scholarly journals Can Mobile Videocall Assist Laypersons’ Use of Automated External Defibrillators? A Randomized Simulation Study and Qualitative Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Jun Young Bang ◽  
Youngsuk Cho ◽  
Gyu Chong Cho ◽  
Jongshill Lee ◽  
In Young Kim
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Time Interval ◽  
Mobile Video ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Automated External Defibrillators ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Voice Calls ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background and Importance. The rate of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has increased rapidly in the past 10 years. However, laypersons’ use of automated external defibrillator (AED) is still low in comparison with bystander CPR. Objective. To investigate the feasibility of mobile videocall guidance to facilitate AED use by laypersons. Design, setting, and participants. A total of 90 laypersons were randomized into three groups: the mobile video call-guided, voice call-guided, and non-guided groups. Participants were exposed to simulated cardiac arrest to use an AED, and guided by video calls, voice calls, or were not guided. We recorded the simulation experiments as a videoclip, and other researchers who were blinded to the simulation assessed the performance according to the prespecified checklist after simulations. Outcomes measure and analysis. We compared the performance score and time intervals from AED arrival to defibrillation among the three groups and analyzed the common errors. Results. There was no significant difference among the three groups in terms of baseline characteristics. Performance scores in the checklist for using AED were higher in the mobile video call-guided group, especially in the category of “Power on AED” and “Correctly attaches pads” than in the other groups. However, the time interval to defibrillation was significantly longer in the mobile video call-guided group. Conclusions. Mobile video call guidance might be an alternative method to facilitate AED use by laypersons. Therefore, further well-designed research is needed to evaluate the feasibility of this approach in OHCA.

5225Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest of non-cardiac origin

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
D M Christensen ◽  
S Rajan ◽  
K Kragholm ◽  
K B Sondergaard ◽  
O M Hansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Ohca Patient ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Knowledge about the effect of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of non-cardiac origin is lacking. We aimed to investigate the association between bystander CPR and survival in OHCA of presumed non-cardiac origin. Methods From the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry and through linkage with national Danish healthcare registries we identified all adult patients with OHCA of presumed non-cardiac origin in Denmark (2001–2014). These were categorized further into OHCA of medical and non-medical cause. We analyzed temporal trends in bystander CPR and 30-day survival during the study period. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the association between bystander CPR and 30-day survival and reported as standardized 30-day survival chances with versus without bystander CPR standardized to the prehospital OHCA-factors and patient characteristics of all patients in the study population. Results We identified 10,761 OHCAs of presumed non-cardiac origin. Bystander CPR was associated with an increased 30-day survival chance of 3.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.9–3.9) versus 1.8% (95% CI: 1.4–2.2) with no bystander CPR, corresponding to a significant difference of 1.6% (95% CI: 0.9–2.3). During the study period, the overall bystander CPR rates increased from 13.6% (95% CI: 11.2–16.5) to 62.7% (95% CI: 60.2–65.2). 30-day survival increased overall from 1.3% (95% CI: 0.7–2.6) to 4.0% (95% CI: 3.1–5.2). Similar findings were observed in subgroups of medical and non-medical OHCA. Table 1. Patient and arrest characteristics according to cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Overall Medical OHCA Non-medical OHCA Patient characteristics   Total patients 10761 7625 3136   Median age,y 67 70 50   Male, n (%) 6357 (59.1) 4154 (54.5) 2204 (70.4) OHCA factors   Witnessed arrest, n (%) 4306 (40.0) 3574 (46.9) 732 (23.3)   Public location, n (%) 6979 (64.9) 5494 (72.1) 1485 (47.4) OHCA, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Figure 1. Temporal trends Conclusion Bystander CPR was associated with a higher chance of 30-day survival among OHCA of presumed non-cardiac origin regardless of the underlying cause (medical/non-medical). Rates of bystander CPR and 30-day survival improved during the study period.

