scholarly journals The Value of Preoperative Alpha-L-Fucosidase Levels in Evaluation of Malignancy and Differential Diagnosis of Urothelial Neoplasms

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Dongshan Chen ◽  
Naidong Xing ◽  
Zhanwu Cui ◽  
Cong Zhang ◽  
Zhao Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Clinicopathological Parameters ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Urothelial Tumors

Purpose. To evaluate the role of Alpha-L-fucosidase (AFU) in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of pure urothelial carcinoma (UC), urothelial carcinoma with squamous differentiation (UCSD), and squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC). Methods. A retrospective study was performed for 599 patients who were histologically confirmed with urothelial tumor. Preoperative AFU levels were compared across the distinct subgroups with different clinicopathological parameters. ROC curve analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to further evaluate the clinical application value of serum AFU levels in diagnosis and differential diagnosis of urothelial tumors. Results. There were no statistically significant differences in the AFU levels between different groups with different malignant degrees (UC versus papilloma and papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential [PUNLMP], high-grade UC versus low-grade UC, invasive versus noninvasive malignant uroepithelial tumor) and different pathological types (UC, UCSD, and SqCC) (all P>0.05). ROC curve analysis and logistic regression analysis showed that there was no statistically significant association between AFU levels and the tumor characteristics (all P>0.05). Conclusions. Preoperative AFU levels cannot serve as a reliable predictor for malignant degree and differential diagnosis, including pure UC, UCSD, and SqCC of urothelial tumors.

scholarly journals The Prediction Model of Risk Factors for COVID-19 Developing into Severe Illness Based on 1046 Patients with COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Zhichuang Lian ◽  
Yafang Li ◽  
Wenyi Wang ◽  
Wei Ding ◽  
Zongxin Niu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Prediction Model ◽  
Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Severe Illness ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Underlying Diseases

This study analyzed the risk factors for patients with COVID-19 developing severe illnesses and explored the value of applying the logistic model combined with ROC curve analysis to predict the risk of severe illnesses at COVID-19 patients’ admissions. The clinical data of 1046 COVID-19 patients admitted to a designated hospital in a certain city from July to September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, the clinical characteristics of the patients were collected, and a multivariate unconditional logistic regression analysis was used to determine the risk factors for severe illnesses in COVID-19 patients during hospitalization. Based on the analysis results, a prediction model for severe conditions and the ROC curve were constructed, and the predictive value of the model was assessed. Logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR = 3.257, 95% CI 10.466–18.584), complications with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 7.337, 95% CI 0.227–87.021), cough (OR = 5517, 95% CI 0.258–65.024), and venous thrombosis (OR = 7322, 95% CI 0.278–95.020) were risk factors for COVID-19 patients developing severe conditions during hospitalization. When complications were not taken into consideration, COVID-19 patients’ ages, number of diseases, and underlying diseases were risk factors influencing the development of severe illnesses. The ROC curve analysis results showed that the AUC that predicted the severity of COVID-19 patients at admission was 0.943, the optimal threshold was −3.24, and the specificity was 0.824, while the sensitivity was 0.827. The changes in the condition of severe COVID-19 patients are related to many factors such as age, clinical symptoms, and underlying diseases. This study has a certain value in predicting COVID-19 patients that develop from mild to severe conditions, and this prediction model is a useful tool in the quick prediction of the changes in patients’ conditions and providing early intervention for those with risk factors.

scholarly journals Computed Tomography Based Score of Early Ischemic Changes Predicts Malignant Infarction

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Bechstein ◽  
Lukas Meyer ◽  
Silke Breuel ◽  
Tobias D. Faizy ◽  
Uta Hanning ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Imaging Parameters ◽  
Malignant Infarction ◽  
Enhanced Ct

