Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 PCR and Chest CT Findings at a Single Facility in Tokyo (Machida Municipal Hospital)

Introduction. The SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test is useful for diagnosing COVID-19, and the RT-PCR positive rate is an important indicator for estimating the incidence rate and number of infections. COVID-19 pneumonia is also associated with characteristic findings on chest CT, which can aid in diagnosis. Methods. We retrospectively evaluated patient background characteristics, the number of cases, the positivity rate, and chest CT findings for positive and negative cases in 672 patients who underwent RT-PCR for suspected COVID-19 at our hospital between April 3 and August 28, 2020. In addition, we compared trends in the positive rates at approximately weekly intervals with trends in the number of new infections in Machida City, Tokyo. Results. The study included 323 men and 349 women, with a median age of 46 years (range: 1 month–100 years). RT-PCR findings were positive in 37 cases, and the positive rate was 5.51%. Trends in the positive rate at our hospital and the number of new COVID-19 cases in the city were similar during the study period. Among patients with positive results, 15 (40.5%) had chest CT findings, and 14 had bilateral homogeneous GGOs. Among patients with negative results, 190 had chest CT findings at the time of examination, and 150 were diagnosed with bacterial pneumonia or bronchitis, with main findings consisting of consolidations and centrilobular opacities. Only 11 of these patients exhibited bilateral homogeneous GGOs. Conclusion. Bilateral homogeneous GGOs are characteristic of COVID-19 pneumonia and may aid in the diagnosis of COVID-19.

Download Full-text

CT findings of 795 COVID-19 positive cases: a multicenter study in Egypt

Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine ◽

10.1186/s43055-020-00351-7 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 51 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Youssriah Yahia Sabri ◽

Mohamed Mohsen Tolba Fawzi ◽

Eman Zaki Nossair ◽

Safaa Mohamed El-Mandooh ◽

Amira Aly Hegazy ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Virus Disease ◽

Chest Ct ◽

Imaging Features ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Relevant Research ◽

Non Invasive ◽

Ct Findings ◽

Global Pandemic ◽

Polymerase Chain ◽

Ct Studies

Abstract Background Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak was officially announced as a global pandemic by the WHO on March 11th 2020. Thorough understanding of CT imaging features of COVID-19 is essential for effective patient management; rationalizing the need for relevant research. The aim of this study was to analyze the chest CT findings of patients with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) proved COVID-19 admitted to four Egyptian hospitals. The recently published RSNA expert consensus statement on reporting COVID-19 chest CT findings was taken into consideration. Results Normal CT “negative for COVID-19” was reported in 26.1% of our RT-PCR proved COVID-19 cases. In descending order of prevalence, imaging findings of the positive CT studies (73.9%) included GGO (69%), consolidation (49.7%), crazy paving (15.4%), and peri-lobular fibrosis (40.6%). These showed a dominantly bilateral (68.2%), peripheral (72.4%), and patchy (64.7%) distribution. Remarkably, thymic hyperplasia was identified in 14.3% of studies. According to the RSNA consensus, CT findings were classified as typical in 68.9%, indeterminate in 3.6%, and atypical in 1.4% of the evaluated CT studies. Conclusion Although COVID-19 cannot be entirely excluded by chest CT, it can be distinguished in more than two-thirds of cases; making CT a widely available, non-invasive, and rapid diagnostic tool.

Download Full-text

Diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Neither Chest CT nor RT-PCR Fits All

10.21203/rs.3.rs-27336/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Yue Teng ◽

Hui Dai ◽

Yalei Shang ◽

Jianguo Xia ◽

Yuehua Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

False Negative ◽

Ground Glass Opacity ◽

Chest Ct ◽

Ct Scans ◽

Imaging Features ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Negative Results ◽

