory ◽

Romain Bourcier ◽

Maeva Kyheng ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Functional Outcome ◽

Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Shift Analysis ◽

Secondary Endpoints ◽

The Difference

BackgroundDespite constant improvements in recent years, sufficient reperfusion after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is not reached in up to 15% of patients with large vessel occlusion stroke (LVOS). The outcome of patients with unsuccessful reperfusion after MT especially after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) use is not known. We investigated the influence of initial IVT in this particular group of patients with failed intracranial recanalization.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) registry from January 2015 to December 2019. Patients presenting with LVOS of the anterior circulation and final modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score (mTICI) of 0, 1 or 2a were included. Posterior circulation, isolated cervical carotid occlusions and successful reperfusions (mTICI 2b, 2c or 3) were excluded. The primary endpoint was favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2) after 3 months. Secondary endpoints were safety outcomes including mortality, any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), parenchymal hematoma (PH) and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) rates.ResultsAmong 5076 patients with LVOS treated with MT, 524 patients with insufficient recanalization met inclusion criteria, of which 242 received IVT and 282 did not. Functional outcome was improved in the MT+IVT group compared with the MT alone group, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (23.0% vs 12.9%; adjusted OR=1.82; 95% CI 0.98 to 3.38; p=0.058). However, 3 month mRS shift analysis showed a significant benefit of IVT (adjusted OR=1.68; 95% CI 1.56 to 6.54). ICH and sICH rates were similar in both groups, although PH rate was higher in the MT+IVT group (adjusted OR=3.20; 95% CI 1.56 to 6.54).ConclusionsAmong patients with LVOS in the anterior circulation and unsuccessful MT, IVT was associated with improved functional outcome even after unsuccessful MT. Despite recent trials questioning the place of IVT in the LVOS reperfusion strategy, these findings emphasize a subgroup of patients still benefiting from IVT.

Download Full-text

Transition to Transradial Access for Mechanical Thrombectomy—Lessons Learned and Comparison to Transfemoral Access in a Single-Center Case Series

Operative Neurosurgery ◽

10.1093/ons/opaa230 ◽

2020 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Stephan A Munich ◽

Kunal Vakharia ◽

Matthew J McPheeters ◽

Muhammad Waqas ◽

Michael K Tso ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

Case Series ◽

Access Point ◽

Lessons Learned ◽

Access Time ◽

Access Site ◽

Access Site Complication ◽

Transradial Access ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Size Constraints

Abstract BACKGROUND Trends in mechanical thrombectomy have emphasized larger bore aspiration catheters that may be difficult to deploy from a radial access point due to size constraints or need to obtain sheathless access. As such, many neurointerventionists are reticent to attempt thrombectomy through transradial access (TRA) for fear of worse outcomes. OBJECTIVE To explore whether mechanical thrombectomy could be achieved safely and effectively through the transradial route. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy at our academic institute between January 2018 and January 2019, which corresponded to a time when we began to transition to TRA for neurointerventions, including mechanical thrombectomy. We compared the procedural details and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy using TRA with those using transfemoral access (TFA). RESULTS During the study period, 44 patients underwent mechanical thrombectomy with TRA and 129 with TFA. There was no statistically significant difference in door-to-access time, door-to-reperfusion time, or first-pass recanalization rate. There was no significant difference in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at discharge, mRS score at last follow-up, or length of stay. There were 7 access-site complications in the TFA group and none in the TRA group. One patient in the TRA group required crossover to TFA. CONCLUSION Mechanical thrombectomy can be performed safely and effectively from a TRA site without compromising recanalization times or rates. TRA has superior access-site complication profiles compared to TFA.

