scholarly journals Micromonas micros Infection of a Prosthetic Hip Joint: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Abhimanyu Aggarwal ◽  
Durane Walker
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Hip Joint ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Dental Procedure ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joints ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Dental Procedures ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽  
Hematogenous Seeding

Micromonas micros is an oral anaerobic Gram-positive coccus and is a commensal of the mouth, and it is rarely isolated in prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and even less frequently related to a preceding dental procedure with eventual hematogenous seeding of the prosthetic joint. Here, we present a case of a 56-year-old male with a prosthetic hip joint who developed Micromonas micros prosthetic hip joint infection with symptoms starting a few days after a dental procedure and not having received periprocedural antibiotic prophylaxis. He recovered well with surgical intervention and antimicrobial therapy. We conducted a literature review of prosthetic hip joint infections caused by Micromonas micros as well as briefly discuss current guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis in patients with prosthetic joints undergoing dental procedures and some knowledge gaps.

scholarly journals Use of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Tooth Extractions, Dental Implants, and Periodontal Surgical Procedures

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katie J Suda ◽  
Heather Henschel ◽  
Ursula Patel ◽  
Margaret A Fitzpatrick ◽  
Charlesnika T Evans
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Oral Infections ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Dental Procedures ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽  
Tooth Extractions

Abstract Background Guidelines for antibiotics prior to dental procedures for patients with specific cardiac conditions and prosthetic joints have changed, reducing indications for antibiotic prophylaxis. In addition to guidelines focused on patient comorbidities, systematic reviews specific to dental extractions and implants support preprocedure antibiotics for all patients. However, data on dentist adherence to these recommendations are scarce. Methods This was a cross-sectional study of veterans undergoing tooth extractions, dental implants, and periodontal procedures. Patients receiving antibiotics for oral or nonoral infections were excluded. Data were collected through manual review of the health record. Results Of 183 veterans (mean age, 62 years; 94.5% male) undergoing the included procedures, 82.5% received antibiotic prophylaxis (mean duration, 7.1 ± 1.6 days). Amoxicillin (71.3% of antibiotics) and clindamycin (23.8%) were prescribed most frequently; 44.7% of patients prescribed clindamycin were not labeled as penicillin allergic. Of those who received prophylaxis, 92.1% received postprocedure antibiotics only, 2.6% received preprocedural antibiotics only, and 5.3% received pre- and postprocedure antibiotics. When prophylaxis was indicated, 87.3% of patients received an antibiotic. However, 84.9% received postprocedure antibiotics when preprocedure administration was indicated. While the majority of antibiotics were indicated, only 8.2% of patients received antibiotics appropriately. The primary reason was secondary to prolonged duration. Three months postprocedure, there were no occurrences of Clostridium difficile infection, infective endocarditis, prosthetic joint infections, or postprocedure oral infections. Conclusion The majority of patients undergoing a dental procedure received antibiotic prophylaxis as indicated. Although patients for whom antibiotic prophylaxis was indicated should have received a single preprocedure dose, most antibiotics were prescribed postprocedure. Dental stewardship efforts should ensure appropriate antibiotic timing, indication, and duration.

Review of Guidelines for Dental Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Prevention of Endocarditis and Prosthetic Joint Infections and Need for Dental Stewardship

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (2) ◽  
pp. 455-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra A Goff ◽  
Julie E Mangino ◽  
Andrew H Glassman ◽  
Douglas Goff ◽  
Peter Larsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Private Practice ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Dental Procedure ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Joint Replacements ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Orthopedic Surgeons ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections

Abstract Dentists prescribe 10% of all outpatient antibiotic prescriptions, writing more than 25.7 million prescriptions per year. Many are for prophylaxis in patients with prosthetic joint replacements; the American Dental Society states that “in general,” prophylactic antibiotics are not recommended to prevent prosthetic joint infections. Orthopedic surgeons are concerned with the risk of implant infections following a dental procedure and, therefore, see high value and low risk in recommending prophylaxis. Patients are “stuck in the middle,” with conflicting recommendations from orthopedic surgeons (OS) and dentists. Unnecessary prophylaxis and fear of lawsuits amongst private practice dentists and OS has not been addressed. We review The American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology, American Dental Association, and American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons’ guidelines on dental antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of endocarditis and prosthetic joint infections. We provide experience on how to engage private-practice dentists and OS in dental stewardship using a community-based program.

scholarly journals Streptococcus salivarius Prosthetic Joint Infection following Dental Cleaning despite Antibiotic Prophylaxis

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Lyra B. Olson ◽  
Daniel J. Turner ◽  
Gary M. Cox ◽  
Christopher J. Hostler
Keyword(s):  
Prosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Streptococcus Salivarius ◽  
Dental Procedure ◽  
Commensal Bacterium ◽  
Bacterial Peritonitis ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Dental Procedures ◽  
Potential Pathogenicity

We present the case of a 92-year-old man with septic arthritis of a prosthetic hip joint due to Streptococcus salivarius one week following a high-risk dental procedure despite preprocedure amoxicillin. S. salivarius is a commensal bacterium of the human oral mucosa that is an uncommon cause of bacteremia. S. salivarius has previously been described as a causative agent of infective endocarditis and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis but was only recently recognized as a cause of prosthetic joint infection. This case highlights the potential pathogenicity of a common commensal bacteria and the questionable utility of prophylactic antibiotics before dental procedures to prevent periprosthetic joint infections.

scholarly journals Microbiological Aetiology, Epidemiology, and Clinical Profile of Prosthetic Joint Infections: Are Current Antibiotic Prophylaxis Guidelines Effective?

