A structural transect between the central North Sea Dome and the South Swedish Dome: Middle Jurassic-Quaternary uplift-subsidence reversal and exhumation across the eastern North Sea Basin

2002 ◽  
Vol 196 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ole Graversen
2003 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 61-73 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Callomon

The palaeogeographic settings of Denmark and East Greenland during the Middle Jurassic are outlined. They lay in the widespread epicontinental seas that covered much of Europe in the post-Triassic transgression. It was a period of continuing eustatic sea-level rise, with only distant connections to world oceans: to the Pacific, via the narrow Viking Straits between Greenland and Norway and hence the arctic Boreal Sea to the north; and to the subtropical Tethys, via some 1200 km of shelf-seas to the south. The sedimentary history of the region was strongly influenced by two factors: tectonism and climate. Two modes of tectonic movement governed basinal evolution: crustal extension leading to subsidence through rifting, such as in the Viking and Central Grabens of the North Sea; and subcrustal thermal upwelling, leading to domal uplift and the partition of marine basins through emergent physical barriers, as exemplified by the Central North Sea Dome with its associated volcanics. The climatic gradient across the 30º of temperate latitude spanned by the European seas governed biotic diversity and biogeography, finding expression in rock-forming biogenic carbonates that dominate sediments in the south and give way to largely siliciclastic sediments in the north. Geochronology of unrivalled finesse is provided by standard chronostratigraphy based on the biostratigraphy of ammonites. The Middle Jurassic saw the onset of considerable bioprovincial endemisms in these guide-fossils, making it necessary to construct parallel standard zonations for Boreal, Subboreal or NW European and Submediterranean Provinces, of which the NW European zonation provides the primary international standard. The current versions of these zonations are presented and reviewed.


1991 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 227-236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigel H. Trewin ◽  
Mark G. Bramwell

AbstractThe Auk field is located in Block 30/16 at the western margin of the Central Graben. Oil is contained in a combination stratigraphic and structural trap which is sealed by Cretaceous chalk and Tertiary claystones. An oil column of up to 400 ft is contained within Rotliegend sandstones, Zechstein dolomites, Lower Cretaceous breccia and Upper Cretaceous chalk. Production has taken place since 1975 with 80% coming from the Zechstein, in which the best reservoir lithology is a vuggy fractured dolomite where porosity is entirely secondary due to the dolomitization process and leaching of evaporites. Both Rotliegend dune slipface sandstones, and the Lower Cretaceous breccia comprising porous Zechstein clasts in a sandy matrix, also contribute to production. Poor seismic definition of the reservoir results in reliance on well control for detailed reservoir definition. The field has an estimated ultimate recovery of 93 MMBBL with 13 MMBBL remaining at the end of 1988.The Auk field is situated in Block 30/16 of the Central North Sea about 270 km ESE from Aberdeen in 240-270 ft of water (Fig. 1). The field covers an area of about 65 km2 and is a combination of tilted horst blocks and stratigraphic traps, located at the western margin of the South West Central Graben. The Auk horst is about 20 km long and 6-8 km wide, with a NNW-SSE trend. It is bounded on the west by a series of faults with throws of up to 1000 ft, and the eastern boundary fault has a throw of 5000 ft in the north reducing to zero in the south (Fig. 2). The horst is a westward tilted fault block in the north which grades into a faulted anticline in the south. The Auk accumulation is largely contained within Zechstein dolomites and is ultimately sealed by Cretaceous chalk which overlies the base Cretaceous erosion surface. An E-W cross-section of the field is illustrated by Fig. 3. Auk was the first of the alphabetical sequence of North Sea sea-bird names used for Shell/ Esso fields.


2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 62.2-62

AbstractMap depicting the position and names of the main oil and gas producing fields located in the South Viking Graben, Inner and Outer Moray Firth Basins and Central Graben areas of the Central North Sea. The international border (median line) between the UK and Norway is highlighted as are the producing fields in the Norwegian sector. The boxed areas show the extent of licensed acreage in the region.


2003 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 145-216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olaf Michelsen ◽  
Lars H. Nielsen ◽  
Peter N. Johannessen ◽  
Jan Andsbjerg ◽  
Finn Surlyk

