scholarly journals Dual-Polarization Radar Rainfall Estimation over Tropical Oceans

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 755-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Thompson ◽  
Steven A. Rutledge ◽  
Brenda Dolan ◽  
Merhala Thurai ◽  
V. Chandrasekar

AbstractDual-polarization radar rainfall estimation relationships have been extensively tested in continental and subtropical coastal rain regimes, with little testing over tropical oceans where the majority of rain on Earth occurs. A 1.5-yr Indo-Pacific warm pool disdrometer dataset was used to quantify the impacts of tropical oceanic drop-size distribution (DSD) variability on dual-polarization radar variables and their resulting utility for rainfall estimation. Variables that were analyzed include differential reflectivity Zdr; specific differential phase Kdp; reflectivity Zh; and specific attenuation Ah. When compared with continental or coastal convection, tropical oceanic Zdr and Kdp values were more often of low magnitude (<0.5 dB, <0.3° km−1) and Zdr was lower for a given Kdp or Zh, consistent with observations of tropical oceanic DSDs being dominated by numerous, small, less-oblate drops. New X-, C-, and S-band R estimators were derived: R(Kdp), R(Ah), R(Kdp, ζdr), R(z, ζdr), and R(Ah, ζdr), which use linear versions of Zdr and Zh, namely ζdr and z. Except for R(Kdp), convective/stratiform partitioning was unnecessary for these estimators. All dual-polarization estimators outperformed updated R(z) estimators derived from the same dataset. The best-performing estimator was R(Kdp, ζdr), followed by R(Ah, ζdr) and R(z, ζdr). The R error was further reduced in an updated blended algorithm choosing between R(z), R(z, ζdr), R(Kdp), and R(Kdp, ζdr) depending on Zdr > 0.25 dB and Kdp > 0.3° km−1 thresholds. Because of these thresholds and the lack of hail, R(Kdp) was never used. At all wavelengths, R(z) was still needed 43% of the time during light rain (R < 5 mm h−1, Zdr < 0.25 dB), composing 7% of the total rain volume. As wavelength decreased, R(Kdp, ζdr) was used more often, R(z, ζdr) was used less often, and the blended algorithm became increasingly more accurate than R(z).

2011 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 352-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Cifelli ◽  
V. Chandrasekar ◽  
S. Lim ◽  
P. C. Kennedy ◽  
Y. Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract The efficacy of dual-polarization radar for quantitative precipitation estimation (QPE) has been demonstrated in a number of previous studies. Specifically, rainfall retrievals using combinations of reflectivity (Zh), differential reflectivity (Zdr), and specific differential phase (Kdp) have advantages over traditional Z–R methods because more information about the drop size distribution (DSD) and hydrometeor type are available. In addition, dual-polarization-based rain-rate estimators can better account for the presence of ice in the sampling volume. An important issue in dual-polarization rainfall estimation is determining which method to employ for a given set of polarimetric observables. For example, under what circumstances does differential phase information provide superior rain estimates relative to methods using reflectivity and differential reflectivity? At Colorado State University (CSU), an optimization algorithm has been developed and used for a number of years to estimate rainfall based on thresholds of Zh, Zdr, and Kdp. Although the algorithm has demonstrated robust performance in both tropical and midlatitude environments, results have shown that the retrieval is sensitive to the selection of the fixed thresholds. In this study, a new rainfall algorithm is developed using hydrometeor identification (HID) to guide the choice of the particular rainfall estimation algorithm. A separate HID algorithm has been developed primarily to guide the rainfall application with the hydrometeor classes, namely, all rain, mixed precipitation, and all ice. Both the data collected from the S-band Colorado State University–University of Chicago–Illinois State Water Survey (CSU–CHILL) radar and a network of rain gauges are used to evaluate the performance of the new algorithm in mixed rain and hail in Colorado. The evaluation is also performed using an algorithm similar to the one developed for the Joint Polarization Experiment (JPOLE). Results show that the new CSU HID-based algorithm provides good performance for the Colorado case studies presented here.


2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (10) ◽  
pp. 1873-1880 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Thurai ◽  
D. Hudak ◽  
V. N. Bringi

Abstract A decrease in copolar correlation coefficient (ρco) at C band has been observed for several rain events with broad drop size distributions (DSDs). Observational evidence comes from simultaneous measurements with a C-band dual-polarization radar and a 2D video disdrometer. The possibility of utilizing the ρco decrease for DSD retrievals is discussed. A preliminary method using the copolar reflectivity, differential reflectivity, and ρco is given for estimating the DSD parameters. Validation is carried out by deriving the differential propagation phase (Φdp) from the estimated DSD parameters and comparing against measurements. The method presented here shows potential but needs to be further assessed in different rain climatologies.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-L. Kim ◽  
M.-K. Suk ◽  
H.-S. Park ◽  
G.-W. Lee ◽  
J.-S. Ko

