scholarly journals Dynamic regulation of sphingosine-1-phosphate homeostasis during development of mouse metanephric kidney

2009 ◽  
Vol 296 (3) ◽  
pp. F634-F641 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Jason Kirby ◽  
Ying Jin ◽  
Jian Fu ◽  
Jimena Cubillos ◽  
Debi Swertfeger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kidney Development ◽  
Sphingosine Kinase ◽  
Branching Morphogenesis ◽  
Lipid Mediator ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Dynamic Regulation ◽  
Sphingosine 1 Phosphate ◽  
Metanephric Kidney

Branching morphogenesis of the metanephric kidney is critically dependent on the delicate orchestration of diverse cellular processes including proliferation, apoptosis, migration, and differentiation. Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a potent lipid mediator influencing many of these cellular events. We report increased expression and activity of both sphingosine kinases and S1P phosphatases during development of the mouse metanephric kidney from induction at embryonic day 11.5 to maturity. Sphingosine kinase activity exceeded S1P phosphatase activity in embryonic kidneys, resulting in a net accumulation of S1P, while kinase and phosphatase activities were similar in adult tissue, resulting in reduced S1P content. Sphingosine kinase expression was greater in the metanephric mesenchyme than in the ureteric bud, while the S1P phosphatase SPP2 was expressed at greater levels in the ureteric bud. Treatment of cultured embryonic kidneys with sphingosine kinase inhibitors resulted in a dose-dependent reduction of ureteric bud tip numbers and increased apoptosis. Exogenous S1P rescued kidneys from apoptosis induced by kinase inhibitors. Ureteric bud tip number was unaffected by exogenous S1P in kidneys treated with N, N-dimethylsphingosine, although tip number increased in those treated with d,l- threo-dihydrosphingosine. S1P1 and S1P2 were the predominant S1P receptors expressed in the embryonic kidney. S1P1 expression increased during renal development while expression of S1P2 decreased, and both receptors were expressed predominantly in the metanephric mesenchyme. These results demonstrate dynamic regulation of S1P homeostasis during renal morphogenesis and suggest that differential expression of S1P metabolic enzymes and receptors provides a novel mechanism contributing to the regulation of kidney development.

scholarly journals Hoxa11andHoxd11regulate branching morphogenesis of the ureteric bud in the developing kidney

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (11) ◽  
pp. 2153-2161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Larry T. Patterson ◽  
Martina Pembaur ◽  
S. Steven Potter
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Kidney Development ◽  
Growth Failure ◽  
Immunohistochemical Analysis ◽  
Branching Morphogenesis ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Metanephric Kidney ◽  
Normal Gene ◽  
Ureteric Buds

Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 are functionally redundant during kidney development. Mice with homozygous null mutation of either gene have normal kidneys, but double mutants have rudimentary, or in extreme cases, absent kidneys. We have examined the mechanism for renal growth failure in this mouse model and find defects in ureteric bud branching morphogenesis. The ureteric buds are either unbranched or have an atypical pattern characterized by lack of terminal branches in the midventral renal cortex. The mutant embryos show that Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 control development of a dorsoventral renal axis. By immunohistochemical analysis, Hoxa11 expression is restricted to the early metanephric mesenchyme, which induces ureteric bud formation and branching. It is not found in the ureteric bud. This suggests that the branching defect had been caused by failure of mesenchyme to epithelium signaling. In situ hybridizations with Wnt7b, a marker of the metanephric kidney, show that the branching defect was not simply the result of homeotic transformation of metanephros to mesonephros. Absent Bf2 and Gdnf expression in the midventral mesenchyme, findings that could by themselves account for branching defects, shows that Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 are necessary for normal gene expression in the ventral mesenchyme. Attenuation of normal gene expression along with the absence of a detectable proliferative or apoptotic change in the mutants show that one function of Hoxa11 and Hoxd11 in the developing renal mesenchyme is to regulate differentiation necessary for mesenchymal-epithelial reciprocal inductive interactions.

