scholarly journals Midterm Prognosis of Patients With Pulmonary Embolism Receiving Catheter‐Directed Thrombolysis or Systemic Thrombolysis: A Nationwide Population‐Based Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donna Shu‐Han Lin ◽  
Yu‐Sheng Lin ◽  
Cho‐Kai Wu ◽  
Heng‐Hsu Lin ◽  
Jen‐Kuang Lee
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Reperfusion Therapy ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Inverse Probability ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Background This study compared the efficacy and safety between catheter‐directed thrombolysis (CDT) and systemic thrombolysis for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) with midterm follow‐up. Methods and Results We conducted a prospective open cohort study by using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database for 2001 to 2013. Patients who were first admitted for PE and were treated by either systemic thrombolysis or CDT were included and compared. Inverse probability of treatment weighting, based on the propensity score, was used to mitigate possible selection bias. A total of 145 CDT‐treated and 1158 systemic thrombolysis–treated patients with PE were included. The in‐hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in the CDT group (12.7% versus 21.4%; odds ratio, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36–0.67) after inverse probability of treatment weighting. No significant differences between the groups were observed for the safety (bleeding) outcomes. In patients who survived the index PE admission, the 1‐year all‐cause mortality rate was significantly lower in the CDT group after inverse probability of treatment weighting (12.2% versus 13.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56–0.94). Treatment with CDT was also associated with lower risks of recurrent PE (9.3% versus 17.5%; subdistribution HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41–0.66). The difference remained through the last follow‐up. Conclusions Among patients with PE requiring reperfusion therapy, those accepting CDT had lower all‐cause mortality and recurrent PE over both short‐term and midterm follow‐up periods than those receiving systemic thrombolysis. The bleeding risk was similar for both groups. These findings should be cautiously validated in future randomized trials.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis versus Pulmonary Artery Embolectomy in Pulmonary Embolism: A National Population-Based Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 152660282110547
Author(s):  
Donna Shu-Han Lin ◽  
Yu-Sheng Lin ◽  
Jen-Kuang Lee ◽  
Wen-Jone Chen
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Pulmonary Artery ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Objectives: This study aimed to compare the short-term and long-term follow-up outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) with those of pulmonary artery embolectomy (PAE) for patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) included in a nationwide cohort. Background: Data allowing direct comparisons between CDT and PAE are lacking in the literature, and the optimal management of high-risk and intermediate-risk PE is still debated. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted with data for 2001 through 2013 collected from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Patients who were first admitted for PE and treated with either CDT or PAE were included and compared. In-hospital outcomes included in-hospital death and safety (bleeding and cardiac arrhythmias) outcomes. Follow-up outcomes included all-cause mortality and recurrent PE during the 1- and 2-year follow-up periods and through the last follow-up. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on the propensity score was used to minimize possible selection bias, including indices for multimorbidity such as the Charlson’s Comorbidity Index (CCI) and HAS-BLED scores. Results: A total of 389 patients treated between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2013, were identified; 169 underwent CDT and 220 underwent PAE. After IPTW, there were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (18.2% vs 21.3%; odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70–1.62) or the incidence of safety outcomes between the CDT and PAE groups. The risks of all-cause mortality (30% vs 29.5%; hazard ratio 1.16, 95% CI: 0.89–1.53), recurrent PE (7.2% vs 8.7%; subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] 0.68, 95% CI: 0.39–1.21) and new-onset pulmonary hypertension (SHR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.05–1.32) were also not significantly different between the CDT and PAE groups at 2 years of follow-up. Subgroup analysis indicated that PAE may be associated with a more favorable 2-year mortality in patients <65 years old, patients with CCI scores of <3, patients with HAS-BLED scores of 1 to 2, and patients without cardiogenic shock (all P for interaction <.05). Conclusions: In patients with PE who required reperfusion therapy, CDT and PAE resulted in similar in-hospital and long-term all-cause mortality rates and long-term rates of recurrent PE. Bleeding risks were also comparable in the 2 groups.

