Abstract TMP21: Intravenous Thrombolysis with Alteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke in Patients with Thrombocytopenia

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashkan Mowla ◽  
Haris Kamal ◽  
Navdeep Lail ◽  
Rick Magun ◽  
Sandhya Mehla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
P Value ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective: To evaluate the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in patients who received Intravenous tPA(IVT) for acute ischemic stroke(AIS) and were later found to have platelets less than 100,000 /mm 3 . Background: With increasing use of IVT for AIS and more studies on its risk and benefits, many of the initial exclusion criteria which were part of the pivotal NINDS trial have been challenged with well-designed case series and reports. Based on the latest scientific statement from the AHA/ASA on the exclusion and inclusion criteria for IVT in AIS published in February 2016, the safety and efficacy of IVT in AIS is unknown for the patients with platelet count <100,000(Class III, Level of evidence C). The platelet threshold of 100,000 /mm 3 was derived from expert consensus in the NINDS trial and since many of the exclusion criteria have been challenged, this value also comes into question. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients who received IVT for AIS from the beginning of 2006 till the end of August 2015 at our large volume comprehensive stroke center (SUNY Buffalo). Those with platelets <100,000/mm 3 were identified. Head CT done in 24 to 36 hours Post-thrombolysis was reviewed to evaluate the rate of sICH. sICH was defined as ICH with an increase in National Institute of Health Stroke Scale of at least 4 points. Results: A total of 835 patients received IV rtPA for AIS in our center during a 9·6-year period. Fifty one patients (6.1 %) were found to have sICH. A total of 5 patients (0.6 %) were identified to have platelet count <100,000 /mm 3 . One of them (20%) developed sICH post IV tPA administration .The mean platelet count of those 5 patients was 63,000 ± 19,000 /mm 3 (Range: 38,000 - 85,000 /mm 3 ) . To the best of our knowledge, only 21 thrombocytopenic patients have been reported to receive IV rtPA for AIS in the medical literature. Combining our 5 cases with 21 patients previously reported, we have 26 AIS patients who had platelet count <100,000 /mm 3 and received IV rtPA, with 2 of them developed sICH (7.7 %). Comparing the rate of sICH among this group with the patients with normal platelet count in our cohort, there was no statistically significant difference (7.7% versus 6.04%, p-value = 0.73). Conclusion: Although our extremely low number of cases precludes any solid conclusion, IV rtPA for AIS might be safe in patients with platelet count <100,000/ mm 3 and it is reasonable not to delay IV rtPA administration while waiting for the platelet count result, unless there is strong suspicion for abnormal platelet count.

Comparison of Sub-Types and Severity of Ischemic Stroke among Both Genders

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 1340-1344
Author(s):  
Q. Yusaf ◽  
A. Qayyum ◽  
E. U. Haq, Javaria ◽  
A. Yasir ◽  
H. A. Qayyum
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
P Value ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Female Case ◽  
The Mean

Background: It has been noted that there is an increased prevalence and serious clinical implications of stroke in women. However, local studies focused on stroke among female gender are still scarce. Aim: To find frequency of female patients with ischemic stroke and to compare the sub-types of ischemic stroke, mean NIHSS score and mean MRS scores among both genders. Methodology: This descriptive case series was conducted in indoor and outdoor department of Neurology at Mayo Hospital, Lahore for six months [Feb 6, 2018 till August 6, 2018]. After taking demographics and clinical characteristics of patients, the severity of stroke was taken using National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at admission in hospital. The functional outcome was measured using Modified Rankin Scale (MRS). Subtype of acute ischemic stroke was assigned using Oxfordshire classification for acute ischemic stroke. All data was taken on a structured proforma and was entered and analyzed using SPSS version 21. Results: The mean age of cases was 53.58 ± 9.42 years with 73(60.83%) male and 47(39.17%) female cases. Among TACS, there were 15(50%) female cases whereas 9(34.6%) female case were found in PACS and 10(33.3%) female cases were found in LACS. The frequency of gender in all subtypes was statistically same in both groups, p-value > 0.05. The mean modified Rankin scale in male and female cases was 2.93 ± 1.58 and 4.30 ±1.50 respectively with significantly higher mean MMR score in females than male cases, p-value < 0.05. Conclusion: This study concludes that females make up a considerable percentage of patients with ischemic stroke. Though, no statistically significant difference could be found in terms of subtypes of ischemic stroke, the mean NIHSS score and mean MRS were statistically higher among females compared to male cases. Keywords: Stroke, subtypes, severity, ischemia, gender difference, NIHSS, MRS

