Abstract 13298: Density, Coverage and Usage of Automated External Defibrillators in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Across Europe

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Kjoelbye ◽  
Linn Andelius ◽  
Enrico Baldi ◽  
Angelo Auricchio ◽  
Marieke Blom ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Effective Treatment ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Free Software ◽  
Geographical Differences ◽  
Automated External Defibrillators ◽  
Prevention Education ◽  
Capital Region ◽  
Software Program ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Though deployment of Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) is increasing rapidly, AEDs are often deployed in an un-strategic manner. Consequently, little is known about the association between AED density, AED coverage of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), and bystander defibrillation across different countries. This study aimed to investigate the differences in AED densities (AEDS/100,000 inhabitants/1,000 km2), the AED coverage of OHCAs, and bystander defibrillation across Europe. Hypothesis: AED density is directly associated with degree of bystander defibrillation across Europe. Methods: The study is a European Sudden Cardiac Arrest network towards Prevention, Education, New Effective Treatment (ESCAPE-NET) project. We included data from Ticino (Switzerland), Lombardy (Italy), and The Capital Region (Denmark) from 2019, covering over 3.7 million inhabitants. AED accessibility was defined as the AED being accessible 24/7 or not and AED coverage was defined as the OHCA being covered by an AED within 100, 250 and 500 meters. AED coverages were calculated the same way by all participants using a free software program (QGIS). Results: AED densities were: 87.3 for Ticino, 15.2 for Lombardy, and 139.4 for The Capital Region. The percentages of OHCAs covered by any AED and by 24/7 accessible AEDs are shown in Figure 1. The calculated AED density per 1% bystander defibrillation (for the percentage of OHCAs bystander defibrillated within 100, 250 and 500m of an AED) were 34.9, 17.5 and 15.6 for Ticino, 76.0, 50.7 and 38.0 for Lombardy and 19.4, 12.6 and 11.2 for The Capital Region. Conclusion: We found great variation in both AED coverage and 24/7 AED accessibility across regions, as well as marked differences in bystander defibrillation according to local AED density. Other factors like geographical differences in the regions, optimal AED placement and citizen responder programs for AED use might explain the observed differences.

scholarly journals Contacts to the healthcare system prior to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Zylyftari ◽  
S.G Moller ◽  
M Wissenberg ◽  
F Folke ◽  
C.A Barcella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
General Population ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Early Identification ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Horizon 2020 ◽  
One Year ◽  
Public Grant ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Abstract Background Patients who suffer a sudden out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) may be preceded by warning symptoms and healthcare system contact. Though, is currently difficult early identification of sudden cardiac arrest patients. Purpose We aimed to examine contacts with the healthcare system up to two weeks and one year before OHCA. Methods OHCA patients were identified from the Danish Cardiac Arrest Registry (2001–2014). The pattern of healthcare contacts (with either general practitioner (GP) or hospital) within the year prior to OHCA of OHCA patients was compared with that of 9 sex- and age-matched controls from the background general population. Additionally, we evaluated characteristics of OHCA patients according to the type of healthcare contact (GP/hospital/both/no-contact) and the including characteristics of contacts, within two weeks prior their OHCA event. Results Out of 28,955 OHCA patients (median age of 72 (62–81) years and with 67% male) of presumed cardiac cause, 16,735 (57.8%) contacted the healthcare system (GP and hospital) within two weeks prior to OHCA. From one year before OHCA, the weekly percentages of contacts to GP were relatively constant (26%) until within 2 weeks prior to OHCA where they markedly increased (54%). In comparison, 14% of the general population contacted the GP during the same period (Figure). The weekly percentages of contacts with hospitals gradually increased in OHCA patients from 3.5% to 6.5% within 6 months, peaking at the second week (6.8%), prior to OHCA. In comparison, only 2% of the general population had a hospital contact in that period (Figure). Within 2 weeks of OHCA, patients contacted GP mainly by telephone (71.6%). Hospital diagnoses were heterogenous, where ischemic heart disease (8%) and heart failure (4.5%) were the most frequent. Conclusions There is an increase in healthcare contacts prior to “sudden” OHCA and overall, 54% of OHCA-patients had contacted GP within 2 weeks before the event. This could have implications for developing future strategies for early identification of patients prior to their cardiac arrest. Figure 1. The weekly percentages of contacts to GP (red) and hospital (blue) within one year before OHCA comparing the OHCA cases to the age- and sex-matched control population (N cases = 28,955; N controls = 260,595). Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – EU funding. Main funding source(s): European Union's Horizon 2020

