Abstract TMP86: Telestroke Improves Guideline-Based Comprehensive Stroke Care: The TELECAST Trial

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher D Streib ◽  
Oladi Bentho ◽  
Kathryn Bard ◽  
Eric Jaton ◽  
Sarah Engkjer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Composite Score ◽  
Stroke Recurrence ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Specialist Service ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Limited access to stroke specialist expertise produces disparities in inpatient stroke treatment. The impact of telestroke on the remote delivery of guideline-based inpatient stroke care is yet to be comprehensively studied. The TELECAST trial (NCT03672890) prospectively examined the impact of a 24-7 telestroke specialist service dedicated to inpatient acute stroke care spanning admission to discharge. Methods: AHA stroke guidelines were used to derive outcome metrics in the following acute stroke inpatient care categories: diagnostic stroke evaluation (DSE), secondary stroke prevention (SSP), health screening and evaluation (HSE), and stroke education (SE). Adherence to AHA guidelines for stroke inpatients pre-telestroke (July 1, 2016-June 30, 2018) and post-telestroke intervention (July 1, 2018-June 30, 2019) were studied. The primary outcome was a composite score of all guideline-based stroke care. Secondary outcomes consisted of subcategory composite scores in DSE, SSP, HSE, and SE. Chi-squared tests were utilized to assess primary and secondary outcomes. Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 15.0. Results: Following institution of a comprehensive inpatient telestroke service, overall adherence to guideline-based metrics improved (composite score: 85% vs 94%, p<0.01) as did adherence to DSE guidelines (subgroup score: 90 vs 95%, p<0.01). SSP, HSE, and SE subgroup scores were not significantly different. See Table 1. Conclusion: The implementation of a 24-7 inpatient telestroke service improved adherence to AHA guidelines for inpatient acute stroke care. Dedicated inpatient telestroke specialist coverage may improve inpatient stroke care and reduce stroke recurrence in hospitals without access to stroke specialists.

Abstract 3379: Benefiting the Community; The Impact of Joining a Regional Stroke Network

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy D Papesh ◽  
James Gebel
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Cleveland Clinic ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Iv Tpa

Background: The Cleveland Clinic Health System (CCHS) consists of a large tertiary care center and 10 regional hospitals. It is organized both clinically and administratively into multispecialty organ based Institutes rather than departments. The CCHS re-introduced a regional initiative to standardize stroke care in 2008. Medina Hospital is a 118-bed community hospital in rural North-eastern Ohio, where there is a high stroke burden and previously minimal IV tPA use. Medina Hospital joined the CCHS Stroke Network in November 2009. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that after joining the formally organized stroke CCHS system of care, the proportion of stroke patients receiving IV tPA and the timeliness of administration of acute thrombolytic therapy would both significantly increase. Methods: Data was analyzed from our prospective participation in the Get with the Guidelines-Stroke and the Ohio Coverdell Stroke Registries. Baseline data regarding quality, outcomes and stroke performance measures were reviewed. CCHS initially supported acute stroke care in early 2010 with a telemedicine cart and then introduced 24/7 emergency, on-site, CCHS neurologist, acute stroke call coverage in late 2010. Standardized CCHS stroke care pathways and order sets were also introduced in 2010. The proportion of stroke patients treated with IV tPA in 2010 and 2011 (post- joining CCHS) was compared to 2009 (2-sided Fisher’s exact test), and door-to-needle times were compared from 2010 to 2011 (unpaired t-test). Results: IV tPA treatment utilization increased from 0/69 patients (0%) in 2009 to 9/67 patients (11.8%) in 2010 [exact p=.0033] and 11/46 (19.3%) in the first 7 months of 2011 [exact p=.0001]. Door-to-needle times improved from a mean of 81.4 (95%CI 66.4 to 96.4) minutes in 2010 to 61.7 (95% CI 52.7 to 70.8) minutes in 2011 (p=.0158). Conclusions: Participation in an organized formal collaborative regional hospital stroke treatment network resulted in dramatic improvements from zero IV tPA utilization to greatly exceeding the national benchmark averages for both percentage treatment with IV tPA and door-to-needle time in a rural area where patients previously had minimal access to acute stroke expertise.