Abstract P12: Alteplase Reduces Mortality in Patients With Ischemic Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of the IAC Study

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shadi Yaghi ◽  
Eva Mistry ◽  
Adam H De Havenon ◽  
Christopher Leon Guerrero ◽  
Amre Nouh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Infarct Volume ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Significant Difference

Background and Purpose: Multiple studies have established that intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase improves outcome after acute ischemic stroke. However, assessment of thrombolysis’ efficacy in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has yielded mixed results. We sought to determine the association of alteplase with mortality, hemorrhagic transformation (HT), infarct volume, and mortality in patients with AF and acute ischemic stroke. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients with AF included in the Initiation of Anticoagulation after Cardioembolic stroke (IAC) study, which pooled data from 8 comprehensive stroke centers in the United States. 1889 (90.6%) had available 90-day follow up data and were included. For our primary analysis we used a cohort of 1367/1889 (72.4%) patients who did not undergo mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Secondary analyses were repeated in the patients that underwent MT (n=522). Binary logistic regression was used to determine whether alteplase use was independently associated with risk of HT, final infarct volume, and 90-day mortality, respectively, adjusting for potential confounders. Results: In our primary analyses we found that alteplase use was independently associated with an increased risk for HT (adjusted OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.49 - 3.07, p <0.001) but overall reduced risk of 90-day mortality (adjusted OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39 - 0.87, p = 0.009). Among patients undergoing MT, alteplase use was associated with a trend towards a reduction in 90-day mortality (adjusted OR 0.68 95% CI 0.45 - 1.04, p = 0.077). In the subgroup of patients prescribed DOAC treatment (n = 327; 24 received alteplase), alteplase treatment was associated with a trend towards smaller infarct size (< 10 mL), (adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.15 - 1.12, p = 0.082) without a significant difference in the odds of 90-day mortality (adjusted OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.12 - 2.13, p = 0.357) or hemorrhagic transformation (adjusted OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.03 - 2.07, p = 0.206). Conclusion: Thrombolysis with intravenous alteplase was associated with reduced 90-day mortality in AF patients with acute ischemic stroke not undergoing MT. Further study is required to assess the safety and efficacy of alteplase in AF patients undergoing MT and those on DOACs.

scholarly journals Intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke patients with negative CT perfusion: a case series

2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 204798161454321
Author(s):  
Ratnesh Mehra ◽  
Chiu Yuen To ◽  
Omar Qahwash ◽  
Boyd Richards ◽  
Richard D Fessler
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Ct Perfusion ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽  
Tissue Type ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Radiographic Findings ◽  
Type Plasminogen Activator

Background Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) is a commonly used modality of neurophysiologic imaging to aid the selection of acute ischemic stroke patients for neuroendovascular intervention by identifying the presence of penumbra versus infarcted brain tissue. However many patients present with evidence of cerebral ischemia with normal CTP, and in that case, should intravenous thrombolytics be given? Purpose To demonstrate if tissue-type plasminogen activator (tPA)-eligible stroke patients without perfusion defects demonstrated on CTP would benefit from administration of intravenous thrombolytics. Material and Methods We retrospectively identified patients presenting with acute ischemic symptoms who received intravenous tPA (IV-tPA) from January to June 2012 without a perfusion defect on CTP. Clinical and radiographic findings including the NIHSS at presentation, 24 h, and at discharge, symptomatic and asymptomatic hemorrhagic transformation, and the modified Rankin score at 30 days were collected. A reduction of NIHSS of greater than 4 points or resolution of symptoms was considered significant. Results Seventeen patients were identified with a mean NIHSS of 8.2 prior to administration of intravenous thrombolytics, 3.5 after 24 h, and 2.5 at discharge. Among them, 13 patients had significant improvement of NIHSS with a mean reduction of 6.15 points at 24 h. One patient initially improved but had delayed hemorrhagic transformation and died. Two patients had improvement in NIHSS but were not significant and two patients had increased in NIHSS at 24 h, although one eventually improved at discharge. There was no asymptomatic hemorrhagic transformation. Mean mRS at 3 months is 1.76. Conclusion The failure to identify a perfusion deficit by CTP should not be used as a contraindication for intravenous thrombolytics. Criteria for administration of intravenous thrombolytics should still be based on time from symptom onset as previously published by NINDS.

