Abstract 3321: Dysregulation of m6A RNA methylation regulators in colorectal cancer: Clinical implication as prognostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raju Kandimalla ◽  
Feng Gao ◽  
Chun Ruan ◽  
Michael Hsieh ◽  
Xin Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Implication ◽  
Therapeutic Targets ◽  
Prognostic Biomarkers ◽  
Rna Methylation ◽  
M6a Rna Methylation

scholarly journals Development and Validation of a Unique Gignature of Cancer Stemness-related Genes for Predicting the Overall survival of Colorectal Cancer Patients

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Wei ◽  
Jichuan Quan ◽  
Shuofeng Li ◽  
Zhao Lu ◽  
Xu Guan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Cancer Stemness ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Rna Methylation ◽  
M6a Rna Methylation

Abstract Background: Cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are characterized by self-renewal and plasticity, are highly correlated with tumor metastasis and drug resistance. To fully understand the role of CSCs in colorectal cancer (CRC), we evaluated the stemness traits and prognostic value of stemness-related genes in CRC.Methods: In this study, the data from 616 CRC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were assessed and subtyped based on the mRNA expression-based stemness index (mRNAsi). The correlations of cancer stemness with the immune microenvironment, tumor mutational burden (TMB) and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation regulators were analyzed. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to identify the crucial stemness-related genes and modules. Furthermore, a prognostic expression signature was constructed using Lasso-penalized Cox regression analysis. The signature was validated via multiplex immunofluorescence staining of tissue samples in an independent cohort of 48 CRC patients.Results: This study suggests that high mRNAsi scores are associated with poor overall survival in stage Ⅳ CRC patients. Moreover, the levels of TMB and m6A RNA methylation regulators were positively correlated with mRNAsi scores, and low mRNAsi scores were characterized by increased immune activity in CRC. The analysis identified 2 key modules and 34 key genes as prognosis-related candidate biomarkers. Finally, a 3-gene prognostic signature (PARPBP, KNSTRN and KIF2C) was explored together with specific clinical features to construct a nomogram, which was successfully validated in an external cohort. Conclusions: There is a unique correlation between CSCs and the prognosis of CRC patients, and the novel biomarkers related to cell stemness could accurately predict the clinical outcomes of these patients.

scholarly journals Integrative Analysis of Biomarkers Through Machine Learning Identifies Stemness Features in Colorectal Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Wei ◽  
Jichuan Quan ◽  
Shuofeng Li ◽  
Hengchang Liu ◽  
Xu Guan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Poor Overall Survival ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
Rna Methylation ◽  
M6a Rna Methylation ◽  
Highly Correlated

Background: Cancer stem cells (CSCs), which are characterized by self-renewal and plasticity, are highly correlated with tumor metastasis and drug resistance. To fully understand the role of CSCs in colorectal cancer (CRC), we evaluated the stemness traits and prognostic value of stemness-related genes in CRC.Methods: In this study, the data from 616 CRC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were assessed and subtyped based on the mRNA expression-based stemness index (mRNAsi). The correlations of cancer stemness with the immune microenvironment, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation regulators were analyzed. Weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) was performed to identify the crucial stemness-related genes and modules. Furthermore, a prognostic expression signature was constructed using the Lasso-penalized Cox regression analysis. The signature was validated via multiplex immunofluorescence staining of tissue samples in an independent cohort of 48 CRC patients.Results: This study suggests that high-mRNAsi scores are associated with poor overall survival in stage IV CRC patients. Moreover, the levels of TMB and m6A RNA methylation regulators were positively correlated with mRNAsi scores, and low-mRNAsi scores were characterized by increased immune activity in CRC. The analysis identified 34 key genes as candidate prognosis biomarkers. Finally, a three-gene prognostic signature (PARPBP, KNSTRN, and KIF2C) was explored together with specific clinical features to construct a nomogram, which was successfully validated in an external cohort.Conclusion: There is a unique correlation between CSCs and the prognosis of CRC patients, and the novel biomarkers related to cell stemness could accurately predict the clinical outcomes of these patients.