Halo Sign ◽

Solid Nodule ◽

Ct Findings

Abstract BackgroundComputed tomography (CT) and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) are the recommended tools for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The present study aimed to investigate the correlation between chest CT and RT-PCR while describing the atypical CT imaging features of COVID-19.MethodsIn this study, 418 patients in Jiangsu, China, clinically diagnosed with COVID-19 from January 10 to February 17, 2020, were included. Patients who fulfilled the following conditions were evaluated further: (1) Patients had positive RT-PCR and negative CT; (2) Patients had initial negative RT-PCR and positive CT, and follow-up PT-PCR tests were positive; (3) Patients had atypical CT findings.ResultsOf the 418 initial chest CT scans, 30 (7.2%) patients had normal CT presentation, and 6 (1.4%) patients had initial negative RT-PCR results and positive CT scans. Next, 10 (2.4%) cases of patients showed atypical CT findings, including 2 case of solid nodule, 4 cases of halo sign (solid nodule or mass surrounded by ground glass opacity), and 4 cases of predominant fibrous stripes.ConclusionsFalse-negative results can be found on both chest CT and RT-PCR; hence, the diagnosis of COVID-19 should consider both CT and RT-PCR. CT manifestations, such as solitary nodule, halo sign, and pulmonary fibrous stripes, might indicate the possibility of COVID-19 to the radiologists.

Download Full-text

The Clinical and Radiological Manifestations in Coronavirus Disease 2019 With Negative Nucleic Acid Results

Open Forum Infectious Diseases ◽

10.1093/ofid/ofaa252 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 7 (7) ◽

Author(s):

Guanjing Lang ◽

Junwei Su ◽

Wenrui Wu ◽

Hong Zhao ◽

Shihong Ying ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Clinical Symptoms ◽

Chest Ct ◽

Common Symptom ◽

Negative Group ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Positive Group ◽

Epidemiological Features ◽

Polymerase Chain ◽

And Gender ◽

Positive Results

Abstract Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) was a new emerging disease with high infectiousness. Its diagnosis primarily depended on real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) results. This study investigated epidemiological, clinical, and radiological characteristics of COVID-19 with negative RT-PCR results before confirmation. Methods Patients with COVID-19 were enrolled and divided into 2 groups: a negative group with negative RT-PCR results before confirmation and a positive group with positive results at the first detection. Epidemiological and clinical features were compared. Dynamic chest computerized tomography (CT) images of the negative group were evaluated. Results Ninety-nine laboratory-confirmed patients with COVID-19 including 8 patients (8%) with negative RT-PCR results were included. Patients from the negative group had similar epidemiological features: the average age (50.25 ± 13.27 years in the negative group and 53.70 ± 16.64 years in the positive group) and gender distribution (males made up 50% of the negative group and 62.6% of the positive group) were comparable. No significant differences were observed in clinical symptoms between the 2 groups. We found that fever was the most common symptom for both groups, followed by cough, expectoration, chest distress, fatigue, and gastroenterological symptoms. Moreover, ground-glass opacities and consolidations were the main manifestation in chest CT of patients with COVID-19 with or without confirmed RT-PCR results. Conclusions Regardless of initial RT-PCR results, patients with COVID-19 had similar epidemiological, clinical, and chest CT features. Our study suggests value from early chest CT scans in COVID-19 screening and dynamic significance of radiology in disease monitoring should guide clinical decisions.

Download Full-text

Effectiveness of Chest CT in Children: CT Findings in Relation to the Clinical Question

RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren ◽

10.1055/a-1586-3023 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Michael Esser ◽