Download Full-text

In-Hospital Intravenous Thrombolysis Offers No Benefit in Mechanical Thrombectomy in Optimized Tertiary Stroke Center Setting

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology ◽

10.1007/s00270-020-02727-8 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Juha-Pekka Pienimäki ◽

Jyrki Ollikainen ◽

Niko Sillanpää ◽

Sara Protto

Keyword(s):

Clinical Outcome ◽

Acute Stroke ◽

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

Clinical Laboratory ◽

Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Ordinal Logistic Regression Analysis ◽

Stroke Center

Abstract Purpose Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the first-line treatment in acute stroke patients presenting with large vessel occlusion (LVO). The efficacy of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to MT is being contested. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of MT without IVT in patients with no contraindications to IVT presenting directly to a tertiary stroke center with acute anterior circulation LVO. Materials and Methods We collected the data of 106 acute stroke patients who underwent MT in a single high-volume stroke center. Patients with anterior circulation LVO eligible for IVT and directly admitted to our institution who subsequently underwent MT were included. We recorded baseline clinical, laboratory, procedural, and imaging variables and technical, imaging, and clinical outcomes. The effect of intravenous thrombolysis on 3-month clinical outcome (mRS) was analyzed with univariate tests and binary and ordinal logistic regression analysis. Results Fifty-eight out of the 106 patients received IVT + MT. These patients had 2.6-fold higher odds of poorer clinical outcome in mRS shift analysis (p = 0.01) compared to MT-only patients who had excellent 3-month clinical outcome (mRS 0–1) three times more often (p = 0.009). There were no significant differences between the groups in process times, mTICI, or number of hemorrhagic complications. A trend of less distal embolization and higher number of device passes was observed among the MT-only patients. Conclusions MT without prior IVT was associated with an improved overall three-month clinical outcome in acute anterior circulation LVO patients.

Download Full-text

Is a picture-perfect thrombectomy necessary in acute ischemic stroke?

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery ◽

10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017193 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. neurintsurg-2020-017193

Author(s):

Ching-Jen Chen ◽

Reda Chalhoub ◽

Dale Ding ◽

Jeyan S Kumar ◽

Natasha Ironside ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Primary Outcome ◽

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

National Institutes Of Health ◽

Stroke Patients ◽

Anterior Circulation ◽

Vessel Occlusion ◽

Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽

History Of ◽

Multivariable Models ◽

Secondary Outcomes

BackgroundThe benefit of complete reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 3) over near-complete reperfusion (≥90%, mTICI 2c) remains unclear. The goal of this study is to compare clinical outcomes between mechanical thrombectomy (MT)-treated stroke patients with mTICI 2c versus 3.MethodsThis is a retrospective study from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) comprising 33 centers. Adults with anterior circulation arterial vessel occlusion who underwent MT yielding mTICI 2c or mTICI 3 reperfusion were included. Patients were categorized based on reperfusion grade achieved. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes were mRS scores at discharge and 90 days, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at discharge, procedure-related complications, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.ResultsThe unmatched mTICI 2c and mTICI 3 cohorts comprised 519 and 1923 patients, respectively. There was no difference in primary (42.4% vs 45.1%; p=0.264) or secondary outcomes between the unmatched cohorts. Reperfusion status (mTICI 2c vs 3) was also not predictive of the primary outcome in non-imputed and imputed multivariable models. The matched cohorts each comprised 191 patients. Primary (39.8% vs 47.6%; p=0.122) and secondary outcomes were also similar between the matched cohorts, except the 90-day mRS which was lower in the matched mTICI 3 cohort (p=0.049). There were increased odds of the primary outcome with mTICI 3 in patients with baseline mRS ≥2 (36% vs 7.7%; p=0.011; pinteraction=0.014) and a history of stroke (42.3% vs 15.4%; p=0.027; pinteraction=0.041).ConclusionsComplete and near-complete reperfusion after MT appear to confer comparable outcomes in patients with acute stroke.

Download Full-text

Mechanical Thrombectomy in Stroke. Experience from Switching from Stent Retriever Only to Stent Retriever Combined with Aspiration Catheter

Journal of Clinical Medicine ◽

10.3390/jcm10091802 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 10 (9) ◽

pp. 1802

Author(s):

Grzegorz Meder ◽

Paweł Żuchowski ◽

Wojciech Skura ◽

Violetta Palacz-Duda ◽

Milena Świtońska ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Clinical Outcomes ◽