Effect of chest-compression-only bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the likelihood of initial shockable rhythm after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a propensity matching analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Funada ◽  
Y Goto ◽  
T Maeda ◽  
H Okada ◽  
M Takamura
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Chest Compression ◽  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Bystander Cpr

Abstract Background/Introduction Shockable rhythm after cardiac arrest is highly expected after early initiation of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) owing to increased coronary perfusion. However, the relationship between bystander CPR and initial shockable rhythm in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) remains unclear. We hypothesized that chest-compression-only CPR (CC-CPR) before emergency medical service (EMS) arrival has an equivalent effect on the likelihood of initial shockable rhythm to the standard CPR (chest compression plus rescue breathing [S-CPR]). Purpose We aimed to examine the rate of initial shockable rhythm and 1-month outcomes in patients who received bystander CPR after OHCA. Methods The study included 59,688 patients (age, ≥18 years) who received bystander CPR after an OHCA with a presumed cardiac origin witnessed by a layperson in a prospectively recorded Japanese nationwide Utstein-style database from 2013 to 2017. Patients who received public-access defibrillation before arrival of the EMS personnel were excluded. The patients were divided into CC-CPR (n=51,520) and S-CPR (n=8168) groups according to the type of bystander CPR received. The primary end point was initial shockable rhythm recorded by the EMS personnel just after arrival at the site. The secondary end point was the 1-month outcomes (survival and neurologically intact survival) after OHCA. In the statistical analyses, a Cox proportional hazards model was applied to reflect the different bystander CPR durations before/after propensity score (PS) matching. Results The crude rate of the initial shockable rhythm in the CC-CPR group (21.3%, 10,946/51,520) was significantly higher than that in the S-CPR group (17.6%, 1441/8168, p<0.0001) before PS matching. However, no significant difference in the rate of initial shockable rhythm was found between the 2 groups after PS matching (18.3% [1493/8168] vs 17.6% [1441/8168], p=0.30). In the Cox proportional hazards model, CC-CPR was more negatively associated with the initial shockable rhythm before PS matching (unadjusted hazards ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94–0.99; p=0.012; adjusted HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.89–0.94; p<0.0001) than S-CPR. After PS matching, however, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups (adjusted HR of CC-CPR compared with S-CPR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.94–1.00; p=0.09). No significant differences were found between C-CPR and S-CPR in the 1-month outcomes after PS matching as follows, respectively: survival, 8.5% and 10.1%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.79–1.00; p=0.07; cerebral performance category 1 or 2, 5.5% and 6.9%; adjusted odds, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.74–1.00; p=0.052. Conclusions Compared with S-CPR, the CC-CPR before EMS arrival had an equivalent multivariable-adjusted association with the likelihood of initial shockable rhythm in the patients with OHCA due to presumed cardiac causes that was witnessed by a layperson. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: Potential for Improvements in Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Chocron ◽  
Julia Jobe ◽  
Sally Guan ◽  
Madeleine Kim ◽  
Mia Shigemura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Performance Metrics ◽  
Medical System ◽  
Emergency Medical System ◽  
Compression Rate ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a critical intervention to improve survival following out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. We evaluated the quality of bystander CPR and whether performance varied according to the number of bystanders or provision of telecommunicator CPR (TCPR). Methods and Results We investigated non‐traumatic out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest occurring in a large metropolitan emergency medical system during a 6‐month period. Information about bystander care was ascertained through review of the 9‐1‐1 recordings in addition to emergency medical system and hospital records to determine bystander CPR status (none versus TCPR versus unassisted), the number of bystanders on‐scene, and CPR performance metrics of compression fraction and compression rate. Of the 428 eligible out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest, 76.4% received bystander CPR including 43.7% unassisted CPR and 56.3% TCPR; 35.2% had one bystander, 33.3% had 2 bystanders, and 31.5% had ≥3 bystanders. Overall compression fraction was 59% with a compression rate of 88 per minute. CPR differed according to TCPR status (fraction=52%, rate=87 per minute for TCPR versus fraction=69%, rate=102 for unassisted CPR, P <0.05 for each comparison) and the number of bystanders (fraction=55%, rate=87 per minute for 1 bystander, fraction=59%, rate=89 for 2 bystanders, fraction=65%, rate=97 for ≥3 bystanders, test for trend P <0.05 for each metric). Additional bystander actions were uncommon to include rotation of compressors (3.1%) or application of an automated external defibrillator (8.0%). Conclusions Bystander CPR quality as gauged by compression fraction and rate approached guideline goals though performance depended upon the type of CPR and number of bystanders.

