scholarly journals Association of Blood Pressure Classification Using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline with Risk of Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidehiro Kaneko ◽  
Yuichiro Yano ◽  
Hidetaka Itoh ◽  
Kojiro Morita ◽  
Hiroyuki Kiriyama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Health Claims ◽  
Claims Database ◽  
Stage 1

Background: Heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are growing in prevalence worldwide. Few studies have assessed to what extent stage 1 hypertension in the 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) blood pressure (BP) guidelines is associated with incident HF and AF. Methods: Analyses were conducted using a nationwide health claims database collected in the JMDC Claims Database between 2005 and 2018 (n=2,196,437; mean age, 44.0±10.9 years; 584% men). No participants were taking antihypertensive medication or had a known history of cardiovascular disease. Each participant was categorized as having normal BP (systolic BP [SBP]<120 mm Hg and diastolic BP [DBP]<80 mm Hg; n=1,155,885); elevated BP (SBP 120-129 mm Hg and DBP<80 mm Hg; n=337,390); stage 1 hypertension (SBP 130-139 mm Hg or DBP 80-89 mm Hg; n=459,820); or stage 2 hypertension (SBP≥140 mm Hg or DBP≥90 mm Hg; n=243,342). Using Cox proportional hazards models, we identified associations between BP groups and HF/AF events. We also calculated the population attributable fractions (PAFs) to estimate the proportion of HF and AF events that would be preventable if participants with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension were to have normal BP. Results: Over a mean follow-up of 1,112±854 days, 28,056 incident HF and 7,774 incident AF events occurred. After multivariable adjustment, hazard ratios for HF and AF events were 1.10 (95% Confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.15) and 1.07 (95% CI, 0.99-1.17), respectively, for elevated BP; 1.30 (95% CI, 1.26-1.35) and 1.21 (95% CI, 1.13-1.29), respectively, for stage 1 hypertension; and 2.05 (95% CI, 1.97-2.13) and 1.52 (95% CI, 1.41-1.64), respectively, for stage 2 hypertension vs normal BP. PAFs for HF associated with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension were 23.2% (95% CI, 20.3%-26.0%) and 51.2% (95% CI, 49.2%-53.1%), respectively. The PAFs for AF associated with stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension were 17.4% (95% CI, 11.5%-22.9%) and 34.3% (95% CI, 29.1%-39.2%), respectively. Conclusions: Both stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension were associated with a greater incidence of HF and AF in the general population. The ACC/AHA BP classification system may help identify adults at higher risk for HF and AF events.

scholarly journals A longitudinal analysis of the progression from normal blood pressure to stage 2 hypertension: A 12-year Korean cohort

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Sun Yu ◽  
Kwan Hong ◽  
Byung Chul Chun
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Normal Blood ◽  
Normal Blood Pressure ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Stage 1

Abstract Background The study aimed to estimate the incidence of and period of progression to stage 2 hypertension from normal blood pressure. Methods We selected a total of 21,172 normotensive individuals between 2003 and 2004 from the National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening and followed them up until 2015. The criteria for blood pressure were based on the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association 2017 guideline (normal BP: SBP < 120 and DBP < 80 mmHg, elevated BP: SBP 120–129 and DBP < 80 mmHg, stage 1 hypertension: SBP 130–139 or DBP 80–89 mmHg, stage 2 hypertension: SBP ≥140 or DBP ≥ 90 mmHg). We classified the participants into four courses (Course A: normal BP → elevated BP → stage 1 hypertension→ stage 2 hypertension, Course B: normal BP → elevated BP → stage 2 hypertension, Course C: normal BP → stage 1 hypertension → stage 2 hypertension, Course D: normal BP → stage 2 hypertension) according to their progression from normal blood pressure to stage 2 hypertension. Results During the median 12.23 years of follow-up period, 52.8% (n= 11,168) and 23.6% (n=5004) of the participants had stage 1 and stage 2 hypertension, respectively. In particular, over 60 years old had a 2.8-fold higher incidence of stage 2 hypertension than 40–49 years old. After the follow-up period, 77.5% (n=3879) of participants with stage 2 hypertension were found to be course C (n= 2378) and D (n=1501). After the follow-up period, 77.5% (n=3879) of participants with stage 2 hypertension were found to be course C (n= 2378) and D (n=1501). The mean years of progression from normal blood pressure to stage 2 hypertension were 8.7±2.6 years (course A), 6.1±2.9 years (course B), 7.5±2.8 years (course C) and 3.2±2.0 years, respectively. Conclusions This study found that the incidence of hypertension is associated with the progression at each stage. We suggest that the strategies necessary to prevent progression to stage 2 hypertension need to be set differently for each target course.

