scholarly journals Interferonβ-1b Induces the Expression of RGS1 a Negative Regulator of G-Protein Signaling

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiffany Tran ◽  
Pedro Paz ◽  
Sharlene Velichko ◽  
Jill Cifrese ◽  
Praveen Belur ◽  
...  

We present evidence of a link between interferonβ-1b (IFN-β) and G-protein signaling by demonstrating that IFN-β can induce the expression of the negative regulator of G-protein signaling 1 (RGS1). RGS1 reduces G-protein activation and immune cell migration by interacting with heterotrimeric G-proteins and enhancing their intrinsic GTPase activity. In this study, IFN-β treatment resulted in the induction of RGS1 in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), monocytes, T cells, and B cells. Induction of RGS1 by IFN-β was concentration dependent and observed at both the RNA and protein level. Other members of the RGS family were not induced by IFN-β, and induction of RGS1 required the activation of the IFN receptor. In addition, RGS1 induction was observed in PBMCs obtained from IFN-β-treated multiple sclerosis patients suggesting a possible, as yet unexplored, involvement of G-protein regulation in disease treatment. The upregulation of RGS1 by IFN-β has not been previously reported.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward L. Stahl ◽  
Laura M. Bohn

AbstractIn a recent report by Gillis et al., 2020 (1), it was suggested that low intrinsic agonism, and not biased agonism, leads to an improvement in the separation of potency in opioid-induced respiratory suppression versus antinociception. Although the compounds that were tested have been shown to display G protein signaling bias in prior publications, the authors conclude that since they cannot detect biased agonism in their cellular signaling studies the compounds are therefore not biased agonists. Rather, they conclude that it is low intrinsic efficacy that leads to the therapeutic window improvement. Intrinsic efficacy is the extent to which an agonist can stimulate a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) response in a system. The designation of full agonist is made to compounds that produce the highest observable activation in a system (maximum intrinsic efficacy); agonists producing some fraction of that response are considered partial agonists. The maximum response window is determined by the cellular environment, receptor and effector expression levels, and the amplification readout of the system. Biased agonism takes into consideration not only intrinsic efficacy, but also potency (concentration required to reach half maximal efficacy) of an agonist in an assay. Herein, the data published in the aforementioned manuscript was used to rederive the intrinsic efficacy and bias factors as ΔΔlog(τ/KA) and ΔΔlog(Emax/EC50). Based on this reanalysis, the data does not support the conclusion that biased agonism, favoring G protein signaling, was not present. Further, these observations agree with prior studies wherein oliceridine, PZM21 and SR-17018 were first described as biased agonists with improvement in antinociception over respiratory suppression in mice. Therefore, introducing G protein signaling bias may be a means to improve opioid analgesia while avoiding certain undesirable side effects.


2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (48) ◽  
pp. E10319-E10328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Leyme ◽  
Arthur Marivin ◽  
Marcin Maziarz ◽  
Vincent DiGiacomo ◽  
Maria P. Papakonstantinou ◽  
...  

Activation of heterotrimeric G proteins by cytoplasmic nonreceptor proteins is an alternative to the classical mechanism via G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). A subset of nonreceptor G protein activators is characterized by a conserved sequence named the Gα-binding and activating (GBA) motif, which confers guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) activity in vitro and promotes G protein-dependent signaling in cells. GBA proteins have important roles in physiology and disease but remain greatly understudied. This is due, in part, to the lack of efficient tools that specifically disrupt GBA motif function in the context of the large multifunctional proteins in which they are embedded. This hindrance to the study of alternative mechanisms of G protein activation contrasts with the wealth of convenient chemical and genetic tools to manipulate GPCR-dependent activation. Here, we describe the rational design and implementation of a genetically encoded protein that specifically inhibits GBA motifs: GBA inhibitor (GBAi). GBAi was engineered by introducing modifications in Gαi that preclude coupling to every known major binding partner [GPCRs, Gβγ, effectors, guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitors (GDIs), GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs), or the chaperone/GEF Ric-8A], while favoring high-affinity binding to all known GBA motifs. We demonstrate that GBAi does not interfere with canonical GPCR-G protein signaling but blocks GBA-dependent signaling in cancer cells. Furthermore, by implementing GBAi in vivo, we show that GBA-dependent signaling modulates phenotypes during Xenopus laevis embryonic development. In summary, GBAi is a selective, efficient, and convenient tool to dissect the biological processes controlled by a GPCR-independent mechanism of G protein activation mediated by cytoplasmic factors.


2011 ◽  
Vol 301 (1) ◽  
pp. H147-H156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Jialin Su ◽  
Michelle E. King ◽  
Angel E. Maldonado ◽  
Cindy Park ◽  
...  

