scholarly journals Short-Term Effect of Laser Acupuncture on Lower Back Pain: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae-Young Shin ◽  
Boncho Ku ◽  
Jaeuk U. Kim ◽  
Yu Jung Lee ◽  
Jae Hui Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Lower Back Pain ◽  
Pressure Pain Threshold ◽  
Acupuncture Group ◽  
Laser Acupuncture ◽  
Double Blind Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Trial ◽  
Lower Back ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose. This trial was performed to investigate the efficacy of laser acupuncture for the alleviation of lower back pain.Methods. This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Fifty-six participants were randomly assigned to either the laser acupuncture group (n=28) or the sham laser acupuncture group (n=28). Participants in both groups received three treatment sessions over the course of one week. Thirteen acupuncture points were selected. The visual analogue scale for pain, pressure pain threshold, Patient Global Impression of Change, and Euro-Quality-of-Life Five Dimensions questionnaire (Korean version) were used to evaluate the effect of laser acupuncture treatment on lower back pain.Results. There were no significant differences in any outcome between the two groups, although the participants in both groups showed a significant improvement in each assessed parameter relative to the baseline values.Conclusion. Although there was no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups, the results suggest that laser acupuncture can provide effective pain alleviation and can be considered an option for relief from lower back pain. Further studies using long-term intervention, a larger sample size, and rigorous methodology are required to clarify the effect of laser acupuncture on lower back pain.

scholarly journals Short term effect of laser acupuncture on low back pain: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 85
Author(s):  
Jae-Young Shin ◽  
Boncho Ku ◽  
Jaeuk U. Kim ◽  
Yu Jung Lee ◽  
Jae Hui Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Term Effect ◽  
Laser Acupuncture ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Double Blind Trial ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Trial ◽  
Short Term Effect

scholarly journals Posterior chain flexibility and lower back pain in farm workers

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-226
Author(s):  
Marcia Regina da Silva ◽  
Lucimare Ferraz ◽  
Fátima Ferretti ◽  
Cristiane Sfredo
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Lower Back Pain ◽  
Muscle Length ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Farm Workers ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Chain Flexibility ◽  
Lower Back ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Hoc

Abstract Introduction: Flexibility is an essential component of physical aptitude that reduces the incidence of muscle distention and improves movement efficiency and posture. Objective: To analyze posterior chain flexibility and lower back pain (LBP) in farm workers from a city in western Santa Catarina state, Brazil. Methods: Quantitative and cross-sectional study conducted with 185 rural workers, average age of 44.24 (±10.83) years. The Rural Worker Health Questionnaire, containing individual issues related to work; sit and reach box, goniometer, visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry and Roland-Morris questionnaires were used to evaluate posterior chain flexibility, hamstring muscle length, pain and lumbar spine dysfunction, respectively. Flexibility was compared with the degree of dysfunction using one-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post hoc test. Results: 181 (97.8%) workers reported LBP symptoms: 100% of the women and 95.2% of the men. The average Oswestry score was 7.09 (±8.25), Roland-Morris 1.22 (±1.63), and VAS 5.81 (±2.5). Average flexibility by the sit and reach test (SRT) was 23.91cm (±18.81); straight leg raise (SLR), 66° (±11.77) and popliteal angle 123.21° (±12.45). There was a significant difference in the popliteal angle (p = 0.003) and SLR (0.001) when compared with the degree of dysfunction. Women showed significant differences in all tests; however, the post hoc test showed a significant difference only in the SRT (p = 0.013), and women with minimal dysfunction had greater flexibility in relation to those with severe dysfunction. Conclusion: Self-reported LBP was severe and women with higher levels of dysfunction exhibited less posterior chain flexibility.

scholarly journals Double-Blind Trial Comparing Epidural Lignocaine with Epidural Fentanyl for Anaesthesia during Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy

1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. S. Silbert ◽  
R. Kluger ◽  
A. C. Meads ◽  
K. Stasytis
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy ◽  
Shock Wave Lithotripsy ◽  
Epidural Fentanyl ◽  
Double Blind Trial ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Trial ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Fentanyl Group

A randomised double-blind trial was undertaken to compare epidural lignocaine 1.5% with adrenaline to epidural fentanyl (100μg in saline 10 ml) in forty unpremedicated patients undergoing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy without ancillary procedures. Midazolam only was used for sedation. There was no significant difference in intraoperative pain scores with several patients in each group complaining of pain. Decreases in blood pressure occurred in both groups but were more pronounced in the lignocaine groups (36% vs 25 % maximum decrease from control, P = 0.004). Heart rate was increased in the lignocaine group compared with control and to the fentanyl group, but there was no difference in respiratory rates within or between groups. Pruritis was more common in the fentanyl group and leg heaviness in the lignocaine group, but neither was troublesome. There was no difference in urological outcome at one month. Both techniques were satisfactory for the majority of patients, but the fentanyl group had a shorter preparation time and less cardiovascular changes.

scholarly journals Analyzing the Influence of Modic Changes on Patients with Lower Back Pain Undergoing Conservative Treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Yufeng Chen ◽  
Huilin Yang ◽  
Lianfang Zhang ◽  
Yue Wang ◽  
Jun Zou
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Lower Back Pain ◽  
Modic Changes ◽  
Nonsurgical Treatment ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Lower Back ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Modic Type ◽  
Vas Scores

Objective. This study aimed to investigate if the presence of Modic changes (MCs) was correlated with lower back pain (LBP) and LBP-related disability in patients who underwent nonsurgical treatment. Methods. In this study, 129 patients who experienced consecutive LBP and underwent lumbar spine magnetic resonance imaging in our institute were divided into three groups according to the presence or type of MCs. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) were used to assess the outcomes of the treatment. Results. Based on the achieved results, there was no significant difference between three groups before treatment (P>0.05). Three months after undergoing nonsurgical treatment, the rates of improved ODI and VAS scores were statistically significantly different (P=0.014,  0.023). After an additional 3 months of treatment, in patients with Modic type I changes, the symptoms significantly improved in comparison with those 3 months prior (P=0.037,  0.026), while that improvement did not occur in patients with Modic type II changes (P>0.05). Conclusions. The existence of MCs affects the outcomes of nonsurgical treatment in patients with LBP. However, symptoms can be improved after an additional round of treatment for Modic type I changes, while this is not confirmed for Modic type II changes.

