Abstract 371: Stroke Healthcare Quality and Outcomes in Different Level of Stroke Centers

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Xin
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Performance Measures ◽  
Healthcare Quality ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Composite Measure ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Hospital Outcomes ◽  
Stroke Center

Background: Evidences support the stroke centers, including primary stroke center (PSC) and comprehensive stroke center (CSC) to improve stroke patient healthcare and outcomes. Objects: We aimed to compare stroke healthcare quality and in-hospital outcomes between CSCs and PSCs in China. Methods: Data were collected from acute stroke patients who were admitted to CSCs or PSCs that participated in the China Stroke Center Alliance (CSCA) program. Stroke care quality performances include: intravenous rtPA or endovascular thrombolysis (EVT) therapy in acute ischemic stroke (IS) patients, neurosurgical procedures of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) or subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients, secondary prevention measures (such as medicines, dysphagia screening, rehabilitation assessment) in stroke patients. Performances of above were assessed by all-or-none measure and composite measure. The former was defined as the proportion of patients who received all the performance measures for which the patient was eligible. The latter was defined as the total number of eligible performance measures performed divided by the total number of performance measures for which a given patient was eligible. The composite measure was calculated for each patient and then averaged. Outcome was mainly estimated by in-hospital mortality. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to analyze the performances of stroke care quality and in-hospital outcomes between CSC and PSC. Results: From 1st Aug, 2015 to 31st July, 2019, 750594 stroke patients from 1474 stroke centers (252 CSCs and 1222 PSCs) were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 65.8 (SD 12.2) years old, and 62.5% (469308) were male. By multivariable logistic regression analysis, patient characteristics (age, gender, NIHSS or GCS score, smoking and all the medical histories) and hospital characteristics (hospital level and location) were adjusted, patients in CSCs had higher all-or-none measure (adjusted OR, 1.22 [95%CI, 1.11 to 1.35]). Compared to PSCs, IS patients at CSCs were more likely to receive IV rtPA or EVT therapy (adjusted OR, 1.31 [95%CI, 1.27 to 1.35]; adjusted OR, 1.43 [95%CI, 1.31 to 1.57]), more ICH and SAH patients received neurosurgery (adjusted OR, 1.70 [95%CI, 1.58 to 1.83]; adjusted OR, 1.29 [95%CI, 1.14 to 1.46]). While, CSCs had higher in-hospital mortality than PSCs (adjusted OR, 1.33 [95%CI, 1.23 to 1.43]), especially in ICH patients (adjusted OR, 1.77 [95%CI, 1.54 to 2.03]). Conclusions: CSCs achieved higher care quality for stroke patients but lower risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality. The results might be instructive in improving the care quality in different types of stroke.

scholarly journals The stroke navigator: meaningful use of the electronic health record to efficiently report inpatient stroke care quality

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (11) ◽  
pp. 1534-1539 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jay K Nathan ◽  
Jenevra Foley ◽  
Tiffany Hoang ◽  
Jim Hiner ◽  
Stephanie Brooks ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Performance Measures ◽  
Inpatient Care ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Automated Process ◽  
Electronic Health ◽  
Daily Time

Abstract To facilitate high-quality inpatient care for stroke patients, we built a system within our electronic health record (EHR) to identify stroke patients while they are in the hospital; capture necessary data in the EHR to minimize the burden of manual abstraction for stroke performance measures, decreasing daily time requirement from 2 hours to 15 minutes; generate reports using an automated process; and electronically transmit data to third parties. Provider champions and support from the EHR development team ensured that we balanced the needs of the hospital with those of frontline providers. This work summarizes the development and implementation of our stroke quality system.

Stroke care quality in China: Substantial improvement, and a huge challenge and opportunity

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 229-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yilong Wang ◽  
Zixiao Li ◽  
Xingquan Zhao ◽  
David Wang ◽  
Hao Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Measures ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Substantial Improvement ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Organization ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
National Priority ◽  
Stroke Center

Stroke is The first two authors contributed equally. the leading cause of death and adult disability in China. Although evidence-based clinical interventions have been identified to improve care and outcomes in stroke, significant gaps still exist between guideline recommendations and clinical practice in China. Regional and national stroke registries have been used to assess the benchmark of stroke care quality, provide feedback on compliance with evidence-based performance measures to health care providers, and continuously improve stroke care quality without increasing additional medical costs in the past several decades worldwide. In China, stroke care has become a national priority. A series of stroke care quality assessment and improvement actions was initiated by the Ministry of Health to increase the detection of high-risk populations with stroke, rate of adherence to evidence-based process performance measures of stroke care, and stroke care organization development, aiming to decrease the burden of stroke. China National Stroke Registries have been started in 2007, and they are conducted every 3 to 5 years. A carotid disease screen and intervention project for communities was initiated in 2009. The Chinese Stroke Association, founded in 2015, launched the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance to increase the stroke center design in the near future. In this article, we described these stroke care actions and progression, summarized the benchmark and improvement of stroke care quality, and outlined the future plans in China.

