Some Counterintuitive Dependencies of Tropical Cyclone Frequency on Parameters in a GCM

2012 ◽  
Vol 69 (7) ◽  
pp. 2272-2283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Zhao ◽  
Isaac M. Held ◽  
Shian-Jiann Lin
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory ◽  
Mixing Rate ◽  
Continuous Increase ◽  
Mean Intensity ◽  
Two Parameters

Abstract High-resolution global climate models (GCMs) have been increasingly utilized for simulations of the global number and distribution of tropical cyclones (TCs), and how they might change with changing climate. In contrast, there is a lack of published studies on the sensitivity of TC genesis to parameterized processes in these GCMs. The uncertainties in these formulations might be an important source of uncertainty in the future projections of TC statistics. This study investigates the sensitivity of the global number of TCs in present-day simulations using the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory High Resolution Atmospheric Model (GFDL HIRAM) to alterations in physical parameterizations. Two parameters are identified to be important in TC genesis frequency in this model: the horizontal cumulus mixing rate, which controls the entrainment into convective cores within the convection parameterization, and the strength of the damping of the divergent component of the horizontal flow. The simulated global number of TCs exhibits nonintuitive response to incremental changes of both parameters. As the cumulus mixing rate increases, the model produces nonmonotonic response in global TC frequency with an initial sharp increase and then a decrease. However, storm mean intensity rises monotonically with the mixing rate. As the strength of the divergence damping increases, the model produces a continuous increase of global number of TCs and hurricanes with little change in storm mean intensity. Mechanisms for explaining these nonintuitive responses are discussed.

Extreme Events in High Resolution CMCC Regional and Global Climate Models

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrico Scoccimarro ◽  
Silvio Gualdi ◽  
Antonella Sanna ◽  
Edoardo Bucchignani ◽  
Myriam Montesarchio
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Extreme Events ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models

scholarly journals Future Australian Severe Thunderstorm Environments. Part II: The Influence of a Strongly Warming Climate on Convective Environments

2014 ◽  
Vol 27 (10) ◽  
pp. 3848-3868 ◽  
Author(s):  
John T. Allen ◽  
David J. Karoly ◽  
Kevin J. Walsh
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Convective Available Potential Energy ◽  
Vertical Wind Shear ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Historical Period ◽  
Severe Thunderstorm ◽  
Warming Climate ◽  
Eastern Australia

Abstract The influence of a warming climate on the occurrence of severe thunderstorm environments in Australia was explored using two global climate models: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation Mark, version 3.6 (CSIRO Mk3.6), and the Cubic-Conformal Atmospheric Model (CCAM). These models have previously been evaluated and found to be capable of reproducing a useful climatology for the twentieth-century period (1980–2000). Analyzing the changes between the historical period and high warming climate scenarios for the period 2079–99 has allowed estimation of the potential convective future for the continent. Based on these simulations, significant increases to the frequency of severe thunderstorm environments will likely occur for northern and eastern Australia in a warmed climate. This change is a response to increasing convective available potential energy from higher continental moisture, particularly in proximity to warm sea surface temperatures. Despite decreases to the frequency of environments with high vertical wind shear, it appears unlikely that this will offset increases to thermodynamic energy. The change is most pronounced during the peak of the convective season, increasing its length and the frequency of severe thunderstorm environments therein, particularly over the eastern parts of the continent. The implications of this potential increase are significant, with the overall frequency of potential severe thunderstorm days per year likely to rise over the major population centers of the east coast by 14% for Brisbane, 22% for Melbourne, and 30% for Sydney. The limitations of this approach are then discussed in the context of ways to increase the confidence of predictions of future severe convection.

scholarly journals Comparing multiple model-derived aerosol optical properties to spatially collocated ground-based and satellite measurements

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 4451-4475 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilissa B. Ocko ◽  
Paul A. Ginoux
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Modeling ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Measurement Techniques ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Orthogonal Polarization ◽  
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory ◽  
Multiple Model ◽  
Anthropogenic Aerosols ◽  
Aerosol Properties

Abstract. Anthropogenic aerosols are a key factor governing Earth's climate and play a central role in human-caused climate change. However, because of aerosols' complex physical, optical, and dynamical properties, aerosols are one of the most uncertain aspects of climate modeling. Fortunately, aerosol measurement networks over the past few decades have led to the establishment of long-term observations for numerous locations worldwide. Further, the availability of datasets from several different measurement techniques (such as ground-based and satellite instruments) can help scientists increasingly improve modeling efforts. This study explores the value of evaluating several model-simulated aerosol properties with data from spatially collocated instruments. We compare aerosol optical depth (AOD; total, scattering, and absorption), single-scattering albedo (SSA), Ångström exponent (α), and extinction vertical profiles in two prominent global climate models (Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, GFDL, CM2.1 and CM3) to seasonal observations from collocated instruments (AErosol RObotic NETwork, AERONET, and Cloud–Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization, CALIOP) at seven polluted and biomass burning regions worldwide. We find that a multi-parameter evaluation provides key insights on model biases, data from collocated instruments can reveal underlying aerosol-governing physics, column properties wash out important vertical distinctions, and improved models does not mean all aspects are improved. We conclude that it is important to make use of all available data (parameters and instruments) when evaluating aerosol properties derived by models.

