scholarly journals Screening Status as a Determinant of Choice of Colorectal Cancer Screening Method: A Population-Based Informed Survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 63-70
Author(s):  
José Luis Sandoval ◽  
Allan Relecom ◽  
Cyril Ducros ◽  
Jean-Luc Bulliard ◽  
Beatrice Arzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Blood Testing ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Crc Screening ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> Fecal blood testing is a noninvasive alternative to colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening and is preferred by a substantial proportion of individuals. However, participant-related determinants of the choice of screening method, particularly up-to-date screening status, remain less studied. We aimed to determine if up-to-date screening status was related to choosing a fecal blood test over colonoscopy. <b><i>Setting:</i></b> Participants in the population-based cross-sectional survey study Bus Santé in Geneva, Switzerland – aged 50–69 years. <b><i>Design:</i></b> Cross-sectional survey study using mailed questionnaires inquiring about CRC screening method of choice after providing information on advantages and disadvantages of both screening methods. We used multivariable logistic regression models to determine the association between up-to-date CRC screening status and choosing fecal blood testing. <b><i>Key results:</i></b> We included 1,227 participants. Thirty-eight percent of participants did not have up-to-date CRC screening. Overall, colonoscopy (54.9%) was preferred to fecal blood testing (45.1%) (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) as screening method of choice. However, screening method choices differed between those with (65.6% colonoscopy and 34.4% fecal blood testing) and without up-to-date CRC screening (36.5% colonoscopy and 63.5% fecal blood testing). Not having up-to-date CRC screening was associated with a higher probability of choosing fecal blood testing as screening method (odds ratio = 2.6 [1.9; 3.7], <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) after adjustment for the aforementioned confounders. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Not having up-to-date screening was independently associated with fecal blood testing as the preferred method for CRC screening. Proposing this method to this subpopulation, in a context of shared decision, could potentially increase screening uptake in settings where it is already high.

scholarly journals Prevalence of self-reported abdominal symptoms among 50–74-years-old men and women eligible for colorectal cancer screening –a cross-sectional study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mette Bach Larsen ◽  
Heidi Heinsen Bachmann ◽  
Bo Søborg ◽  
Tinne Laurberg ◽  
Katrine J. Emmertsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prevalence Ratio ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Healthy Population ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Men And Women ◽  
Crc Screening ◽  
Abdominal Symptoms

Abstract Background Screening is defined as the identification of unrecognized disease in an apparently healthy population. Symptomatic individuals are recommended to contact a physician instead of participating in screening. However, in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening this approach may be problematic as abdominal symptoms are nonspecific. This study aimed at identifying the prevalence of self-reported abdominal symptoms among screening-eligible men and women aged 50–74 years. Methods This cross-sectional survey study included 11,537 individuals aged 50–74 years invited for CRC screening from 9 to 23 September 2019. Descriptive statistics of responders experiencing alarm symptoms of CRC, Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Score (LARS) and the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms (PAC-SYM) were derived. The association between abdominal symptoms and demographic and socioeconomic variables were estimated by prevalence ratio (PR) using a Poisson regression model with robust variance. Results A total of 5488 respondents were included. The respondents were more likely women, of older age, Danish, cohabiting and had higher education and income level compared to non-respondents. Abdominal pain more than once a week was experienced by 12.0% of the respondents. Of these, 70.8% had been experiencing this symptom for >1 month. Fresh blood in the stool was experienced by 0.7% and of these 82.1% for >1 month. About one third of those experiencing alarm symptoms more than once a week for >1 month had not consulted a doctor. A total of 64.1% of the respondents had no LARS, 21.7% had minor LARS and 14.2% had major LARS. The median PAC-SYM score was 0.33 (Interquartile range (IQR): 0.17;0.75), the median abdominal score was 0.50 (IQR: 0.00;1.00), median rectal score 0.00 (IQR:0.00;0.33) and median stool score 0.40 (IQR: 0.00;0.80). Men and those aged 65–74 reported less symptoms than women and those aged 50–64 years, respectively. Conclusions This study illustrated that abdominal symptoms were frequent among screening-eligible men and women. This should be taken into account when implementing and improving CRC screening strategies. A concerning high number of the respondents experiencing alarm symptoms had not consulted a doctor. This calls for attention to abdominal symptoms in general and how those with abdominal symptoms should participate in CRC screening.

scholarly journals To do or not to do – a survey study on factors associated with participating in the Danish screening program for colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper Bo Nielsen ◽  
Gabriele Berg-Beckhoff ◽  
Anja Leppin
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Stepwise Logistic Regression ◽  
Willingness To Participate ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Crc Screening ◽  
Screening Participation