Background and Purpose: Identification of ischemic stroke patients at high risk of developing life-threatening malignant infarction at an early stage is critical to consider more rigorous monitoring and further therapeutic measures. We hypothesized that a score consisting of simple measurements of visually evident ischemic changes in non-enhanced CT (NEMMI score) predicts malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarctions (MMI) with similar diagnostic power compared to other baseline clinical and imaging parameters.Methods: One hundred and nine patients with acute proximal MCA occlusion were included. Fifteen (13.8%) patients developed MMI. NEMMI score was defined using the sum of the maximum diameter (anterior-posterior plus medio-lateral) of the hypoattenuated lesion in baseline-CT multiplied by a hypoattenuation factor (3-point visual grading in non-enhanced CT, no/subtle/clear hypoattenuation = 1/2/3). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to calculate the predictive values of the NEMMI score, baseline clinical and other imaging parameters.Results: The median NEMMI score at baseline was 13.6 (IQR: 11.6–31.1) for MMI patients, and 7.7 (IQR: 3.9–11.2) for patients with non-malignant infarctions (p < 0.0001). Based on ROC curve analysis, a NEMMI score >10.5 identified MMI with good discriminative power (AUC: 0.84, sensitivity/specificity: 93.3/70.7%), which was higher compared to age (AUC: 0.76), NIHSS (AUC: 0.61), or ischemic core volume (AUC: 0.80). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, NEMMI score was significantly and independently associated with MMI (OR: 1.33, 95%CI: 1.13–1.56, p < 0.001), adjusted for recanalization status.Conclusion: The NEMMI score is a quick and simple rating tool of early ischemic changes on CT and could serve as an important surrogate marker for developing malignant edema. Its diagnostic accuracy was similar to CTP and clinical parameters.

scholarly journals Association Between D-Dimer Level and In-Hospital Death of Pulmonary Embolism Patients

Dose-Response ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 155932582096843
Author(s):  
Zi-Kai Song ◽  
Haidi Wu ◽  
Xiaoyan Xu ◽  
Hongyan Cao ◽  
Qi Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Survival Group ◽  
Death Group ◽  
D Dimer

To investigate whether D-dimer level could predict pulmonary embolism (PE) severity and in-hospital death, a total of 272 patients with PE were divided into a survival group (n = 249) and a death group (n = 23). Comparisons of patient characteristics between the 2 groups were performed using Mann-Whitney U test. Significant variables in univariate analysis were entered into multivariate logistic regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the predictive value of D-dimer level alone or together with the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) for in-hospital death. Results showed that patients in the death group were significantly more likely to have hypotension (P = 0.008), tachycardia (P = 0.000), elevated D-dimer level (P = 0.003), and a higher sPESI (P = 0.002) than those in the survival group. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that D-dimer level was an independent predictor of in-hospital death (OR = 1.07; 95% CI, 1.003-1.143; P = 0.041). ROC curve analysis showed that when D-dimer level was 3.175 ng/ml, predicted death sensitivity and specificity were 0.913 and 0.357, respectively; and when combined with sPESI, specificity (0.838) and area under the curve (0.740) were increased. Thus, D-dimer level is associated with in-hospital death due to PE; and the combination with sPESI can improve the prediction level.

scholarly journals Serum Irisin Predicts Mortality Risk in Acute Heart Failure Patients

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 615-622 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shutong Shen ◽  
Rongrong Gao ◽  
Yihua Bei ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Haifeng Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Background/Aims: Irisin is a peptide hormone cleaved from a plasma membrane protein fibronectin type III domain containing protein 5 (FNDC5). Emerging studies have indicated association between serum irisin and many major chronic diseases including cardiovascular diseases. However, the role of serum irisin as a predictor for mortality risk in acute heart failure (AHF) patients is not clear. Methods: AHF patients were enrolled and serum was collected at the admission and all patients were followed up for 1 year. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure serum irisin levels. To explore predictors for AHF mortality, the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used. To determine the role of serum irisin levels in predicting survival, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used. Results: In this study, 161 AHF patients were enrolled and serum irisin level was found to be significantly higher in patients deceased in 1-year follow-up. The univariate logistic regression analysis identified 18 variables associated with all-cause mortality in AHF patients, while the multivariate logistic regression analysis identified 2 variables namely blood urea nitrogen and serum irisin. ROC curve analysis indicated that blood urea nitrogen and the most commonly used biomarker, NT-pro-BNP, displayed poor prognostic value for AHF (AUCs ≤ 0.700) compared to serum irisin (AUC = 0.753). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that AHF patients with higher serum irisin had significantly higher mortality (P<0.001). Conclusion: Collectively, our study identified serum irisin as a predictive biomarker for 1-year all-cause mortality in AHF patients though large multicenter studies are highly needed.

scholarly journals 18F-RGD PET/CT and Systemic Inflammatory Biomarkers Predict Outcomes of Patients With Advanced NSCLC Receiving Combined Antiangiogenic Treatment