Impact of Dispatcher-Assisted Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 372-381
Author(s):  
Junhong Wang ◽  
Hua Zhang ◽  
Zongxuan Zhao ◽  
Kaifeng Wen ◽  
Yaoke Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Systemic Review ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AbstractObjective:This systemic review and meta-analysis was conducted to explore the impact of dispatcher-assisted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-BCPR) on bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) probability, survival, and neurological outcomes with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).Methods:Electronically searching of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, along with manual retrieval, were done for clinical trials about the impact of DA-BCPR which were published from the date of inception to December 2018. The literature was screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, the baseline information, and interested outcomes were extracted. Two reviewers assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by STATA version 13.1.Results:In 13 studies, 235,550 patients were enrolled. Compared with no dispatcher instruction, DA-BCPR tended to be effective in improving BCPR rate (I2 = 98.2%; OR = 5.84; 95% CI, 4.58-7.46; P <.01), return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) before admission (I2 = 36.0%; OR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.06-1.29; P <.01), discharge or 30-day survival rate (I2 = 47.7%; OR = 1.25; 95% CI, 1.06-1.46; P <.01), and good neurological outcome (I2 = 30.9%; OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.04-1.48; P = .01). However, no significant difference in hospital admission was found (I2 = 29.0%; OR = 1.09; 95% CI, 0.91-1.30; P = .36).Conclusion:This review shows DA-BPCR plays a positive role for OHCA as a critical section in the life chain. It is effective in improving the probability of BCPR, survival, ROSC before admission, and neurological outcome.

scholarly journals Insights From the Ventricular Fibrillation Waveform Into the Mechanism of Survival Benefit From Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke Bessen ◽  
Jason Coult ◽  
Jennifer Blackwood ◽  
Cindy H. Hsu ◽  
Peter Kudenchuk ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Ventricular Fibrillation ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Amplitude Spectrum ◽  
Peak Frequency ◽  
Spectrum Area ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background The mechanism by which bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) improves survival following out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest is unclear. We hypothesized that ventricular fibrillation (VF) waveform measures, as surrogates of myocardial physiology, mediate the relationship between bystander CPR and survival. Methods and Results We performed a retrospective cohort study of adult, bystander‐witnessed patients with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest with an initial rhythm of VF who were treated by a metropolitan emergency medical services system from 2005 to 2018. Patient, resuscitation, and outcome variables were extracted from emergency medical services and hospital records. A total of 3 VF waveform measures (amplitude spectrum area, peak frequency, and median peak amplitude) were computed from a 3‐second ECG segment before the initial shock. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the association between bystander CPR and survival to hospital discharge adjusted for Utstein elements. Causal mediation analysis quantified the proportion of survival benefit that was mediated by each VF waveform measure. Of 1069 patients, survival to hospital discharge was significantly higher among the 814 patients who received bystander CPR than those who did not (0.52 versus 0.43, respectively; P <0.01). The multivariable‐adjusted odds ratio for bystander CPR and survival was 1.6 (95% CI, 1.2, 2.1), and each VF waveform measure attenuated this association. Depending on the specific waveform measure, the proportion of mediation varied: 53% for amplitude spectrum area, 31% for peak frequency, and 29% for median peak amplitude. Conclusions Bystander CPR correlated with more robust initial VF waveform measures, which in turn mediated up to one‐half of the survival benefit associated with bystander CPR. These results provide insight into the biological mechanism of bystander CPR in VF out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest.

P4169The crucial role of the bystander in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Campos ◽  
V Baert ◽  
H Hubert ◽  
E Wiel ◽  
N Benameur
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Propensity Analysis ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is a major public health concern in France, given that there are 61.5 cases per 100,000 inhabitants a year. The impact of bystander action, performed before the arrival of emergency medical services (EMS), on survival has never been studied in France. Purpose Determine whether bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), performed before the arrival of EMS, was correlated with an increased 30-day survival rate after an OHCA. Methods 24,885 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests witnessed in France from 1 January 2012 to 1 May 2018 were analysed to determine whether CPR, performed before the arrival of EMS, was correlated with survival. Data from the Electronic Registry of Cardiac Arrests was used. The association between the effect of CPR performed before the arrival of EMS and 30-day survival rate was studied, using propensity analysis (which included variables such as age and sex of the patient, location, cause, and year of cardiac arrest, initial cardiac rhythm, EMS response time and no-flow time). Results CPR was performed before the arrival of EMS in 14,904 cases (59.9%) and was not performed in 9,981 cases (40.1%). The 30-day survival rate was 10.2% when CRP was performed by bystanders versus 3.9% when CRP was not performed before the EMS arrival (p<0.001). CPR performed by bystanders was associated with an increased 30-day survival rate (odds ratio 1.269; 1.207 to 1.334). The effect of bystander CPR on survival Conclusion Bystander CPR performed before the arrival of EMS was associated with an increased 30-day survival rate after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in France.