Abstract Background Screening programs for colorectal cancer (CRC) exist in many countries, and with varying participation rates. The present study aimed at identifying socio-demographic factors for accepting a cost-free screening offer for CRC in Denmark, and to study if more people would accept the screening offer if the present fecal test was replaced by a blood test. Methods We used a cross-sectional survey design based on a representative group of 6807 Danish citizens aged 50–80 years returning a fully answered web-based questionnaire with socio-demographic data added from national registries. Data were analyzed in STATA and based on bivariate analyses followed by regression models. Results Danes in general have a high level of lifetime participation (+ 80%) in the national CRC screening program. The results of the stepwise logistic regression model to predict CRC screening participation demonstrated that female gender, higher age, higher income, and moderate alcohol intake were positively associated with screening participation, whereas a negative association was observed for higher educational attainment, obesity, being a smoker, and higher willingness to take health risks. Of the 1026 respondents not accepting the screening offer, 61% were willing to reconsider their initial negative response if the fecal sampling procedure were replaced by blood sampling. Conclusion The CRC screening program intends to include the entire population within a certain at-risk age group. However, individual factors (e.g. sex, age obesity, smoking, risk aversity) appear to significantly affect willingness to participate in the screening program. From a preventive perspective, our findings indicate the need for a more targeted approach trying to reach these groups.

scholarly journals Recognition and Participation of Colorectal Cancer Screening in Turkey: Meta-analysis of Literature

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement_4) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Aydoğan ◽  
S Metintaş ◽  
M F Önsüz
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
English Language ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Fecal Occult Blood ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Crc Screening

Abstract Background The aim of the study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies about the proportion of recognition of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) and colonoscopy (CS) methods and participation to them in any period of life for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in Turkey. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Turkey Citation Index and YOK Thesis Center databases were screened both in Turkish and English language to identify relevant studies and key words ’colorectal cancer’, ’colon cancer’, ’cancer screening’, ’information’, ’attitude’, ’behavior’, ’awareness’ and ’Turkey’ were. Criteria for inclusion in the analysis were; conducted in Turkey, original and cross-sectional, conducted CRC risky groups (having CRC in the first degree patients and 50 and above age), studies that give the number of participants and number of taking FOBT and CS screening in any period of their lives and/or the number of knowing them. The studies that met the criteria were read as double blind. The data were entered into the Open Meta Analyst demo program. Because of p &lt; 0.001 in the heterogeneity test, random effects model was used in group analysis of the articles. The proportion and 95% confidence interval of knowing and taking FOBT and CS were calculated from the total number of cases. Results A total of 1176 articles were reached in first review. Duplications and inappropriated studies were eliminated, and 52 studies were selected. Eight studies about recognition FOBT, 16 about participation FOBT, 9 about recognition CS and 17 about participation CS were taken in analysis. After analysis it was found that 1315 of 4334 individuals (19.3%, 95%CI:6.6-32.1) recognized to FOBT, 1174 of 6825 individuals (13.2%, 8.0-18.5) participated to FOBT, 2197 of 5728 individuals (31.7%, 18.2-45.2) recognized to CS and 913 of 8860 individuals (10.0%, 8.1-12.0) participated to CS. Conclusions The proportion of recognition and participation to FOBT and CS were found less than expected. Key messages The proportion of recognition and participation CRC screening methods is low in risky groups. Awareness and participation of screening should be increased in risky groups.

Cross‐sectional survey study of primary care clinics on evidence‐based colorectal cancer screening intervention use

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinobu Watanabe‐Galloway ◽  
Jungyoon Kim ◽  
Frantzlee LaCrete ◽  
Kaeli Samson ◽  
Jason Foster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Primary Care Clinics

scholarly journals Prevalence of asthmatic respiratory complications among the rural community of Tangail area in Bangladesh

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 1291
Author(s):  
Md. Imam Hossain ◽  
Masum Parvez ◽  
Fatama Tous Zohora ◽  
Md. Shariful Islam ◽  
Luthfunnesa Bari
Keyword(s):  
Rural Community ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Respiratory Complications ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Strenuous Work ◽  
Nocturnal Cough