Cardiac fibroblasts play a key role in fibrosis development in response to stress and injury. Angiotensin II (ANG II) is a major profibrotic activator whose downstream effects (such as phospholipase Cβ activation, cell proliferation, and extracellular matrix secretion) are mainly mediated via Gq-coupled AT1 receptors. Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS), which accelerate termination of G protein signaling, are expressed in the myocardium. Among them, RGS2 has emerged as an important player in modulating Gq-mediated hypertrophic remodeling in cardiac myocytes. To date, no information is available on RGS in cardiac fibroblasts. We tested the hypothesis that RGS2 is an important regulator of ANG II-induced signaling and function in ventricular fibroblasts. Using an in vitro model of fibroblast activation, we have demonstrated expression of several RGS isoforms, among which only RGS2 was transiently upregulated after short-term ANG II stimulation. Similar results were obtained in fibroblasts isolated from rat hearts after in vivo ANG II infusion via minipumps for 1 day. In contrast, prolonged ANG II stimulation (3–14 days) markedly downregulated RGS2 in vivo. To delineate the functional effects of RGS expression changes, we used gain- and loss-of-function approaches. Adenovirally infected RGS2 had a negative regulatory effect on ANG II-induced phospholipase Cβ activity, cell proliferation, and total collagen production, whereas RNA interference of endogenous RGS2 had opposite effects, despite the presence of several other RGS. Together, these data suggest that RGS2 is a functionally important negative regulator of ANG II-induced cardiac fibroblast responses that may play a role in ANG II-induced fibrosis development.


2004 ◽  
Vol 89 (8) ◽  
pp. 4153-4157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorenzo A. Calò ◽  
Elisa Pagnin ◽  
Paul A. Davis ◽  
Michelangelo Sartori ◽  
Giulio Ceolotto ◽  
...  

Regulator of G protein signaling-2 (RGS-2) plays a key role in the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) angiotensin II (Ang II) signaling. NO and cGMP exert a vasodilating action also through activation and binding to RGS-2 of cGMP dependent protein kinase 1-α, which phosphorylates RGS-2 and dephosphorylates myosin light chain. In Bartter’s/Gitelman’s patients (BS/GS) Ang II related signaling and vasomotor tone are blunted. Experiments were planned to explore whether RGS-2 may play a role in BS/GS vascular hyporeactivity. NO metabolites and cGMP urinary excretion were also measured. Mononuclear cells (PBM) from six BS/GS patients and six healthy controls were used. PBM RGS-2 mRNA and RGS-2 protein were increased in BS/GS: 0.47 ± 0.06 d.u. vs 0.32 ± 0.04, (p < 0.006) (RGS-2 mRNA), and 0.692 ± 0.02 vs 0.363 ± 0.06 (p < 0.0001) (RGS2 protein). Incubation of PBM with Ang II increased RGS-2 protein in controls (from 0.363 ± 0.06 d.u. to 0.602 ± 0.05; p < 0.0001) but not in BS/GS (from 0.692 ± 0.02 to 0.711 ± 0.02). NO2-/NO3- and cGMP urinary excretion were increased in BS/GS (0.46 ± 0.13 vs 0.26 ± 0.05 μmol/μmol of urinary creatinine, p < 0.005, and 0.060 ± 0.030 vs 0.020 ± 0.01 p < 0.009, respectively). These results demonstrate that RGS-2 is increased and maximally stimulated in BS/GS and human RGS-2 system reacts as predicted by knockout mice experiments. This is the first report of RGS-2 level in a human clinical condition characterized by altered vascular tone, underlines the importance of RGS-2 as a key regulator element for Ang II signaling and provides insight into the links between BS/GS genetic abnormalities and abnormal vascular tone regulation.


2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Oldham ◽  
Heidi E. Hamm

1. Introduction 22. Heterotrimeric G-protein structure 32.1. G-protein α subunit 32.2. G-protein βγ dimer 82.3. Unique role of Gβ5 in complexes with RGS proteins 92.4. Heterotrimer structure 102.5. Lipid modifications direct membrane association 113. Receptor–G protein complex 113.1. Low affinity interactions between inactive receptors (R) and G proteins 113.2. Receptor activation exposes the high-affinity G-protein binding site 123.3. Receptor–G protein interface 143.4. Structural determinants of receptor–G protein specificity 153.5. Models of the receptor–G protein complex 173.6. Sequential interactions may form the receptor–G protein complex 194. Molecular basis for G-protein activation 194.1. Potential mechanisms of receptor-catalyzed GDP release 204.2. GTP-mediated alteration of the receptor–G protein complex 235. Activation of downstream effector proteins 245.1. Gα interactions with effectors 245.2. Gβγ interactions with effectors and regulatory proteins 266. G-protein inactivation 286.1. Intrinsic GTPase-activity of Gα 286.2. GTPase-activating proteins 307. Novel regulation of G-protein signaling 318. New approaches to study G-protein dynamics 328.1. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy 328.2. Site-directed labeling techniques 338.3. Mapping allosteric connectivity with computational approaches 348.4. Studies of G-protein function in living cells 369. Conclusions 3710. References 38Heterotrimeric guanine-nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) act as molecular switches in signaling pathways by coupling the activation of heptahelical receptors at the cell surface to intracellular responses. In the resting state, the G-protein α subunit (Gα) binds GDP and Gβγ. Receptors activate G proteins by catalyzing GTP for GDP exchange on Gα, leading to a structural change in the Gα(GTP) and Gβγ subunits that allows the activation of a variety of downstream effector proteins. The G protein returns to the resting conformation following GTP hydrolysis and subunit re-association. As the G-protein cycle progresses, the Gα subunit traverses through a series of conformational changes. Crystallographic studies of G proteins in many of these conformations have provided substantial insight into the structures of these proteins, the GTP-induced structural changes in Gα, how these changes may lead to subunit dissociation and allow Gα and Gβγ to activate effector proteins, as well as the mechanism of GTP hydrolysis. However, relatively little is known about the receptor–G protein complex and how this interaction leads to GDP release from Gα. This article reviews the structural determinants of the function of heterotrimeric G proteins in mammalian systems at each point in the G-protein cycle with special emphasis on the mechanism of receptor-mediated G-protein activation. The receptor–G protein complex has proven to be a difficult target for crystallography, and several biophysical and computational approaches are discussed that complement the currently available structural information to improve models of this interaction. Additionally, these approaches enable the study of G-protein dynamics in solution, which is becoming an increasingly appreciated component of all aspects of G-protein signaling.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
William C Simke ◽  
Andrew J Hart ◽  
Cory P Johnson ◽  
Sari Mayhue ◽  
P Lucas Craig ◽  
...  