Ilias Tsiflikas ◽

Mareen Sarah Kraus ◽

Sabine Hess ◽

Sergios Gatidis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chest Ct ◽

University Hospital ◽

Cell Transplant ◽

Clinical Question ◽

Negative Results ◽

Ct Findings ◽

Pediatric Chest ◽

Clinically Significant ◽

Positive Results ◽

Suspected Diagnosis

Purpose To estimate the effectiveness and efficiency of chest CT in children based on the suspected diagnosis in relation to the number of positive, negative, and inconclusive CT results. Materials and Methods In this monocentric retrospective study at a university hospital with a division of pediatric radiology, 2019 chest CT examinations (973 patients; median age: 10.5 years; range: 2 days to 17.9 years) were analyzed with regards to clinical data, including the referring department, primary questions or suspected diagnosis, and CT findings. It was identified if the clinical question was answered, whether the suspected diagnosis was confirmed or ruled out, and if additional findings (clinically significant or minor) were detected. Results The largest clinical subgroup was the hematooncological subgroup (n = 987), with frequent questions for inflammation/pneumonia (66 % in this subgroup). Overall, CT provided conclusive results in 97.6 % of all scans. In 1380 scans (70 %), the suspected diagnosis was confirmed. In 406/2019 cases (20 %), the CT scan was negative also in terms of an additional finding. In 8 of 9 clinical categories, the proportion of positive results was over 50 %. There were predominantly negative results (110/179; 61 %) in pre-stem cell transplant evaluation. In the subgroup of trauma management, 81/144 exams (57 %) showed positive results, including combined injuries (n = 23). 222/396 (56 %) of all additional findings were estimated to be clinically significant. Conclusion In a specialized center, the effectiveness of pediatric chest CT was excellent when counting the conclusive results. However, to improve efficiency, the clinical evaluation before imaging appears crucial to prevent unnecessary CT examinations. Key Points: Citation Format

Download Full-text

Investigation of revers-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction values of patients with COVID-19 findings in lung computed tomography results

Jurnal Teknologi Laboratorium ◽

10.29238/teknolabjournal.v9i1.220 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 9 (1) ◽

pp. 41-48

Author(s):

Ozüdogru Osman ◽

Gunes Bolatli ◽

Fatih Tas

Keyword(s):

Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽

Clinical Symptoms ◽

Chest Ct ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Chain Reaction ◽

Alternative Approach ◽

Polymerase Chain ◽

Bilateral Lung ◽

Patient’S History ◽

Positive Results

It turned out that the cause of pneumonia cases that occurred in China was due to SARS-CoV-2. The aim is to compare chest computer tomography and Revers-Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction methods used in the diagnosis of COVID-19 disease with each other and to evaluate this disease with risk factors. The study was carried out on 66 patients. Epidemiological history, clinical symptoms, chest CT and RT-PCR results of the cases were examined. RT-PCR results of 1, 4, and 7 days were evaluated for each case with positive chest CT results. Thirty-seven of them were found to be positive on day 1, 5 of them were found to be positive on day 4, and 2 of them were found to be positive on day seven from 52 patients whose RT-PCR results were examined. In the remaining 8 cases, no positive findings were found. The most common findings are; cough (78.8%), fever (55.8%), and shortness of breath (28.8%). It was observed that 51.9% of the cases had chronic disease history and 50% of the patients using cigarettes had bilateral lung involvement in their CT results. Seven cases received intensive care support, 3 cases were intubated. Two of the intubated cases were exitus (3,8%). The positive results of RT-PCR were found to be negative in most of the cases which have positive chest CT; suggests that chest CT is more reliable in making a diagnosis. Therefore, evaluating chest CT results with RT-PCR can be an appropriate alternative approach in the diagnosis and treatment of disease. However, in order to be fully diagnosed, the patient's history, chronic diseases, age, symptoms, imaging, blood, and test findings must all be considered as a whole.

Download Full-text

Is it enough for COVID-19 screening test? Limitation of swab test and general characteristics of mild symptom patients

Science Progress ◽

10.1177/00368504211026152 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 104 (2) ◽

pp. 003685042110261

Author(s):

Sungwoo Choi ◽

Hyo Jeong Choi ◽

Ho Jung Kim

Keyword(s):

