scholarly journals Classification of Dopamine Receptor Genes in Vertebrates: Nine Subtypes in Osteichthyes

2015 ◽  
Vol 86 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 164-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kei Yamamoto ◽  
Romain Fontaine ◽  
Catherine Pasqualini ◽  
Philippe Vernier
Keyword(s):  
Dopamine Receptors ◽  
Dopamine Receptor ◽  
Animal Studies ◽  
Phylogenetic Analyses ◽  
D2 Receptor ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Brain Functions ◽  
History Of ◽  
Dopamine Receptor Genes ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Dopamine neurotransmission regulates various brain functions, and its regulatory roles are mediated by two families of G protein-coupled receptors: the D1 and D2 receptor families. In mammals, the D1 family comprises two receptor subtypes (D1 and D5), while the D2 family comprises three receptor subtypes (D2, D3 and D4). Phylogenetic analyses of dopamine receptor genes strongly suggest that the common ancestor of Osteichthyes (bony jawed vertebrates) possessed four subtypes in the D1 family and five subtypes in the D2 family. Mammals have secondarily lost almost half of the ancestral dopamine receptor genes, whereas nonmammalian species kept many of them. Although the mammalian situation is an exception among Osteichthyes, the current classification and characterization of dopamine receptors are based on mammalian features, which have led to confusion in the identification of dopamine receptor subtypes in nonmammalian species. Here we begin by reviewing the history of the discovery of dopamine receptors in vertebrates. The recent genome sequencing of coelacanth, gar and elephant shark led to the proposal of a refined scenario of evolution of dopamine receptor genes. We also discuss a current problem of nomenclature of dopamine receptors. Following the official nomenclature of mammalian dopamine receptors from D1 to D5, we propose to name newly identified receptor subtypes from D6 to D9 in order to facilitate the use of an identical name for orthologous genes among different species. To promote a nomenclature change which allows distinguishing the two dopamine receptor families, a nomenclature consortium is needed. This comparative perspective is crucial to correctly interpret data obtained in animal studies on dopamine-related brain disorders, and more fundamentally, to understand the characteristics of dopamine neurotransmission in vertebrates.

scholarly journals The renal dopamine receptors.

1992 ◽  
Vol 2 (8) ◽  
pp. 1265-1278
Author(s):  
P A Jose ◽  
J R Raymond ◽  
M D Bates ◽  
A Aperia ◽  
R A Felder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Amino Acids ◽  
Adenylyl Cyclase ◽  
Dopamine Receptors ◽  
Dopamine Receptor ◽  
D2 Receptor ◽  
D2 Receptors ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Renal Dopamine ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Stimulation Of

Dopamine is an endogenous catecholamine that modulates many functions including behavior, movement, nerve conduction, hormone synthesis and release, blood pressure, and ion fluxes. Dopamine receptors in the brain have been classically divided into D1 and D2 subtypes, based on pharmacological data. However, molecular biology techniques have identified many more dopamine receptor subtypes. Several of the receptors cloned from the brain correspond to the classically described D1 and D2 receptors. Several D1 receptor subtypes have been cloned (D1A, D1B, and D5) and are each coupled to the stimulation of adenylyl cyclase. The D2 receptor has two isoforms, a shorter form, composed of 415 amino acids, is termed the D2short receptor. The long form, called the D2long receptor, is composed of 444 amino acids; both are coupled to the inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. The D3 and D4 receptors are closely related to, but clearly distinct from, the D2 receptor. They have not yet been linked to adenylyl cyclase activity. Outside of the central nervous system, the peripheral dopamine receptors have been classified into the DA1 and DA2 subtypes, on the basis of synaptic localization. The pharmacological properties of DA1 receptors roughly approximate those of D1 and D5 receptors, whereas those of DA2 receptors approximate those of D2 receptors. A renal dopamine receptor with some pharmacological features of the D2 receptor but not linked to adenylyl cyclase has been described in the renal cortex and inner medulla. In the inner medulla, this D2-like receptor, termed DA2k, is linked to stimulation of prostaglandin E2 production, apparently due to stimulation of phospholipase A2. Of the cloned dopamine receptors, only the mRNA of the D3 receptor has been reported in the kidney. The DA1 receptor in the kidney is associated with renal vasodilation and an increase in electrolyte excretion. The DA1-related vasodilation and inhibition of electrolyte transport is mediated by cAMP. The role of renal DA2 receptors remains to be clarified. Although DA1 and DA2 receptors may act in concert to decrease transport in the renal proximal convoluted tubule, the overall function of DA2 receptors may be actually the opposite of those noted for DA1 receptors. Dopamine has been postulated to act as an intrarenal natriuretic hormone. Moreover, an aberrant renal dopaminergic system may play a role in the pathogenesis of some forms of hypertension. A decreased renal production of dopamine and/or a defective transduction of the dopamine signal is/are present in some animal models of experimental hypertension as well as in some forms of human essential hypertension.

