CPCNP: Tratamiento inmuno-oncológico y masa tumoral

2020 ◽  
pp. 59-60
Author(s):  
Oscar Chanona-Alcocer

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Immuno-oncological (IO) therapies such as PD-1 and PD-L1 antibodies have been introduced in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) since 2015 based on randomized trials showing unprecedentedad vantages in overall survival (OS) with hazard ratios (HRs) between 0.5 and 0.7. The impact of these treatmentson OS in routine clinical practice and the role of tumor mass have not been studied. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> 557 consecutive patients with inoperable stage III or stage IV NSCLC diagnosed in our certified lung cancer center from 2006 to 2018 were included if they had received at least one line of systemic treatment.OS of immuno-oncologically treated patients (IO patients, <i>n</i> = 144) who received treatment with a PD-1 antibody (nivolumab [<i>n</i> = 77] or pembrolizumab [<i>n</i> = 51]) or a PD-L1 antibody (atezolizumab [<i>n</i> = 4] or durvalumab [<i>n</i> = 12]) was compared to historic controls treated before availability ofIO treatment (<i>n</i> = 413) using case-control analysis. IO patientsand historic controls were individually matched forstage, performance state, histology, smoking status, gender,age, and initial treatment mode (palliative vs. definitive radio-chemotherapy). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Case-control analysis of 91 matched pairs showed significantly longer OS in IO patients compared to historic controls (21.2 vs. 10.9 months, HR 0.526, CI 0.373-0.723). The benefit was more pronounced inpatients with lower tumor stage (HR 0.48 [stage III], 0.40 [IVA], 0.63 [IVB]) or smaller tumor size (HR 0.38 [RECIST ≤57 mm], 0.40 [RECIST 58-94 mm], 0.59 [RECIST 95-141 mm], 0.75 [RECIST ≥142 mm]). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> IO patients showed significant benefit in OS with HRs comparable to those reported in phase III trials. The benefit tended to be greater in patients with lower tumor mass.

Lung Cancer ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-186 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenting Wu ◽  
Hongliang Liu ◽  
Rong Lei ◽  
Dan Chen ◽  
Shuyu Zhang ◽  
...  

Lung Cancer ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 340-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guangfu Jin ◽  
Haifeng Wang ◽  
Zhibin Hu ◽  
Hongliang Liu ◽  
Weiwei Sun ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2129-2129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dana E Rollison ◽  
Rami Komrokji ◽  
Ji-Hyun Lee ◽  
Shalaka S Hampras ◽  
William Fulp ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: The incidence of subsequent primary malignancies (SPM) associated with lenalidomide treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) outside the context of maintenance therapy post-melphalan is unknown. Three clinical trials reported modest, statistically significant increased risks of SPM associated with lenalidomide treatment in MM patients (Palumbo et al, N Engl J Med, 2012; Attal et al, N Engl J Med, 2012; McCarthy et al, N Engl J Med, 2012). Although these randomized trials are well controlled for potential confounders, they represent a unique population of patients and a specific juxtaposition of lenalidomide use with melphalan; as such, their results are not necessarily generalizable to the broader MM patient population. To investigate whether lenalidomide is associated with an increased risk of SPM in MM patients within a clinical setting in the United States, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of 1,653 MM patients treated with or without lenalidomide at the Moffitt Cancer Center (“MCC”) in Tampa, FL. Methods: Patients treated for MM at MCC from 2004-2012 were identified through Moffitt's enterprise wide data warehouse combining clinical information from several sources, including the Cancer Registry, electronic medical records and disease-specific databases. Among 1,653 MM patients, ages 18 and older, 51 cases of SPM were verified by two hematologists for confirmation of MM and SPM diagnoses. Incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for SPM were estimated using a Poisson distribution. Cox proportional hazards ratios (HR) and 95% CIs were calculated to estimate the age-adjusted association between lenalidomide treatment and SPM in the overall cohort, and stratified by ISS. Additional details on lenalidomide treatment and potential confounders were obtained through medical chart abstraction for SPM cases and a subset of MM patients from the baseline cohort who had not developed SPM; these controls were matched to cases 2:1 on age at MM diagnosis (+/- 5 years), gender, follow-up time (+/- 6 months), and date of diagnosis (+/- 1 year). Associations between lenalidomide and SPM in the nested case-control analysis were estimated using odds ratios (OR) and 95% CIs adjusted for age at MM diagnosis, bone marrow transplantation, creatinine levels and personal history of cancer. Results: Overall, 1,653 MM patients were followed for an average of 40 months, including patients treated with (n=846) or without (n=807) lenalidomide. Incident SPMs were observed for 15 patients treated with lenalidomide (0.55 per 100 person-years) and 36 patients treated without lenalidomide (1.27 per 100 person-years), corresponding to an HR of 0.44 (95% CI=0.24-0.80) (Figure 1). Of the 51 SPMs observed, 37 were solid tumors comprising 14 different types, including 9 and 28 in the lenalidomide and no lenalidomide groups, respectively (HR=0.55, 95% CI=0.15-0.69). Of the 14 hematological SPMs observed, 8 were in the lenalidomide group versus 6 in the no lenalidomide group (HR=0.90, 95%CI = 0.31-2.63). Similar associations between lenalidomide and SPM were observed for MM patients with ISS = 1 (HR=0.26, 95% CI=0.06-1.21) and for MM patients with ISS = 2 or 3 (HR=0.20, 95% CI=0.02-1.62). Of the 51 SPM cases and 102 matched controls included in the nested case-control analysis, 33.3% and 74.5% were treated with lenalidomide, respectively (adjusted OR=0.03, 95% CI=0.002-0.34). Similar associations were observed for lenalidomide given as part of first line treatment versus subsequent treatment, and for lenalidomide given alone or in combination with other drugs. (8 cases and 46 controls received melphalan in addition to lenalidomide.) There was no association between lenalidomide and SPM among those treated for >9.1 months (OR=0.05, 95% CI=0.01-0.43), the median treatment duration among controls. Conclusion: Lenalidomide treatment was not associated with an increased risk of SPM among a large cohort of MM patients. It is important to note that in this clinical setting (in 2004-2012) the use of lenalidomide in combination with melphalan and in the maintenance setting was a rare event. This may be a critical factor in the contrast between the results of this study and in the increase in SPMs reported in randomized clinical trials. Figure 1: Incidence of SPM among patients treated for MM with or without lenalidomide, Moffitt Cancer Center, 2004-2012 Figure 1:. Incidence of SPM among patients treated for MM with or without lenalidomide, Moffitt Cancer Center, 2004-2012 Disclosures Rollison: Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Lenalidomide given as treatment for non-del(5q) MDS and/or multiple myeloma . Komrokji:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding. Lee:Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding. Hampras:Celgene, Inc: Research Funding. Fulp:Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding. Fisher:Celgene, Inc: Research Funding. Baz:Celgene: Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding. Olesnyckyj:Celgene: Employment, stock options Other. Kenvin:Celgene: Employment, stock options Other. Knight:Celgene, Inc: Employment, stock options Other. Dalton:Celgene, Inc.: Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Shain:L&M Healthcare/Onyx/Amgen: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Envision/Celgene: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S91-S92
Author(s):  
Julie A Rizzo ◽  
Ryan McMahon ◽  
James K Aden ◽  
Daniel B Brillhart ◽  
Leopoldo C Cancio

