MST Responses to Pursuit Across Optic Flow With Motion Parallax

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 818-826 ◽  
Author(s):  
Urmen D. Upadhyay ◽  
William K. Page ◽  
Charles J. Duffy
Keyword(s):  
Flow Field ◽  
Optic Flow ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Motion Parallax ◽  
Depth Plane ◽  
Relative Depth ◽  
Depth Cues ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Heading Direction ◽  
Mst Neurons

Self-movement creates the patterned visual motion of optic flow with a focus of expansion (FOE) that indicates heading direction. During pursuit eye movements, depth cues create a retinal flow field that contains multiple FOEs, potentially complicating heading perception. Paradoxically, human heading perception during pursuit is improved by depth cues. We have studied medial superior temporal (MST) neurons to see whether their heading selectivity is also improved under these conditions. The responses of 134 MST neurons were recorded during the presentation of optic flow stimuli containing one or three speed-defined depth planes. During pursuit, multiple depth-plane stimuli evoked larger responses (71% of neurons) and stronger heading selectivity (70% of neurons). Responses to the three speed-defined depth-planes presented separately showed that most neurons (54%) preferred one of the planes. Responses to multiple depth-plane stimuli were larger than the averaged responses to the three component planes, suggesting enhancing interactions between depth-planes. Thus speed preferences create selective responses to one of many depth-planes in the retinal flow field. The presence of multiple depth-planes enhances those responses. These properties might improve heading perception during pursuit and contribute to relative depth perception.

scholarly journals Discharge Properties of MST Neurons That Project to the Frontal Pursuit Area in Macaque Monkeys

2005 ◽  
Vol 94 (2) ◽  
pp. 1084-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne K. Churchland ◽  
Stephen G. Lisberger
Keyword(s):  
Optic Flow ◽  
Action Potentials ◽  
Rhesus Monkeys ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Image Motion ◽  
Antidromic Activation ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Mst Neurons ◽  
Direction Tuning ◽  
And Control

We have used antidromic activation to determine the functional discharge properties of neurons that project to the frontal pursuit area (FPA) from the medial-superior temporal visual area (MST). In awake rhesus monkeys, MST neurons were considered to be activated antidromically if they emitted action potentials at fixed, short latencies after stimulation in the FPA and if the activation passed the collision test. Antidromically activated neurons ( n = 37) and a sample of the overall population of MST neurons ( n = 110) then were studied during pursuit eye movements across a dark background and during laminar motion of a large random-dot texture and optic flow expansion and contraction during fixation. Antidromically activated neurons showed direction tuning during pursuit (25/37), during laminar image motion (21/37), or both (16/37). Of 27 neurons tested with optic flow stimuli, 14 showed tuning for optic flow expansion ( n = 10) or contraction ( n = 4). There were no statistically significant differences in the response properties of the antidromically activated and control samples. Preferred directions for pursuit and laminar image motion did not show any statistically significant biases, and the preferred directions for eye versus image motion in each sample tended to be equally divided between aligned and opposed. There were small differences between the control and antidromically activated populations in preferred speeds for laminar motion and optic flow; these might have reached statistical significance with larger samples of antidromically activated neurons. We conclude that the population of MST neurons projecting to the FPA is highly diverse and quite similar to the general population of neurons in MST.

Location and Functional Definition of Human Visual Motion Organization Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

2011 ◽  
pp. 18-27
Author(s):  
Tianyi Yan ◽  
Jinglong Wu
Keyword(s):  
Visual Field ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Superior Temporal Sulcus ◽  
Object Motion ◽  
Posterior Limb ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Processing Abilities ◽  
Mst Neurons ◽  
Definition Of