A complete updated and revised lithostratigraphic scheme for the Jurassic succession of the onshore and offshore Danish areas is presented together with an overview of the geological evolution. The lithostratigraphies of Bornholm, the Danish Basin and the Danish Central Graben are described in ascending order, and a number of new units are defined. On Bornholm, the Lower–Middle Jurassic coal-bearing clays and sands that overlie the Lower Pliensbachian Hasle Formation are referred to the new Sorthat Formation (Lower Jurassic) and the revised Bagå Formation (Middle Jurassic). In the southern Danish Central Graben, the Middle Jurassic succession formerly referred to the Lower Graben Sand Formation is now included in the revised Bryne Formation. The Lulu Formation is erected to include the uppermost part of the Middle Jurassic succession, previously referred to the Bryne Formation in the northern Danish Central Graben. The Upper Jurassic Heno Formation is subdivided into two new members, the Gert Member (lower) and the Ravn Member (upper). The organic-rich part of the upper Farsund Formation, the former informal ‘hot unit’, is established formally as the Bo Member. Dominantly shallow marine and paralic deposition in the Late Triassic was succeeded by widespread deposition of offshore marine clays in the Early Jurassic. On Bornholm, coastal and paralic sedimentation prevailed. During maximum transgression in the Early Toarcian, sedimentation of organic-rich offshore clays took place in the Danish area. This depositional phase was terminated by a regional erosional event in early Middle Jurassic time, caused by uplift of the central North Sea area, including the Ringkøbing–Fyn High. In the Sorgenfrei–Tornquist Zone to the east, where slow subsidence continued, marine sandy sediments were deposited in response to the uplift. Uplift of the central North Sea area was followed by fault-controlled subsidence accompanied by fluvial and floodplain deposition during Middle Jurassic time. On Bornholm, deposition of lacustrine muds, fluvial sands and peats dominated. The late Middle Jurassic saw a gradual shift to shallow marine deposition in the Danish Central Graben, the Danish Basin and Skåne, southern Sweden. During the Late Jurassic, open marine shelf conditions prevailed with deposition of clay-dominated sediments while shallow marine sands were deposited on platform areas. The Central Graben received sand by means of sediment gravity flows. The clay sediments in the Central Graben became increasingly rich in organic matter at the Jurassic–Cretaceous transition, whilst shallow marine coarse-grained deposits prograded basinwards in the Sorgenfrei– Tornquist Zone.


2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 394-394

AbstractMap depicting the position and names of the main oil and gas producing fields located in the South Viking Graben, Inner and Outer Moray Firth Basins and Central Graben areas of the Central North Sea. The international border (median line) between the UK and Norway is highlighted as are the producing fields in the Norwegian sector. The boxed areas show the extent of licensed acreage in the region.


2003 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 603-609
Author(s):  
Peter M. Chandler ◽  
Barbara Dickinson

AbstractThe Moira Field, discovered in 1988, lies on the Maureen Shelf, 10 km SSW of the Maureen Field. The reservoir comprises submarine fan sandstones in a four-way dip closure, draped over a Middle Jurassic fault block. The good quality reservoir (porosity 17-25%, permeability 80-400mD) flowed 5100 BOPD of 42° API oil in the discovery well. STOIIP was initially calculated as 20 MMBBL, but seismic pick and depth conversion uncertainites were revealed by later drilling. The most recent (1998) calculation yielded STOIIP of 12.4 MMBBL. Reserves of 4.2 MMBBL (34%), have been produced through a single deviated well tied-back to the Maureen platform. The field was shut-in in 1999.


Geophysics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (4) ◽  
pp. U25-U38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nuno V. da Silva ◽  
Andrew Ratcliffe ◽  
Vetle Vinje ◽  
Graham Conroy

Parameterization lies at the center of anisotropic full-waveform inversion (FWI) with multiparameter updates. This is because FWI aims to update the long and short wavelengths of the perturbations. Thus, it is important that the parameterization accommodates this. Recently, there has been an intensive effort to determine the optimal parameterization, centering the fundamental discussion mainly on the analysis of radiation patterns for each one of these parameterizations, and aiming to determine which is best suited for multiparameter inversion. We have developed a new parameterization in the scope of FWI, based on the concept of kinematically equivalent media, as originally proposed in other areas of seismic data analysis. Our analysis is also based on radiation patterns, as well as the relation between the perturbation of this set of parameters and perturbation in traveltime. The radiation pattern reveals that this parameterization combines some of the characteristics of parameterizations with one velocity and two Thomsen’s parameters and parameterizations using two velocities and one Thomsen’s parameter. The study of perturbation of traveltime with perturbation of model parameters shows that the new parameterization is less ambiguous when relating these quantities in comparison with other more commonly used parameterizations. We have concluded that our new parameterization is well-suited for inverting diving waves, which are of paramount importance to carry out practical FWI successfully. We have demonstrated that the new parameterization produces good inversion results with synthetic and real data examples. In the latter case of the real data example from the Central North Sea, the inverted models show good agreement with the geologic structures, leading to an improvement of the seismic image and flatness of the common image gathers.


2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. SM19-SM28 ◽  
Author(s):  
John F. Karlo ◽  
Frans S. P. van Buchem ◽  
Jan Moen ◽  
Katie Milroy

The framework of salt tectonics in the Central North Sea was set early in the Triassic. We defined and illustrated five major domains of differing salt tectonic style. The differing structural styles were all interpreted as having evolved under a component of lateral displacement pairing extensional and contractional structures, produced by some combination of decoupled rift extension and gravity sliding. However, the extensional structures are located toward the basin center and the contractional structures near the original updip limits of salt. This suggests a framework driven by gravity sliding of the sediments overlying the Zechstein away from the Central Graben. Possible mechanisms for structural relief away from the Central Graben are the Triassic focus of rifting lying further east at the Norwegian-Danish basin, footwall uplift of a Triassic Central Graben precursor and significant thermal doming occurring much earlier than had previously been thought. The mechanisms are not mutually exclusive and may have acted in concert.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document