scholarly journals Sudden Cardiac Arrest and Automated External Defibrillators

2003 ◽  
Vol 67 (12) ◽  
pp. 975-982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mithilesh K. Das ◽  
Douglas P. Zipes
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Automated External Defibrillators

scholarly journals European Sudden Cardiac Arrest network: towards Prevention, Education and New Effective Treatments (ESCAPE-NET)

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 86-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanno L Tan ◽  
Nikolaos Dagres ◽  
Bernd W Böttiger ◽  
Peter J Schwartz ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Prevention Education ◽  
Effective Treatments

Abstract 01: Dispatching Lay Rescuers Through a Smartphone Application is Associated With Increased Bystander Defibrillation in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Linn Andelius ◽  
Carolina Malta Hansen ◽  
Freddy Lippert ◽  
Lena Karlsson ◽  
Christian Torp-Pedersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Smartphone Application ◽  
Automated External Defibrillator ◽  
Early Defibrillation ◽  
Emergency Medical Dispatch ◽  
Capital Region ◽  
Electronic Survey ◽  
Emergency Medical ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
External Defibrillator

Introduction: Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is dependent on early defibrillation. To increase bystander defibrillation in OHCAs, a first-responder program dispatching lay rescuers (Heart Runners) through a smartphone application (Heart Runner-app) was implemented in the Capital Region of Denmark. We investigated the proportion of Heart Runners arriving prior to the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and rates of bystander defibrillation. Methods: The Capital Region of Denmark comprises 1.8 mil. inhabitants and 19,048 Heart Runners were registered. In cases of suspected OHCA, the Heart Runner-app was activated by the Emergency Medical Dispatch Center. Up to 20 Heart Runners < 1.8 km from the OHCA were dispatched to either start cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or to retrieve and use a publicly accessible automated external defibrillator (AED). Through an electronic survey, Heart Runners reported if they arrived before EMS and if they applied an AED. OHCAs where at least one Heart Runner arrived before EMS were compared with OHCAs where EMS arrived first. All OHCAs from September 2017 to May 2018, where Heart Runners had been dispatched, were included. Results: Of 399 EMS treated OHCAs, 78% (n=313/399) had a matching survey. A Heart Runner arrived before EMS in 47% (n=147/313) of the cases, and applied an AED in 41% (n=61/147) of these cases. Rate of bystander defibrillation was 2.5-fold higher compared to cases where the EMS arrived first (Table 1). Conclusions: By activation of the Heart Runner-app, Heart Runners arrived prior to EMS in nearly half of all the OHCA cases. Bystander defibrillation rate was significantly higher when Heart Runners arrived prior to EMS.

Out-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest in children with congenital heart defects

2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jarle Jortveit ◽  
Jakob Klcovansky ◽  
Gaute Døhlen ◽  
Leif Eskedal ◽  
Sigurd Birkeland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Congenital Heart Defects ◽  
Congenital Heart ◽  
Heart Defects ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Supplementary Information ◽  
Clinical Registry ◽  
Birth Registry ◽  
Live Births ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

AimsOut-of-hospital sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) is a rare but devastating event in children and adolescents. The risk is assumed to be higher in children with congenital heart defects (CHDs) than in healthy individuals. The aim of the present study was to investigate the rate of and survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in children 2–18 years old with CHDs.Methods and resultsData concerning all live births in Norway between 1994 and 2009 were retrieved from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway, the patient administrative systems at all hospitals in Norway, the Oslo University Hospital’s Clinical Registry for Congenital Heart Defects and the Norwegian Cause of Death Registry. Survivors were followed through 2012, and supplementary information for the deceased children was retrieved from medical records at Norwegian hospitals. Among the 943 871 live births in Norway from 1994 to 2009, 11 272 (1.2%) children had a CHD. We identified 11 (0.1%) children 2–18 years old with CHDs who experienced out-of-hospital SCA. The estimated rate of out-of-hospital SCA in children 2–18 years old with CHD was 10 per 100 000 person-years. Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation was initiated in all patients. Three children survived.ConclusionsThe incidence of and survival after out-of-hospital SCA in children with CHDs were comparable to the reported rates in the general child population.