In-Hospital Stroke Care: A Six-Year Community-Based Primary Stroke Center Experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 194187442110070
Author(s):  
Felix Ejike Chukwudelunzu ◽  
Bart M Demaerschalk ◽  
Leonardo Fugoso ◽  
Emeka Amadi ◽  
Donn Dexter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Stroke Team ◽  
Primary Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background and purpose: In-hospital stroke-onset assessment and management present numerous challenges, especially in community hospitals. Comprehensive analysis of key stroke care metrics in community-based primary stroke centers is under-studied. Methods: Medical records were reviewed for patients admitted to a community hospital for non-cerebrovascular indications and for whom a stroke alert was activated between 2013 and 2019. Demographic, clinical, radiologic and laboratory information were collected for each incident stroke. Descriptive statistical analysis was employed. When applicable, Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-Square tests were used to compare median values and categorical data between pre-specified groups. Statistical significance was set at alpha = 0.05. Results: There were 192 patients with in-hospital stroke-alert activation; mean age (SD) was 71.0 years (15.0), 49.5% female. 51.6% (99/192) had in-hospital ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. The most frequent mechanism of stroke was cardioembolism. Upon stroke activation, 45.8% had ischemic stroke while 40.1% had stroke mimics. Stroke team response time from activation was 26 minutes for all in-hospital activations. Intravenous thrombolysis was utilized in 8% of those with ischemic stroke; 3.4% were transferred for consideration of endovascular thrombectomy. In-hospital mortality was 17.7%, and the proportion of patients discharged to home was 34.4% for all activations. Conclusion: The in-hospital stroke mortality was high, and the proportions of patients who either received or were considered for acute intervention were low. Quality improvement targeting increased use of acute stroke intervention in eligible patients and reducing hospital mortality in this patient cohort is needed.

Abstract P394: Association Between Admission Dehydration and In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Gao ◽  
Hongqiu Gu ◽  
Shimeng Liu ◽  
Qi Zhou ◽  
Kang Kaijiang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Blood Urea Nitrogen ◽  
Regression Models ◽  
Fluid Management ◽  
Urea Nitrogen ◽  
Logistic Regression Models ◽  
Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Stroke Center

Background and purpose: Our aim was to investigate the associations between dehydration status at admission and in-hospital mortality in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods: Data of consecutive patients with intracerebral hemorrhage between August 2015 and July 2019 based on China Stroke Center Alliance (CSCA) were analyzed. The patients were stratified based on the blood urea nitrogen (BUN) to creatinine (CR) ratio (BUN/CR) on admission, into dehydrated (BUN/CR ≥ 15) and non-dehydrated (BUN/CR < 15) groups. Data were analyzed with multi-variate logistic regression models to analyze the risks of death at hospital and baseline dehydration status. Results: A total number of 84043 patients with intracerebral hemorrhage were included in the study. The median age of patients on admission was 63.0 years, and 37.5% of them were women. Based on the baseline BUN/CR, 59153 (70.4%) patients were classified into dehydration group. Patients with admission dehydration (BUN/CR ≥ 15) had 13% lower risks of in-hospital mortality than those without dehydration (BUN/CR < 15, adjusted OR=0.87, 95%CI: [0.78-0.96]). In patients aged <65 years, patients with baseline dehydration (BUN/CR ≥ 15) showed 19% lower risks of in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR=0.81, 95%CI: [0.70-0.94].adjusted p=0.0049) than non-dehydrated patients (BUN/CR<15). Conclusion: Admission dehydration is associated with lower in-hospital mortality in intracerebral hemorrhage,which provides an imaging clue that fluid management could be important for acute intracerebral hemorrhage.

Abstract P855: Importance of Compliance in Dysphagia Screening in Acute Stroke Care

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patty Noah ◽  
Melanie Henderson ◽  
Rebekah Heintz ◽  
Russell Cerejo ◽  
Christopher T Hackett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Aspiration Pneumonia ◽  
Hemorrhagic Stroke ◽  
Oral Intake ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Stroke Center

