scholarly journals Popper as a process: revisiting the appropriation of the Popperian philosophy by the cladists during the “systematics wars”

2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 13-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcelo Domingos de Santis

The philosophy of Karl Popper was strongly used by the cladists in their battle against evolutionary and numerical taxonomy. It became known as “Systematics Wars” by David Hull. His historical account in Science as a Process, described the outcome of that era that end up with the victory of cladistics. Claiming it as hypothetico-deductivist, and falsificationist, cladists have transformed and distorted Popper, that almost nothing of these ideas survived scrutiny. One of the Hull’s conclusion was that the success of cladistics was largely due to their ability to maintain social cohesion and intellectual orthodoxy during the years of the Systematic Wars. In this paper, I will provide a concise historical development about the appropriation of Popper’s ideas that were used by systematics, both as a defense and as a critic, trying to make clear the interpretations of these authors in relation to Popper and their research program. Using David Hull’s General Theory of Selection Processes, I will argue that these facts were, partially, to a heavy adherence to Popper’s philosophy.

Author(s):  
Valenti Rull

Studying the causes of biological diversification and the main environmental drivers involved is useful not only for the progress of fundamental science but also to inform conservation practices. Unraveling the origin and maintenance of the comparatively high Neotropical biodiversity is important to understand the global latitudinal biodiversity gradients (LBGs), which is one of the more general and conspicuous biogeographical patterns on Earth. This chapter reviews the historical development of the study of Neotropical diversification, in order to highlight the influence of methodological progress and to identify the conceptual developments that have appeared through history. Four main steps are recognized and analyzed, namely the discovery of the LBGs by pioneer naturalists, the first biogeographic studies, the inception of paleoecology and the recent revolution of molecular phylogeography. This historical account ends with an update of the current state of the study of Neotropical diversification and the main conceptual handicaps that are believed to slow progress towards a general theory on this topic. Among these constraints, emphasis is placed on (i) the shifting from one paradigm to another, (ii) the extrapolation from particular case studies to the whole Neotropics, (iii) the selection of biased evidence to support either one or another hypothesis, (iv) the assumption that Pleistocene diversification equals to refuge diversification, and (v) the straightforward inference of diversification drivers from diversification timing. The main corollary is that the attainment of a general theory on Neotropical diversification is being delayed by conceptual, rather than methodological causes. Some solutions are proposed based on the Chamberlin’s multiple-working-hypotheses scheme and a conceptual research framework to address the problem from this perspective is suggested.


Author(s):  
Valenti Rull

Studying the causes of biological diversification and the main environmental drivers involved is useful not only for the progress of fundamental science but also to inform conservation practices. Unraveling the origin and maintenance of the comparatively high Neotropical biodiversity is important to understand the global latitudinal biodiversity gradients (LBGs), which is one of the more general and conspicuous biogeographical patterns on Earth. This chapter reviews the historical development of the study of Neotropical diversification, in order to highlight the influence of methodological progress and to identify the conceptual developments that have appeared through history. Four main steps are recognized and analyzed, namely the discovery of the LBGs by pioneer naturalists, the first biogeographic studies, the inception of paleoecology and the recent revolution of molecular phylogeography. This historical account ends with an update of the current state of the study of Neotropical diversification and the main conceptual handicaps that are believed to slow progress towards a general theory on this topic. Among these constraints, emphasis is placed on (i) the shifting from one paradigm to another, (ii) the extrapolation from particular case studies to the whole Neotropics, (iii) the selection of biased evidence to support either one or another hypothesis, (iv) the assumption that Pleistocene diversification equals to refuge diversification, and (v) the straightforward inference of diversification drivers from diversification timing. The main corollary is that the attainment of a general theory on Neotropical diversification is being delayed by conceptual, rather than methodological causes. Some solutions are proposed based on the Chamberlin’s multiple-working-hypotheses scheme and a conceptual research framework to address the problem from this perspective is suggested.


1997 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 117-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. LEE

This study represents part of a long-term research program to investigate the influence of U.K. accountants on the development of professional accountancy in other parts of the world. It examines the impact of a small group of Scottish chartered accountants who emigrated to the U.S. in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Set against a general theory of emigration, the study's main results reveal the significant involvement of this group in the founding and development of U.S. accountancy. The influence is predominantly with respect to public accountancy and its main institutional organizations. Several of the individuals achieved considerable eminence in U.S. public accountancy.


2012 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
AMEDEO FOSSATI

The paper discusses the influence of Pareto’s methodological revolution on the Italian scientific tradition in public finance. To that end, the works of the most celebrated scholars from within the first, second, and final generations of this tradition are reviewed with reference to their reactions to Pareto’s idea of science as logico-experimental activities, and his contributions to the development of marginalism and theoretical sociology. The particular scholars considered across the three generations’ time span include Pantaleoni, De Viti, Barone, Einaudi, Sensini, Griziotti, Borgatta, Murray, and Fasiani. The main original contribution of this paper is the marshaling of evidence in support of the author’s proposition that Fasiani’s research program is characterized by a clearly Paretian mode of enquiry with regard to methodology and the economic investigation of fiscal activities, although the specific influence of Pareto’s sociology on Fasiani’s approach to fiscal studies was relatively modest. It is provisionally concluded that, in taking the best and most relevant of Pareto’s work for fiscal studies, Fasiani’s contributions came to represent the highest point in the evolution of the general theory of public finance in the Italian tradition.


2021 ◽  
pp. 159-173
Author(s):  
N. N. Shpilnaya ◽  

The article is an outline of the development of Dialogical Linguistics in Russia. It represents its milestones of formation and the current state. Dialogical Linguistics is considered to be an integral linguistic branch, claiming the status of a distinct «research program» and comprises such sections as follows: Linguistics of Dialogical Text, Linguistic Theory of Replication, Interactional Theory of Dialogue, General Theory of Dialogue. In the final part of the article, the principles of dialogical modeling of linguistic objects are being formulated.


Pneuma ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
William K. Kay

AbstractKarl Popper argued that science proceeds not by induction but by offering explanatory theories that scientists then attempt to falsify. What cannot be falsified falls outside the realm of science. In applying his ideas to the writing of history, Popper was particularly scathing about Marxist predictions of future historical development. But he did believe history could be written by looking at the situations in which historical figures found themselves and the problems they attempted to solve. Pentecostal historiography has been divided into four main types: the providential, the historical roots, the multicultural, and the functional. When each of these types is analyzed and judged against Popper’s strictures against induction, we find, among other things, that the unfashionable providential account need not be ruled out.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document