Screening Test ◽

Community Treatment ◽

Upper Respiratory Tract ◽

Test Results ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Pcr Assay ◽

Positive Rate ◽

Upper Respiratory ◽

Polymerase Chain ◽

Discharge Criteria

The most common method for SARS-CoV-2 testing is throat or nasal swabbing by real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay. In South Korea, drive-through swab test is used for screening system and community treatment centers (CTCs), which admit and treat confirmed COVID-19 patients with mild symptoms, are being used. This retrospective study was conducted on patients admitted to a CTC on March 6, 2020. A total of 313 patients were admitted. The nasal and throat swabs were collected from the upper respiratory tract, and a sputum test was performed to obtain lower respiratory samples. The positive rate of the first set of test, sputum test was higher than that of the swab test ( p = 0.011). In the second set of test, 1 week after the first ones, the rate of positive swab tests was relatively high ( p = 0.026). In the first set of test, 66 of 152 (43.4%) patients showed 24-h consecutive negative swab test results, when the sputum test results were considered together, that number fell to 29 patients (19.1%) ( p < 0.001). Also, in the second set of test, 63 of 164 (38.4%) patients met the discharge criteria only when the swab test was considered; that number fell to 30 (18.3%) when the sputum test results were also considered ( p < 0.001). Using the swab test alone is insufficient for screening test and discharge decision. Patients who may have positive result in the sputum test can be missed.

Download Full-text

A meta-analysis of accuracy and sensitivity of chest CT and RT-PCR in COVID-19 diagnosis

Scientific Reports ◽

10.1038/s41598-020-80061-2 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Fatemeh Khatami ◽

Mohammad Saatchi ◽

Seyed Saeed Tamehri Zadeh ◽

Zahra Sadat Aghamir ◽

Alireza Namazi Shabestari ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽

Reverse Transcriptase ◽

Ct Scan ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Chest Ct ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Chain Reaction ◽

Polymerase Chain ◽

Chest Ct Scan

AbstractNowadays there is an ongoing acute respiratory outbreak caused by the novel highly contagious coronavirus (COVID-19). The diagnostic protocol is based on quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and chests CT scan, with uncertain accuracy. This meta-analysis study determines the diagnostic value of an initial chest CT scan in patients with COVID-19 infection in comparison with RT-PCR. Three main databases; PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and EMBASE were systematically searched for all published literature from January 1st, 2019, to the 21st May 2020 with the keywords "COVID19 virus", "2019 novel coronavirus", "Wuhan coronavirus", "2019-nCoV", "X-Ray Computed Tomography", "Polymerase Chain Reaction", "Reverse Transcriptase PCR", and "PCR Reverse Transcriptase". All relevant case-series, cross-sectional, and cohort studies were selected. Data extraction and analysis were performed using STATA v.14.0SE (College Station, TX, USA) and RevMan 5. Among 1022 articles, 60 studies were eligible for totalizing 5744 patients. The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of chest CT scan compared to RT-PCR were 87% (95% CI 85–90%), 46% (95% CI 29–63%), 69% (95% CI 56–72%), and 89% (95% CI 82–96%), respectively. It is important to rely on the repeated RT-PCR three times to give 99% accuracy, especially in negative samples. Regarding the overall diagnostic sensitivity of 87% for chest CT, the RT-PCR testing is essential and should be repeated to escape misdiagnosis.

Download Full-text

The role of CT imaging for management of COVID-19 in epidemic area: early experience from a University Hospital

Insights into Imaging ◽

10.1186/s13244-020-00957-5 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 12 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Vikram rao Bollineni ◽

Koenraad Hans Nieboer ◽

Seema Döring ◽

Nico Buls ◽

Johan de Mey

Keyword(s):

Ct Scan ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Ct Imaging ◽

Chest Ct ◽

University Hospital ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Ct Findings ◽