Abstract WP317: The Impact of Post-acute Discharge Disposition on Outcomes in the SWIFT PRIME Trial

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir R Belagaje ◽  
Diogo C Haussen ◽  
Jeffrey L Saver ◽  
Mayank Goyal ◽  
David S Liebeskind ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Skilled Nursing Facility ◽  
Inpatient Rehabilitation ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Favorable Outcome ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Discharge Disposition ◽  
The Impact

Intro: Post-acute stroke care in an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) demonstrates better outcomes compared to a skilled nursing facility (SNF). With advancements in endovascular acute stroke, the impact that post-acute care plays is unclear. Here, we analyze a successful endovascular acute stroke trial to demonstrate that more improvement is seen in patients discharged to an IRF compared to a SNF. Methods: From SWIFT PRIME, a prospective, multi-center randomized acute endovascular trial, subject characteristics, and modified Rankin scores (mRS) were obtained. Post-acute hospital discharge was classified as home, IRF, and SNF. A favorable outcome was defined as 90 day mRS ≤ 2 and improvement was defined as ≥ 1 point decrease in mRS score. The effect of each disposition on a favorable outcome was calculated overall and stratified by stroke severity class (defined as discharge mRS 0-3, 4, 5) Results: A total of 165 subjects (mean age 64.8 years, mean initial NIHSS= 16.5, and 50 % male) were analyzed. Discharge disposition included: 51 (31%) going home, 92 (56%) IRF, 22 (13%) SNF. The baseline characteristics were similar between patients that went to IRF and SNF: age (p =0.76), gender (p= 0.81), baseline NIHSS (p=0.055), final infarct volumes (p=0.20), and recanalization rates (p=0.19). However, IRF subjects had lower NIHSS (p<0.001) and mRS (p=0.017) at day 7. Time to treatment defined as symptom onset to groin puncture was not significantly associated with discharge disposition (p=0.119). Only 1/22 (4.5%) subjects who were discharged to SNF achieved a 90 day mRS ≤2, compared to 41/92 (44.6%) in the IRF group or 48/51 (94.1%) in the home group (p < 0.001). When stratified by stroke severity: for mRS=0-3, there were no differences in favorable outcomes; mRS=4, 1/7 (14.3%) showed improvement at SNF compared to 21/27 (77.8%) at IRF (p=0.008); mRS =5, 5/14 (35.7%) showed improvement at SNF compared to 28/37 (75.7%) at IRF (p=0.013). Conclusions: Despite having similar characteristics following acute stroke treatment, not only did subjects who went to SNF compared to IRF have more unfavorable outcomes, they were less likely to make improvement. These findings show the continued importance of post-stroke rehabilitation, even in the endovascular era.

scholarly journals Bottlenecks in the Acute Stroke Care System during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Catalonia

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Anna Ramos-Pachón ◽  
Álvaro García-Tornel ◽  
Mònica Millán ◽  
Marc Ribó ◽  
Sergi Amaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Prehospital Delays ◽  
The Impact

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant healthcare reorganizations, potentially striking standard medical care. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care quality and clinical outcomes to detect healthcare system’s bottlenecks from a territorial point of view. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Crossed-data analysis between a prospective nation-based mandatory registry of acute stroke, Emergency Medical System (EMS) records, and daily incidence of COVID-19 in Catalonia (Spain). We included all stroke code activations during the pandemic (March 15–May 2, 2020) and an immediate prepandemic period (January 26–March 14, 2020). Primary outcomes were stroke code activations and reperfusion therapies in both periods. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics, workflow metrics, differences across types of stroke centers, correlation analysis between weekly EMS alerts, COVID-19 cases, and workflow metrics, and impact on mortality and clinical outcome at 90 days. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Stroke code activations decreased by 22% and reperfusion therapies dropped by 29% during the pandemic period, with no differences in age, stroke severity, or large vessel occlusion. Calls to EMS were handled 42 min later, and time from onset to hospital arrival increased by 53 min, with significant correlations between weekly COVID-19 cases and more EMS calls (rho = 0.81), less stroke code activations (rho = −0.37), and longer prehospital delays (rho = 0.25). Telestroke centers were afflicted with higher reductions in stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, referrals to endovascular centers, and increased delays to thrombolytics. The independent odds of death increased (OR 1.6 [1.05–2.4], <i>p</i> 0.03) and good functional outcome decreased (mRS ≤2 at 90 days: OR 0.6 [0.4–0.9], <i>p</i> 0.015) during the pandemic period. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> During the COVID-19 pandemic, Catalonia’s stroke system’s weakest points were the delay to EMS alert and a decline of stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, and interhospital transfers, mostly at local centers. Patients suffering an acute stroke during the pandemic period had higher odds of poor functional outcome and death. The complete stroke care system’s analysis is crucial to allocate resources appropriately.