Introduction: Dysphagia occurs in up to two thirds of stroke patients and can lead to serious complications such as aspiration pneumonia, which is also linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Evidence-based guidelines recommend a bedside dysphagia assessment before oral intake in stroke patients regardless of initial stroke severity. Several studies have described registered nurses’ competency in terms of knowledge and skills regarding dysphagia screening. We aimed to examine the rate of aspiration pneumonia compared to the rate of dysphagia screening. Methods: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data at a single tertiary stroke center was carried out between January 2017 and June 2020. Data comparison was completed utilizing ICD-10 diagnosis codes to identify aspiration pneumonia in ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients. The data was reviewed to compare the compliance of a completed dysphagia screen prior to any oral intake to rate of aspiration pneumonia. Chi square tests were used to assess proportion differences in completed dysphagia screen and proportion of aspiration pneumonia diagnosis in the ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients. Results: We identified 3320 patient that met inclusion criteria. 67% were ischemic strokes, 22% were intracerebral hemorrhages and 11% were subarachnoid hemorrhages. Compliance with dysphagia screening decreased from 94.2% (n=1555/1650) in 2017-2018 to 74.0% (n=1236/1670) in 2019-2020, OR=0.17 (95%CI 0.14 - 0.22), p < 0.0001. Aspiration pneumonias increased from 58 (3.5%) in 2017-2018 to 77 (4.6%) in 2019-2020, but this difference was not statistically significant, OR=0.75 (95%CI 0.53 - 1.07), p = 0.11. Conclusion: We noted that the decrease in compliance with completing a dysphagia screen in patients with acute stroke prior to any oral intake was associated with a higher trend of aspiration pneumonia.

Abstract 5: Do Stroke Centers Reduce Mortality for Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke? An Instrumental Variable Analysis

2011 ◽  
Vol 4 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Xian ◽  
Robert G Holloway ◽  
Katia Noyes ◽  
Manish N Shah ◽  
Bruce Friedman
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
New York State ◽  
Selection Effect ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Instrumental Variable Analysis ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Stroke Center

Background: Although the establishment of stroke centers based on the Brain Attack Coalition recommendations has great potential to improve quality of stroke care, little is known about whether stroke centers improve health outcomes such as mortality. Methods: Using 2005-2006 New York State Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System data, we identified 32,783 hospitalized patients age 18+ with a principal diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke (ICD-9 433.x1, 434.x1 and 436). We compared in-hospital mortality and up to one year all-cause mortality between New York State Designated Stroke Centers and non-stroke center hospitals. Because patients were not randomly assigned to hospitals, stroke centers might treat different types of patients than other hospitals (a selection effect). We used a “natural randomization” approach, instrumental variable analysis (differential distance was the instrument), to control for this selection effect. To determine whether the mortality difference was specific to stroke care, we repeated the analysis using a different group of patients with gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage (N=53,077). Results: Of the 32,783 stroke patients, nearly 50% (16,258) were admitted to stroke centers. Stroke centers had lower unadjusted in-hospital mortality and 30-, 90-, 180-, and 365-day all-cause mortality than non-stroke centers (7.0% vs. 7.8%, 10.0% vs. 12.6%, 14.6% vs. 17.5%, 18.0% vs. 21.0%, 22.4% vs. 26.2%, respectively). After adjusting for patient and hospital characteristics, comorbidities, and the patient selection effect, stroke centers were associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality. The adjusted differences were -2.6%, -2.7%, -1.8%, and -2.3% for 30-, 90-, 180- and 365-day mortality (all p<0.05). The adjusted difference in in-hospital mortality was -0.8% but was not statistically significant. In a specificity analysis of patients with GI hemorrhage, stroke centers had slightly higher mortality. Conclusions: Hospitals that are Designated Stroke Centers had lower mortality for acute ischemic stroke than non-stroke center hospitals. The mortality benefit was specific to stroke and was not observed for GI hemorrhage. Providing stroke centers nationwide has the potential to reduce mortality.

Abstract TP383: Ischemic Stroke Patients With Diabetes Looking for Practices in Need of Improvement

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cynthia Bautista ◽  
Sally Gerard
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Cause Of Death ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Patients With Diabetes ◽  
Care Outcomes ◽  
Stroke Center

Background/Purpose: Stroke is the fifth leading cause of death and Diabetes is the seventh leading cause of death in the United States. Diabetes is an independent risk factor for stroke. Diabetes is a common co-morbidity in stroke patients and is associated with poor outcomes after stroke. Get with the Guidelines - Stroke (GWTG-S) Registry database provides a rich opportunity to look at disease-specific data and find opportunities for improving care. The purpose of this study was to examine specific elements of acute ischemic stroke care in patients with diabetes using the GWTG-S at Comprehensive and Primary Stroke Centers in Northeast of America. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive study at both a Comprehensive and Primary Stroke Center. The analysis focused on patients with ischemic stroke and diabetes entered in the GWTG-S from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2017. Data were analyzed looking at measures specific to stroke and the presence of diabetes. General demographic data were examined to compare populations and quality outcome measures. Results: The sample of patients with ischemic stroke and diabetes was over 1,000 patient’s at the two sites (Comprehensive site N = 804, Primary site N = 203) Incidence of ischemic stroke with diabetes at the two sites were 32% and 26%, respectively. Demographic data were similar in most categories including age, race, and gender. Significant differences were found in regard to the type of insurance. Stroke care outcomes indicated thrombolytic administration rates were the same at 8%. Diabetes care outcomes indicated patients discharged on insulin occurred in 18% to 26% of the sample. Conclusion/Implications for Practice: Ischemic stroke patients with diabetes were shown to receive similar care at both a comprehensive and primary care stroke center. There were no differences between centers in thrombolysis treatment for ischemic stroke patients with diabetes. Several opportunities for improvement in diabetes-related care need to be addressed.