scholarly journals Construction and Analysis of a Colorectal Cancer Prognostic Model Based on N6-Methyladenosine-Related lncRNAs

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanqian Zeng ◽  
Yiying Xu ◽  
Shiwen Xu ◽  
Linli Jin ◽  
Yanyan Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Clinical Staging ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Lymph Node Status ◽  
Rna Methylation ◽  
M6a Rna Methylation ◽  
Cancer Tissues

Given the relatively poor understanding of the expression and functional effects of the N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methylation on colorectal cancer (CRC), we attempted to measure its prognostic value and clinical significance. We comprehensively screened 37 m6A-related prognostic long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) with significant differences in expression based on 21 acknowledged regulators of m6A modification and data on 473 colorectal cancer tissues and 41 para-cancer tissues obtained from the TCGA database. Accordingly, we classified 473 CRC patients into two clusters by consensus clustering on the basis of significantly different survival outcomes. We also found a potential correlation between m6A-related prognostic lncRNAs and BRAF-KRAS expression, as well as immune cell infiltration. Then, we established a prognostic model by selecting 16 m6A-related prognostic lncRNAs via LASSO Cox analysis and grouped the CRC patients into low- and high-risk groups to calculate risk scores. Then, we performed stratified sampling to validate and confirm our model by categorising the 473 samples into a training group (N = 208) and a testing group (N = 205) in a 1:1 ratio. The survival curve showed a distinct clinical outcome in the low- and high-risk subgroups. We reconfirmed the reliability and independence of the prognostic model through various measures: risk curve, heat map and univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. To ensure that the outcomes were applicable to clinical settings, we performed stratified analyses on different clinical features, such as age, lymph node status and clinical stage. CRC patients with downregulated m6A-related gene expression, lower immune score, distant metastasis, lymph node metastasis or more advanced clinical staging had higher risk scores, indicating less-desirable outcomes. Moreover, we explored the immunology of colorectal cancer cells. The risk score showed positive correlations with eosinophils, M2 macrophages and neutrophils. In summary, our effort revealed the significance of m6A RNA methylation regulators in colorectal cancer, and the prognostic model we constructed may be used as an essential reference for predicting the outcome of CRC patients.

scholarly journals Bioinformatics analysis of C3 and CXCR4 demonstrates their potential as prognostic biomarkers in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Quan ◽  
Yuchen Bai ◽  
Yunbei Yang ◽  
Er Lei Han ◽  
Hong Bai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Therapeutic Targets ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Prognostic Biomarkers ◽  
Hub Genes ◽  
Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Upregulated Genes

Abstract Background The molecular prognostic biomarkers of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are still unknown. We aimed at researching the candidate biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets of ccRCC. Methods Three ccRCC expression microarray datasets (include GSE14762, GSE66270 and GSE53757) were downloaded from the gene expression omnibus (GEO) database. The differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between ccRCC and normal tissues were explored. The potential functions of identified DEGs were analyzed by Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). And then the protein - protein interaction network (PPI) was established to screen the hub genes. After that, the expressions of hub genes were identified by the oncomine database. The hub genes’ prognostic values of patients with ccRCC were analyzed by GEPIA database. Results A total of 137 DEGs were identified by utilizing the limma package and RRA method, including 63 upregulated genes and 74 downregulated genes. It is found that 137 DEGs were mainly enriched in 82 functional terms and 24 pathways in accordance with the research results. Thirteen highest-scoring genes were screened as hub genes (include 10 upregulated genes and 3 downregulated candidate genes) by utilizing the PPI network and module analysis. Through integrating the oncoming database and GEPIA database, the author found that C3 and CXCR4 are not only overexpressed in ccRCC, but also associated with the prognosis of ccRCC. Further results could reveal that patients with high C3 expression had a poor overall survival (OS), while patients with high CTSS and TLR3 expressions had a good OS; patients with high C3 and CXCR4 expressions had a poor disease-free survival (DFS), while ccRCC patients with high TLR3 expression had a good DFS. Conclusion These findings suggested that C3 and CXCR4 were the candidate biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets of ccRCC patients.