Abstract P141: Global Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Acute Stroke and Mechanical Thrombectomy - An International Survey

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dileep R Yavagal ◽  
Vasu Saini ◽  
Violiza Inoa ◽  
Hannah E Gardener ◽  
Sheila O Martins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Treatment Practices ◽  
Global Impact ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The World ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has strained the healthcare systems across the world but its impact on acute stroke care is just being elucidated. We hypothesized a major global impact of COVID-19 not only on stroke volumes but also on thrombectomy practice. Methods: A 19-item questionnaire survey aimed to identify the changes in stroke volumes and treatment practices seen during COVID-19 pandemic was designed using Qualtrics software. It was sent to stroke and neuro-interventional physicians around the world who are part of the executive committee of a global coalition, Mission Thrombectomy 2020 (MT2020) between April 5 th to May 15 th , 2020. Results: There were 113 responses across 25 countries. Globally there was a median 33% decrease in stroke admissions and a 25% decrease in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) procedures during COVID-19 pandemic compared to immediately preceding months (Figure 1A-B). This overall median decrease was despite a median increase in stroke volume in 4 European countries which diverted all stroke patients to only a few selected centers during the pandemic. The intubation policy during the pandemic for patients undergoing MT was highly variable across participating centers: 44% preferred intubating all patients, including 25% centers that changed their policy to preferred-intubation (PI) vs 27% centers that switched to preferred-conscious-sedation (PCS). There was no significant difference in rate of COVID-19 infection between PI vs PCS (p=0.6) or if intubation policy was changed in either direction (p=1). Low-volume (<10 stroke/month) compared with high-volume stroke centers (>20 strokes/month) are less likely to have neurointerventional suite specific written personal protective equipment protocols (74% vs 88%) and if present, these centers are more likely to report them to be inadequate (58% vs 92%). Conclusion: Our data provides a comprehensive snapshot of the impact on acute stroke care observed worldwide during the pandemic.

Ten Years of Improving Acute Stroke Management in a Metropolitan Area: A Population-Based Quantification of Quality Indicators

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Anna Alegiani ◽  
Michael Rosenkranz ◽  
Leonie Schmitz ◽  
Susanne Lezius ◽  
Günter Seidel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Quality Indicators ◽  
Metropolitan Area ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Stroke Units ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Acute Stroke Treatment ◽  
Over Time

<b><i>Background and Purpose:</i></b> Rapid access to acute stroke treatment improves clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke. We aimed to shorten the time to admission and to acute stroke treatment for patients with acute stroke in the Hamburg metropolitan area by collaborative multilevel measures involving all hospitals with stroke units, the Emergency Medical Services (EMS), and health-care authorities. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In 2007, an area-wide stroke care quality project was initiated. The project included mandatory admission of all stroke patients in Hamburg exclusively to hospitals with stroke units, harmonized acute treatment algorithms among all hospitals, repeated training of the EMS staff, a multimedia educational campaign, and a mandatory stroke care quality monitoring system based on structured data assessment and quality indicators for procedural measures. We analyzed data of all patients with acute stroke who received inhospital treatment in the city of Hamburg during the evaluation period from the quality assurance database data and evaluated trends of key quality indicators over time. <b><i>Results:</i></b> From 2007 to 2016, a total of 83,395 patients with acute stroke were registered. During this period, the proportion of patients admitted within ≤3 h from symptom onset increased over time from 27.8% in 2007 to 35.2% in 2016 (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). The proportion of patients who received rapid thrombolysis (within ≤30 min after admission) increased from 7.7 to 54.1% (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Collaborative stroke care quality projects are suitable and effective to improve acute stroke care.