Ultrasound-Assisted Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Submassive Pulmonary Embolism

2018 ◽  
Vol 52 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasoon P. Mohan ◽  
John J. Manov ◽  
Francisco Contreras ◽  
Michael E. Langston ◽  
Mehul H. Doshi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Right Heart ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
Ultrasound Assisted ◽  
Vascular Obstruction ◽  
The Right ◽  
Pulmonary Vascular Obstruction

Purpose: Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is a relatively new therapy for pulmonary embolism that achieves the superior clot resolution compared to systemic thrombolysis while avoiding the high bleeding risk intrinsically associated with that therapy. In order to examine the efficacy and safety of CDT, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing ultrasound-assisted CDT at our institution. Methods: The charts of 30 consecutive patients who underwent CDT as a treatment of pulmonary embolism at our institution were reviewed. Risk factors for bleeding during thrombolysis were noted. Indicators of the right heart strain on computed tomography and echocardiogram, as well as the degree of pulmonary vascular obstruction, were recorded before and after CDT. Thirty-day mortality and occurrence of bleeding events were recorded. Results: Nine (30%) patients had 3 or more minor contraindications to thrombolysis and 14 (47%) had major surgery in the month prior to CDT. Right ventricular systolic pressure and vascular obstruction decreased significantly after CDT. There was a significant decrease in the proportion of patients with right ventricular dilation or hypokinesis. Decrease in pulmonary vascular obstruction was associated with nadir of fibrinogen level. No patients experienced major or moderate bleeding attributed to CDT. Conclusion: Catheter-directed thrombolysis is an effective therapy in rapidly alleviating the right heart strain that is associated with increased mortality and long-term morbidity in patients with pulmonary embolism with minimal bleeding risk. Catheter-directed thrombolysis is a safe alternative to systemic thrombolysis in patients with risk factors for bleeding such as prior surgery. Future studies should examine the safety of CDT in patients with contraindications to systemic thrombolysis.

Bleeding, death, and costs of care during hospitalization for acute pulmonary embolism: Insights from the Saint Luke’s Outcomes of Pulmonary Embolism (SLOPE) study

2020 ◽  
pp. 1358863X2096741
Author(s):  
Matthew C Bunte ◽  
Kensey Gosch ◽  
Ahmed Elkaryoni ◽  
Anas Noman ◽  
Erin Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Common Adverse Event ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Death ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
Acute Pe

Limited data exist that comprehensively describe the practical management, in-hospital outcomes, healthcare resource utilization, and rates of post-hospital readmission among patients with submassive and massive pulmonary embolism (PE). Consecutive discharges for acute PE were identified from a single health system over 3 years. Records were audited to confirm presence of acute PE, patient characteristics, disease severity, medical treatment, and PE-related invasive therapies. Rates of in-hospital major bleeding and death, hospital length of stay (LOS), direct costs, and hospital readmission are reported. From January 2016 to December 2018, 371 patients were hospitalized for acute massive or submassive PE. In-hospital major bleeding (12.1%) was common, despite low utilization of systemic thrombolysis (1.8%) or catheter-directed thrombolysis (3.0%). In-hospital death was 10-fold higher among massive PE compared to submassive PE (36.6% vs 3.3%, p < 0.001). Massive PE was more common during hospitalizations not primarily related to venous thromboembolism, including hospitalizations primarily for sepsis or infection (26.8% vs 8.2%, p = 0.001). Overall, the median LOS was 6.0 days (IQR, 3.0–11.0) and the median standardized direct cost of admissions was $10,032 (IQR, $4467–$20,330). Rates of all-cause readmission were relatively high throughout late follow-up but did not differ between PE subgroups. Despite low utilization of thrombolysis, in-hospital bleeding remains a common adverse event during hospitalizations for acute PE. Although massive PE is associated with high risk for in-hospital bleeding and death, those successfully discharged after a massive PE demonstrate similar rates of readmission compared to submassive PE into late follow-up.

scholarly journals Reperfusion Treatment for Acute Pulmonary Embolism

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (02) ◽  
pp. 98-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rolf Engelberger ◽  
Nils Kucher
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Good Alternative ◽  
Reperfusion Therapy ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis ◽  
Favourable Safety ◽  
Favourable Safety Profile ◽  
Surgical Embolectomy