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Liu ◽  
Leilei Wu ◽  
Zhiguo Liu ◽  
Samuel Seery ◽  
Jianing Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Standard Uptake Value ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Antiangiogenic Treatment ◽  
Pet Ct

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate 18F-AlF-NOTA-PRGD2 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-RGD PET/CT) and serum inflammation biomarkers for predicting outcomes of patients receiving combined antiangiogenic treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsPatients with advanced NSCLC underwent 18F-RGD PET/CT examination and provided blood samples before treatments commenced. PET/CT parameters included maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) and mean standard uptake value (SUVmean), peak standard uptake value (SUVpeak) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) for all contoured lesions. Biomarkers for inflammation included pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (PreNLR), pretreatment platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PrePLR), and pretreatment lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (PreLMR). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to describe response prediction accuracy. Logistic regression and Cox’s regression analysis was implemented to identify independent factors for short-term responses and progression-free survival (PFS).ResultsThis study included 23 patients. According to ROC curve analysis, there were significant correlations between the SUVmax, SUVmean, and 18F-RGD PET/CT MTV and short-term responses (p&lt;0.05). SUVmax was identified using logistic regression analysis as a significant predictor of treatment sensitivity (p=0.008). Cox’s multivariate regression analysis suggested that high SUVpeak (p=0.021) and high PreLMR (p=0.03) were independent PFS predictors. Combining SUVpeak and PreLMR may also increase the prognostic value for PFS, enabling us to identify a subgroup of patients with intermediate PFS.Conclusion18F-RGD uptake on PET/CT and serum inflammation biomarker pretreatment may predict outcomes for combined antiangiogenic treatments for advanced NSCLC patients. Higher 18F-RGD uptake and higher PreLMR also appear to predict improved short-term responses and PFS. Combining biomarkers may therefore provide a basis for risk stratification, although further research is required.

Acute heart failure: predicting early in-hospital outcomes

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Santos ◽  
S Paula ◽  
I Almeida ◽  
H Santos ◽  
H Miranda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Study Data ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Older Age ◽  
Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Patients (P) with acute heart failure (AHF) are a heterogeneous population. Risk stratification at admission may help predict in-hospital complications and needs. The Get With The Guidelines Heart Failure score (GWTG-HF) predicts in-hospital mortality (M) of P admitted with AHF. ACTION ICU score is validated to estimate the risk of complications requiring ICU care in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Objective To validate ACTION-ICU score in AHF and to compare ACTION-ICU to GWTG-HF as predictors of in-hospital M (IHM), early M [1-month mortality (1mM)] and 1-month readmission (1mRA), using real-life data. Methods Based on a single-center retrospective study, data collected from P admitted in the Cardiology department with AHF between 2010 and 2017. P without data on previous cardiovascular history or uncompleted clinical data were excluded. Statistical analysis used chi-square, non-parametric tests, logistic regression analysis and ROC curve analysis. Results Among the 300 P admitted with AHF included, mean age was 67.4 ± 12.6 years old and 72.7% were male. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 131.2 ± 37.0mmHg, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was 57.1 ± 23.5ml/min. 35.3% were admitted in Killip-Kimball class (KKC) 4. ACTION-ICU score was 10.4 ± 2.3 and GWTG-HF was 41.7 ± 9.6. Inotropes’ usage was necessary in 32.7% of the P, 11.3% of the P needed non-invasive ventilation (NIV), 8% needed invasive ventilation (IV). IHM rate was 5% and 1mM was 8%. 6.3% of the P were readmitted 1 month after discharge. Older age (p &lt; 0.001), lower SBP (p = 0,035) and need of inotropes (p &lt; 0.001) were predictors of IHM in our population. As expected, patients presenting in KKC 4 had higher IHM (OR 8.13, p &lt; 0.001). Older age (OR 1.06, p = 0.002, CI 1.02-1.10), lower SBP (OR 1.01, p = 0.05, CI 1.00-1.02) and lower left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR 1.06, p &lt; 0.001, CI 1.03-1.09) were predictors of need of NIV. None of the variables were predictive of IV. LVEF (OR 0.924, p &lt; 0.001, CI 0.899-0.949), lower SBP (OR 0.80, p &lt; 0.001, CI 0.971-0.988), higher urea (OR 1.01, p &lt; 0.001, CI 1.005-1.018) and lower sodium (OR 0.92, p = 0.002, CI 0.873-0.971) were predictors of inotropes’ usage. Logistic regression showed that GWTG-HF predicted IHM (OR 1.12, p &lt; 0.001, CI 1.05-1.19), 1mM (OR 1.10, p = 1.10, CI 1.04-1.16) and inotropes’s usage (OR 1.06, p &lt; 0.001, CI 1.03-1.10), however it was not predictive of 1mRA, need of IV or NIV. Similarly, ACTION-ICU predicted IHM (OR 1.51, p = 0.02, CI 1.158-1.977), 1mM (OR 1.45, p = 0.002, CI 1.15-1.81) and inotropes’ usage (OR 1.22, p = 0.002, CI 1.08-1.39), but not 1mRA, the need of IV or NIV. ROC curve analysis revealed that GWTG-HF score performed better than ACTION-ICU regarding IHM (AUC 0.774, CI 0.46-0-90 vs AUC 0.731, CI 0.59-0.88) and 1mM (AUC 0.727, CI 0.60-0.85 vs AUC 0.707, CI 0.58-0.84). Conclusion In our population, both scores were able to predict IHM, 1mM and inotropes’s usage.

