Abstract P3-09-14: Regulation of gene expression and DNA methylation with cytotoxic T lymphocytes evaluation in subtypes of breast cancers

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan(Daisy) Shen ◽  
Chi-Ren Shyu ◽  
Jonathan B. Mitchem ◽  
Yifeng Shi ◽  
Ayesha N. Shajahan-Haq
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
T Lymphocytes ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocytes ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Breast Cancers

scholarly journals DNA methylation and regulation of gene expression: Guardian of our health

The Nucleus ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurab Aditya Dhar ◽  
Shagnik Saha ◽  
Parama Mitra ◽  
Ronita Nag Chaudhuri
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression

scholarly journals TET2 coactivates gene expression through demethylation of enhancers

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (11) ◽  
pp. eaau6986 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lu Wang ◽  
Patrick A. Ozark ◽  
Edwin R. Smith ◽  
Zibo Zhao ◽  
Stacy A. Marshall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Estrogen Receptor Α ◽  
Dna Demethylation ◽  
Estrogen Response ◽  
Dna Base ◽  
Modified Dna ◽  
Global Increase ◽  
Methylation Patterns

The tet methylcytosine dioxygenase 2 (TET2) enzyme catalyzes the conversion of the modified DNA base 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine. TET2 is frequently mutated or dysregulated in multiple human cancers, and loss of TET2 is associated with changes in DNA methylation patterns. Here, using newly developed TET2-specific antibodies and the estrogen response as a model system for studying the regulation of gene expression, we demonstrate that endogenous TET2 occupies active enhancers and facilitates the proper recruitment of estrogen receptor α (ERα). Knockout of TET2 by CRISPR-CAS9 leads to a global increase of DNA methylation at enhancers, resulting in attenuation of the estrogen response. We further identified a positive feedback loop between TET2 and ERα, which further requires MLL3 COMPASS at these enhancers. Together, this study reveals an epigenetic axis coordinating a transcriptional program through enhancer activation via DNA demethylation.

Epigenetic aspects of triple-negative in patients with breast cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1041-1041
Author(s):  
Joaquina Martínez-Galan ◽  
Sandra Rios ◽  
Juan Ramon Delgado ◽  
Blanca Torres-Torres ◽  
Jesus Lopez-Peñalver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtype ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Breast Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Luminal A ◽  
Cancer Subtypes ◽  
Luminal B

1041 Background: Identification of gene expression-based breast cancer subtypes is considered a critical means of prognostication. Genetic mutations along with epigenetic alterations contribute to gene-expression changes occurring in breast cancer. However, the reproducibility of differential DNA methylation discoveries for cancer and the relationship between DNA methylation and aberrant gene expression have not been systematically analysed. The present study was undertaken to dissect the breast cancer methylome and to deliver specific epigenotypes associated with particular breast cancer subtypes. Methods: By using Real Time QMSPCR SYBR green we analyzed DNA methylation in regulatory regions of 107 pts with breast cancer and analyzed association with prognostics factor in triple negative breast cancer and methylation promoter ESR1, APC, E-Cadherin, Rar B and 14-3-3 sigma. Results: We identified novel subtype-specific epigenotypes that clearly demonstrate the differences in the methylation profiles of basal-like and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing tumors. Of the cases, 37pts (40%) were Luminal A (LA), 32pts (33%) Luminal B (LB), 14pts (15%) Triple-negative (TN), and 9pts (10%) HER2+. DNA hypermethylation was highly inversely correlated with the down-regulation of gene expression. Methylation of this panel of promoter was found more frequently in triple negative and HER2 phenotype. ESR1 was preferably associated with TN(80%) and HER2+(60%) subtype. With a median follow up of 6 years, we found worse overall survival (OS) with more frequent ESR1 methylation gene(p>0.05), Luminal A;ESR1 Methylation OS at 5 years 81% vs 93% when was ESR1 Unmethylation. Luminal B;ESR1 Methylation 86% SG at 5 years vs 92% in Unmethylation ESR1. Triple negative;ESR1 Methylation SG at 5 years 75% vs 80% in unmethylation ESR1. HER2;ESR1 Methylation SG at 5 years was 66.7% vs 75% in unmethylation ESR1. Conclusions: Our results provide evidence that well-defined DNA methylation profiles enable breast cancer subtype prediction and support the utilization of this biomarker for prognostication and therapeutic stratification of patients with breast cancer.