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Stent Retriever ◽

Single Center Experience ◽

Significant Difference ◽

First Pass ◽

Need To Evaluate ◽

The Difference

Endovascular treatment is a rapidly evolving technique; therefore, there is a constant need to evaluate this method and its modifications. This paper discusses a single-center experience and the results of switching from the stent retriever only (SO) mechanical thrombectomy (MT) to the combined approach (CA), with a stent retriever and aspiration catheters. Methods: The study involved a retrospective analysis of 70 patients undergoing MT with the use of either SO or CA. The primary endpoint was the frequency of perfect reperfusion defined as grade 3 of the modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale (mTICI) after the first pass. The secondary endpoints were the procedure success, defined as mTICI grades 2b-3; time of the procedure; clinical outcome, measured by 90 days’ modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score; Δ NIHSS, defined as the difference between National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at patients’ admission and discharge; and the total number of device passes. Results: Out of the 70 patients included, 33 were treated with SO and 37 with CA. In both groups, a total number of 42 patients received intravenous recombined tissue plasminogen activator (iv-rTPA: 20 patients (60.6%) in the SO group and 22 patients (59.5%) in the CA group (p = 1.000). There was a significant difference between the groups regarding first-pass success rate, with 46% in the CA group and 18% in the SO group, (OR 3.83, 95% CI 1.28 to 11.44, p = 0.016). Complete procedure success tended to be more frequent in the CA group than in the SO group—94.6% vs. 84.8% (OR 3.13, 95% CI 0.56 to 17.34, p = 0.193)—and CA tended to require a lower number of passes than SO (mean 1.76 vs. 2.09 passes per procedure, p = 0.114), yet these differences did not reach statistical significance. Mean duration of the procedure was significantly shorter in the CA group than in the SO group (49 min vs. 64 min, p = 0.017). There was a significant difference in clinical outcomes, with higher Δ NIHSS (9.3 in the CA group vs. 6.7 in the SO group, p = 0.025) after the procedure and 90-day mRS (median 2 in the CA group vs. 4 in the SO group, p = 0.031). Conclusions: Combining stent retrievers with aspiration catheters may offer a beneficial effect on angiographic results and clinical outcomes in stroke patients undergoing endovascular treatment.

Download Full-text

Abstract P141: Global Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Acute Stroke and Mechanical Thrombectomy - An International Survey

Stroke ◽

10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.p141 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽

Author(s):

Dileep R Yavagal ◽

Vasu Saini ◽

Violiza Inoa ◽

Hannah E Gardener ◽

Sheila O Martins ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Stroke ◽

Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽

High Volume ◽

Stroke Care ◽

Acute Stroke Care ◽

Treatment Practices ◽

Global Impact ◽

Significant Difference ◽

The World ◽

The Impact

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has strained the healthcare systems across the world but its impact on acute stroke care is just being elucidated. We hypothesized a major global impact of COVID-19 not only on stroke volumes but also on thrombectomy practice. Methods: A 19-item questionnaire survey aimed to identify the changes in stroke volumes and treatment practices seen during COVID-19 pandemic was designed using Qualtrics software. It was sent to stroke and neuro-interventional physicians around the world who are part of the executive committee of a global coalition, Mission Thrombectomy 2020 (MT2020) between April 5 th to May 15 th , 2020. Results: There were 113 responses across 25 countries. Globally there was a median 33% decrease in stroke admissions and a 25% decrease in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) procedures during COVID-19 pandemic compared to immediately preceding months (Figure 1A-B). This overall median decrease was despite a median increase in stroke volume in 4 European countries which diverted all stroke patients to only a few selected centers during the pandemic. The intubation policy during the pandemic for patients undergoing MT was highly variable across participating centers: 44% preferred intubating all patients, including 25% centers that changed their policy to preferred-intubation (PI) vs 27% centers that switched to preferred-conscious-sedation (PCS). There was no significant difference in rate of COVID-19 infection between PI vs PCS (p=0.6) or if intubation policy was changed in either direction (p=1). Low-volume (<10 stroke/month) compared with high-volume stroke centers (>20 strokes/month) are less likely to have neurointerventional suite specific written personal protective equipment protocols (74% vs 88%) and if present, these centers are more likely to report them to be inadequate (58% vs 92%). Conclusion: Our data provides a comprehensive snapshot of the impact on acute stroke care observed worldwide during the pandemic.

Download Full-text