Dopamine Receptors and Antipsychotic Drug Response

1993 ◽  
Vol 163 (S22) ◽  
pp. 31-38 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger K. Sunahara ◽  
Philip Seeman ◽  
Hubert H. M. Van Tol ◽  
Hyman B. Niznik
Keyword(s):  
Dopamine Receptors ◽  
Dopamine Receptor ◽  
Antipsychotic Drug ◽  
Drug Response ◽  
Chromosomal Location ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Receptor System ◽  
Dopamine Receptor Genes ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Receptor Family

Dopamine receptors have been divided into two major types – D1 and D2 – based primarily on pharmacological and biochemical criteria. Recent advances in the molecular biology of the dopamine receptor system have allowed the identification and characterisation of at least five distinct neuronal dopamine receptor genes (D1 to D5). These genes encode dopamine receptors belonging to the D1 receptor family, termed D1 and D5, and three D2-like receptors, termed D2, D3 and D4. These receptors are distinguished on the basis of their primary structure, chromosomal location, mRNA size and tissue distribution, and biochemical and pharmacological differences. Although individually these receptor subtypes may not be directly and exclusively involved in the maintenance or expression of schizophrenia, alterations of any of the receptors may contribute to the perturbation or instability of dopaminergic homeostasis in the brain. What was once thought to be a simple two-receptor system seems to have emerged as an intricate and interactive entity. This review summarises what is currently understood about dopamine receptors, their role in antipsychotic drug action, and their association with psychosis.

scholarly journals Differential receptor crosstalk in DRD1-DRD2 heterodimer upon phasic and tonic dopamine signals

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyunbin Kim ◽  
Min-Ho Nam ◽  
Sohyeon Jeong ◽  
Hyowon Lee ◽  
Soo-Jin Oh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dopamine Receptors ◽  
Dopamine Receptor ◽  
Camp Level ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Dopamine Level ◽  
Individual Activity ◽  
Time Activity ◽  
Downstream Signaling ◽  
Receptor Crosstalk

In response to phasic and tonic release, dopamine neurotransmission is regulated by its receptor subtypes, mainly dopamine receptor type 1 and 2 (DRD1 and DRD2). These dopamine receptors are known to form a heterodimer, however the receptor crosstalk between DRD1 and DRD2 was only suspected by measuring their downstream signaling products, due to the lack of methodology for selectively detecting individual activity of different dopamine receptors. Here, we develop red DRD1 sensor (R-DRD1) and green DRD2 sensor (G-DRD2) which can specifically monitor the real-time activity of DRD1 and DRD2, and apply these multicolor sensors to directly measure the receptor crosstalk in the DRD1-DRD2 heterodimer. Surprisingly, we discover that DRD1 activation in the heterodimer is inhibited only at micromolar phasic concentration of dopamine, while DRD2 activation is selectively inhibited at nanomolar tonic dopamine level. Differential receptor crosstalk in the DRD1-DRD2 heterodimer further modulates their downstream cAMP level. These data imply a novel function of the DRD1-DRD2 heterodimer at physiological dopamine levels of phasic and tonic release. Our approach utilizing multicolor receptor sensors will be useful to discover novel function of GPCR heterodimers.

scholarly journals Genomic signatures of G-protein-coupled receptor expansions reveal functional transitions in the evolution of cephalopod signal transduction