scholarly journals Body of Evidence in Favor of Adopting 130/80 mm Hg as New Blood Pressure Cut-Off for All the Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy

Medicina ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (10) ◽  
pp. 703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Sisti ◽  
Belinda Williams
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Diastolic Blood Pressure ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Hypertensive Disorders Of Pregnancy ◽  
Obstetric Population ◽  
Stage 1

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) updated its guideline redefining the classification of hypertension and the blood pressure cut-off in 2017. The current cut-offs for stage 1 hypertension of 130 mm Hg systolic blood pressure or 80 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure replace the previous cut-offs of 140 mm Hg systolic blood pressure or 90 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure which were based on the ACC/AHA guidelines from 1988. However, the blood pressure cut-off for the obstetric population still remains as 140/90 mm Hg despite the scarcity of evidence for it. Recent American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) bulletins for pregnant women have not reflected the new ACC/AHA change of guideline. We reviewed a mounting body of evidence prompting the implementation of the new ACC/AHA guidelines for the obstetric population. These studies examined maternal and fetal outcomes applying the new ACC/AHA guidelines during antepartum or postpartum care.

scholarly journals Association between blood pressure classification using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood pressure guideline and hypertensive retinopathy

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H Seki ◽  
H Kaneko ◽  
S Matsuoka ◽  
H Itoh ◽  
Y Yano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Hypertensive Retinopathy ◽  
Stage 1

Abstract Purpose We aimed to explore the association of blood pressure (BP) classification using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Guideline and the prevalence of hypertensive retinopathy using a nationwide epidemiological database. Methods This study is a retrospective observational cross-sectional analysis using the health claims database of the JMDC between 2005 and 2020. We analyzed 280,599 participants who did not take anti-hypertensive medications. Each participant was categorized as having normal BP (systolic BP [SBP] &lt;120 mm Hg and diastolic BP [DBP] &lt;80 mm Hg; n=159,524); elevated BP (SBP 120–129 mm Hg and DBP &lt;80 mm Hg; n=35,603); stage 1 hypertension (SBP 130–139 mm Hg or DBP 80–89 mm Hg; n=54,795); or stage 2 hypertension (SBP ≥140 mm Hg or DBP ≥90 mm Hg; n=30,677). Retinal photography at health check-up was classified as normal, grade 1, grade 2, grade 3, or grade 4 according to the Keith-Wagener-Barker system. Results Median (interquartile range) age was 46 (40–53) years, and 50.4% were men. Hypertensive retinopathy which was defined as ≥ Keith-Wagener-Barker system grade 1, was observed in 16,836 participants (6.0%). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that, compared with normal BP, elevated BP (odds ratio [OR] 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.23–1.38), stage 1 hypertension (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.64–1.79), and stage 2 hypertension (OR 4.10, 95% CI 3.93–4.28) were associated with higher prevalence of hypertensive retinopathy. Even among 92,121 participants without obesity, high waist circumference, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, cigarette smoking, and alcohol drinking, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that, compared with normal BP, elevated BP (odds ratio 1.34, 95% CI 1.19–1.51), stage 1 hypertension (OR 1.79, 95% CI 1.61–1.98), and stage 2 hypertension (OR 4.42, 95% CI 4.00–4.92) were associated with higher prevalence of hypertensive retinopathy. The association between BP category and hypertensive retinopathy was observed in all subgroups stratified by age or sex. Conclusion Our investigation showed that the prevalence of hypertensive retinopathy increased with the blood pressure category, suggesting that atherosclerotic change could start even in elevated BP and stage 1 hypertension. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan (19AA2007 and H30-Policy-Designated-004) and the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan (17H04141).

scholarly journals Association of Isolated Diastolic Hypertension Based on the Cutoff Value in the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guidelines With Subsequent Cardiovascular Events in the General Population