Amisulpride versus fluoxetine in dysthymia: preliminary results of a double-blind comparative study

1996 ◽  
Vol 11 (S3) ◽  
pp. 141s-143s ◽  
Author(s):  
E Smeraldi ◽  
E Haefele ◽  
G Crespi ◽  
GL Casadei ◽  
F Biondi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Low Doses ◽  
Double Blind Trial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Main Criterion ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Trial ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Significant Difference

SummaryThe efficacy and safety of low doses of amisulpride (50 mg/day) and of fluoxetine (20 mg/day) were compared respectively in 139 and 129 outpatients with dysthymia during three months in a multi-centre double-blind trial. No statistically significant difference between the two groups was found in the number of responders at study-end with the Montgomery and Asberg Depressive Rating Scale, which was the main criterion for efficacy. In addition, amisulpride was well tolerated. These preliminary results suggest that low doses of amisulpride may be effective in the treatment of dysthymic patients.

scholarly journals PENGARUH SIT STRETCHING TERHADAP PERUBAHAN SKALA NYERI PUNGGUNG BAWAH PADA KARYAWAN DI PT. RIFAN FINANCINDO BERJANGKA CABANG SEMARANG

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Gamalia Anggriya Dwi Putra ◽  
Asti Nuraeni ◽  
Mamat Supriyono
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Lower Back Pain ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
P Value ◽  
Research Subjects ◽  
Lower Back ◽  
Group Research ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Female Employees

Lower back pain is one of musculoskeletal disorder in the shape of pain in the back bone, to be exact is in the forth lumbar to the first sacrum. It is caused by the not appropriate posture (not ergonomic) while working or doing the activities, such as very long standing or sitting. This complaint can be reduced by sit stretching regularly. The aim of this study is to find out impact of sit stretching towards the changes of scale of lower back pain on employees at PT. Rifan Financindo Berjangka Branch Semarang. The method of research is quasy experiment designed in pre test and post test with compare group. Research subjects are 30 male and female employees. Sample taking uses total sampling. Statisitic test utilizes Mann Whitney with level of meaning (α=0,05). The result of pre test statisitc test is p-value = 0,467 (> 0,05), it means that  there is no significant difference scale of lower back pain between intervention group and compare group  before performing sit stretching to intervention  group. The post test statisitic the result is p-value = 0,001 (> 0,05), it means there is a significant difference scale of lower back pain at intervention group with compare group after performing sit stretching on the intervention group. Based on result of p-value on post test can be concluded that there is an impact of sit stretching towards the changes in scale of lower back pain on the employees at PT. Rifan Financindo Berjangka Branch Semarang.

Prevalence of Lower Back Pain in Pregnant Women with Pre-Eclampsia

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 2773-2776
Author(s):  
Parveen Shafi ◽  
Rahim Khan ◽  
Tariq Ahmad ◽  
Syed Alam Zeb ◽  
Ahsan Sajjad
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Lower Back Pain ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Domestic Work ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Lower Back ◽  
Group I ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group Ii

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of lower back pain in pregnant women with pre-eclampsia. Study Design: Cross sectional study Place and Duration: Mardan Medical Complex/BKMC, Tahseel Headquarter Hospital, Takht Bhai Mardan, Swabi Medical Complex /GKMC, from October 2019 to October 2021. Methods: Total 160 pregnant women were presented in this study. Patients were aged between 18-45 years. Detailed demographics of enrolled cases age, body mass index, gestational age, and residency and education status were calculated after taking informed written consent. Patients were divided into two groups. Group I had 80 patients with pre-eclampsia and group II had 80 patients with normotensive. Gravidity among both groups was assessed. Symptoms and prevalence of lower back pain among both groups were assessed and compared. Complete data was analyzed by SPSS 22.0 version. Results: Mean age of the patients in group I was 27.09±5.66 years with mean gestational age 33.14±7.41 weeks while in group II mean age was 26.55±8.26 years with mean gestational age 32.47±8.33 weeks. Thirty seven patients (46.3%) in group I was primigravida and 40 (50%) in group II was primigravida. Thirty nine patients (48.8%) had urban residency in group I and in group II thirty seven (46.3%) cases were from urban area. Frequency of literacy among both groups were 42 (52.5%) and 44 (55%). Prevalence of lower back pain in group I was 55 (68.8%) higher as compared to group II 53 (66.3%) with no any significant difference. Domestic work was the most common cause among both groups followed by social work (Job), lifting of heavy object and medication pain. Conclusion: We concluded in this study the prevalence of lower back pain among pregnant women was significantly high among both pre-eclampsia and normotensive cases. Most common causes of lower back among women was domestic work. Health professionals must be proactive in diagnosing LBP and providing proper management due to the enormous impact of it on the quality of life. Keywords: Pregnant Women, Low Back Pain, Prevalence, Symptoms, causes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document