Abstract 52: An Evidence Based Animal Model Of Prolonged Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 116 (suppl_16) ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J Mader
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Time Intervals ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Improved Outcomes ◽  
Response Interval ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: Promising basic science findings in cardiac resuscitation often do not translate into improved outcomes when studied in humans. One explanation is that the current animal models do not adequately reflect the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) clinical trial environment. The author sought to review the literature and devise a new model of prolonged VF with time intervals that more accurately simulate OHCA conditions. Methods: A systematic review of the literature (01/90 –12/06) was conducted using PUBMED and a comprehensive list of appropriate MESH headings. All OHCA human clinical trials were included. The most relevant studies underwent explicit and detailed review. Mean values with 95%CI were calculated for each specified interval. Suitable conditions and establishment of appropriate times were then devised. Results: Twenty-two papers with adequate detail for evaluation were examined, leading to the following recommendations: the duration of non-treatment (assuming no bystander CPR or first-responders) is 11” (3” for recognition and EMS activation, 7” response interval and 1” for paramedics to reach the patient); chest compressions are initiated immediately with passive oxygen insufflation; assuming they can be done simultaneously, IV access and intubation (ETI) are accomplished 4” after arrival; drugs are delivered by minute 16 - well into the metabolic phase; and 2” of CPR are needed to circulate the drugs for the first rescue shock (RS) at minute 18. Conclusions: This proposed evidence based experimental model of prolonged untreated VF cardiac arrest has conditions and time intervals that simulate those of human OHCA clinical trials.

Abstract 121: The Influence of Age, Race, and Ethnicity on Public Automated External Defibrillator Use and Outcomes of Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in the United States: An Analysis of the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES)

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Griffis ◽  
Lucy Wu ◽  
Maryam Naim ◽  
Joshua Tobin ◽  
Bryan McNally ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Race And Ethnicity ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hispanic Children ◽  
White Children ◽  
Automated External Defibrillators ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Few Data ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are an important link in the chain of survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). While the use of AEDs are clearly beneficial for OHCA in adults, there are few data on the overall use and outcomes of public AED use in children. Hypothesis: AED use is uncommon in children and associated with neurologically favorable survival. Methods: We conducted an analysis of the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival database. Inclusion criteria were age ≤ 18 years of age, public arrests, and non-traumatic OHCA from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2017. Neurologically favorable survival was defined as a Cerebral Performance Category Scale of 1 or 2 at hospital discharge. Results: Of 971 public pediatric OHCA (66% male, 32% white), AEDs were used by bystanders in 117 (10.3%). AEDs were used among 2.3% of children aged ≤ 1 year (infants), 8.3% of 2-5 year-olds, 12.4% of 6-11 year-olds, and 18.2% of 12-18 year-olds (p<0.001). AED use was similar among white (11.1%), black (9.1%), and Hispanic children (8.1%) (p=0.84). AED use was more common with the provision of bystander CPR (19.1%) vs no bystander CPR (0.9%), witnessed arrests (16.0%) vs unwitnessed arrests (4.7%), and arrests with a shockable rhythm (23.6%) vs a nonshockable rhythm (6.3%) (p<0.001 for all). Overall, adjusted neurologically favorable survival was 29.1% (95% CI 22.7%, 35.5%) when a bystander used an AED compared to 23.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 21.1%, 26.3%) for no bystander AED use (p=0.11). There was a significant interaction with age and race/ethnicity. AEDs were associated with neurologically favorable survival among children aged 12-18 years (p=0.04) but not associated with neurologically favorable survival in children ≤ 1 year (p=0.43), 1-5 years (p=0.16) or 6-11 years (0.41). AEDs were also associated with neurologically favorable survival in white children (p=0.01) but not with black (p=0.97) or Hispanic children (p=0.06). Conclusions: AED use is uncommon in children suffering OHCA but is associated with improved neurologically favorable survival. The benefit of AEDs was evident mostly for adolescents and white children. Further study is needed to understand these disparities in AED use and outcomes after AED use.