Abstract 219: Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Vienna 2014

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Keferböck ◽  
Philip Datler ◽  
Mario Krammel ◽  
Elisabeth Lobmeyer ◽  
Alexander Nürnberger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cerebral Performance Category ◽  
Medical Personnel ◽  
Shockable Rhythm ◽  
Initial Rhythm ◽  
Bystander Cpr ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Background: Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) and especially the out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is always an urgent situation, which requires well trained medical personnel. The emergency medical system (EMS) in Vienna took part in the Circulation Improving Care (CIRC) trial form 2008 to 2010. In this time they had an additional training. Therefore we revaluated the outcome of OHCA nowadays. Method: Interim report of a prospective observational study of all humans over eighteen, who suffer an OHCA resuscitated by the EMS in Vienna from August 2013 - April 2014. For those patients, who survived 30 days, a cerebral performance category score (CPC) was evaluated. Results: During nine months 701 patients could be investigated and 625 achieved the protocol for this trial. The median age of the patients was 68 years (IQR 59-79) and 399 (64%) were male. Witnessed by bystanders was the cardiac arrest in 359 (57%) patients. In the latter patients restoration of spontaneous circulation (n=223, 36%)(ROSC) and 30 day survival (n=166, 27%) was significantly more often achieved than in patients with non-witnessed cardiac arrest. Bystanders provided chest compressions in 284 (45%) cases and in this subgroup a shockable initial rhythm was more often (p<0.0001). Still in 189 (53%) of the patients where the cardiac arrest was witnessed, bystander resuscitation wasn′t attempted. An initial shockable rhythm was found in 146 (24%) patients with significant better outcome in all primary outcome measures. Of the 62 (10%) 30-days-survivors, 33 (6%) had good neurological outcome with a CPC 1-2.In 12 (2%) cases the CPC was missing. Conclusion: The results are comparable to findings of our previous studies. A significant better result in all primary outcome measures could be found for witnessed OHCA with an initial shockable rhythm. Furthermore those patients with bystander CPR had significant more often a shockable initial rhythm. Therefore more efforts have to be invested into encouraging the community to start with a bystander CPR if an OHCA is witnessed.

Abstract 25: Cost-Effectiveness of Public Automated External Defibrillators

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars W Andersen ◽  
Mathias J Holmberg ◽  
Asger Granfeldt ◽  
Lyndon P James ◽  
Lisa Caulley
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Incremental Cost ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio ◽  
Cost Effectiveness Ratio ◽  
Automated External Defibrillators ◽  
The Us ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Despite a consistent association with improved outcomes, automated external defibrillators (AEDs) are used in only approximately 10% of public out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. One of the barriers towards increased use might be cost. The objective of this study was to provide a contemporary cost-effectiveness analysis on the use of public AEDs in the United States (US) to inform guidelines and public health initiatives. Methods: We compared the cost-effectiveness of public AEDs to no AEDs for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the US over a life-time horizon. The analysis assumed a societal perspective and results are presented as costs (in 2017 US dollars) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Model inputs were based on reviews of the literature. For the base case, we modelled an annual cardiac arrest incidence per AED of 20%. It was assumed that AED use was associated with a 52% relative increase in survival to hospital discharge with a favorable neurological outcome in those with a shockable rhythm. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis was conducted to account for joint parameter uncertainty. Consistent with recent guidelines from the American Heart Association, we used a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY gained. Results: The no AED strategy resulted in 1.63 QALYs at a cost of $42,757. The AED strategy yielded an additional 0.26 QALYs for an incremental increase in cost of $13,793 per individual. The AED strategy yielded an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $53,797 per QALY gained. The yearly incidence of cardiac arrests occurring in the presence of an AED had minimal effect on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio except at very low incidences. At an incidence of 1%, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $101,040 per QALY gained. In sensitivity analyses across a plausible range of health-care and societal estimates, the AED strategy remained cost-effective. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, the AED strategy was cost-effective in 43%, 85%, and 91% of the scenarios at a threshold of $50,000, $100,000, and $150,000 per QALY gained, respectively. Conclusion: Public AEDs are a cost-effective public health intervention in the US. These findings support widespread dissemination of public AEDs.