Background: Asthmatic respiratory complications appear to be a notable public health consequence and associated with mortality, morbidity and economic burden worldwide. Globally several epidemiological studies have been conducted to assess the prevalence of asthmatic respiratory complications. As far our knowledge very few population based study have been conducted in Bangladesh to assess the magnitude of asthmatic respiratory complications focusing the rural community. Therefore the study was undertaken to assess the prevalence of asthma and related respiratory complications in the rural community of Tangail area in Bangladesh.Methods: This human population based cross-sectional survey study was conducted during the period of August to December 2016 on some villagers of Tangail area in Bangladesh using a pre-standardized questionnaires called "IUATLD -1984 bronchial symptoms questionnaires", designed by the International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (IUATLD). The demographic data of the study subjects were collected by interviewing the subjects and the data were analyzed using SPSS software.Results: The results demonstrated that a substantial proportion of study subjects showed the main characteristic symptoms of asthma i.e., wheeze last 12 months is about 18.27%, shortness of breath (SOB) without strenuous work were 21.84%, nocturnal SOB 14.70%, morning cough 13.26%, nocturnal cough 17.25% and morning phlegm 10.37%. Overall 9.69% of the subjects were found to be asthmatic. Female study subjects showed more asthmatic complications than male subjects and in the higher aged group asthmatic symptoms were more prevalent.Conclusions: Among the study subjects, asthmatic complications were found to be substantial. Further clinical study is necessary to confirm the findings.  

scholarly journals To do or not to do – A survey study on factors associated with participating in the Danish screening program for colorectal cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper Bo Nielsen ◽  
Gabriela Berg-Beckhoff ◽  
Anja Leppin
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Stepwise Logistic Regression ◽  
Willingness To Participate ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Crc Screening ◽  
Screening Participation

Abstract Background Screening programs for colorectal cancer (CRC) exist in many countries, and with varying participation rates. The present study aimed at identifying socio-demographic factors for accepting a cost-free screening offer for CRC in Denmark, and to study if more people would accept the screening offer if the present fecal test was replaced by a blood test. Methods We used a cross-sectional survey design based on a representative group of 6,807 Danish citizens aged 50-80 years returning a fully answered web-based questionnaire with socio-demographic data added from national registries. Data were analyzed in STATA and based on bivariate analyses followed by regression models. Results Danes in general have a high level of lifetime participation (+80%) in the national CRC screening program. The results of the stepwise logistic regression model to predict CRC screening participation demonstrated that female gender, higher age, higher income, and moderate alcohol intake were positively associated with screening participation, whereas a negative association was observed for higher educational attainment, obesity, being a smoker, and higher willingness to take health risks. Of the 1026 respondents not accepting the screening offer, 61% were willing to reconsider their initial negative response if the fecal sampling procedure were replaced by blood sampling.Conclusion The CRC screening program intends to include the entire population within a certain at-risk age group. However, individual factors (e.g. sex, age obesity, smoking, risk aversity) appear to significantly affect willingness to participate in the screening program. From a preventive perspective, our findings indicate the need for a more targeted approach trying to reach these groups.

scholarly journals To do or not to do – A survey study on factors associated with participating in the Danish screening program for colorectal cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper Bo Nielsen ◽  
Gabriela Berg-Beckhoff ◽  
Anja Leppin
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Stepwise Logistic Regression ◽  
Willingness To Participate ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Screening Programs ◽  
Crc Screening ◽  
Screening Participation

Abstract Background Screening programs for colorectal cancer (CRC) exist in many countries, and with varying participation rates. The present study aimed at identifying socio-demographic factors for accepting a cost-free screening offer for CRC in Denmark, and to study if more people would accept the screening offer if the present fecal test was replaced by a blood test. Methods We used a cross-sectional survey design based on a representative group of 6,807 Danish citizens aged 50-80 years returning a fully answered web-based questionnaire with socio-demographic data added from national registries. Data were analyzed in STATA and based on bivariate analyses followed by regression models. Results Danes in general have a high level of lifetime participation (+80%) in the national CRC screening program. The results of the stepwise logistic regression model to predict CRC screening participation demonstrated that female gender, higher age, higher income, and moderate alcohol intake were positively associated with screening participation, whereas a negative association was observed for higher educational attainment, obesity, being a smoker, and higher willingness to take health risks. Of the 1026 respondents not accepting the screening offer, 61% were willing to reconsider their initial negative response if the fecal sampling procedure were replaced by blood sampling.Conclusion The CRC screening program intends to include the entire population within a certain at-risk age group. However, individual factors (e.g. gender, age obesity, smoking, risk aversity) appear to significantly affect willingness to participate in the screening program. From a preventive perspective, our findings indicate the need for a more targeted approach trying to reach these groups.