scholarly journals Flexible Versus Rigid Methods Of Intravenous Thrombolysis In Iran

2017 ◽  
pp. 6
Author(s):  
Kavian Ghandehari
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Recent Decade ◽  
Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Standard Protocol ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Thrombolysis with administration of intravenous (IV) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) has been performed in some tertiary care hospitals in Iran in recent decade. Mininstery of Health and Medical Education of Iran approved a new management strategy which covers the cost of Alteplase since 2015. This is a great advance in increasing chance for Iranian stroke patients to get the treatment. Delay in performing triage and CT and laboratory tests is another limiting factor which can be decreased by defining special team members for thrombolysis. Most of the Iranian neurologists are not expert for performing the management. This limitation can be managed by continous thrombolysis work shops. However many of the Neurologists may not be interested to do the thrombolysis due to its risks and lack of financial benefits for responsible doctor.  Most of the contraindications for thrombolysis with tPA originated as exclusion criteria in famous clinical trials. These were derived from expert consensus for the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) trial. Despite the fact that the safety and efficacy of IV rtPA has been repeatedly confirmed in large international observational studies over the past 20 years, most patients with acute ischemic stroke  still do not receive thrombolytic treatment. Some of the original exclusion criteria have proven to be unnecessarily restrictive in real-world clinical practice. It has been suggested that application of relaxed exclusion criteria might increase the IV thrombolysis rate up to 20% with comparable outcomes to thrombolysis with more conventional criteria. We review the absolute and relative contraindications to IV rtPA for acute ischemic stroke, discussing the underlying rationale and evidence supporting these exclusion criteria. There are two therapeutic strategies for selecting the contraindications and exclusion criteria. Flexible method is ignoring some absolute or partial exclusion critera as illustrated above. This method will increase the probability of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and death and may increase  numbers of legal condemnations for treating physician. Rigid method is prohibition of violations from standard protocols of thrombolysis which decreases both numbers of managed patients and thrombolysis contraindications. Physicians who prefer the first therapeutic strategy refer to data of published articles and guidelines of American and European stroke societies. There are two points of view; first, the Iranian neurologists do not have thrombolysis experience as well as western neurologusts. For instance very limited number of Iranian neurologists have enough experience for detection of ASPECT score. Second, due to some social factors number of legal condemnations  due to medical malpractice has been hugely increased in recent two decades in Iran. Based on these points second strategy is more wise for Iranian neurologists. The speaker has made a standard protocol of thrombolysis based on international gudelines and his experience. This standard protocol which is designed according to the rigid method is available by search in Google engine and is provided in Persian language.  

scholarly journals A HOSPITAL BASED COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SERUM MEAN PLATELET VOLUME IN ISCHEMIC STROKE PATIENTS.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dr. Atul Baid ◽  
Dr. Chhavi Raman Baid
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Count ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mean Platelet Volume ◽  
Normal Subjects ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
P Value ◽  
Modified Rankin Scale ◽  
Platelet Volume ◽  
Laboratory Findings ◽  
Significant Difference

Objectives: This study was evaluated the association of serum means platelet volume, functional outcome and various parameters in patients of ischemic stroke. Methods: Detail history clinical examinations and relevant investigations were performed to all subjects. Lab parameters included as platelets counts, mean platelet volume and others were performed. The diagnosis of ischaemic stroke was made clinically with the evidence of acute lesions (infarct) confirmed by brain CT or MRI within the first 24 h of presentation of symptoms. Each patient condition was assessed by modified Rankin Scale. Results: Data was analyzed using SPSS version 26 software. Related-Samples Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was applied. Mean and standard deviation were calculated. P value was taken less than or equal to 0.05 for significant differences (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions: There was no significant difference seen in platelet count of ischemic stroke cases with control. Mean platelet volume was significantly higher in ischemic stroke cases than normal subjects. Majorities of ischemic stroke cases had moderate disability, required some help but able to walk without assistance. MPV was higher in ischemic stroke cases that had higher Modified Rankin scale.  Hence, serum MPV can be used as meaningful laboratory findings for early detection of ischemic stroke. Key words: Ischemic stroke, mean platelet volume, platelet count, modified Rankin score

Abstract P532: Does Atrial Fibrillation Impact Rate of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated With rt-PA and/or Endovascular Treatment?