In humans, functional imaging studies have found a homolog of the macaque motion complex, MT+, which is suggested to contain both the middle temporal (MT) and medial superior temporal (MST) areas in the ascending limb of the inferior temporal sulcus. In the macaque, the motion-sensitive MT and MST areas are adjacent in the superior temporal sulcus. Electrophysiology has identified several motion-selective regions in the superior temporal sulcus (STS) of the macaque. Two of the best-studied areas include the MT and MST areas. The MT area has strong projections to the adjacent MST area and is typically subdivided into the dorsal (MSTd) and lateral (MSTl) subregions. While MT encodes the basic elements of motion, MST has higher-order motion-processing abilities and has been implicated in the perception of both object motion and self motion. The macaque MST area has been shown to have considerably larger receptive fields than the MT area. The receptive fields of MT cells typically extend only a few degrees into the ipsilateral visual field, while MST neurons have receptive fields that extend well into the ipsilateral visual field. This study tentatively identifies these subregions as the human homologs of the macaque MT and MST areas, respectively (Fig. 1). Putative human MT and MST areas were typically located on the posterior/ventral and anterior/dorsal banks of a dorsal/posterior limb of the inferior temporal sulcus. These locations are similar to their relative positions in the macaque superior temporal sulcus.

MSTd Neuronal Basis Functions for the Population Encoding of Heading Direction

2003 ◽  
Vol 90 (2) ◽  
pp. 549-558 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Ben Hamed ◽  
W. Page ◽  
C. Duffy ◽  
A. Pouget
Keyword(s):  
Optic Flow ◽  
Basis Functions ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Nonlinear Functions ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
A Value ◽  
Heading Direction ◽  
Linear Estimators ◽  
Average Accuracy ◽  
Optimal Linear

Basis functions have been extensively used in models of neural computation because they can be combined linearly to approximate any nonlinear functions of the encoded variables. We investigated whether dorsal medial superior temporal (MSTd) area neurons use basis functions to simultaneously encode heading direction, eye position, and the velocity of ocular pursuit. Using optimal linear estimators, we first show that the head-centered and eye-centered position of a focus of expansion (FOE) in optic flow, pursuit direction, and eye position can all be estimated from the single-trial responses of 144 MSTd neurons with an average accuracy of 2–3°, a value consistent with the discrimination thresholds measured in humans and monkeys. We then examined the format of the neural code for the head-centered position of the FOE, eye position, and pursuit direction. The basis function hypothesis predicts that a large majority of cells in MSTd should encode two or more signals simultaneously and combine these signals nonlinearly. Our analysis shows that 95% of the neurons encode two or more signals, whereas 76% code all three signals. Of the 95% of cells encoding two or more signals, 90% show nonlinear interactions between the encoded variables. These findings support the notion that MSTd may use basis functions to represent the FOE in optic flow, eye position, and pursuit.

Reversed Visual Motion and Self-Sustaining Eye Oscillations

Perception ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 26 (7) ◽  
pp. 823-830 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lothar Spillmann ◽  
Stuart Anstis ◽  
Anne Kurtenbach ◽  
Ian Howard
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Flow Field ◽  
Negative Feedback ◽  
Positive Feedback ◽  
Optic Flow ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Optokinetic Nystagmus ◽  
Retinal Images ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Reversed Motion

A random-dot field undergoing counterphase flicker paradoxically appears to move in the same direction as head and eye movements, ie opposite to the optic-flow field. The effect is robust and occurs over a wide range of flicker rates and pixel sizes. The phenomenon can be explained by reversed phi motion caused by apparent pixel movement between successive retinal images. The reversed motion provides a positive feedback control of the display, whereas under normal conditions retinal signals provide a negative feedback. This altered polarity invokes self-sustaining eye movements akin to involuntary optokinetic nystagmus.

Optic Flow Signals in Extrastriate Area MST: Comparison of Perceptual and Neuronal Sensitivity

2004 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 1314-1326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilary W. Heuer ◽  
Kenneth H. Britten
Keyword(s):  
Optic Flow ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Extrastriate Cortex ◽  
Sufficient Information ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Behavioral Choices ◽  
Behavioral Sensitivity