Abstract T MP75: Facilities Available in Chinese Hospitals From China Stroke Research Network

Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunjuan Wang ◽  
Zixiao Li ◽  
Yilong Wang ◽  
Yong Jiang ◽  
Xingquan Zhao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Mainland China ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Level Of Care ◽  
Minimum Level ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Stroke Research ◽  
Primary Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background and Purpose: Stroke is the first leading cause of death in China and millions of patients were admitted to various levels of hospitals each year. However, it is unknown how many of these hospitals are able to provide an appropriate level of care for stroke patients since the certification program of comprehensive stroke center (CSC) and primary stroke center (PSC) has not been initiated in China. Method: In 2012, we selected all 554 hospitals that joined into the China Stroke Research Network (CSRN) to start a survey. These hospitals were from 31 provinces or municipalities, covered nearly the entire Mainland China. A six-page questionnaire was sent to each of them to obtain the stroke facility information. We used the same criteria and definitions for CSC, PSC, and minimum level for any hospital ward (AHW) admitting stroke patients with that of the European Stroke Facilities Survey. Results: For all the hospitals in CSRN, 521 (94.0%) returned the questionnaire, 20 (3.8%) met criteria for CSC, 179 (34.4%) for PSC, 64 (12.3%) for AHW, and 258 (49.5%) met none of them and provided a lower level of care. Hospitals meeting criteria for CSC, PSC, AHW, and none of them admitted 70 052 (8.8%), 334 834 (42.2%), 88 364 (11.1%), and 299 806 (37.8%) patients in the whole of last year. There was no 24-hour availability for brain CT scan in 4.3% of hospitals not meeting criteria for AHW, while neither stroke care map nor stroke pathway for patients admission in 81.0% of them. Conclusions: Less than two fifths of Chinese hospitals admitting acute stroke patients have optimal facilities, and nearly half even the minimum level is not available. Our study suggests that only one half acute stroke patients are treated in appropriate centers in China, facilities for hospitals admitting stroke patients should be enhanced and certification project of CSCs and PSCs may be a feasible choice.

scholarly journals The stroke mothership model survived during COVID-19 era: an observational single-center study in Emilia-Romagna, Italy

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (12) ◽  
pp. 3395-3399
Author(s):  
Andrea Zini ◽  
Michele Romoli ◽  
Mauro Gentile ◽  
Ludovica Migliaccio ◽  
Cosimo Picoco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Combined Treatment ◽  
Temporal Trends ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Minor Stroke ◽  
Care Organization ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Stroke Center ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction A reduction of the hospitalization and reperfusion treatments was reported during COVID-19 pandemic. However, high variability in results emerged, potentially due to logistic paradigms adopted. Here, we analyze stroke code admissions, hospitalizations, and stroke belt performance for ischemic stroke patients in the metropolitan Bologna region, comparing temporal trends between 2019 and 2020 to define the impact of COVID-19 on the stroke network. Methods This retrospective observational study included all people admitted at the Bologna Metropolitan Stroke Center in timeframes 1 March 2019–30 April 2019 (cohort-2019) and 1 March 2020–30 April 2020 (cohort-2020). Diagnosis, treatment strategy, and timing were compared between the two cohorts to define temporal trends. Results Overall, 283 patients were admitted to the Stroke Center, with no differences in demographic factors between cohort-2019 and cohort-2020. In cohort-2020, transient ischemic attack (TIA) was significantly less prevalent than 2019 (6.9% vs 14.4%, p = .04). Among 216 ischemic stroke patients, moderate-to-severe stroke was more represented in cohort-2020 (17.8% vs 6.2%, p = .027). Similar proportions of patients underwent reperfusion (45.9% in 2019 vs 53.4% in 2020), although a slight increase in combined treatment was detected (14.4% vs 25.4%, p = .05). Door-to-scan timing was significantly prolonged in 2020 compared with 2019 (28.4 ± 12.6 vs 36.7 ± 14.6, p = .03), although overall timing from stroke to treatment was preserved. Conclusion During COVID-19 pandemic, TIA and minor stroke consistently reduced compared to the same timeframe in 2019. Longer stroke-to-call and door-to-scan times, attributable to change in citizen behavior and screening at hospital arrival, did not impact on stroke-to-treatment time. Mothership model might have minimized the effects of the pandemic on the stroke care organization.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document