2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (5) ◽  
pp. 2386-2391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Trisha N. Peel ◽  
Allen C. Cheng ◽  
Kirsty L. Buising ◽  
Peter F. M. Choong
Keyword(s):  
Antibiotic Prophylaxis ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infection ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽  
Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis

ABSTRACTProsthetic joint infections remain a major complication of arthroplasty. At present, local and international guidelines recommend cefazolin as a surgical antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of arthroplasty. This retrospective cohort study conducted across 10 hospitals over a 3-year period (January 2006 to December 2008) investigated the epidemiology and microbiological etiology of prosthetic joint infections. There were 163 cases of prosthetic joint infection identified. From a review of the microbiological culture results, methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) and coagulase-negative staphylococci were isolated in 45% of infections. In addition, polymicrobial infections, particularly those involving Gram-negative bacilli and enterococcal species, were common (36%). The majority (88%) of patients received cefazolin as an antibiotic prophylaxis at the time of arthroplasty. In 63% of patients in this cohort, the microorganisms subsequently obtained were not susceptible to the antibiotic prophylaxis administered. The results of this study highlight the importance of ongoing reviews of the local ecology of prosthetic joint infection, demonstrating that the spectrum of pathogens involved is broad. The results should inform empirical antibiotic therapy. This report also provokes discussion about infection control strategies, including changing surgical antibiotic prophylaxis to a combination of glycopeptide and cefazolin, to reduce the incidence of infections due to methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

scholarly journals Do Prosthetic Joint Infections Worsen the Functional Ambulatory Outcome of Patients with Joint Replacements? A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 872
Author(s):  
Isabel Mur ◽  
Marcos Jordán ◽  
Alba Rivera ◽  
Virginia Pomar ◽  
José Carlos González ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Assistive Device ◽  
Matched Cohort ◽  
Knee Prostheses ◽  
Matched Cohort Study ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽  
Hip Arthroplasties

Objectives: To assess the effect on the functional ambulatory outcome of postoperative joint infection (PJI) cured at the first treatment attempt versus not developing PJI in patients with hip and knee prostheses. Methods: In a single-hospital retrospectively matched cohort study, each patient with PJI between 2007 and 2016 was matched on age, sex, type of prosthesis and year of implantation with two other patients with uninfected arthroplasties. The definition of a PJI cure included infection eradication, no further surgical procedures, no PJI-related mortality and no suppressive antibiotics. Functional ambulatory status evaluated one year after the last surgery was classified into four simple categories: able to walk without assistance, able to walk with one crutch, able to walk with two crutches, and unable to walk. Patients with total hip arthroplasties (THAs), total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) and partial hip arthroplasties (PHAs) were analysed separately. Results: A total of 109 PJI patients (38 TKA, 41 THA, 30 PHA) and 218 non-PJI patients were included. In a model adjusted for clinically relevant variables, PJI was associated with a higher risk of needing an assistive device for ambulation (vs. walking without aid) among THA (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 3.10, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.26–7.57; p = 0.014) and TKA patients (OR 5.40, 95% CI 2.12–13.67; p < 0.001), and with requiring two crutches to walk or being unable to walk (vs. walking unaided or with one crutch) among PHA patients (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.01–9.20; p = 0.047). Conclusions: Ambulatory outcome in patients with hip and knee prostheses with postoperative PJI is worse than in patients who do not have PJI.

scholarly journals The Right Time to Safely Re-Evaluate Empirical Antimicrobial Treatment of Hip or Knee Prosthetic Joint Infections

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 2113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deroche ◽  
Bémer ◽  
Valentin ◽  
Jolivet-Gougeon ◽  
Tandé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Joint Infection ◽  
Antimicrobial Treatment ◽  
Microbiological Diagnosis ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Time To Positivity ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
The Right ◽  
Polymicrobial Infections

Currently, no guideline provides recommendations on the duration of empirical antimicrobial treatment (EAT) in prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The aim of our study was to describe the time to growth of bacteria involved in PJI, rendering possible decreased duration of EAT. Based on a French multicentre prospective cohort study, culture data from patients with confirmed hip or knee PJI were analysed. For each patient, five samples were processed. Time to positivity was defined as the first positive medium in at least one sample for virulent pathogens and as the first positive medium in at least two samples for commensals. Definitive diagnosis of polymicrobial infections was considered the day the last bacteria were identified. Among the 183 PJIs, including 28 polymicrobial infections, microbiological diagnosis was carried out between Day 1 (D1) and D5 for 96.7% of cases. There was no difference in the average time to positivity between acute and chronic PJI (p = 0.8871). Microbiological diagnosis was given earlier for monomicrobial than for polymicrobial infections (p = 0.0034). When an optimized culture of peroperative samples was carried out, almost all cases of PJI were diagnosed within five days, including polymicrobial infections. EAT can be re-evaluated at D5 according to microbiological documentation.

scholarly journals Is Gram staining still useful in prosthetic joint infections?

