Tumor Microenvironment-Derived R-spondins Enhance Anti-Tumor Immunity to Suppress Tumor Growth and Sensitize for Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy

2021 ◽  
pp. candisc.0833.2020
Author(s):  
Yuting Tang ◽  
Qian Xu ◽  
Liang Hu ◽  
Xiaomei Yan ◽  
Xiaomin Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Tumor Immunity ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade

scholarly journals A TLR4 agonist improves immune checkpoint blockade treatment by increasing the ratio of effector to regulatory cells within the tumor microenvironment

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Farias ◽  
A. Soto ◽  
F. Puttur ◽  
C. J. Goldin ◽  
S. Sosa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Therapeutic Effect ◽  
Immune Cells ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Regulatory Cells ◽  
Ifn Γ

AbstractBrucella lumazine synthase (BLS) is a homodecameric protein that activates dendritic cells via toll like receptor 4, inducing the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. We have previously shown that BLS has a therapeutic effect in B16 melanoma-bearing mice only when administered at early stages of tumor growth. In this work, we study the mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effect of BLS, by analyzing the tumor microenvironment. Administration of BLS at early stages of tumor growth induces high levels of serum IFN-γ, as well as an increment of hematopoietic immune cells within the tumor. Moreover, BLS-treatment increases the ratio of effector to regulatory cells. However, all treated mice eventually succumb to the tumors. Therefore, we combined BLS administration with anti-PD-1 treatment. Combined treatment increases the outcome of both monotherapies. In conclusion, we show that the absence of the therapeutic effect at late stages of tumor growth correlates with low levels of serum IFN-γ and lower infiltration of immune cells in the tumor, both of which are essential to delay tumor growth. Furthermore, the combined treatment of BLS and PD-1 blockade shows that BLS could be exploited as an essential immunomodulator in combination therapy with an immune checkpoint blockade to treat skin cancer.

Targeting the tumor microenvironment to overcome immune checkpoint blockade therapy resistance

2020 ◽  
Vol 220 ◽  
pp. 88-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaqi Li ◽  
Jing Liu ◽  
Long Gao ◽  
Yuan Liu ◽  
Fang Meng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Therapy Resistance ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade

Sequential and Timely Combination of a Cancer Nanovaccine with Immune Checkpoint Blockade Effectively Inhibits Tumor Growth and Relapse

2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (34) ◽  
pp. 14628-14638
Author(s):  
Yujin Kim ◽  
Sukmo Kang ◽  
Hocheol Shin ◽  
Taewoo Kim ◽  
Byeongjun Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade

scholarly journals Sensitization to immune checkpoint blockade through activation of a STAT1/NK axis in the tumor microenvironment

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (501) ◽  
pp. eaav7816 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachael M. Zemek ◽  
Emma De Jong ◽  
Wee Loong Chin ◽  
Iona S. Schuster ◽  
Vanessa S. Fear ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Nk Cells ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Signature ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Poly I:C ◽  
Mouse Strains

Cancer immunotherapy using antibodies that target immune checkpoints has delivered outstanding results. However, responses only occur in a subset of patients, and it is not fully understood what biological processes determine an effective outcome. This lack of understanding hinders the development of rational combination treatments. We set out to define the pretreatment microenvironment associated with an effective outcome by using the fact that inbred mouse strains bearing monoclonal cancer cell line–derived tumors respond in a dichotomous manner to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). We compared the cellular composition and gene expression profiles of responsive and nonresponsive tumors from mice before ICB and validated the findings in cohorts of patients with cancer treated with ICB antibodies. We found that responsive tumors were characterized by an inflammatory gene expression signature consistent with up-regulation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) and Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3) signaling and down-regulation of interleukin-10 (IL-10) signaling. In addition, responsive tumors had more infiltrating-activated natural killer (NK) cells, which were necessary for response. Pretreatment of mice with large established tumors using the STAT1-activating cytokine interferon-γ (IFNγ), the TLR3 ligand poly(I:C), and an anti–IL-10 antibody sensitized tumors to ICB by attracting IFNγ-producing NK cells into the tumor, resulting in increased cure rates. Our results identify a pretreatment tumor microenvironment that predicts response to ICB, which can be therapeutically attained. These data suggest a biomarker-driven approach to patient management to establish whether a patient would benefit from treatment with sensitizing therapeutics before ICB.