The medial superior temporal area of extrastriate cortex (MST) contains signals selective for nonuniform patterns of motion often termed “optic flow.” The presence of such tuning, however, does not necessarily imply involvement in perception. To quantify the relationship between these selective neuronal signals and the perception of optic flow, we designed a discrimination task that allowed us to simultaneously record neuronal and behavioral sensitivities to near-threshold optic flow stimuli tailored to MST cells' preferences. In this two-alternative forced-choice task, we controlled the salience of globally opposite patterns (e.g., expansion and contraction) by varying the coherence of the motion. Using these stimuli, we could both relate the sensitivity of neuronal signals in MST to the animal's behavioral sensitivity and also measure trial-by-trial correlation between neuronal signals and behavioral choices. Neurons in MST showed a wide range of sensitivities to these complex motion stimuli. Many neurons had sensitivities equal or superior to the monkey's threshold. On the other hand, trial-by-trial correlation between neuronal discharge and choice (“choice probability”) was weak or nonexistent in our data. Together, these results lead us to conclude that MST contains sufficient information for threshold judgments of optic flow; however, the role of MST activity in optic flow discriminations may be less direct than in other visual motion tasks previously described by other laboratories.

Lateral optic flow does not influence distance estimation in the desert ant Cataglyphis fortis

2000 ◽  
Vol 203 (7) ◽  
pp. 1113-1121 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Ronacher ◽  
K. Gallizzi ◽  
S. Wohlgemuth ◽  
R. Wehner
Keyword(s):  
Flow Field ◽  
Optic Flow ◽  
Visual Cues ◽  
Food Source ◽  
Motion Parallax ◽  
Distance Estimation ◽  
Desert Ants ◽  
Desert Ant ◽  
Walking Speeds ◽  
Cataglyphis Fortis

The present account answers the question of whether desert ants (Cataglyphis fortis) gauge the distance they have travelled by using self-induced lateral optic-flow parameters, as has been described for bees. The ants were trained to run to a distant food source within a channel whose walls were covered with black-and-white gratings. From the food source, they were transferred to test channels of double or half the training width, and the distance they travelled before searching for home and their walking speeds were recorded. Since the animals experience different motion parallax cues when walking in the broader or narrower channels, the optic-flow hypothesis predicted that the ants would walk faster and further in the broader channels, but more slowly and less far in the narrower channels. In contrast to this expectation, neither the walking speeds nor the searching distances depended on the width or height of the channels or on the pattern wavelengths. Even when ventral-field visual cues were excluded by covering the eyes with light-tight paint, the ants were not influenced by lateral optic flow-field cues. Hence, walking desert ants do not depend on self-induced visual flow-field cues in gauging the distance they have travelled, as do flying honeybees, but can measure locomotor distance exclusively by idiothetic means.

scholarly journals Task contingencies and perceptual strategies shape behavioral effects on neuronal response profiles

2013 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 546-556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuya Sato ◽  
William K. Page ◽  
Charles J. Duffy
Keyword(s):  
Optic Flow ◽  
Neuronal Response ◽  
Ground Plane ◽  
Flow Analysis ◽  
Prior Probabilities ◽  
Match To Sample ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Heading Direction ◽  
Stimulus Match ◽  
Perceptual Strategy

We presented optic flow simulating eight directions of self-movement in the ground plane, while monkeys performed delayed match-to-sample tasks, and we recorded dorsal medial superior temporal (MSTd) neuronal activity. Randomly selected sample headings yield smaller test responses to the neuron's preferred heading when it is near the sample's heading direction and larger test responses to the preferred heading when it is far from the sample's heading. Limiting test stimuli to matching or opposite headings suppresses responses to preferred stimuli in both test conditions, whereas focusing on each neuron's preferred vs. antipreferred stimuli enhances responses to the antipreferred stimulus. Match vs. opposite paradigms create bimodal heading profiles shaped by interactions with late delay-period activity. We conclude that task contingencies, determining the prior probabilities of specific stimuli, interact with the monkeys' perceptual strategy for optic flow analysis. These influences shape attentional and working memory effects on the heading direction selectivities and preferences of MSTd neurons.