Yeast use a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling pathway to detect mating pheromone, arrest in G1, and direct polarized growth towards the potential mating partner. The primary negative regulator of this pathway is the regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS), Sst2, which induces Gα GTPase activity and subsequent inactivation of all downstream signaling. MAPK phosphorylates the RGS in response to pheromone, but the role of this modification is unknown. We set out to examine the role of RGS phosphorylation during the pheromone response. We found that phosphorylation of the RGS peaks early in the pheromone response and diminishes RGS localization to the polarization site and focuses Gα/MAPK complexes there. At later time points, RGS is predominantly unphosphorylated, which promotes RGS localization to the polar cap and broadens the distribution of Gα/MAPK complexes relative to the Cdc42 polarity machinery. Surprisingly, we found that phosphorylation of the RGS is required for the completion of cytokinesis prior to pheromone induced growth. The completion of cytokinesis in the presence of pheromone is promoted by the formin Bnr1 and the kelch-repeat protein, Kel1, both proteins previously found to interact with the RGS.


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 2861-2861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Noé ◽  
Kathleen Freson ◽  
Elke Giets ◽  
Chantal Thijs ◽  
Christine Wittevrongel ◽  
...  

Abstract Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins stimulate the GTPase activity of Gα subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins, thereby negatively regulating G protein signaling. In this way, RGS2 acts as a negative regulator of Gq and Gi signaling. It has also been described as a negative regulator of Gs signaling, but via a different mechanism. It inhibits the activation of adenylyl cyclase (AC), the target molecule of Gs, by interacting with it. In olfactory neurons, it was shown that RGS2 attenuates activation of AC type III (Sinnarajah et al., Nature 2001), the main AC subtype in platelets. In this study, we describe the first human genetic defect in RGS2 and provide evidence that RGS2 influences the cAMP level in platelets after Gs stimulation. The proposita is an obese 16-year-old girl with borderline IQ, hirsutism and an increased bone alkaline phosphatase. These symptoms are similar to features of Albright hereditary osteodystrophy, due to heterozygous inactivating mutations in the Gsα gene. The Gsα gene of the proposita is normal, but she carries a missense mutation in the RGS2 gene, resulting in a Gly to Asp substitution in the conserved residue 23 (G23D). This substitution could also be found in her mother and brother, but not in 200 unrelated normal controls. The family members carrying this mutation present with a relatively low number of platelets (+/−150.000/μL) and an increased mean platelet volume (+/−13 fL) and platelet distribution width (+/−17.5 %). Also, platelet function is affected by the mutation. Platelet aggregation is normal in response to all standard agonists, but when the Gs pathway is challenged in their platelets, high levels of different Gs agonists are needed to get inhibition of aggregation in comparison to controls or the father. We also measured cAMP levels in platelets and found that stimulation of the Gs coupled receptors with Gs agonists produced less cAMP in the affected family members. The functional relevance of the mutation was further studied in vitro in HEK293 and MEG-01 cells transfected with wildtype RGS2 and RGS2-G23D. cAMP levels were measured at different time points after stimulation of these cells with Gs agonists. These measurements show that cAMP levels are lower in cells transfected with RGS2-G23D, compared to wildtype RGS2. This indicates that the reduction in cAMP levels found in the platelets of the affected members, is a functional consequence of the mutation. To understand why this mutation leads to an altered function of RGS2, we studied the effect of the mutation at the protein level. Recently, it was shown that there are 4 different translation initiation sites in the RGS2 mRNA, giving rise to 4 proteins with different functional characteristics (Gu et al., Mol Pharmacol 2008). An in vitro transcriptiontranslation assay showed that the presence of the mutation results in a different protein expression profile. We excluded a difference in posttranslational modifications to be the cause of this divergent pattern. The G23D mutation is located in the proximity of 2 of the different translation initiation sites and its presence alters the use of these sites. This results in a different expression profile of the functionally different RGS2 proteins. In conclusion, we present the first platelet Gs signaling defect due to an RGS2 mutation associated with aberrant RGS2 translation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document