Abstract 352: Early Data From an Implementation Science Study Suggests the Need for Identification and Adoption of Best Practices to Improve the Timeliness of Stroke Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa M Monk
Keyword(s):  
Best Practices ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Early Data ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Ct Scanner ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Stroke Treatment

There is a disconnect from discovery of best treatment options and application into clinical practice in a timely manner. The I M plementation of best Pr actices f O r acute stroke care-de v eloping and optimizing regional systems of Stroke Care (IMPROVE Stroke Care) goal is to develop a regional integrated stroke system that identifies, classifies, and treats patients with acute ischemic stroke more rapidly and effectively with reperfusion therapy. These improvements in acute stroke care delivery are expected to result in lower mortality, fewer recurrent strokes, and improved long term functional outcomes. Recent discoveries in stroke care and advancement in technology extends the window for both TPA administration and mechanical thombectomy. The challenge of implementing these latest advances are difficult considering the ability of hospitals to implement the original American Heart Association (AHA) Systems of Stroke Care recommendations. Early data from this project shows that the challenges continue to exist in recommendations that have been in place as early as 2005. EMS is not utilizing pre-hospital stroke screening tools, only 5% of the time, stroke severity tools, only 7% of the time, lytic checklists, 0% of the time, destination decision changed due to severity score, 0% of the time, and pre-notifying emergency rooms, only 63% of the time. Emergency departments door to CT <45 minutes, only 55% of the time, Lytic given in CT scanner, only 35% of the time, Door to lytic therapy< 45 minutes, 77% of the time, Door to Groin puncture, 81% of the time, and Door to TICI Flow 2c/3 flow <90 minutes, 39% of the time. The Systems of Stroke Care have recommendations that will improve time to treatment and outcomes for patients. This project is working to provide tools, guidance, data, and feedback to improve application of these recommendations and identify best practices and solutions to barriers.

scholarly journals The Impact of Ambulance Practice on Acute Stroke Care

Stroke ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 38 (10) ◽  
pp. 2765-2770 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Mosley ◽  
Marcus Nicol ◽  
Geoffrey Donnan ◽  
Ian Patrick ◽  
Fergus Kerr ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
The Impact

Abstract WP248: Methods to Achieving a 9-minute Door to TPA Time

Stroke ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 44 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepak S Nair ◽  
Arun Talkad ◽  
Clayton McNeil ◽  
Jan Jahnel ◽  
Teresa Swanson-Devlin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Time Of Day ◽  
National Average ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
The Past ◽  
Stroke Center

Introduction Despite guidelines recommending “door to needle times” (DTN) of ≤60 minutes and the Target: Stroke program, the national average for stroke treatment is 79 minutes. We present the factors that have reduced DTN in our Stroke Center. Methods We retrospectively identified all patients who received IV rt-PA using our acute stroke code database, from 2007 to 2012. The patients were organized by their DTN into four groups: <20min, 20-39min, 40-59min, and ≥60min. Median NIHSS scores were calculated, along with median DTN per group and annually. We also specified median lab times, the source of the stroke code (EMS or ED), and time of day for the code. Results There were 180 patients that received IV rt-PA: 7 patients in <20min, 49 in 20-39min, 52 in 40-59min, and 72 in ≥60min. Median DTN was 14min, 30min, 46.5min, and 76min, respectively, with the overall fastest DTN being 9 minutes. Median NIHSS scores were 7, 12, 13, and 8, respectively. EMS initiated the code in 100% of the <20min cases, 45% in 20-39min, 44% in 40-59min, and 40% in ≥60min. Eighty-six percent of the <20min cases arrived during the day, as did 84% of the 20-39min, 65% of the 40-59min, and 42% of the ≥60min cases. When rt-PA was given before labs were resulted, the median DTN was 30min; otherwise, the median DTN was 54min. All cases with <20min DTN presented after May 2011, when the first such case occurred. The median DTN was 65.5min in 2007, 51min in 2008, 61min in 2009, 59.5min in 2010, 47min in 2011, and 35min in 2012. Conclusions Our experience suggests that the “Target: Stroke” strategies (EMS initiation of stroke codes, rapid triage, rt-PA before labs) can significantly reduce the time to thrombolysis. However, our significant improvement over the past two years followed a singular 13-minute DTN, which demonstrated that teamwork and passion for acute stroke care can catalyze the consistent delivery of efficient stroke treatment.