Abstract Introduction Extubation failure is associated with negative outcomes making the identification of risk factors for failure paramount to patient selection. Burn patients experience a high incidence of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. There is no consensus on the acceptable rate of extubation failure and many conventional indices used in critical care do not accurately predict extubation outcome in burn patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the rate of extubation failure in the burned population and to examine the impact of inhalation injury, as well as other factors, on extubation outcome. Methods Burn patients from a single center over the period 2009–2017 were examined and included if they were intubated prior to arrival or within 48 hours of admission and underwent a planned extubation. Patients were excluded if they proceeded directly to tracheostomy, died prior to extubation, or experienced an unintentional extubation. From this cohort, a matched case-control analysis based on age, TBSA and gender was performed of patients who succeeded after extubation, defined as not requiring reintubation within 72 hours of extubation, to those who failed. Characteristics and clinical parameters were compared between these two groups to determine if any factor(s) could predict extubation failure. Results A 12.3% incidence of extubation failure was found in our cohort of 106 burn patients. In the matched case-control analysis of 48 extubation successes and 58 extubation failures, the presence of inhalation injury was surprisingly associated with extubation success as was a higher PaO2:FiO2 ratio immediately prior to extubation. Higher heart rate and lower serum pH was associated with extubation failure. ANCOVA analysis demonstrated that a sodium trending higher before extubation was associated with more successes, possibly indicative of a lower volume status. Conclusions Classic extubation criteria do not accurately predict extubation outcome in burn patients; analysis of other characteristics and clinical parameters may be able to provide better predictions. A constellation of these parameters needs to be studied prospectively. Applicability of Research to Practice Defining a constellation of parameters that can aid in identifying those at high risk of extubation failure could change practice.


Author(s):  
Julie A Rizzo ◽  
Mahdi Haq ◽  
Ryan A McMahon ◽  
James K Aden ◽  
Daniel B Brillhart ◽  
...  

Abstract Extubation failure is associated with negative outcomes making the identification of risk factors for failure paramount. Burn patients experience a high incidence of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation. There is no consensus on the acceptable rate of extubation failure and many conventional indices do not accurately predict extubation outcomes in burn patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the rate of extubation failure in the burned population and to examine the impact of factors on extubation outcomes. Burn patients from a single center over 9 years were examined and included if they were intubated prior to arrival or within 48 hours of admission and underwent a planned extubation. From this cohort, a matched case–control analysis based on age, TBSA, and sex was performed of patients who succeeded after extubation, defined as not requiring reintubation within 72 hours, to those who failed. Characteristics and clinical parameters were compared to determine whether any factors could predict extubation failure. There was a 12.3% incidence of extubation failure. In the matched case–control analysis, the presence of inhalation injury was associated with extubation success. Higher heart rate and lower serum pH were associated with extubation failure. ANCOVA analysis demonstrated that a sodium trending higher before extubation was associated with more successes, possibly indicative of a lower volume status. Classic extubation criteria do not accurately predict extubation outcomes in burn patients; analysis of other parameters may be able to provide better predictions. A constellation of these parameters needs to be studied prospectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document