Proteoglycans are required for maintenance of Wnt-11 expression in the ureter tips

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (11) ◽  
pp. 3627-3637 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Kispert ◽  
S. Vainio ◽  
L. Shen ◽  
D.H. Rowitch ◽  
A.P. McMahon
Keyword(s):  
Collecting Duct ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Branching Morphogenesis ◽  
Proteoglycan Synthesis ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Metanephric Kidney ◽  
Specific Factors ◽  
Collecting Duct Epithelium ◽  
Metanephric Blastema

Development of the metanephric kidney requires the concerted interaction of two tissues, the epithelium of the ureteric duct and the metanephric mesenchyme. Signals from the ureter induce the metanephric mesenchyme to condense and proliferate around the ureter tip, reciprocal signals from the mesenchyme induce the ureter tip to grow and to branch. Wnt genes encode secreted glycoproteins, which are candidate mediators of these signaling events. We have identified three Wnt genes with specific, non-overlapping expression patterns in the metanephric kidney, Wnt-4, Wnt-7b and Wnt-11. Wnt-4 is expressed in the condensing mesenchyme and the comma- and S-shaped bodies. Wnt-7b is expressed in the collecting duct epithelium from 13.5 days post coitum onward. Wnt-1l is first expressed in the nephric duct adjacent to the metanephric blastema prior to the outgrowth of the ureteric bud. Wnt-l1 expression in Danforth's short-tail mice suggests that signaling from the mesenchyme may regulate Wnt-ll activation. During metanephric development, Wnt-11 expression is confined to the tips of the branching ureter. Maintenance of this expression is independent of Wnt-4 signaling and mature mesenchymal elements in the kidney. Moreover, Wnt-ll expression is maintained in recombinants between ureter and lung mesenchyme suggesting that branching morphogenesis and maintenance of Wnt-ll expression are independent of metanephric mesenchyme-specific factors. Interference with proteoglycan synthesis leads to loss of Wnt-ll expression in the ureter tip. We suggest that Wnt-11 acts as an autocrine factor within the ureter epithelium and that its expression is regulated at least in part by proteoglycans.

scholarly journals Genetic Dissection of Cadherin Function during Nephrogenesis

2002 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 1474-1487 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulf Dahl ◽  
Anders Sjödin ◽  
Lionel Larue ◽  
Glenn L. Radice ◽  
Stefan Cajander ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Development ◽  
Morphological Changes ◽  
Genetic Dissection ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Metanephric Kidney ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Deficient Mice

ABSTRACT The distinct expression of R-cadherin in the induced aggregating metanephric mesenchyme suggests that it may regulate the mesenchymal-epithelial transition during kidney development. To address whether R-cadherin is required for kidney ontogeny, R-cadherin-deficient mice were generated. These mice appeared to be healthy and were fertile, demonstrating that R-cadherin is not essential for embryogenesis. The only kidney phenotype of adult mutant animals was the appearance of dilated proximal tubules, which was associated with an accumulation of large intracellular vacuoles. Morphological analysis of nephrogenesis in R-cadherin −/− mice in vivo and in vitro revealed defects in the development of both ureteric bud-derived cells and metanephric mesenchyme-derived cells. First, the morphology and organization of the proximal parts of the ureteric bud epithelium were altered. Interestingly, these morphological changes correlated with an increased rate of apoptosis and were further supported by perturbed branching and patterning of the ureteric bud epithelium during in vitro differentiation. Second, during in vitro studies of mesenchymal-epithelial conversion, significantly fewer epithelial structures developed from R-cadherin −/− kidneys than from wild-type kidneys. These data suggest that R-cadherin is functionally involved in the differentiation of both mesenchymal and epithelial components during metanephric kidney development. Finally, to investigate whether the redundant expression of other classic cadherins expressed in the kidney could explain the rather mild kidney defects in R-cadherin-deficient mice, we intercrossed R-cadherin −/− mice with cadherin-6−/− , P-cadherin −/−, and N-cadherin +/− mice. Surprisingly, however, in none of the compound knockout strains was kidney development affected to a greater extent than within the individual cadherin knockout strains.

scholarly journals Transcription Factor 21 Is Required for Branching Morphogenesis and Regulates the Gdnf-Axis in Kidney Development