Abstract TMP8: Predictors of Large Vessel Occlusion in Kaiser Stroke EXPRESS Program

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey G Klingman ◽  
Anne C Kim ◽  
Meghan Hatfield ◽  
Benjamin Wilson ◽  
Lauren Klingman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Kaiser Permanente ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Improved Outcomes

Background: In 2015, trials showed that rapid endovascular stroke treatment (EST) of qualified patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) resulted in improved outcomes over treatment with IV tPA alone. In 2015, Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) redesigned its acute stroke care work flow for its 21 stroke centers, which included expedited IV t-pa treatment, rapid CTA investigation, expedited transfer of appropriate patients for EST. We assessed for predictors of LVO post-implementation. Methods: The KPNC Stroke EXPRESS program was live in all centers by January 2016. Using clinical data for 1/1/16 - 7/10/16, we evaluated the frequency and locations of LVO, and patient characteristics of those with LVO. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine whether age, gender, race, or an NIHSS ≥ 8 are predictors of LVO. Results: There were 2,204 tele-stroke alert cases from the ED. Among 993 (39.3%) that proceeded as likely acute stroke, 812 (81.8%) were evaluated with CTA. Out of those who had a CTA, 152 (18.7%) were found to have LVO as followed: 27 (17.8%) ICA, 87 (57.2%) M1, 24 (15.8%) M2, 6 (4.0%) basilar, 5 (3.3%) PCA, and 3 (2.0%) vertebral. Of those with LVO, 97 (63.8%) were treated with EST. Patients with LVO had a higher median NIHSS (15 vs. 5 in those without LVO). Neglect (27% vs. 7%) and gaze deviation (16% vs. 1%) were more likely to be seen among those with LVO and treated with EST compared to those without LVO. In multivariate analysis, age (OR=1.02, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.03, p=0.01) and NIHSS ≥8 (OR = 4.99, 95% CI 3.32- 7.49, p < 0.001) were associated with LVO. PPV for NIHSS ≥8 was 75.7%. Conclusions: In our large multi-ethnic population of acute stroke patients, a relatively small percentage (19%) was found to have LVO and only a subset qualified for EST. Predictors of LVO included NIHSS ≥8, increasing age, and presence of neglect and gaze preference. Given the low numbers of patients brought in for acute stroke treatment who ended up with a LVO requiring EST, further research is needed to assess a given system’s ability to rapidly evaluate and transfer as appropriate for EST rather than paramedic based diversion.

scholarly journals Stroke care in Italy: An overview of strategies to manage acute stroke in COVID-19 time

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marialuisa Zedde ◽  
Francesca Romana Pezzella ◽  
Maurizio Paciaroni ◽  
Francesco Corea ◽  
Nicoletta Reale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Care Pathways ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Treatment Pathways ◽  
Delivery Of Care ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Italian Regions ◽  
Before And After

Purpose To analyse structural and non-structural modifications of acute stroke care pathways undertaken at healthcare institutions across the regions of Italy due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Methods Research on National decrees specific for the pandemic was carried out. The stroke pathways of four Italian regions from North to South, such as Lombardy, Veneto, Lazio and Campania, were analysed before and after the pandemic outbreak. Findings On 29 February 2020, the Italian Minister of Health issued national guidelines on how to address the COVID-19 emergency. Stroke management was affected and required changes, basically resulting in the need to prioritise the ongoing COVID-19 emergency. In the most affected regions, the closure of departments and hospitals led to a complete reorganisation of previously functioning stroke networks. With the closure of several Stroke Units and Stroke Centres, the transportation time to hospital lengthened significantly, especially for the outlying populations. Discussion The COVID-19 pandemic outbreak has been spreading rapidly in Italy and placing an overwhelming burden on healthcare systems. In response to this, political and healthcare decision-makers worked together to develop and implement efforts to sustain the national healthcare system while fighting the pandemic. Stroke care pathways changed during the pandemic and different organisational models were applied in the most affected regions. Conclusions Stroke treatment pathways will need to be redesigned so to guarantee that severe and acute disease patients do not lose their rights to the access and delivery of care during the COVID-19 pandemics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document