scholarly journals The m6A RNA methylation regulates oncogenic signaling pathways driving cell malignant transformation and carcinogenesis

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Burhan Uddin ◽  
Zhishan Wang ◽  
Chengfeng Yang
Keyword(s):  
Signaling Pathways ◽  
Malignant Transformation ◽  
Noncoding Rna ◽  
Rna Modification ◽  
Oncogenic Signaling ◽  
Aberrant Expression ◽  
Rna Methylation ◽  
Rna Molecules ◽  
M6a Rna Methylation ◽  
Oncogenic Signaling Pathways

AbstractThe m6A RNA methylation is the most prevalent internal modification in mammalian mRNAs which plays critical biological roles by regulating vital cellular processes. Dysregulations of the m6A modification due to aberrant expression of its regulatory proteins are frequently observed in many pathological conditions, particularly in cancer. Normal cells undergo malignant transformation via activation or modulation of different oncogenic signaling pathways through complex mechanisms. Accumulating evidence showing regulation of oncogenic signaling pathways at the epitranscriptomic level has added an extra layer of the complexity. In particular, recent studies demonstrated that, in many types of cancers various oncogenic signaling pathways are modulated by the m6A modification in the target mRNAs as well as noncoding RNA transcripts. m6A modifications in these RNA molecules control their fate and metabolism by regulating their stability, translation or subcellular localizations. In this review we discussed recent exciting studies on oncogenic signaling pathways that are modulated by the m6A RNA modification and/or their regulators in cancer and provided perspectives for further studies. The regulation of oncogenic signaling pathways by the m6A modification and its regulators also render them as potential druggable targets for the treatment of cancer.

Predictive and prognostic biomarkers with therapeutic targets in colorectal cancer: A 2021 update on current development, evidence, and recommendation

2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522110055
Author(s):  
Clement Chung
Keyword(s):  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Therapeutic Targets ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Prognostic Biomarkers ◽  
Her2 Gene ◽  
Braf Mutations ◽  
Therapeutic Implications ◽  
Molecular Alterations

Although therapeutically actionable molecular alterations are widely distributed across many cancer types, only a handful of them show evidence of clinical utility and are recommended for routine clinical practice in the management of cancers of colon and rectum (CRC). This 2021 update aims to provide a succinct summary on the use of prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers (expanded RAS, BRAF, microsatellite-high [MSI-H] or deficient mismatch repair [dMMR], neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase [ NTRK] fusion genes, and human epidermal growth factor receptor type II [ HER2] gene amplification) associated with CRC. Therapeutic implications of each relevant predictive or prognostic biomarker for patients with CRC are described, along with discussion on new developments on (1) biomarker-driven therapies such as testing of BRAF, MLH1 promoter methylation and MMR germline genes in differentiating sporadic CRC or hereditary conditions such as Lynch syndrome; (2) first-line use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic CRC; (3) risk stratification and therapy selection based on primary tumor location (left-sided vs. right-sided colon cancer); (3) atypical BRAF mutations; (4) use of EGFR directed therapy in the perioperative oligometastatic disease setting; (5) re-challenge of EGFR directed therapy and (6) personalizing therapy of fluoropyrimidine and irinotecan based on new evidence in pharmacogenomic testing. Data are collected and analyzed from available systematic reviews and meta-analyses of treatments with known therapeutic targets in CRC, which may be associated with predictive and/or prognostic biomarkers. Discussions are presented in an application-based format, with goal to empower pharmacists or other clinicians to gain awareness and understanding in biomarker-driven cancer therapy issues.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document