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 2795-2808 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shintaro Ide ◽  
Gal Finer ◽  
Yoshiro Maezawa ◽  
Tuncer Onay ◽  
Tomokazu Souma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Kidney Development ◽  
Renal Dysplasia ◽  
Branching Morphogenesis ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Renal Hypodysplasia ◽  
Cap Mesenchyme

BackgroundThe mammalian kidney develops through reciprocal inductive signals between the metanephric mesenchyme and ureteric bud. Transcription factor 21 (Tcf21) is highly expressed in the metanephric mesenchyme, including Six2-expressing cap mesenchyme and Foxd1-expressing stromal mesenchyme. Tcf21 knockout mice die in the perinatal period from severe renal hypodysplasia. In humans, Tcf21 mRNA levels are reduced in renal tissue from human fetuses with renal dysplasia. The molecular mechanisms underlying these renal defects are not yet known.MethodsUsing a variety of techniques to assess kidney development and gene expression, we compared the phenotypes of wild-type mice, mice with germline deletion of the Tcf21 gene, mice with stromal mesenchyme–specific Tcf21 deletion, and mice with cap mesenchyme–specific Tcf21 deletion.ResultsGermline deletion of Tcf21 leads to impaired ureteric bud branching and is accompanied by downregulated expression of Gdnf-Ret-Wnt11, a key pathway required for branching morphogenesis. Selective removal of Tcf21 from the renal stroma is also associated with attenuation of the Gdnf signaling axis and leads to a defect in ureteric bud branching, a paucity of collecting ducts, and a defect in urine concentration capacity. In contrast, deletion of Tcf21 from the cap mesenchyme leads to abnormal glomerulogenesis and massive proteinuria, but no downregulation of Gdnf-Ret-Wnt11 or obvious defect in branching.ConclusionsOur findings indicate that Tcf21 has distinct roles in the cap mesenchyme and stromal mesenchyme compartments during kidney development and suggest that Tcf21 regulates key molecular pathways required for branching morphogenesis.

scholarly journals Identification of pleiotrophin as a mesenchymal factor involved in ureteric bud branching morphogenesis

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (17) ◽  
pp. 3283-3293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Sakurai ◽  
Kevin T. Bush ◽  
Sanjay K. Nigam
Keyword(s):  
Cell Line ◽  
Conditioned Medium ◽  
Kidney Development ◽  
Egf Receptor ◽  
Branching Morphogenesis ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Receptor Ligands ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Apparent Homogeneity ◽  
Mesenchyme Cell

Branching morphogenesis is central to epithelial organogenesis. In the developing kidney, the epithelial ureteric bud invades the metanephric mesenchyme, which directs the ureteric bud to undergo repeated branching. A soluble factor(s) in the conditioned medium of a metanephric mesenchyme cell line is essential for multiple branching morphogenesis of the isolated ureteric bud. The identity of this factor had proved elusive, but it appeared distinct from factors such as HGF and EGF receptor ligands that have been previously implicated in branching morphogenesis of mature epithelial cell lines. Using sequential column chromatography, we have now purified to apparent homogeneity an 18 kDa protein, pleiotrophin, from the conditioned medium of a metanephric mesenchyme cell line that induces isolated ureteric bud branching morphogenesis in the presence of glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor. Pleiotrophin alone was also found to induce the formation of branching tubules in an immortalized ureteric bud cell line cultured three-dimensionally in an extracellular matrix gel. Consistent with an important role in ureteric bud morphogenesis during kidney development, pleiotrophin was found to localize to the basement membrane of the developing ureteric bud in the embryonic kidney. We suggest that pleiotrophin could act as a key mesenchymally derived factor regulating branching morphogenesis of the ureteric bud and perhaps other embryonic epithelial structures.

Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors regulate in vitro ureteric bud branching morphogenesis

2000 ◽  
Vol 279 (5) ◽  
pp. F891-F900 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Pohl ◽  
Hiroyuki Sakurai ◽  
Kevin T. Bush ◽  
Sanjay K. Nigam
Keyword(s):  
Conditioned Medium ◽  
Kidney Development ◽  
Gelatin Zymography ◽  
Branching Morphogenesis ◽  
Complex Model ◽  
Northern Analysis ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Direct Role

Mammalian kidney development is initiated by the mutual interaction between embryonic metanephric mesenchyme (MM) and the ureteric bud (UB), leading to tightly controlled UB branching morphogenesis. In a three-dimensional cell culture model, which employs MM cell-derived conditioned medium (BSN-CM) to induce UB cell branching morphogenesis in extracellular matrix (ECM) gels (Sakurai H, Barros EJ, Tsukamoto T, Barasch J, and Nigam SK. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 6279–6284, 1997), branching morphogenesis was inhibited by both chemical agents (ilomastat and 1,10-orthophenanthroline) and a physiological protein factor [tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases (TIMP)-2], known to act as matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitors. In addition, UB branching was inhibited in isolated UB culture (Qiao J, Sakurai H, and Nigam SK. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA96: 7330–7335, 1999) by TIMP-2 and ilomastat, suggesting a direct role for MMPs in UB branching. Gelatin zymography and enzymatic measurement of MMP activity revealed that MMPs could originate from at least three different sources: the conditioned medium, the ECM, and the UB cells themselves. In the UB cells, transcription of several MMPs [gelatinase A (MMP2) and B (MMP9), stromelysin (MMP3), MT1-MMP] and TIMPs was altered by BSN-CM and changed as more complex branching structures formed. The ECM appeared to serve as both a reservoir for MMPs and modulated their expression because different ECM compositions altered the total MMP activity as well as specific subsets of MMPs expressed by the UB cells (as determined by zymography and Northern analysis). In the context of UB branching morphogenesis during kidney development, our data suggest a complex model in which soluble factors produced by the MM, in the context of specific ECM components, modulate the expression of specific subsets of MMPs and TIMPs in the UB, which alter as structures develop and the matrix environment changes. This suggests distinct roles for different subsets of MMPs and their inhibitors during different phases of branching morphogenesis.

Regulation of ureteric bud outgrowth by Pax2-dependent activation of the glial derived neurotrophic factor gene

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (23) ◽  
pp. 4747-4756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick D. Brophy ◽  
Lance Ostrom ◽  
Katherine M. Lang ◽  
Gregory R. Dressler
Keyword(s):  
Neurotrophic Factor ◽  
Kidney Development ◽  
Branching Morphogenesis ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Ectopic Ureter ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Signaling Complex ◽  
Duct Epithelium ◽  
Glial Derived Neurotrophic Factor

The outgrowth of the ureteric bud from the posterior nephric duct epithelium and the subsequent invasion of the bud into the metanephric mesenchyme initiate the process of metanephric, or adult kidney, development. The receptor tyrosine kinase RET and glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) form a signaling complex that is essential for ureteric bud growth and branching morphogenesis of the ureteric bud epithelium. We demonstrate that Pax2 expression in the metanephric mesenchyme is independent of induction by the ureteric bud. Pax2 mutants are deficient in ureteric bud outgrowth and do not express GDNF in the uninduced metanephric mesenchyme. Furthermore, Pax2 mutant mesenchyme is unresponsive to induction by wild-type heterologous inducers. In normal embryos, GDNF is sufficient to induce ectopic ureter buds in the posterior nephric duct, a process inhibited by bone morphogenetic protein 4. However, GDNF replacement in organ culture is not sufficient to stimulate ureteric bud outgrowth from Pax2 mutant nephric ducts, indicating additional defects in the nephric duct epithelium of Pax2 mutants. Pax2 can activate expression of GDNF in cell lines derived from embryonic metanephroi. Furthermore, Pax2 protein can bind to upstream regulatory elements within the GDNF promoter region and can transactivate expression of reporter genes. Thus, activation of GDNF by Pax2 coordinates the position and outgrowth of the ureteric bud such that kidney development can begin.