2019 ◽  
Vol 286 (1897) ◽  
pp. 20182929 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena A. Ritschard ◽  
Robert R. Fitak ◽  
Oleg Simakov ◽  
Sönke Johnsen
Keyword(s):  
Signal Transduction ◽  
Positive Selection ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Evolutionary History ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Phylogenetic Analyses ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Genomic Signatures ◽  
History Of ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Coleoid cephalopods show unique morphological and neural novelties, such as arms with tactile and chemosensory suckers and a large complex nervous system. The evolution of such cephalopod novelties has been attributed at a genomic level to independent gene family expansions, yet the exact association and the evolutionary timing remain unclear. In the octopus genome, one such expansion occurred in the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) repertoire, a superfamily of proteins that mediate signal transduction. Here, we assessed the evolutionary history of this expansion and its relationship with cephalopod novelties. Using phylogenetic analyses, at least two cephalopod- and two octopus-specific GPCR expansions were identified. Signatures of positive selection were analysed within the four groups, and the locations of these sequences in the Octopus bimaculoides genome were inspected. Additionally, the expression profiles of cephalopod GPCRs across various tissues were extracted from available transcriptomic data. Our results reveal the evolutionary history of cephalopod GPCRs. Unexpanded cephalopod GPCRs shared with other bilaterians were found to be mainly nervous tissue specific. By contrast, duplications that are shared between octopus and the bobtail squid or specific to the octopus' lineage generated copies with divergent expression patterns devoted to tissues outside of the brain. The acquisition of novel expression domains was accompanied by gene order rearrangement through either translocation or duplication and gene loss. Lastly, expansions showed signs of positive selection and some were found to form tandem clusters with shared conserved expression profiles in cephalopod innovations such as the axial nerve cord. Altogether, our results contribute to the understanding of the molecular and evolutionary history of signal transduction and provide insights into the role of this expansion during the emergence of cephalopod novelties and/or adaptations.

Postnatal Expression Patterns of Estrogen Receptor Subtypes and Choline Acetyltransferase in Different Regions of the Papez Circuit

2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 203-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu-xiang Wang ◽  
Lin Zhu ◽  
Li-xia Li ◽  
Hui-nan Xu ◽  
Hong-gang Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Choline Acetyltransferase ◽  
Brain Area ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Female Rats ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Brain Functions ◽  
Papez Circuit ◽  
G Protein Coupled

The Papez circuit is crucial for several brain functions, including long-term memory and emotion. Estradiol modulates cognitive functions based on the expression pattern of its receptor subtypes including estrogen receptor (ER) α, β, and G protein-coupled receptor 30 (GPR30). Similarly, the activity in the cholinergic system correlates with several brain functions, such as learning and memory. In this study, we used immunofluorescence to examine the expression patterns of ERβ and Western blotting to analyze GPR30 and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) expression, in different regions of the Papez circuit, including the prefrontal cortex, hippocampus, hypothalamus, anterior nucleus of the thalamus, and cingulum in female rats at postnatal days (PND) 1, 10, and 56. Our main finding was that the highest expression of ERβ and GPR30 was noted in each brain area of the Papez circuit in the PND1 rats, whereas the expression of ChAT was the highest in PND10 rats. These results provide vital information on the postnatal expression patterns of ER subtypes and ChAT in different regions of the Papez circuit.

Dopamine Receptors: From Structure to Function

1998 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 189-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
CRISTINA MISSALE ◽  
S. RUSSEL NASH ◽  
SUSAN W. ROBINSON ◽  
MOHAMED JABER ◽  
MARC G. CARON
Keyword(s):  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Adenylyl Cyclase ◽  
Dopamine Receptors ◽  
G Protein ◽  
Receptor Gene ◽  
Hormone Secretion ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Genetic Linkage Analysis ◽  
G Protein Coupled

Missale, Cristina, S. Russel Nash, Susan W. Robinson, Mohamed Jaber, and Marc G. Caron. Dopamine Receptors: From Structure to Function. Physiol. Rev. 78: 189–225, 1998. — The diverse physiological actions of dopamine are mediated by at least five distinct G protein-coupled receptor subtypes. Two D1-like receptor subtypes (D1 and D5) couple to the G protein Gs and activate adenylyl cyclase. The other receptor subtypes belong to the D2-like subfamily (D2 , D3 , and D4) and are prototypic of G protein-coupled receptors that inhibit adenylyl cyclase and activate K+ channels. The genes for the D1 and D5 receptors are intronless, but pseudogenes of the D5 exist. The D2 and D3 receptors vary in certain tissues and species as a result of alternative splicing, and the human D4 receptor gene exhibits extensive polymorphic variation. In the central nervous system, dopamine receptors are widely expressed because they are involved in the control of locomotion, cognition, emotion, and affect as well as neuroendocrine secretion. In the periphery, dopamine receptors are present more prominently in kidney, vasculature, and pituitary, where they affect mainly sodium homeostasis, vascular tone, and hormone secretion. Numerous genetic linkage analysis studies have failed so far to reveal unequivocal evidence for the involvement of one of these receptors in the etiology of various central nervous system disorders. However, targeted deletion of several of these dopamine receptor genes in mice should provide valuable information about their physiological functions.

scholarly journals Quantification of [11C]FLB 457 Binding to Extrastriatal Dopamine Receptors in the Human Brain