Attentional Modulation of Self-Motion Perception

Perception ◽  
10.1068/p5037 ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 475-484 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michiteru Kitazaki ◽  
Takao Sato
Keyword(s):  
Motion Perception ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Depth Plane ◽  
Relative Depth ◽  
Attentional Modulation ◽  
Motion Energy ◽  
Large Display ◽  
Attentional Effect ◽  
Self Motion ◽  
Direction Opposite

Attentional effects on self-motion perception (vection) were examined by using a large display in which vertical stripes containing upward or downward moving dots were interleaved to balance the total motion energy for the two directions. The dots moving in the same direction had the same colour, and subjects were asked to attend to one of the two colours. Vection was perceived in the direction opposite to that of non-attended motion. This indicates that non-attended visual motion dominates vection. The attentional effect was then compared with effects of relative depth. Clear attentional effects were again found when there was no relative depth between dots moving in opposite directions, but the effect of depth was much stronger for stimuli with a relative depth. Vection was mainly determined by motion in the far depth plane, although some attentional effects were evident even in this case. These results indicate that attentional modulation for vection exists, but that it is overridden when there is a relative depth between the two motion components.

Distinct Nature of Directional Signals Among Parietal Cortical Areas During Visual Guidance

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 1777-1790 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad N. Eskandar ◽  
John A. Assad
Keyword(s):  
Visual Motion ◽  
Hand Movement ◽  
Direction Selectivity ◽  
Visually Guided ◽  
Stimulus Motion ◽  
Directional Information ◽  
Temporal Area ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Direction Of Movement ◽  
Mst Neurons

We examined neuronal signals in the monkey medial superior temporal area (MST), the medial intraparietal area (MIP), and the lateral intraparietal area (LIP) during visually guided hand movements. Two animals were trained to use a joystick to guide a spot to a target. Many neurons responded in a direction-selective manner in this guidance task. We tested whether the direction selectivity depended on the direction of the stimulus spot or the direction of the hand movement. First, in some trials, the moving spot disappeared transiently. Second, the mapping between the hand direction and the spot direction was reversed on alternate blocks of trials. Third, we recorded the spot's movement while the animals moved the joystick and then played back that movement while the animals fixated without moving the joystick. Neurons in the three parietal areas conveyed distinct directional information. MST neurons were active and directional only on visible trials in both joystick-movement mode and playback mode and were not affected by the direction of hand movement. MIP neurons were mainly directional with respect to the hand movement, although some MIP neurons were also selective for stimulus direction. MIP neurons were much less active in playback mode. LIP neurons were active and directional in both joystick-movement mode and playback mode. Directional signals in LIP were unrelated to planning saccades. The selectivity of LIP neurons also became evident hundreds of milliseconds before the start of movement. Since the direction of movement was consistent throughout a block of trials, these signals could provide a prediction of the upcoming direction of motion. We tested this by alternating blocks of trials in which the direction was consistent or randomized. The direction selectivity developed earlier on trials in which the upcoming direction could be predicted. These results suggest that LIP neurons combine “bottom-up” visual motion signals with extraretinal, predictive signals about stimulus motion.

MST Neurons Code for Visual Motion in Space Independent of Pursuit Eye Movements

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 3473-3483 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naoko Inaba ◽  
Shigeru Shinomoto ◽  
Shigeru Yamane ◽  
Aya Takemura ◽  
Kenji Kawano
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Neural Mechanism ◽  
Mt Neurons ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Medial Superior Temporal ◽  
Counter Rotation ◽  
Induced Motion ◽  
Mst Neurons

When a person tracks a small moving object, the visual images in the background of the visual scene move across his/her retina. It, however, is possible to estimate the actual motion of the images despite the eye-movement-induced motion. To understand the neural mechanism that reconstructs a stable visual world independent of eye movements, we explored areas MT (middle temporal) and MST (medial superior temporal) in the monkey cortex, both of which are known to be essential for visual motion analysis. We recorded the responses of neurons to a moving textured image that appeared briefly on the screen while the monkeys were performing smooth pursuit or stationary fixation tasks. Although neurons in both areas exhibited significant responses to the motion of the textured image with directional selectivity, the responses of MST neurons were mostly correlated with the motion of the image on the screen independent of pursuit eye movement, whereas the responses of MT neurons were mostly correlated with the motion of the image on the retina. Thus these MST neurons were more likely than MT neurons to distinguish between external and self-induced motion. The results are consistent with the idea that MST neurons code for visual motion in the external world while compensating for the counter-rotation of retinal images due to pursuit eye movements.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document