SOX2 as a target for immunotherapy of pediatric gliomas.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22012-e22012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Vasquez ◽  
Anita Huttner ◽  
Lin Zhang ◽  
Asher Marks ◽  
Amy Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cells ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Tumor Immunity ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Glial Tumors

e22012 Background: New treatments are needed to improve outcomes for pediatric gliomas. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are effective therapies in tumors with a high mutation burden that express multiple neo-antigens. However, for pediatric tumors that carry few mutations, there is a need to identify new antigenic targets of anti-tumor immunity. SOX2 is an embryonal stem cell antigen implicated in the biology of glioma initiating cells. Expression of SOX2 by pediatric glial tumors, and the capacity of the immune system in these patients to recognize SOX2, has not been studied. Methods: We examined the expression of SOX2 on paraffin-embedded tissue from pediatric glial tumors (n = 30). The presence of T cell immunity to SOX2 was examined in both blood and tumor-infiltrating T cells using antigen-dependent cytokine and T cell proliferation assays (n = 15). The nature of tumor-infiltrating immune cells in glial tumors (n = 4) was analyzed using single cell mass cytometry. Results: SOX2 is expressed by tumor cells but not surrounding normal tissue in all low grade gliomas (n = 15), high grade gliomas (n = 7), ependymomas (n = 3) and in 60% of oligodendrogliomas (n = 5). T cells against SOX2 can be detected in blood and tumor tissue in 33% of patients. CD4 and CD8 tumor infiltrating T-cells display a higher proportion of PD-1 expression compared to circulating T cells (p < 0.05). Glial CD4 and CD8 T cells are enriched for tissue resident memory phenotype (TRM; CD45RO+, CD69+, CCR7-) and the expression of PD-1 is primarily on these TRM cells (p < 0.05). A subset of CD4 and CD8 TRM cells also co-express multiple inhibitory checkpoints including PD-L1 and TIGIT. Glial tumors also contain NK cells with reduced expression of lytic granzyme (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our data demonstrate in vivo immunogenicity of SOX2, which is specifically overexpressed on pediatric glial tumor cells. Our data also suggest that the TRM subset of tumor-infiltrating T cells may be key targets for immune checkpoint blockade, and harnessing tumor immunity will likely require the combined targeting of multiple inhibitory checkpoints. Future efforts to target SOX2 with dendritic cell vaccines combined with immune checkpoint blockade could provide effective tumor immunity and improve outcomes in pediatric brain tumors.

Veristrat based stratification of responses to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20512-e20512
Author(s):  
Paul R. Walker ◽  
Nitika Sharma ◽  
Chipman Robert Geoffrey Stroud ◽  
Mahvish Muzaffar ◽  
Cynthia R. Cherry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Microenvironment ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Surveillance ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Clinicopathologic Characteristics ◽  
Metastatic Nsclc ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

e20512 Background: Veristrat (Biodesix, Boulder, CO) is a blood based proteomic assay that is dominated by inflammatory proteins and is prognostic and predictive in metastatic NSCLC after treatment with platinum based chemotherapy (Gregorc et al, Lancet 2014). Smoldering inflammation in the tumor microenvironment regulates and escalates cancer invasion, angiogenesis and immune surveillance escape (Balkwill and Mantovani, Lancet 2001). There is preclinical evidence to suggest that the tumor microenvironment can be altered with immunomodulatory interventions (Martino et al, 2016). While immune checkpoint blockade has shown durable benefit in metastatic NSCLC, the response rates still hover around 20%. As a result, identification of predictive biomarkers are of critical importance. The predictive value of the Veristrat assay with respect to ICB is poorly defined. Methods: At our institution, 83 pts with metastatic lung cancer pts were treated with nivolumab between 6/2015 to 12/2016. The following clinicopathologic characteristics were abstracted from medical records: tumor histology, Veristrat status, no. of doses of nivolumab, irAEs and overall survival. Results: Of the 83 pts, 65 pts were found to have NSCLC. Veristrat status was available for 17/65 of these pts. Nine pts were identified to have “Veristrat good” and seven pts were “Veristrat poor”. Median number of nivolumab doses was 4. Median survival for all patients was 30 weeks. Median survival was 20 weeks for “Veristrat poor” and 26 weeks for “Veristrat good”(p = 0.68). Grade 3-4 irAEs were noted in 5/9 patients with “Veristrat good” and 5/7 patients with “Veristrat poor”. Conclusions: “Veristrat poor” pts treated with ICB have a lower median survival as compared to “Veristrat good” pts. Our study did not meet statistically significant end point due to limited sample size. Further studies are needed to identify poorly immunogenic tumors and develop novel treatment approaches to optimize outcomes. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document