Abstract 18: Analyzing Heart Rhythm During Chest Compressions in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients Using New Algorithm for Automated External Defibrillators

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 138 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Corina de Graaf ◽  
Stefanie G Beesems ◽  
Ronald E Stickney ◽  
Paula Lank ◽  
Fred W Chapman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Pulseless Electrical Activity ◽  
Heart Rhythm ◽  
Chest Compressions ◽  
Study Region ◽  
Automated External Defibrillators ◽  
Conventional Analysis ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Conventional Algorithm

Purpose: Automated external defibrillators (AED) prompt the rescuer to stop cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for ECG analysis. Any interruption of CPR has a negative impact on outcome. We prospectively evaluated a new algorithm (cprINSIGHT) which can analyse the ECG while rescuers continue CPR. Methods: We analysed data from patients with attempted resuscitation from OHCA who were connected to an AED with cprINSIGHT (Stryker Physio-Control LIFEPAK CR2) between June 2017 and June 2018 in the Amsterdam Resuscitation Study region. The first analysis in the CR2 is a conventional analysis; subsequent analyses use the cprINSIGHT algorithm. This algorithm classifies the rhythm as shockable (S), non-shockable (NS), or no decision. If no decision, the AED prompts for a pause in CPR and uses its conventional algorithm. The characteristics of the first 3 cprINSIGHT analyses (analyses 2-4) were analysed. Ventricular fibrillation (VF) cases were both coarse and fine VF with a lower threshold of 0.08 mV. Results: Data from 132 consecutive OHCA cases were analysed. The initial recorded rhythm was VF or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) in 35 cases (27%), pulseless electrical activity in 34 cases (25%) and asystole in 63 cases (48%). In 114 cases (86%), 1 or more cprINSIGHT analyses were done. Analyses 2-4 covered 90% of all cprINSIGHT analyses. The analyzed rhythm was VF/VT in 12-17%, organised QRS rhythm in 29-35% and asystole in 51-56% (see table). cprINSIGHT reached a S or NS decision in 65-74% of cases, with a sensitivity of 90-100% and a specificity of 100%. When it reached no decision, the rhythm was asystole in 65-79% of analyses, VF/VT in 0-9% and QRS rhythm in 18-27%; conventional analysis followed. Chest compression fraction was 85-88%, CPR fraction was 99%. Conclusion: This new algorithm analysed the ECG without need for a pause in chest compressions 65-74% of the time and had 90-100% sensitivity and 100% specificity when it made a shock or a no shock decision.

scholarly journals LO19: AED on the fly: A drone delivery feasibility study for rural and remote out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

CJEM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (S1) ◽  
pp. S13-S14
Author(s):  
I. Drennan ◽  
S. Cheskes ◽  
P. Snobelen ◽  
M. Nolan ◽  
T. Chan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Response Time ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Sudden Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Optimal Strategies ◽  
Second Phase ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Rural And Remote ◽  
Automated External Defibrillators ◽  
Lift Off