Epidemic Area ◽

Chest Ct Scan ◽

Pcr Test

Abstract Background To evaluate the clinical value of the chest CT scan compared to the reference standard real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in COVID-19 patients. Methods From March 29th to April 15th of 2020, a total of 240 patients with respiratory distress underwent both a low-dose chest CT scan and RT-PCR tests. The performance of chest CT in diagnosing COVID-19 was assessed with reference to the RT-PCR result. Two board-certified radiologists (mean 24 years of experience chest CT), blinded for the RT-PCR result, reviewed all scans and decided positive or negative chest CT findings by consensus. Results Out of 240 patients, 60% (144/240) had positive RT-PCR results and 89% (213/240) had a positive chest CT scans. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of chest CT in suggesting COVID-19 were 100% (95% CI: 97–100%, 144/240), 28% (95% CI: 19–38%, 27/240), 68% (95% CI: 65–70%) and 100%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the chest CT suggesting COVID-19 was 71% (95% CI: 65–77%). Thirty-three patients with positive chest CT scan and negative RT-PCR test at baseline underwent repeat RT-PCR assay. In this subgroup, 21.2% (7/33) cases became RT-PCR positive. Conclusion Chest CT imaging has high sensitivity and high NPV for diagnosing COVID-19 and can be considered as an alternative primary screening tool for COVID-19 in epidemic areas. In addition, a negative RT-PCR test, but positive CT findings can still be suggestive of COVID-19 infection.

Download Full-text

Chest CT texture-based radiomics analysis in differentiating COVID-19 from other interstitial pneumonia

La radiologia medica ◽

10.1007/s11547-021-01402-3 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Damiano Caruso ◽

Francesco Pucciarelli ◽

Marta Zerunian ◽

Balaji Ganeshan ◽

Domenico De Santis ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Interstitial Pneumonia ◽

Potential Role ◽

Texture Features ◽

Roc Curves ◽

Chest Ct ◽

Preliminary Evaluation ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

Mean Intensity ◽

Polymerase Chain

Abstract Purpose To evaluate the potential role of texture-based radiomics analysis in differentiating Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pneumonia from pneumonia of other etiology on Chest CT. Materials and methods One hundred and twenty consecutive patients admitted to Emergency Department, from March 8, 2020, to April 25, 2020, with suspicious of COVID-19 that underwent Chest CT, were retrospectively analyzed. All patients presented CT findings indicative for interstitial pneumonia. Sixty patients with positive COVID-19 real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and 60 patients with negative COVID-19 RT-PCR were enrolled. CT texture analysis (CTTA) was manually performed using dedicated software by two radiologists in consensus and textural features on filtered and unfiltered images were extracted as follows: mean intensity, standard deviation (SD), entropy, mean of positive pixels (MPP), skewness, and kurtosis. Nonparametric Mann–Whitney test assessed CTTA ability to differentiate positive from negative COVID-19 patients. Diagnostic criteria were obtained from receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results Unfiltered CTTA showed lower values of mean intensity, MPP, and kurtosis in COVID-19 positive patients compared to negative patients (p = 0.041, 0.004, and 0.002, respectively). On filtered images, fine and medium texture scales were significant differentiators; fine texture scale being most significant where COVID-19 positive patients had lower SD (p = 0.004) and MPP (p = 0.004) compared to COVID-19 negative patients. A combination of the significant texture features could identify the patients with positive COVID-19 from negative COVID-19 with a sensitivity of 60% and specificity of 80% (p = 0.001). Conclusions Preliminary evaluation suggests potential role of CTTA in distinguishing COVID-19 pneumonia from other interstitial pneumonia on Chest CT.

Download Full-text

Chest CT as a Complement to RT-PCR to Confirm and Follow-up COVID-19 Patients

Medicinus ◽

10.19166/med.v8i1.3122 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 8 (1) ◽

pp. 31

Author(s):

Aziza Ghanie Icksan ◽

Muhammad Hafiz ◽

Annisa Dian Harlivasari

Keyword(s):

Chest Ct ◽

Rt Pcr ◽

High Resolution Computed Tomography ◽

X Ray ◽

First Case ◽

Chest X Ray ◽

Polymerase Chain

Background : The first case of COVID-19 in Indonesia was recorded in March 2020. Limitation of reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) has put chest CT as an essential complementary tool in the diagnosis and follow up treatment for COVID-19. Literatures strongly suggested that High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) is essential in diagnosing typical symptoms of COVID-19 at the early phase of disease due to its superior sensitivity (97%) compared to chest x-ray (CXR).The two cases presented in this case study showed the crucial role of chest CT with HRCT to establish the working diagnosis and follow up COVID-19 patients as a complement to RT-PCR, currently deemed a gold standard.

Download Full-text