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Bavarsad Shahripour ◽  
Benjamin Shifflett ◽  
Edward Labin ◽  
Morgan Figurelle ◽  
Anna Barminova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Intracranial Hemorrhage ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage

Background: Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to atrial fibrillation (afib) may have increased complications from intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular treatment (ET) compared to other stroke subtypes. The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) in patients with and without a history of a fib treated with IV rt-PA and/or ET. Methods: Consecutive stroke code activations were retrospectively analyzed from January 2004-June 2020 at an academic comprehensive stroke center. Patients were included if they were treated with IV rt-PA and/or ET within 24 hours of stroke onset. Patients were stratified into the six groups:1-No hx of a fib with ET only, 2-Hx of a fib with ET only, 3-No hx of a fib with IV rt-PA plus ET, 4-Hx of a fib with IV rt-PA plus ET, 5-No hx of a fib with IV rt-PA only, 6-Hx of a fib with IV rt-PA only. Primary outcome was defined as any sICH within 72 hours of treatment using the NINDS definition. Baseline demographics were compared. Chi squared was used to assess differences in sICH rates and logistic regression to compare individual groups. Analyses were both unadjusted and adjusted for baseline NIHSS, age, sex, baseline blood pressure, pre-stroke mRS, smoking status, and baseline glucose. Results: We identified 720 AIS patients who received acute treatment (IV rt-PA: n=578; ET: n=100; IV rt-PA+ET:n=18). There was a significant difference in sex (p=0.005); Hispanic ethnicity (p=0.002); current smoking (p=<0.001); current alcohol use (p=0.03), CHF (p=0.01); and age (p<0.0001) between groups. Baseline NIHSS was significantly higher in Group 4 (23, SD 8, p=<0.001).In adjusted analysis, there was no significant difference in sICH in patients with a fib after receiving IVtPA (OR 1.53, CI 0.47-4.99, p=0.48), ET (OR 0.93 , CI 0-∞, p=1.00), or both (OR 0.25,CI 0.00-9.07, p=0.45) compared to those without afib. There was no significant difference in sICH in adjusted analyses in patients with and without a fib overall (OR 0.93, CI 0-∞, p=1.00). Conclusion: In this study, atrial fibrillation did not have a significant impact on rates of sICH in AIS patients treated with IV rt-PA, ET, or both. This study supports the safety of IV rt-PA, ET, and combination therapy in the atrial fibrillation population.

Abstract WMP1: Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Mechanical Thrombectomy: the THRACE Randomized Trial

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hamza Achit ◽  
Francis guillemin ◽  
Marc Soudant ◽  
Kossar Hosseini ◽  
Aurelie Bannay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life Year ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life

Background and purpose: The benefit of mechanical thrombectomy added to intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke has been largely demonstrated. However, evidence on economic incentive of this strategy is still limited, especially in the context of randomized trial. The purpose of this study is to analyze whether the combination of mechanical thrombectomy with intravenous thrombolysis is more cost-effective than implementing intravenous thrombolysis alone. Patients and methods: Individual-level cost and outcome data were collected in the THRACE randomized clinical trial, including patients with acute ischaemic stroke and proximal cerebral artery occlusion. Patients were assigned to either intravenous thrombolysis (IVT; n = 208) or intravenous thrombolysis plus intra-arterial thrombectomy (IVMT; n=204). The primary outcomes were both modified Rankin scale of functional independence at 90 days (score 0-2) and the EuroQol-5D score of quality of life. This study considered the perspective of the National Health Security System in France. Results: Bridging therapy increased by 10.9% the rate of functional independence compared to IVT (53% vs 42,1%) at an increased cost of 1909 є, with no significant difference in mortality (12% vs 13%) or symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (2% vs 2%). Cost per one averted case of disability was consequently estimated at 17,480 є. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year gained was 13,423 є. Sensitivity analysis showed that combined approach had 84.1% probability of being cost-effective regarding cases of averted disability and 92.2% probability regarding quality-adjusted life year outcome. The national implementation of this new strategy would result in additional cost of 12.9 million є and avoid about 737 cases of death or disability. Conclusions: Based on randomized trial, this study demonstrates that intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical intra-arterial thrombectomy for treating acute ischemic stroke is more cost-effective than intravenous thrombolysis alone.