Regulation of gene expression by DNA methylation with cytotoxic T lymphocytes evaluation in consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
Yuanyuan Shen ◽  
Justin Hummel ◽  
Isabel Cristina Trindade ◽  
Christos Papageorgiou ◽  
Chi-Ren Shyu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Molecular Subtypes ◽  
Epigenetic Modification ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
The Cancer Genome Atlas ◽  
Highly Correlated

25 Background: Low cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTLs) infiltration in colorectal cancer (CRC) tumors is a challenge to treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Consensus molecular subtypes (CMS) classify patients based on tumor attributes, and CMS1 patients include the majority of patients with high CTL infiltration and “inflamed” tumors. Epigenetic modification plays a critical role in gene expression and therapy resistance. Therefore, in this study we compared DNA methylation, gene expression, and CTL infiltration of CMS1 patients to other CMS groups to determine targets for improving immunotherapy in CRC. Methods: RNA-seq (n = 511) and DNA methylation (n = 316) from The Cancer Genome Atlas databases were used to determine gene expression and methylation profiles based on CMSs. CMS1 was used as a reference and compared to other subtypes (CMS2-4). Microenvironment Cell Populations- counter (MCPcounter) was used to determine tumor CTL infiltration. Genes with significantly different expression (p < 0.01, LogFC≥|1.5|) and difference of mean methylation β value ≥|0.25| were integrated for Pearson correlation coefficient analysis with MCPcounter score (r > |0.7|). Results: Comparing CMS1 and CMS2, ARHGAP9, TBX21, and LAG3 were differentially methylated and correlated with CTL scores. ARHGAP9 and TBX21 were decreased and hypomethylated in CMS2. Comparing CMS1 and CMS3, ARHGAP9, TBX21, FMNL1, HLA-DPB1, and STX11 were downregulated in CMS3 and highly correlated with CTL scores. ARHGAP9, FMNL1, HLA-DPB1, and STX11 were hypomethylated in CMS3 and TBX21 was methylated in both, but had a higher methylation ratio in CMS1. Comparing CMS1 and CMS4, TBX21 was the only gene downregulated, hypomethylated, and highly correlated with CTL scores in CMS4 patients. Conclusions: We found six genes differentially expressed, differentially methylated, and highly correlated with CTL infiltration when comparing CMS1 to other CMS groups. Specifically, TBX21 was the only gene highly correlated with CTL scores with differential gene expression and methylation in CMS2-4 when compared to CMS1. Thus, T-bet may be a critical regulator of T cell responses in CRC.

scholarly journals CG gene body DNA methylation changes and evolution of duplicated genes in cassava

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (44) ◽  
pp. 13729-13734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haifeng Wang ◽  
Getu Beyene ◽  
Jixian Zhai ◽  
Suhua Feng ◽  
Noah Fahlgren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Copy ◽  
Gene Body ◽  
Duplicated Genes ◽  
Gene Body Methylation ◽  
Substantial Impact ◽  
Tropical Regions

DNA methylation is important for the regulation of gene expression and the silencing of transposons in plants. Here we present genome-wide methylation patterns at single-base pair resolution for cassava (Manihot esculenta, cultivar TME 7), a crop with a substantial impact in the agriculture of subtropical and tropical regions. On average, DNA methylation levels were higher in all three DNA sequence contexts (CG, CHG, and CHH, where H equals A, T, or C) than those of the most well-studied model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. As in other plants, DNA methylation was found both on transposons and in the transcribed regions (bodies) of many genes. Consistent with these patterns, at least one cassava gene copy of all of the known components of Arabidopsis DNA methylation pathways was identified. Methylation of LTR transposons (GYPSY and COPIA) was found to be unusually high compared with other types of transposons, suggesting that the control of the activity of these two types of transposons may be especially important. Analysis of duplicated gene pairs resulting from whole-genome duplication showed that gene body DNA methylation and gene expression levels have coevolved over short evolutionary time scales, reinforcing the positive relationship between gene body methylation and high levels of gene expression. Duplicated genes with the most divergent gene body methylation and expression patterns were found to have distinct biological functions and may have been under natural or human selection for cassava traits.

