Deep Learning for Three Types of Keratitis Classification based on Confocal Microscopy Images

Author(s):  
Xinming Zhang ◽  
Gang Ding ◽  
Chi Gao ◽  
Chao Li ◽  
Bingliang Hu ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan D. Oakley ◽  
Daniel B. Russakoff ◽  
Megan E. McCarron ◽  
Rachel L. Weinberg ◽  
Jessica M. Izzi ◽  
...  

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (13) ◽  
pp. 4582
Author(s):  
Changjie Cai ◽  
Tomoki Nishimura ◽  
Jooyeon Hwang ◽  
Xiao-Ming Hu ◽  
Akio Kuroda

Fluorescent probes can be used to detect various types of asbestos (serpentine and amphibole groups); however, the fiber counting using our previously developed software was not accurate for samples with low fiber concentration. Machine learning-based techniques (e.g., deep learning) for image analysis, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), have been widely applied to many areas. The objectives of this study were to (1) create a database of a wide-range asbestos concentration (0–50 fibers/liter) fluorescence microscopy (FM) images in the laboratory; and (2) determine the applicability of the state-of-the-art object detection CNN model, YOLOv4, to accurately detect asbestos. We captured the fluorescence microscopy images containing asbestos and labeled the individual asbestos in the images. We trained the YOLOv4 model with the labeled images using one GTX 1660 Ti Graphics Processing Unit (GPU). Our results demonstrated the exceptional capacity of the YOLOv4 model to learn the fluorescent asbestos morphologies. The mean average precision at a threshold of 0.5 ([email protected]) was 96.1% ± 0.4%, using the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) fiber counting Method 7400 as a reference method. Compared to our previous counting software (Intec/HU), the YOLOv4 achieved higher accuracy (0.997 vs. 0.979), particularly much higher precision (0.898 vs. 0.418), recall (0.898 vs. 0.780) and F-1 score (0.898 vs. 0.544). In addition, the YOLOv4 performed much better for low fiber concentration samples (<15 fibers/liter) compared to Intec/HU. Therefore, the FM method coupled with YOLOv4 is remarkable in detecting asbestos fibers and differentiating them from other non-asbestos particles.


Author(s):  
J.M. Murray ◽  
P. Pfeffer ◽  
R. Seifert ◽  
A. Hermann ◽  
J. Handke ◽  
...  

Objective: Manual plaque segmentation in microscopy images is a time-consuming process in atherosclerosis research and potentially subject to unacceptable user-to-user variability and observer bias. We address this by releasing Vesseg a tool that includes state-of-the-art deep learning models for atherosclerotic plaque segmentation. Approach and Results: Vesseg is a containerized, extensible, open-source, and user-oriented tool. It includes 2 models, trained and tested on 1089 hematoxylin-eosin stained mouse model atherosclerotic brachiocephalic artery sections. The models were compared to 3 human raters. Vesseg can be accessed at https://vesseg .online or downloaded. The models show mean Soerensen-Dice scores of 0.91±0.15 for plaque and 0.97±0.08 for lumen pixels. The mean accuracy is 0.98±0.05. Vesseg is already in active use, generating time savings of >10 minutes per slide. Conclusions: Vesseg brings state-of-the-art deep learning methods to atherosclerosis research, providing drastic time savings, while allowing for continuous improvement of models and the underlying pipeline.


2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ishita Garg ◽  
Jon J. Camp ◽  
Robert McBane ◽  
Waldemar Wysokinski ◽  
Richard A. Robb

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document