scholarly journals To do or not to do – A survey study on factors associated with participating in the Danish Screening Program for Colorectal Cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper Bo Nielsen ◽  
Gabriela Berg-Beckhoff ◽  
Anja Leppin
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Stepwise Logistic Regression ◽  
Willingness To Participate ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Crc Screening ◽  
Screening Participation

Abstract BackgroundScreening programs for colorectal cancer (CRC) exist in many countries, and with varying participation rates. The present study aimed at identifying socio-demographic factors for accepting a cost-free screening offer for CRC, and to study if more people would accept the screening offer if the present fecal test was replaced by a blood test. MethodsWe used a cross-sectional survey design based on a representative group of 6,807 Danish citizens aged 50-80 years returning a fully answered web-based questionnaire with socio-demographic data added from national registries. Data were analyzed in STATA and based on bivariate analyses followed by regression models. ResultsDanes in general have a high level of lifetime participation (+80%) in the national CRC screening program. The results of the stepwise logistic regression model to predict CRC screening participation demonstrated that female gender, age, income, and moderate alcohol intake was positively associated with screening participation, whereas a negative association was observed for educational attainment, obesity, smoking status, and willingness to take health risks. Of the 1026 respondents not accepting the screening offer, 61% were willing to reconsider their initial negative response if the fecal sampling procedure were replaced by blood sampling.ConclusionThe CRC screening program intents to include the entire population within a certain at-risk age group. However, individual factors (e.g. gender, age obesity, smoking, risk aversity) appear to significantly affect willingness to participate in the screening program. From a preventive perspective, our findings indicate the need for a more targeted approach trying to reach these groups.

Primary Care Providers' Attitudes Towards Recommending Cancer Screening to Patients With Intellectual Disability: A Cross-Sectional Survey

Inclusion ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-193
Author(s):  
Genevieve Breau ◽  
Sally Thorne ◽  
Jennifer Baumbusch ◽  
T. Greg Hislop ◽  
Arminee Kazanjian
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Intellectual Disability ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Screening ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional

Abstract Individuals with intellectual disability (ID) obtain breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening at lower rates, relative to the general population. This cross-sectional survey study explored how primary care providers and trainees recommend cancer screening to patients with ID, using a standardized attitudes questionnaire and vignettes of fictional patients. In total, 106 primary care providers and trainees participated. Analyses revealed that participants' attitudes towards community inclusion predicted whether participants anticipated recommending breast and colorectal cancer screening to fictional patients. Further research is needed to explore these factors in decisions to recommend screening, and how these factors contribute to cancer screening disparities.

Patient navigation (PN) for colorectal cancer screening (CRC): Experience in program implementation for underserved neighborhoods of Cleveland, Ohio.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 147-147
Author(s):  
Katherine Glass ◽  
Aqeel Seals
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Program Implementation ◽  
Patient Navigation ◽  
Underserved Populations ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Community Members ◽  
Crc Screening ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Cleveland Ohio

147 Background: Cleveland, Ohio has high rates of colorectal cancer (CRC). 50% of CRC in Cleveland is late stage, and rates of CRC screening in Cleveland are low. Colonoscopy is a screening method for CRC, but barriers exist for the underserved population of Cleveland. The Fecal Immunohistochemical Test (FIT) is a less-costly and non-invasive CRC screening method that has demonstrated increased uptake in CRC screening for underserved populations. Previous literature has demonstrated that Patient Navigation (PN) can increase screening rates in underserved populations through education and assistance to overcome barriers to care. Little, however, has been published about the impact of pairing PN with a program that encourages either colonoscopies or FIT utilization to complete screening. Methods: Community members were educated about both colonoscopies and FIT in a neutral manner. After education, interested participants provided preference for screening type. Participants received follow-up calls from patient navigators. Navigators provided encouragement to complete screening and collected information about barriers. Results: N = 612 patients received PN for CRC. 72% of the population (n = 442) were Black. 47% (n = 290) chose colonoscopy, and n = 322 chose FIT. 44% (n = 263) completed a screening. 19% (n = 55) of those choosing colonoscopy completed screening. 66% (n = 213) choosing FIT completed screening. Women who chose FIT were more likely than men who chose FIT to complete screening (86% vs. 45%, p < 0.001). Barriers to screening included appointment coordination, transportation, and insurance. Conclusions: When offered PN and choice of CRC screening, community members in Cleveland equally chose colonoscopy vs. FIT. Those that chose FIT were more likely to complete screening (p < 0.001). Barriers suggest access and use of healthcare remain challenging for underserved communities. The simplicity of FIT paired with PN may remove barriers for this population and increase screening uptake. More research needs to be done to understand the impact of PN on sustained rate of completion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document