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 56-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker ◽  
Noam Shohat ◽  
Marine Sebillotte ◽  
Cédric Arvieux ◽  
Javad Parvizi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Revision Surgery ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Individual Case ◽  
Gram Stain ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Gram Staining ◽  
Causative Microorganism ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections

Abstract. Introduction: Staphylococcus aureus is an independent risk factor for DAIR failure in patients with a late acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI). Therefore, identifying the causative microorganism in an acute setting may help to decide if revision surgery should be chosen as a first surgical approach in patients with additional risk factors for DAIR failure. The aim of our study was to determine the sensitivity of Gram staining in late acute S. aureus PJI.Material and methods: We retrospectively evaluated all consecutive patients between 2005-2015 who were diagnosed with late acute PJI due to S. aureus. Late acute PJI was defined as the development of acute symptoms and signs of PJI, at least three months after the index surgery. Symptoms existing for more than three weeks were excluded from the analysis. Gram staining was evaluated solely for synovial fluid.Results: A total of 52 cases were included in the analysis. Gram staining was positive with Gram positive cocci in clusters in 31 cases (59.6%). Patients with a C-reactive protein (CRP) > 150 mg/L at clinical presentation had a significantly higher rate of a positive Gram stain (30/39, 77%) compared to patients with a CRP ≤ 150 mg/L (4/10, 40%) (p=0.02). A positive Gram stain was not related to a higher failure rate (60.6% versus 57.9%, p 0.85).Conclusion: Gram staining may be a useful diagnostic tool in late acute PJI to identify S. aureus PJI. Whether a positive Gram stain should lead to revision surgery instead of DAIR should be determined per individual case.

Prosthetic Joint Infections

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Mabey ◽  
Hasan E. Baydoun ◽  
Jamil D. Bayram
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Prophylaxis ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Joint Fluid ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Joint Replacement Surgery ◽  
Fluid Analysis ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI), a complication of joint replacement surgery, presents with fever, joint pain, erythema, effusion, and joint loosening. Many advances have decreased the risk of infection, such as the use of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis and intraoperative laminar airflow. Joint fluid analysis should be pursued by the orthopedic surgeons; primary and acute care providers should consult the definitive care team and refer these patients for admission. Organisms causing prosthetic joint infections often grow in biofilms, which make them difficult to treat. Surgical treatment options include one or two-stage prosthesis exchange, debridement with retention of the prosthesis, resection arthroplasty, arthrodesis, or amputation. Antibiotic therapy should be guided by intraoperative cultures and selected in consultation with the infectious disease service.

scholarly journals Handling of Doubtful WBC Scintigraphies in Patients with Suspected Prosthetic Joint Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. 4031
Author(s):  
Chiara Lauri ◽  
Giancarlo Lauretti ◽  
Filippo Galli ◽  
Giuseppe Campagna ◽  
Simone Tetti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Analysis ◽  
Joint Infection ◽  
White Blood Cells ◽  
Final Diagnosis ◽  
Joint Infections ◽  
Prosthetic Joint ◽  
Prosthetic Joint Infections ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Despite the application of EANM recommendations for radiolabelled white-blood-cells (WBC) scintigraphy, some cases still remain doubtful based only on visual analysis. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of semi-quantitative analysis and bone marrow scan (BMS) in solving doubtful cases. We retrospectively evaluated all [99mTc]HMPAO-WBC scintigraphies performed, in the last 7 years, for a suspected monolateral prosthetic joint infection (PJI). In doubtful cases, we used five different thresholds of increase of target-to-background (T/B) ratio, between delayed and late images, as criteria of positivity (5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 30%). BMS were also analysed and sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of different methods were calculated according to final diagnosis. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were, respectively, 77.8%, 43.8% and 53.0% for the cut-off at 5%; 72.2%, 66.7% and 68.2% for the cut-off at 10%; 66.7%, 75.0% and 72.7% for the cut-off at 15%; 66.7%, 85.4% and 80.3% for the cut-off at 20%; 33.3%, 93.8% and 77.3% for the cut-off at 30%. BMS provided a significantly higher diagnostic performance than 5%, 10% and 15% thresholds. Conversely, we did not observe any statistically significant difference between BMS and the cut-off of more than 20%. Therefore, doubtful cases should be analysed semi-quantitatively. An increase in T/B ratio of more than 20% between delayed and late images, should be considered as a criterion of positivity, thus avoiding BMS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document