A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between MTHFR Gene A1298C Polymorphism and the Risk of Adult Stroke

2014 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 425-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming-Jie Zhang ◽  
Zi-Cheng Hu ◽  
Yan-Wei Yin ◽  
Bing-Hu Li ◽  
Yun Liu ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hailong Su ◽  
Guo Zhang

Background: The correlation between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains controversial. Objectives: We performed this study to better assess the relationship between MTHFR gene polymorphisms and the likelihood of HCC. Methods: A systematic research of PubMed, Medline, and Embase was performed to retrieve relevant articles. ORs and 95% CIs were calculated. Results: A total of 15 studies with 8,378 participants were analyzed. In overall analyses, a significant association with the likelihood of HCC was detected for the rs1801131 polymorphism with fixed-effect models (FEMs) in recessive comparison (p = 0.002, OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43–0.82). However, no positive results were detected for the rs1801133 polymorphism in any comparison. Further subgroup analyses revealed that the rs1801131 polymorphism was significantly associated with the likelihood of HCC in Asians with both FEMs (recessive model: p < 0.0001, OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.29–0.62; allele model: p = 0.004, OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.06–1.35) and random-effect models (recessive model: p = 0.002, OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.29–0.75). Nevertheless, we failed to detect any significant correlation between the rs1801133 polymorphism and HCC. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that the rs1801131 polymorphism may serve as a genetic biomarker of HCC in Asians.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vandana Rai

AbstractMethylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is a crucial enzyme involved in homocysteine/methionone metabolism. It catalyzes the conversion of 5,10methlenetetrahydrofolate in to 5methyltetrahydrofolate. A number of studies have examined the association of MTHFR A1298C polymorphism as risk factor for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but the results were contradictory. To clarify the influence of MTHFR A1298C polymorphism on Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a meta-analysis of ten case-control studies was carried out. Four electronic databases were searched up to August, 2019 for suitable articles. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to evaluate the association. All statistical analyses were performed by MetaAnalyst program.The results of meta-analysis suggested that except allele contrast model, A1298C polymorphism is not risk for Alzheimer’s disease using overall comparisons in three genetic models (C vs. A: OR= 1.26, 95%CI= 0.912-1.76, p= 0.04; CC+AC vs. AA: OR= 1.43; 95%CI= 0.85-2.44; p=0.05; CC vs. AA: OR= 1.16, 95%CI= .88-1.55, p= 0.51; AC vs. AA: 1.55; 95%CI= 0.81-2.93,p=0.07). Publication bias was absent in all five genetic models. In conclusion, results of present meta-analysis showed no significant association between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and AD risk.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vandana Rai

AbstractRecent epidemiological studies have reported association between methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene polymorphisms and lung cancer. The aim of the present study to perform a meta-analysis of published studies to validate the association between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and risk of lung cancer.PubMed, Springer Link, Science Direct and Google Scholar databases were searched for eligible studies. Of the 78 initially identified studies, 11 case–control studies with 5,996 patients and 7,404 healthy controls were finally included in the present meta-analysis. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the association, and all statistical analyses were performed using MIX software (version 1.7).No statistically significant associations were found between the MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and lung cancer risk in the additive/ allele contrast, co-dominant/heterozygote, homozygote, dominant and recessive genetic models (C vs. A: OR= 0.95, 95% CI= 0.83-1.08; CC vs. AA: OR= 1.13, 95% CI= 0.83-1.5; AC vs. AA: OR= 0.86, 95% CI= 0.70-1.02; AC+CC vs. AA: OR= 0.89, 95% CI= 0.75-1.05; CC vs. AA+AC: OR= 1.20, 95% CI= 0.89-1.40). Significant heterogeneity between individual studies was evident in all five models. In conclusion, present meta-analysis results indicated that there is no significant association between MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and risk of lung cancer.