AbstractDue to the manifold treatment options for the management of acute pulmonary embolism, state-of-the-art management requires risk stratification for choosing the adapted treatment for each patient. Reperfusion therapy is an integral part of therapy for patients with pulmonary embolism at high risk for mortality, but its role in patients with intermediate risk pulmonary embolism is more debated. The largest amount of evidence exists for systemic thrombolysis, which is an efficient therapy, but at the prize of an increased bleeding risk. In recent years, various types of catheter-based reperfusion therapies have been introduced, and evidence is growing that this therapy is as efficient as systemic thrombolysis, but with a more favourable safety profile. Surgical embolectomy remains a good alternative for unstable patients, especially for those with absolute contraindications for thrombolysis or after failed systemic thrombolysis. While the early benefits of reperfusion therapy are well documented, evidence for long-term benefit is still scarce. The scope of this review is to summarize the evidence for the currently available reperfusion therapies in the management of acute pulmonary embolism.

scholarly journals Long-term mortality after massive, submassive, and low-risk pulmonary embolism

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 141-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajesh Gupta ◽  
Zaid Ammari ◽  
Osama Dasa ◽  
Mohammed Ruzieh ◽  
Jordan J Burlen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Acute Pe ◽  
Long Term Mortality ◽  
Overall Mortality

Guidelines for management of normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) emphasize further risk stratification on the basis of right ventricular (RV) size and biomarkers of RV injury or strain; however, the prognostic importance of these factors on long-term mortality is not known. We performed a retrospective cohort study of subjects diagnosed with acute PE from 2010 to 2015 at a tertiary care academic medical center. The severity of initial PE presentation was categorized into three groups: massive, submassive, and low-risk PE. The primary endpoint of all-cause mortality was ascertained using the Centers for Disease Control National Death Index (CDC NDI). A total of 183 subjects were studied and their median follow-up was 4.1 years. The median age was 65 years. The 30-day mortality rate was 7.7% and the overall mortality rate through the end of follow-up was 40.4%. The overall mortality rates for massive, submassive, and low-risk PE were 71.4%, 44.5%, and 28.1%, respectively ( p < 0.001). Landmark analysis using a 30-day cutpoint demonstrated that subjects presenting with submassive PE compared with low-risk PE had increased mortality during both the short- and the long-term periods. The most frequent causes of death were malignancy, cardiac disease, respiratory disease, and PE. Independent predictors of all-cause mortality were cancer at baseline, age, white blood cell count, diabetes mellitus, liver disease, female sex, and initial presentation with massive PE. In conclusion, the diagnosis of acute PE was associated with substantial long-term mortality. The severity of initial PE presentation was associated with both short- and long-term mortality.

scholarly journals Treatment Difficulties in High Risk Pulmonary Embolism. A Case Report

2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Balázs Bajka ◽  
Edvin Benedek ◽  
Alexandra Stănescu ◽  
Emese Rapolti ◽  
Monica Chițu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Thrombolytic Agent ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Surgical Embolectomy ◽  
High Bleeding Risk

Abstract Pulmonary embolism (PE) remains a common and potentially life-threatening cardiovascular emergency. Systemic thrombolysis with intravenous infusion of a thrombolytic agent is generally recommended for treatment of high risk PE. However, this method has known limitations in the presence of high bleeding risk. Catheter-directed thrombolysis has the potential to achieve the same benefits as systemic thrombolysis, with a lower risk of haemorrhage. The case presented is of a 67-year-old male patient with a high risk of pulmonary embolism and contraindications for systemic thrombolysis, in whom the presence of severe comorbidities presented an increased risk of surgical embolectomy, who was successfully treated by catheter-directed thrombolysis.

scholarly journals Pulmonary Embolism in COVID-19 Treated with VA-ECLS and Catheter tPA

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 117954842095745
Author(s):  
Arda Akoluk ◽  
Usman Mazahir ◽  
Steven Douedi ◽  
Adel Aziz ◽  
Aref Obagi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Massive Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Response Monitoring ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis ◽  
First Case ◽  
Catheter Directed Thrombolysis ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Bail Out