Abstract. The shapes of raindrops play an important role in inducing polarimetric rainfall algorithms with differential reflectivity (ZDR) and specific differential phase (KDP). The shapes of raindrops have a direct impact on rainfall estimation. However, the characteristics of raindrop size distribution (DSD) are different depending on precipitation type, storm stage of development, and regional and climatological conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to provide assumptions based on raindrop shapes that reflect the rainfall characteristics of the Korean peninsula. In this study, we presented a method to find optimal polarimetric rainfall algorithms on the Korean peninsula using the 2-Dimensional Video Disdrometer (2DVD) and Bislsan S-Band dual-polarization radar. First, a new axis ratio of raindrop relations was developed for the improvement of rainfall estimation. Second, polarimetric rainfall algorithms were derived using different axis ratio relations, and estimated radar-point one-hour rain rate for the differences in polarimetric rainfall algorithms were compared with the hourly rain rate measured by gauge. In addition, radar rainfall estimation was investigated in relation to calibration bias of reflectivity and differential reflectivity. The derived raindrop axis ratio relation from the 2DVD was more oblate than existing relations in the D < 1.5 mm and D > 5.5 mm range. The R(KDP, ZDR) algorithm based on a new axis ratio relation showed the best result on DSD statistics; however, the R(Zh, ZDR) algorithm showed the best performance for radar rainfall estimation, because the rainfall events used in the analysis were mainly weak precipitation and KDP is noisy at lower rain rates ( ≤ 5 mm hr−1). Thus, the R(KDP, ZDR) algorithm is suitable for heavy rainfall and R(Zh, ZDR) algorithm is suited for light rainfall. The calibration bias of reflectivity (ZH) and differential reflectivity (ZDR) were calculated from the comparison of measured with simulated ZH and ZDR from the 2DVD. The calculated ZH and ZDR bias was used to reduce radar bias, and to produce more accurate rainfall estimation.


2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 1618-1635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Adirosi ◽  
Eugenio Gorgucci ◽  
Luca Baldini ◽  
Ali Tokay

AbstractTo date, one of the most widely used parametric forms for modeling raindrop size distribution (DSD) is the three-parameter gamma. The aim of this paper is to analyze the error of assuming such parametric form to model the natural DSDs. To achieve this goal, a methodology is set up to compare the rain rate obtained from a disdrometer-measured drop size distribution with the rain rate of a gamma drop size distribution that produces the same triplets of dual-polarization radar measurements, namely reflectivity factor, differential reflectivity, and specific differential phase shift. In such a way, any differences between the values of the two rain rates will provide information about how well the gamma distribution fits the measured precipitation. The difference between rain rates is analyzed in terms of normalized standard error and normalized bias using different radar frequencies, drop shape–size relations, and disdrometer integration time. The study is performed using four datasets of DSDs collected by two-dimensional video disdrometers deployed in Huntsville (Alabama) and in three different prelaunch campaigns of the NASA–Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) ground validation program including the Hydrological Cycle in Mediterranean Experiment (HyMeX) special observation period (SOP) 1 field campaign in Rome. The results show that differences in rain rates of the disdrometer DSD and the gamma DSD determining the same dual-polarization radar measurements exist and exceed those related to the methodology itself and to the disdrometer sampling error, supporting the finding that there is an error associated with the gamma DSD assumption.


2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon L. Mason ◽  
J. Christine Chiu ◽  
Robin J. Hogan ◽  
Lin Tian

Abstract. Satellite radar remote-sensing of rain is important for quantifying of the global hydrological cycle, atmospheric energy budget, and many microphysical cloud and precipitation processes; however, radar estimates of rain rate are sensitive to assumptions about the raindrop size distribution. The upcoming EarthCARE satellite will feature a 94-GHz Doppler radar alongside lidar and radiometer instruments, presenting opportunities for enhanced global retrievals of the rain drop size distribution. In this paper we demonstrate the capability to retrieve both rain rate and a parameter of the rain drop size distribution from an airborne 94-GHz Doppler radar using CAPTIVATE, the variational retrieval algorithm developed for EarthCARE radar–lidar synergy. For a range of rain regimes observed during the Tropical Composition, Cloud and Climate Coupling (TC4) field campaign in the eastern Pacific in 2007, we explore the contributions of Doppler velocity and path-integrated attenuation (PIA) to the retrievals, and evaluate the retrievals against independent measurements from a second, less attenuated, Doppler radar aboard the same aircraft. Retrieved drop number concentration varied over five orders of magnitude between light rain from melting ice, and warm rain from liquid clouds. Doppler velocity can be used to estimate rain rate over land, and retrievals of rain rate and drop number concentration are possible in profiles of light rain over land; in moderate warm rain, drop number concentration can be retrieved without Doppler velocity. These results suggest that EarthCARE rain retrievals facilitated by Doppler radar will make substantial improvements to the global understanding of the interaction of clouds and precipitation.


2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jungsoo Yoon ◽  
Mi-Kyung Suk ◽  
Kyung-Yeub Nam ◽  
Jeong-Seok Ko ◽  
Hae-Lim Kim ◽  
...  

Abstract. This study presents an easy and convenient empirical method to optimize polarimetric variables and produce more accurate dual polarization radar rainfall estimation. Weather Radar Center (WRC) in Korea Meteorological Administration (KMA) suggested relations between polarimetric variables (Z–ZDR and Z–KDP) based on a 2-D Video Distrometer (2DVD) measurements in 2014. Observed polarimetric variables from CAPPI (Constant Altitude Plan Position Indicator) images composed at 1 km of height were adjusted using the WRC's relations. Then dual polarization radar rainfalls were estimated by six different radar rainfall estimation algorithms, which are using either Z, Z and ZDR, or Z, ZDR and KDP. Accuracy of radar rainfall estimations derived by the six algorithms using the adjusted variables was assessed through comparison with raingauge observations. As a result, the accuracy of the radar rainfall estimation using adjusted polarimetric variables has improved from 50 % to 70 % approximately. Three high rainfall events with more than 40 mm of maximum hourly rainfall were shown the best accuracy on the rainfall estimation derived by using Z, ZDR and KDP. Meanwhile stratiform event was gained better radar rainfalls estimated by algorithms using Z and ZDR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document