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 1164-1173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans Olsson ◽  
Christer Halldin ◽  
Carl-Gunnar Swahn ◽  
Lars Farde
Keyword(s):  
Human Brain ◽  
Dopamine Receptors ◽  
Dopamine Receptor ◽  
Compartment Model ◽  
Binding Potential ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
D2 Dopamine Receptor ◽  
Reliable Determination ◽  
Three Compartment Model ◽  
Dopamine Receptor Binding

Positron emission tomography (PET) has hitherto been used to examine D2 dopamine receptor binding in the striatum, a region with a high density of receptors. Research has been hampered by the lack of suitable radioligands for detection of the low-density D2 dopamine receptor populations in the limbic and cortical dopamine systems that are implicated in the patophysiology of schizophrenia. [11C]FLB 457 is a new radioligand with the very high affinity of 20 pmol/L (Ki) for the D2 and D3 dopamine receptor subtypes. This study in eight healthy subjects was designed to evaluate the suitability of [11C]FLB 457 for quantification of extrastriatal D2/D3 dopamine receptors. PET-data were acquired in the three-dimensional mode and the arterial input function was corrected for labeled metabolites. The standard three-compartment model and four derived approaches were applied to calculate and compare the binding potentials. Besides the striatum, conspicuous radioactivity was found in extrastriatal regions such as the thalamus, the anterior cinguli, and the temporal and frontal cortices. The time activity curves could be described by the three compartment model. The different approaches gave similar binding potential values and the rank order between regions was consistent with that found in vitro. The short time of a PET measurement using [11C]FLB 457 (63 minutes) seemed not to be sufficient for reliable determination of the high binding potential in the striatum. These results are of principal importance because they show the potential for PET quantification of minute receptor populations in the human brain.

scholarly journals Molecular modelling of D2-like dopamine receptors

1992 ◽  
Vol 287 (1) ◽  
pp. 277-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
C D Livingstone ◽  
P G Strange ◽  
L H Naylor
Keyword(s):  
Dopamine Receptors ◽  
Dopamine Receptor ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Transmembrane Domains ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Alpha Helices ◽  
Dopamine Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Membrane Bound ◽  
Agonist Ligands ◽  
Sequence Similarities

Three-dimensional computer models of the rat D2, D3 and D4 dopamine receptor subtypes have been constructed based on the diffraction co-ordinates for bacteriorhodopsin, another membrane-bound protein containing seven transmembrane domains presumed to be arranged in a similar spatial orientation. Models were assembled by aligning the putative transmembrane domains of the dopamine receptors with those of bacteriorhodopsin using sequence similarities, and then superimposing these modelled alpha-helices on to the bacteriorhodopsin-derived co-ordinates. These models explore the potential hydrogen bonding, electrostatic and stacking interactions within the receptor which may be important for maintaining the conformation of these receptors, and thereby provide target sites for agonist binding. Proposed interactions between the catecholamine ligands and these receptors appear to account for the affinity, although not the specificity, of these agonist ligands for the different dopamine receptor subtypes. Such models will be useful for establishing structure-function relationships between ligands and the dopamine receptors, and may ultimately provide a template for the design of receptor-specific drugs.

Renal Dopamine Receptors and Hypertension

2003 ◽  
Vol 228 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tahir Hussain ◽  
Mustafa F. Lokhandwala
Keyword(s):  
Proximal Tubule ◽  
Dopamine Receptors ◽  
Dopamine Receptor ◽  
Sodium Excretion ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Sympathetic Ganglia ◽  
Receptor Subtypes ◽  
Receptor Function ◽  
The Central Nervous System ◽  
Renal Dopamine

Dopamine has been recognized as an important modulator of central as well as peripheral physiologic functions in both humans and animals. Dopamine receptors have been identified in a number of organs and tissues, which Include several regions within the central nervous system, sympathetic ganglia and postganglionic nerve terminals, various vascular beds, the heart, the gastrointestinal tract, and the kidney. The peripheral dopamine receptors influence cardiovascular and renal function by decreasing afterload and vascular resistance and promoting sodium excretion. Within the kidney, dopamine receptors are present along the nephron, with highest density on proximal tubule epithelial cells. It has been reported that there is a defective dopamine receptor, especially D1 receptor function, in the proximal tubule of various animal models of hypertension as well as in humans with essential hypertension. Recent reports have revealed the site of and the molecular mechanisms responsible for the defect in D1 receptors in hypertension. Moreover, recent studies have also demonstrated that the disruption of various dopamine receptor subtypes and their function produces hypertension in rodents. In this review, we present evidence that dopamine and dopamine receptors play an important role in regulating renal sodium excretion and that defective renal dopamine production and/or dopamine receptor function may contribute to the development of various forms of hypertension.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document