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (19) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hidehiro Kaneko ◽  
Hidetaka Itoh ◽  
Haruki Yotsumoto ◽  
Hiroyuki Kiriyama ◽  
Tatsuya Kamon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Cutoff Value ◽  
Diastolic Hypertension ◽  
Epidemiological Database ◽  
Stage 1

Background The 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines lowered the threshold of blood pressure (BP) for hypertension to 130/80 mm Hg. However, the clinical significance of isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH) according to the cutoff value of the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines was uncertain. Methods and Results We analyzed the claims database of Japan Medical Data Center (a nationwide epidemiological database). We excluded individuals who were aged <20 years, had systolic hypertension, were taking antihypertensive medication, or had prevalent cardiovascular disease, and studied 1 746 493 individuals (mean age, 42.9±10.7 years; 961 097 men [55.0%]). The average observational period was 1107±855 days. Stage 1 IDH, defined as diastolic BP 80 to 89 mm Hg, and stage 2 IDH, defined as diastolic BP ≥90 mm Hg, were found in 230 513 (13.2%) and 16 159 (0.9%) individuals, respectively. Compared with individuals with normal diastolic BP, individuals with stage 1 and stage 2 IDH were older and more likely to be men. Prevalence of classic risk factors was higher in patients with IDH. Kaplan–Meier curves showed that stage 1 and stage 2 IDH were associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular events, defined as myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, and stroke. Multivariable analysis showed that stage 1 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.17) and stage 2 (HR, 1.28) IDH were independently associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular events. Subgroup analyses showed that the association of IDH with cardiovascular events was seen irrespective of age and sex. Conclusions The analysis of a nationwide epidemiological database showed that IDH based on the cutoff value in the 2017 ACC/AHA BP guidelines was associated with an elevated risk of subsequent cardiovascular events.

scholarly journals AHA/ACC-defined stage 1 hypertensive adults do not display cutaneous microvascular endothelial dysfunction

2020 ◽  
Vol 319 (3) ◽  
pp. H539-H546
Author(s):  
Gabrielle A. Dillon ◽  
Jody L. Greaney ◽  
Sean Shank ◽  
Urs A. Leuenberger ◽  
Lacy M. Alexander
Keyword(s):  
Nitric Oxide ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Endothelial Dysfunction ◽  
Endothelial Function ◽  
Clinical Guidelines ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Microvascular Endothelial ◽  
Stage 1

This is the first study to pharmacologically assess the mechanistic regulation of endothelial function in adults with hypertension, classified according to the 2017 clinical guidelines set for by the American Heart Association (AHA) and American College of Cardiology (ACC). Compared with that in normotensive adults, nitric oxide-mediated endothelium-dependent dilation is impaired in adults with stage 2, but not stage 1, hypertension. Adults lacking a nighttime dip in blood pressure demonstrated reductions in endothelium-dependent dilation.

scholarly journals Managing Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Gopinathannair ◽  
Lin Y. Chen ◽  
Mina K. Chung ◽  
William K. Cornwell ◽  
Karen L. Furie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
American Heart Association ◽  
American Heart ◽  
Heart Association ◽  
Rhythm Control ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Patients With Heart Failure ◽  
Scientific Statement

Atrial fibrillation and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction are increasing in prevalence worldwide. Atrial fibrillation can precipitate and can be a consequence of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and cardiomyopathy. Atrial fibrillation and heart failure, when present together, are associated with worse outcomes. Together, these 2 conditions increase the risk of stroke, requiring oral anticoagulation in many or left atrial appendage closure in some. Medical management for rate and rhythm control of atrial fibrillation in heart failure remain hampered by variable success, intolerance, and adverse effects. In multiple randomized clinical trials in recent years, catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction has shown superiority in improving survival, quality of life, and ventricular function and reducing heart failure hospitalizations compared with antiarrhythmic drugs and rate control therapies. This has resulted in a paradigm shift in management toward nonpharmacological rhythm control of atrial fibrillation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The primary objective of this American Heart Association scientific statement is to review the available evidence on the epidemiology and pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation in relation to heart failure and to provide guidance on the latest advances in pharmacological and nonpharmacological management of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. The writing committee’s consensus on the implications for clinical practice, gaps in knowledge, and directions for future research are highlighted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document