scholarly journals Identifying causal models between genetically regulated methylation patterns and gene expression in healthy colon tissue

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Díez-Villanueva ◽  
Mireia Jordà ◽  
Robert Carreras-Torres ◽  
Henar Alonso ◽  
David Cordero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Quantitative Trait Loci ◽  
Genetic Variants ◽  
Quantitative Trait ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Colon Tissue ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Trait Loci

Abstract Background DNA methylation is involved in the regulation of gene expression and phenotypic variation, but the inter-relationship between genetic variation, DNA methylation and gene expression remains poorly understood. Here we combine the analysis of genetic variants related to methylation markers (methylation quantitative trait loci: mQTLs) and gene expression (expression quantitative trait loci: eQTLs) with methylation markers related to gene expression (expression quantitative trait methylation: eQTMs), to provide novel insights into the genetic/epigenetic architecture of colocalizing molecular markers. Results Normal mucosa from 100 patients with colon cancer and 50 healthy donors included in the Colonomics project have been analyzed. Linear models have been used to find mQTLs and eQTMs within 1 Mb of the target gene. From 32,446 eQTLs previously detected, we found a total of 6850 SNPs, 114 CpGs and 52 genes interrelated, generating 13,987 significant combinations of co-occurring associations (meQTLs) after Bonferromi correction. Non-redundant meQTLs were 54, enriched in genes involved in metabolism of glucose and xenobiotics and immune system. SNPs in meQTLs were enriched in regulatory elements (enhancers and promoters) compared to random SNPs within 1 Mb of genes. Three colorectal cancer GWAS SNPs were related to methylation changes, and four SNPs were related to chemerin levels. Bayesian networks have been used to identify putative causal relationships among associated SNPs, CpG and gene expression triads. We identified that most of these combinations showed the canonical pathway of methylation markers causes gene expression variation (60.1%) or non-causal relationship between methylation and gene expression (33.9%); however, in up to 6% of these combinations, gene expression was causing variation in methylation markers. Conclusions In this study we provided a characterization of the regulation between genetic variants and inter-dependent methylation markers and gene expression in a set of 150 healthy colon tissue samples. This is an important finding for the understanding of molecular susceptibility on colon-related complex diseases.

scholarly journals Dynamics of DNA Methylation and Its Functions in Plant Growth and Development

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh Kumar ◽  
Trilochan Mohapatra
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Developmental Process ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Biotic Stresses ◽  
Epigenome Editing ◽  
Dna Base

Epigenetic modifications in DNA bases and histone proteins play important roles in the regulation of gene expression and genome stability. Chemical modification of DNA base (e.g., addition of a methyl group at the fifth carbon of cytosine residue) switches on/off the gene expression during developmental process and environmental stresses. The dynamics of DNA base methylation depends mainly on the activities of the writer/eraser guided by non-coding RNA (ncRNA) and regulated by the developmental/environmental cues. De novo DNA methylation and active demethylation activities control the methylation level and regulate the gene expression. Identification of ncRNA involved in de novo DNA methylation, increased DNA methylation proteins guiding DNA demethylase, and methylation monitoring sequence that helps maintaining a balance between DNA methylation and demethylation is the recent developments that may resolve some of the enigmas. Such discoveries provide a better understanding of the dynamics/functions of DNA base methylation and epigenetic regulation of growth, development, and stress tolerance in crop plants. Identification of epigenetic pathways in animals, their existence/orthologs in plants, and functional validation might improve future strategies for epigenome editing toward climate-resilient, sustainable agriculture in this era of global climate change. The present review discusses the dynamics of DNA methylation (cytosine/adenine) in plants, its functions in regulating gene expression under abiotic/biotic stresses, developmental processes, and genome stability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document