Introduction: Time-to-treatment plays a pivotal role in survival from sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). Every minute delay in defibrillation results in a 7-10% reduction in survival. This is particularly problematic in rural and remote regions, where bystander and EMS response is often prolonged and automated external defibrillators (AED) are often not available. Our objective was to examine the feasibility of a novel AED drone delivery method for rural and remote SCA. A secondary objective was to compare times between AED drone delivery and ambulance response to various mock SCA resuscitations. Methods: We conducted 6 simulations in two different rural communities in southern Ontario. During phase 1 (4 simulations) a “mock” call was placed to 911 and a single AED drone and an ambulance were simultaneously dispatched from the same location to a pre-determined destination. Once on scene, trained first responders retrieved the AED from the drone and initiated resuscitative efforts on a manikin. The second phase (2 scenarios) were done in a similar manner save for the drone being dispatched from a regionally optimized location for drone response. Results: Phase 1: The distance from dispatch location to scene varied from 6.6 km to 8.8 km. Mean (SD) response time from 911 call to scene arrival was 11.2 (+/- 1.0) minutes for EMS compared to 8.1 (+/- 0.1) for AED drone delivery. In all four simulations, the AED drone arrived before EMS, ranging from 2.1 to 4.4 minutes faster. The mean time for trained responders to retrieve the AED and apply it to the manikin was 35 (+/- 5) sec. No difficulties were encountered in drone activation by dispatch, drone lift off, landing or removal of the AED from the drone by responders. Phase 2: The ambulance response distance was 20km compared to 9km for the drone. Drones were faster to arrival at the scene by 7 minutes and 8 minutes with AED application 6 and 7 minutes prior to ambulance respectively. Conclusion: This implementation study suggests AED drone delivery is feasible with improvements in response time during a simulated SCA scenario. These results suggest the potential for AED drone delivery to decrease time to first defibrillation in rural and remote communities. Further research is required to determine the appropriate distance for drone delivery of an AED in an integrated EMS system as well as optimal strategies to simplify bystander application of a drone delivered AED.

P1702ARIADNA: first steps in the development of a collaborative initiative to create a map of automated external defibrillators and improve survival in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Spain

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Garcia-Izquierdo Jaen ◽  
C Martin-Munoz ◽  
V Orozco-Legaza ◽  
A Iniguez-Romo ◽  
M Anguita-Sanchez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Social Engagement ◽  
Easy Access ◽  
Dissemination And Implementation ◽  
Spanish Society ◽  
Automated External Defibrillators ◽  
Final Version ◽  
The Future ◽  
Hospital Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Collaborative Initiative

Abstract Background Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Although some geographical variation in the incidence of OHCA can be found, clinical outcomes are globally poor, with an expected percentage of survival to hospital discharge below 10% worldwide. Up to 60% of public OHCAs present with ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. Early OHCA recognition and early defibrillation are key elements to increase the chances of survival with a favorable neurological outcome. To make this possible, easy access to automated external defibrillators (AEDs) must be warranted. Public AED programs have been implemented worldwide and have shown a significant improvement in survival and better functional outcome after OHCA. However, installation of public-access AEDs without linking them to responders appears to be meaningless and might not improve survival. Ariadna is the first collaborative approach to improve survival in OHCA in Spain. Endorsed by the Spanish Society of Cardiology and the Spanish Red Cross, Ariadna is a smartphone app that aims to create a map of all available AEDs within the Spanish territory using GPS functions available on smartphones. This app is also directed at establishing the first national network of lay responders trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). In the future, this network will serve as an enhancing tool to provide a rapid response to OHCA under the coordination of the emergency medical services. Purpose To analyze the preliminary results in terms of dissemination and implementation of Ariadna in the first months after the release of the final version of the app. Methods Ariadna app is available for free on iOS and Android. Users can sign up as “seekers” to locate and validate AEDs within the Spanish territory. All AEDs are displayed on a map, including those pending validation. “Seekers” who provide proof of valid CPR training can become “responders” and agree to be alerted in case of OHCA nearby in the future. In this preliminary analysis, the number of registered users along with the amount of registered and validated AEDs were retrieved from the app database. Results The final version of app was released September, 8, 2018. Since then and until February 2019, Ariadna has recruited 10846 users. A total of 3975 AEDs have been registered, 1037 of which (26%) have received validation from at least a different user. These numbers represent a growth rate of 70 new users and 26 new AEDs every day. Ariadna App growth in numbers Conclusion Ariadna has experienced an exponential growth in the first months of functioning and is already helping raise awareness for cardiac arrest in Spain. This proves the social engagement and successful dissemination of this collaborative initiative. Every effort will be made to progressively increase the number of users and registered AEDs in order to link them to trained responders and finally improve survival in cardiac arrest. Acknowledgement/Funding Financial support from the Spanish Society of Cardiology

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document