2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 493-498 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAWEI LI ◽  
TIAN TIAN ◽  
CHUNHUI GUO ◽  
JUCHAO REN ◽  
LEI YAN ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vandana Rai

Objective: Methyleneterahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) A1298C polymorphism has been reported a risk factor for nonsyndromic cleft/palate (NSCL/P) in several published articles but results were inconclusive. To confirm the association between maternal MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and NSCL/P risk, a meta-analysis was conducted. Method: Case control articles for maternal MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and NSCL/P risk were identified by search of databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, Elsevier and Springer Link for the period up to December, 2013. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to assess the association. Results: Meta-analysis of ten included studies showed that there was no significant association between maternal MTHFR A1298C polymorphism and risk of NSCL/P under five genetic models (for C versus A, OR= 1.007, 95 % CI= 0.89-1.13, P=0.90; for CC versus AA, OR=0.851, 95 % CI = 0.63-1.15, P=0.30.; for AC versus AA, OR= 1.033, 95 % CI= 0.88-1.21, P= 0.69; for CC+AC versus AA, OR= 1.005, 95 % CI= 0.86-1.17, P=0.94; for CC versus AC+AA, OR= 0.86, 95 % CI= 0.64-1.15, P= 0.32). Conclusion: In conclusion, results of present meta-analysis demonstrate that maternal MTHFR A1298C polymorphism may not be a risk factor for developing NSCL/P in offspring. Further studies with large sample sizes are needed to evaluate the association of maternal MTHFR A1298C polymorphism with NSCL/P in more detail. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v6i1.10281 Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.6(1) 2015 16-21


VASA ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Hanji Zhang ◽  
Dexin Yin ◽  
Yue Zhao ◽  
Yezhou Li ◽  
Dejiang Yao ◽  
...  

Summary: Our meta-analysis focused on the relationship between homocysteine (Hcy) level and the incidence of aneurysms and looked at the relationship between smoking, hypertension and aneurysms. A systematic literature search of Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase databases (up to March 31, 2020) resulted in the identification of 19 studies, including 2,629 aneurysm patients and 6,497 healthy participants. Combined analysis of the included studies showed that number of smoking, hypertension and hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy) in aneurysm patients was higher than that in the control groups, and the total plasma Hcy level in aneurysm patients was also higher. These findings suggest that smoking, hypertension and HHcy may be risk factors for the development and progression of aneurysms. Although the heterogeneity of meta-analysis was significant, it was found that the heterogeneity might come from the difference between race and disease species through subgroup analysis. Large-scale randomized controlled studies of single species and single disease species are needed in the future to supplement the accuracy of the results.


2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 157-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip L. Roth ◽  
Allen I. Huffcutt

The topic of what interviews measure has received a great deal of attention over the years. One line of research has investigated the relationship between interviews and the construct of cognitive ability. A previous meta-analysis reported an overall corrected correlation of .40 ( Huffcutt, Roth, & McDaniel, 1996 ). A more recent meta-analysis reported a noticeably lower corrected correlation of .27 ( Berry, Sackett, & Landers, 2007 ). After reviewing both meta-analyses, it appears that the two studies posed different research questions. Further, there were a number of coding judgments in Berry et al. that merit review, and there was no moderator analysis for educational versus employment interviews. As a result, we reanalyzed the work by Berry et al. and found a corrected correlation of .42 for employment interviews (.15 higher than Berry et al., a 56% increase). Further, educational interviews were associated with a corrected correlation of .21, supporting their influence as a moderator. We suggest a better estimate of the correlation between employment interviews and cognitive ability is .42, and this takes us “back to the future” in that the better overall estimate of the employment interviews – cognitive ability relationship is roughly .40. This difference has implications for what is being measured by interviews and their incremental validity.


2018 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 303-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jedidiah Siev ◽  
Shelby E. Zuckerman ◽  
Joseph J. Siev

Abstract. In a widely publicized set of studies, participants who were primed to consider unethical events preferred cleansing products more than did those primed with ethical events ( Zhong & Liljenquist, 2006 ). This tendency to respond to moral threat with physical cleansing is known as the Macbeth Effect. Several subsequent efforts, however, did not replicate this relationship. The present manuscript reports the results of a meta-analysis of 15 studies testing this relationship. The weighted mean effect size was small across all studies (g = 0.17, 95% CI [0.04, 0.31]), and nonsignificant across studies conducted in independent laboratories (g = 0.07, 95% CI [−0.04, 0.19]). We conclude that there is little evidence for an overall Macbeth Effect; however, there may be a Macbeth Effect under certain conditions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document