scholarly journals Low-dose versus standard-dose alteplase for intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke in Iran: Results from the safe implementation of treatments in stroke registry

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elyar Sadeghi-Hokmabadi ◽  
Abdoreza Ghoreishi ◽  
Reza Rikhtegar ◽  
Payam Sariaslani ◽  
Shahram Rafie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Standard Group ◽  
Eastern Region ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Rates of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) differ depending regard are scarce in the Middle Eastern region. Methods: The present retrospective study was performed on data extracted from the Safe Implementation of Treatments in Stroke (SITS) registry. Computed tomography (CT) image analysis was based on the SITS-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) definition for symptomatic ICH (SICH). Functional outcome at 3 months was assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Multivariate logistic regression including adjusted analysis was used for comparison between groups. Results: Of 6615 patients, 1055 were enrolled. A total of 86% (n = 906) received a standard dose and 14% (n = 149) received a low dose of alteplase. Favorable 3-month outcome was achieved in 481 (53%) patients in the standard group and 71 (48%) patients in the low-dose group [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-1.75, P = 0.218]. SICH occurred in 14 (1.5%) patients in the standard group and 3 (2%) patients in the low-dose group [odds ratio (OR) = 2.77, 95% CI: 0.36-21.04, P = 0.120]. At 3 months, mortality occurred in 145 (16.0%) patients in the standard group and 29 (19.4%) patients in the low-dose group (OR = 1.22, 95% CI: 0.78-1.91, P = 0.346). Conclusion: Low-dose compared to standard-dose alteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) was not associated with fewer hemorrhagic events and there was no significant difference in the favorable 3-month outcome (mRS: 0-2) or mortality rate.

Abstract P15: Does Atrial Fibrillation Impact 90-Day Outcome in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated With rt-PA and/or Endovascular Treatment?

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reza Bavarsad Shahripour ◽  
Benjamin R Shifflett ◽  
Edward Labin ◽  
Anna Barminova ◽  
Morgan Figurelle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Treatment ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Favourable Outcome ◽  
Multinomial Regression ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
History Of

Background: Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to atrial fibrillation (a fib) may not have as favourable of a response to intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular treatment (ET) compared to other stroke subtypes. The purpose of this study was to compare the 90-day outcome in patients with and without a history of a fib treated with IV rt-PA and/or ET. Method: Consecutive stroke code activations were retrospectively analyzed from January 2004-June 2020 at an academic comprehensive stroke center. Patients were included if they were treated with IV rt-PA and/or ET within 24 hours of stroke onset. Patients were stratified into the six groups: 1- No history of a fib with ET only, 2- History of a fib with ET only, 3- No history of a fib with IV rt-PA plus ET, 4- History of a fib with IV rt-PA plus ET, 5- No history of a fib with IV rt-PA only, 6- History of a fib with IV rt-PA only. Primary outcome was 90 day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) with favourable outcome defined as mRS 0-2. Baseline demographics were compared and pairwise Wilcoxon Rank was used to assess group differences followed by multinomial regression. Analyses were both unadjusted and adjusted for baseline NIHSS, age, sex, baseline blood pressure, pre-stroke mRS, smoking status, and baseline glucose. Results: We identified 720 AIS patients who received acute treatment (IV rt-PA: n=578; ET: n=100; IV rt-PA+ET:n=18). There was a significant difference in sex (p=0.005); Hispanic ethnicity (p=0.002); current smoking (p=<0.001); current alcohol use (p=0.03), CHF (p=0.01); and age (p<0.0001) between groups. Baseline NIHSS was significantly higher in Group 4 (23, SD 8, p=<0.001). In adjusted analysis, there were significantly more patients with mRS 1 (p=0.03) and mRS 2 (p=0.01) in Group 5 compared to group 6. There was no significant difference in “favourable outcome” in adjusted analyses both between groups and in patients with and without afib overall (OR: 3.10, 95% CI: 0.19-50.97, p=0.43). Conclusion: In this study, afib did not have a significant impact on 90-day outcome in AIS patients treated with IV rt-PA, ET, or both. This study supports the acute use of IV rt-PA in the atrial fibrillation population despite anecdotal comments that cardioembolic strokes do not improve with thrombolysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document