Abstract 11312: Activation of Citizen Responders to Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Temporal Changes During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Denmark 2020

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mads Christian Tofte Gregers ◽  
Linn Andelius ◽  
Carolina Malta Hansen ◽  
Astrid Rolin Kragh ◽  
Christian Torp-Pedersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Acceptance Rate ◽  
Smartphone App ◽  
Hospital Arrival ◽  
Automated External Defibrillators ◽  
Return Of Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Multiple citizen responder (CR) programs worldwide which dispatch laypersons to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) were affected by the COVID-19 outbreak in 2020, but little is known about how the pandemic affected CR activation and initiation of bystander CPR and defibrillation. In Denmark, the CR program continued to run during lockdown but with the recommendation to perform chest-compression-only CPR in contrast to standard CPR including ventilations. We hypothesized that bystander interventions as CPR and AED usage decreased during the first COVID-19 lockdown in two regions of Denmark in the spring of 2020. Methods: All OHCAs from January 1, 2020 to June 30, 2020 with CR activation from the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry and the National Citizen Responder database. Bystander CPR, AED usage, and CRs’ alarm acceptance rate during the national lockdown from March 11, 2020 to April 20, 2020 were compared with the non-lockdown period from January 1, 2020 to March 10, 2020 and from April 21 to June 30, 2020. Results: A total of 6,120 CRs were alerted in 443 (23/100.000 inhabitants) cases of presumed OHCA of which 256 (58%) were confirmed cardiac arrests. Bystander CPR remained equally high in the lockdown period compared with non-lockdown period (99% vs. 92%, p=0.07). Likewise, there was no change in bystander defibrillation (9% vs. 14%, p=0.4). There was a slight increase in the number of CRs who accepted an alarm (7 per alarm, IQR 4) during lockdown compared with non-lockdown period (6 per alarm, IQR 4), p=0.0001. The proportion of patients achieving return of spontaneous circulation at hospital arrival was also unchanged (lockdown 23% vs non-lockdown 23%, p=1.0) (Table 1). Conclusion: Bystander initiated resuscitation rates did not change during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Denmark for OHCAs where CRs were activated through a smartphone app.

Abstract 18304: Are Prolonged Resuscitation Efforts Worthwhile? Patient Outcomes by Time to Restoration of Spontaneous Circulation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristian Kragholm ◽  
Monique Anderson ◽  
Carolina Malta Hansen ◽  
Phillip J. Schulte ◽  
Michael C. Kurz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Neurological Outcome ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Spontaneous Circulation ◽  
Significant Survival ◽  
Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Using Data ◽  
Favorable Neurological Outcome ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: How long resuscitation attempts should be continued before termination of efforts is not clear in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). We studied outcomes in patients with return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) across quartiles of time from 9-1-1 call to ROSC. Hypothesis: Survival with favorable neurological outcome is seen in all time intervals from 9-1-1 call to ROSC. Methods: Using data from Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium (ROC) Prehospital Resuscitation clinical trials: IMpedance valve and an Early vs. Delayed analysis (PRIMED) available via National Institute of Health, patients with ROSC not witnessed by the emergency medical service (EMS) were identified and grouped by quartiles of time from 9-1-1 call to ROSC. We defined favorable neurological outcome as modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores of ≤3. Results: Included were 3,431 OHCA patients with ROSC. Median time from 9-1-1 call to ROSC was 22.8 min (25%-75% 17 min–29.2 min); 953 (27.8%) survived to discharge (20.4% mRS ≤3). Significant survival and favorable neurological outcome were seen in each quartile (Figure). In patients who received bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), survival rates were 60.9%, 33.2%, 18.3% and 11.1% across quartiles of time to ROSC versus (vs.) 51.5%, 25.6%, 13.3% and 8.9% in patients without bystander CPR; corresponding rates of favorable neurological outcome were 50.7%, 23.8%, 12.2% and 9.1% vs. 40.1%, 16.6%, 8% and 4.8%. Correspondingly, survival rates in defibrillated patients were 70.1%, 45.9%, 25.5% and 16.4% vs. 36.3%, 9.5%, 6% and 3.4% in non-defibrillated patients; corresponding rates of favorable neurological outcome were 59.8%, 33.4%, 18.3% and 11.4% vs. 24.4%, 4.1%, 1.9% and 1.8%. Conclusions: Survival with favorable neurological outcome was seen in all quartiles of time to ROSC, even in cases without bystander CPR or shocks delivered. This suggests that EMS personnel should not terminate resuscitation efforts too early.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document