Abstract 5088: Glioblastoma stem cell-secreted exosomes can induce a tumor supportive M2 response

Author(s):  
Konrad Gabrusiewicz ◽  
Yuuri Hashimoto ◽  
Jun Wei ◽  
Maiti Sourindra ◽  
John Yu ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Rominiyi ◽  
A Vanderlinden ◽  
K Myers ◽  
N Gomez-Roman ◽  
D Dar ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Glioblastoma is the most common cancer arising within the brain. Despite surgery, followed by DNA-damaging chemoradiotherapy, average survival remains between 12-15 months. Unacceptable survival rates underline the need to develop preclinical research models which recapitulate features underpinning therapeutic resistance in patients, such as intratumoural heterogeneity and treatment resistant glioblastoma stem cell (GSC) subpopulations which demonstrate elevated DNA damage response (DDR) activity. Method Tumour specimens from patients were used to generate 2D and 3D scaffold-based GSC models, with a range of preclinical survival and molecular assays used to interrogate cancer biology and assess therapeutic responses. Result We have developed a ‘living biobank’ of 20+ ex-vivo GSC models which reflect key clinicopathological diversity. These models include residual disease models based on careful macrodissection of rare en-blocpartial lobectomy specimens to liberate parallel GSC lines from the tumour core and adjacent infiltrated brain, to represent cells typically left behind after surgery. Therapeutic strategies targeting fundamental DDR processes demonstrate preclinical efficacy, for example dual inhibition of ATR and the FA DNA damage repair pathways elicits profound radiosensitisation (sensitiser enhancement ratio of 3.23 (3.03-3.49, 95%-CI)) with evidence of delayed DNA damage repair on single-cell gel electrophoresis. Finally, characterisation of our surgically-relevant resected and residual models reveals numerous divergent properties including elevated stem cell marker expression in residual models (p=0.0021), which may partially explain treatment resistance in disease left behind after surgery. Conclusion Our living biobank represents a useful resource for preclinical glioblastoma research and demonstrates the value of partnership between surgeons and laboratory-based scientists. Take-home message Our living biobank represents a useful resource for preclinical glioblastoma research and demonstrates the value of partnership between surgeons and laboratory-based scientists.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 4011
Author(s):  
Brianna Chen ◽  
Dylan McCuaig-Walton ◽  
Sean Tan ◽  
Andrew P. Montgomery ◽  
Bryan W. Day ◽  
...  

Glioblastoma display vast cellular heterogeneity, with glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) at the apex. The critical role of GSCs in tumour growth and resistance to therapy highlights the need to delineate mechanisms that control stemness and differentiation potential of GSC. Dual-specificity tyrosine phosphorylation-regulated kinase 1A (DYRK1A) regulates neural progenitor cell differentiation, but its role in cancer stem cell differentiation is largely unknown. Herein, we demonstrate that DYRK1A kinase is crucial for the differentiation commitment of glioblastoma stem cells. DYRK1A inhibition insulates the self-renewing population of GSCs from potent differentiation-inducing signals. Mechanistically, we show that DYRK1A promotes differentiation and limits stemness acquisition via deactivation of CDK5, an unconventional kinase recently described as an oncogene. DYRK1A-dependent inactivation of CDK5 results in decreased expression of the stemness gene SOX2 and promotes the commitment of GSC to differentiate. Our investigations of the novel DYRK1A-CDK5-SOX2 pathway provide further insights into the mechanisms underlying glioblastoma stem cell maintenance.


2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qi Cui ◽  
Su Yang ◽  
Peng Ye ◽  
E. Tian ◽  
Guoqiang Sun ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 20 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii289-iii289
Author(s):  
V V V Hira ◽  
J R Wormer ◽  
H Kakar ◽  
B Breznik ◽  
B van der Swaan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (suppl_6) ◽  
pp. vi229-vi229
Author(s):  
Briana Prager ◽  
Qi Xie ◽  
Jeremy Rich

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 1069-1078 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christelle Bouchart ◽  
Anne‐Laure Trépant ◽  
Matthieu Hein ◽  
Dirk Van Gestel ◽  
Pieter Demetter

2017 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-246.e7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian B. Liau ◽  
Cem Sievers ◽  
Laura K. Donohue ◽  
Shawn M. Gillespie ◽  
William A. Flavahan ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document