Background: Novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) has been the focus of the medical world since being declared a pandemic in March 2020. While the pathogenesis and heterogeneity of COVID-19 manifestations is still not fully understood, viral evasion of cellular immune responses and inflammatory dysregulation are believed to play essential roles in disease progression and severity. Case Presentation: We present the first case of a patient with COVID-19 with massive pulmonary embolism treated successfully with systemic thrombolysis, VA-ECLS, and bail out catheter directed thrombolysis. He was discharged from the hospital after an eventful hospital course on therapeutic anticoagulation with warfarin. Conclusions: We present the first case of a patient with COVID-19 with massive pulmonary embolism (PE) treated successfully with systemic thrombolysis, VA-ECLS and bail out catheter directed thrombolysis. In our experience catheter directed thrombolysis comes with an acceptable bleeding risk despite use of mechanical circulatory support, particularly with meticulous attention to vascular access and dose response monitoring.

Risk Stratification in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: The Latest Algorithms

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (02) ◽  
pp. 183-198
Author(s):  
Georgios A. Triantafyllou ◽  
Oisin O'Corragain ◽  
Belinda Rivera-Lebron ◽  
Parth Rali
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Hemodynamic Instability ◽  
Reperfusion Therapy ◽  
Mortality Prediction ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Short Term Mortality ◽  
Urgent Patient

AbstractPulmonary embolism (PE) is a common clinical entity, which most clinicians will encounter. Appropriate risk stratification of patients is key to identify those who may benefit from reperfusion therapy. The first step in risk assessment should be the identification of hemodynamic instability and, if present, urgent patient consideration for systemic thrombolytics. In the absence of shock, there is a plethora of imaging studies, biochemical markers, and clinical scores that can be used to further assess the patients' short-term mortality risk. Integrated prediction models incorporate more information toward an individualized and precise mortality prediction. Additionally, bleeding risk scores should be utilized prior to initiation of anticoagulation and/or reperfusion therapy administration. Here, we review the latest algorithms for a comprehensive risk stratification of the patient with acute PE.

Trends in risk stratification, in-hospital management and mortality of patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an analysis from China pUlmonary thromboembolism REgistry Study (CURES)

2021 ◽  
pp. 2002963
Author(s):  
Zhenguo Zhai ◽  
Dingyi Wang ◽  
Jieping Lei ◽  
Yuanhua Yang ◽  
Xiaomao Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Acute Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Severity Index ◽  
Disease Diagnosis ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
European Respiratory Society ◽  
Systemic Thrombolysis ◽  
All Cause Mortality

BackgroundSimilar trends of management and in-hospital mortality of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) have been reported in European and American populations. However, these tendencies were not clear in Asian countries.ObjectivesWe retrospectively analyzed the trends of risk stratification, management and in-hospital mortality for patients with acute PE through a multicenter registry in China (CURES).MethodsAdult patients with acute symptomatic PE were included between 2009 and 2015. Trends in disease diagnosis, treatment and death in hospital were fully analyzed. Risk stratification was retrospectively classified by hemodynamical status and the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) score according to the 2014 European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society guidelines.ResultsAmong overall 7438 patients, the proportions with high (hemodynamically instability), intermediate (sPESI≥1) and low (sPESI=0) risk were 4.2%, 67.1% and 28.7%, respectively. Computed tomographic pulmonary angiography was the widely employed diagnostic approach (87.6%) and anticoagulation was the frequently adopted initial therapy (83.7%). Between 2009 and 2015, a significant decline was observed for all-cause mortality (from 3.1% to 1.3%, adjusted Pfor trend=0.0003), with a concomitant reduction in use of initial systemic thrombolysis (from 14.8% to 5.0%, Pfor trend<0.0001). The common predictors for all-cause mortality shared by hemodynamically stable and unstable patients were co-existing cancer, older age, and impaired renal function.ConclusionsThe considerable reduction of mortality over years was accompanied by changes of initial treatment. These findings highlight the importance of risk stratification-guided management throughout the nation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document