scholarly journals Predictive CT features for the diagnosis of primary pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma: comparison with squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohua Ban ◽  
Xinping Shen ◽  
Huijun Hu ◽  
Rong Zhang ◽  
Chuanmiao Xie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Multinomial Logistic Regression ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Ct Imaging ◽  
Squamous Cell Carcinomas ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Imaging Features ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Ct Features

Abstract Background To determine the predictive CT imaging features for diagnosis in patients with primary pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinomas (PMECs). Materials and methods CT imaging features of 37 patients with primary PMECs, 76 with squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and 78 with adenocarcinomas were retrospectively reviewed. The difference of CT features among the PMECs, SCCs and adenocarcinomas was analyzed using univariate analysis, followed by multinomial logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results CT imaging features including tumor size, location, margin, shape, necrosis and degree of enhancement were significant different among the PMECs, SCCs and adenocarcinomas, as determined by univariate analysis (P < 0.05). Only lesion location, shape, margin and degree of enhancement remained independent factors in multinomial logistic regression analysis. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under curve of the obtained multinomial logistic regression model was 0.805 (95%CI: 0.704–0.906). Conclusion The prediction model derived from location, margin, shape and degree of enhancement can be used for preoperative diagnosis of PMECs.

scholarly journals Right choice of a method for determination of cut-off values: A statistical tool for a diagnostic test

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 30-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Balkishan Sharma ◽  
Ravikant Jain
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Discriminant Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Test ◽  
Roc Curve ◽  
Traditional Method ◽  
Statistical Technique ◽  
Curve Analysis ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis

Objective: The clinical diagnostic tests are generally used to identify the presence of a disease. The cutoff value of a diagnostic test should be chosen to maximize the advantage that accrues from testing a population of human and others. When a diagnostic test is to be used in a clinical condition, there may be an opportunity to improve the test by changing the cutoff value. To enhance the accuracy of diagnosis is to develop new tests by using a proper statistical technique with optimum sensitivity and specificity. Method: Mean±2SD method, Logistic Regression Analysis, Receivers Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis and Discriminant Analysis (DA) have been discussed with their respective applications. Results: The study highlighted some important methods to determine the cutoff points for a diagnostic test. The traditional method is to identify the cut-off values is Mean±2SD method. Logistic Regression Analysis, Receivers Operating Characteristics (ROC) curve analysis and Discriminant Analysis (DA) have been proved to be beneficial statistical tools for determination of cut-off points.Conclusion: There may be an opportunity to improve the test by changing the cut-off value with the help of a correctly identified statistical technique in a clinical condition when a diagnostic test is to be used. The traditional method is to identify the cut-off values is Mean ± 2SD method. It was evidenced in certain conditions that logistic regression is found to be a good predictor and the validity of the same can be confirmed by identifying the area under the ROC curve. Abbreviations: ROC-Receiver operating characteristics and DA-Discriminant Analysis. Asian Journal of Medical Science, Volume-5(3) 2014: 30-34 http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v5i3.9296      

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document