Evolution of gene expression patterns in a model of branching morphogenesis

1999 ◽  
Vol 277 (4) ◽  
pp. F650-F663 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Pavlova ◽  
Robert O. Stuart ◽  
Martin Pohl ◽  
Sanjay K. Nigam
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Branching Morphogenesis ◽  
Computational Method ◽  
Metanephric Mesenchyme ◽  
Ureteric Bud ◽  
Cdna Arrays ◽  
Apoptotic Genes ◽  
Collecting System

Branching morphogenesis of the ureteric bud in response to unknown signals from the metanephric mesenchyme gives rise to the urinary collecting system and, via inductive signals from the ureteric bud, to recruitment of nephrons from undifferentiated mesenchyme. An established cell culture model for this process employs cells of ureteric bud origin (UB) cultured in extracellular matrix and stimulated with conditioned media (BSN-CM) from a metanephric mesenchymal cell line (H. Sakurai, E. J. Barros, T. Tsukamoto, J. Barasch, and S. K. Nigam. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 6279–6284, 1997.). In the presence of BSN-CM, the UB cells form branching tubular structures reminiscent of the branching ureteric bud. The pattern of gene regulation in this model of branching morphogenesis of the kidney collecting system was investigated using high-density cDNA arrays. Software and analytical methods were developed for the quantification and clustering of genes. With the use of a computational method termed “vector analysis,” genes were clustered according to the direction and magnitude of differential expression in n-dimensional log-space. Changes in gene expression in response to the BSN-CM consisted primarily of differential expression of transcription factors with previously described roles in morphogenesis, downregulation of pro-apoptotic genes accompanied by upregulation of anti-apoptotic genes, and upregulation of a small group of secreted products including growth factors, cytokines, and extracellular proteinases. Changes in expression are discussed in the context of a general model for epithelial branching morphogenesis. In addition, the cDNA arrays were used to survey expression of epithelial markers and secreted factors in UB and BSN cells, confirming the largely epithelial character of the former and largely mesenchymal character of the later. Specific morphologies (cellular processes, branching multicellular cords, etc.) were shown to correlate with the expression of different, but overlapping, genomic subsets, suggesting differences in morphogenetic mechanisms at these various steps in the evolution of branching tubules.

scholarly journals Filamin A Links Sphingosine Kinase 1 and Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor 1 at Lamellipodia To Orchestrate Cell Migration

2008 ◽  
Vol 28 (18) ◽  
pp. 5687-5697 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Maceyka ◽  
Sergio E. Alvarez ◽  
Sheldon Milstien ◽  
Sarah Spiegel
Keyword(s):  
Critical Role ◽  
Cell Movement ◽  
Sphingosine Kinase ◽  
Lipid Mediator ◽  
Sphingosine Kinase 1 ◽  
Filamin A ◽  
Interacting Protein ◽  
Surface Receptors ◽  
Sphingosine 1 Phosphate ◽  
Lamellipodia Formation

ABSTRACT Sphingosine kinase 1 (SphK1) catalyzes the phosphorylation of sphingosine to produce the potent lipid mediator sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), which plays a critical role in cell motility via its cell surface receptors. Here, we have identified filamin A (FLNa), an actin-cross-linking protein involved in cell movement, as a bona fide SphK1-interacting protein. Heregulin stimulated SphK1 activity only in FLNa-expressing A7 melanoma cells but not in FLNa-deficient cells and induced its translocation and colocalization with FLNa at lamellipodia. SphK1 was required for heregulin-induced migration, lamellipodia formation, activation of PAK1, and subsequent FLNa phosphorylation. S1P directly stimulated PAK1 kinase, suggesting that it may be a target of intracellularly generated S1P. Heregulin also induced colocalization of S1P1 (promotility S1P receptor) but not S1P2, with SphK1 and FLNa at membrane ruffles. Moreover, an S1P1 antagonist inhibited the lamellipodia formation induced by heregulin. Hence, FLNa links SphK1 and S1P1 to locally influence the dynamics of actin cytoskeletal structures by orchestrating the concerted actions of the triumvirate of SphK1, FLNa, and PAK1, each of which requires and/or regulates the actions of the others, at lamellipodia to promote cell movement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document