scholarly journals An evaluation of the importance of spatial resolution in a global climate and hydrological model based on the Rhine and Mississippi basin

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imme Benedict ◽  
Chiel C. van Heerwaarden ◽  
Albrecht H. Weerts ◽  
Wilco Hazeleger
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Spatial Resolution ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Hydrological Cycle ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Convective Processes ◽  
Parameter Values

Abstract. The hydrological cycle of river basins can be simulated by combining global climate models (GCMs) and global hydrological models (GHMs). The spatial resolution of these models is restricted by computational resources and therefore limits the processes and level of detail that can be resolved. To further improve simulations of precipitation and river-runoff on a global scale, we assess and compare the benefits of an increased resolution for a GCM and a GHM. We focus on the Rhine and Mississippi basin. Increasing the resolution of a GCM (1.125° to 0.25°) results in more realistic large-scale circulation patterns over the Rhine and an improved precipitation budget. These improvements with increased resolution are not found for the Mississippi basin, most likely because precipitation is strongly dependent on the representation of still unresolved convective processes. Increasing the resolution of vegetation and orography in the high resolution GHM (from 0.5° to 0.05°) shows no significant differences in discharge for both basins, because the hydrological processes depend highly on other parameter values that are not readily available at high resolution. Therefore, increasing the resolution of the GCM provides the most straightforward route to better results. This route works best for basins driven by large-scale precipitation, such as the Rhine basin. For basins driven by convective processes, such as the Mississippi basin, improvements are expected with even higher resolution convection permitting models.

scholarly journals Comparison of warming trends over the last century around Antarctica from three coupled models

1998 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 565-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Connolley ◽  
Siobhan P. O'Farrell
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Large Temperature ◽  
Coupled Models ◽  
Temperature Changes ◽  
Model Variability ◽  
The Antarctic

We compare observed temperature variations in Antarctica with climate-model runs over the last century. The models used are three coupled global climate models (GCMs) — the UKMO, the CSIRO and the MPI forced by the CO2 increases observed over the last century, and an atmospheric model experiment forced with observed sea-surface temperatures and sea-ice extents over the last century. Despite some regions of agreement, in general the GCM runs appear to be incompatible with each other and with the observations, although the short observational record and high natural variability make verification difficult. One of the best places for a more detailed study is the Antarctic Peninsula where the density of stations is higher and station records are longer than elsewhere in Antarctica. Observations show that this area has seen larger temperature rises than anywhere else in Antarctica. None of the three GCMs simulate such large temperature changes in the Peninsula region, in either climate-change runs radiatively forced by CO2 increases or control runs which assess the level of model variability.

Using PRIMAVERA high-resolution global climate models for European windstorm risk assessment in present and future climates for the (re)insurance industry

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Lockwood ◽  
Erika Palin ◽  
Galina Guentchev ◽  
Malcolm Roberts
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Insurance Industry ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Storm Track ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Climate Modelling ◽  
Business And Society ◽  
High Resolution Models

<p>PRIMAVERA is a European Union Horizon2020 project about creating a new generation of advanced and well-evaluated high-resolution global climate models, for the benefit of governments, business and society in general. The project has been engaging with several sectors, including finance, transport, and energy, to understand the extent to which any improved process understanding arising from high-resolution global climate modelling can – in turn – help with using climate model output to address user needs.</p><p>In this talk we will outline our work for the finance and (re)insurance industries.  Following consultation with members of the industry, we are using PRIMAVERA climate models to generate a European windstorm event set for use in catastrophe modelling and risk analysis.  The event set is generated from five different climate models, each run at a selection of resolutions ranging from 18-140km, covering the period 1950-2050, giving approximately 1700 years of climate model data in total.  High-resolution climate models tend to have reduced biases in storm track position (which is too zonal in low-resolution climate models) and windstorm intensity.  We will compare the properties of the windstorm footprints and associated risk across the different models and resolutions, to assess whether the high-resolution models lead to improved estimation of European windstorm risk.  We will also compare windstorm risk in present and future climates, to see if a consistent picture emerges between models.  Finally we will address the question of whether the event sets from each PRIMAVERA model can be combined to form a multi-model event set ensemble covering thousands of years of windstorm data.</p>

Extending the paleoglaciological record of the southeastern Tibetan Plateau by combining geochronological and high-resolution remote sensing techniques

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arjen P. Stroeven ◽  
Ramona A.A. Schneider ◽  
Robin Blomdin ◽  
Natacha Gribenski ◽  
Marc W. Caffee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Tibetan Plateau ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Luminescence Dating ◽  
The Tibetan Plateau ◽  
Exposure Dating ◽  
Southeastern Margin ◽  
Downstream Communities

<p>Paleoglaciological data is a crucial source of information towards insightful paleoclimate reconstructions by providing vital boundary conditions for regional and global climate models. In this context, the Third Pole Environment is considered a key region because it is highly sensitive to global climate change and its many glaciers constitute a diminishing but critical supply of freshwater to downstream communities in SE Asia. Despite its importance, extents of past glaciation on the Tibetan Plateau remain poorly documented or controversial largely because of the lack of well define glacial chronostratigraphies and reconstructions of former glacier extent. This study contributes to a better documentation of the extent and improved resolution of the timing of past glaciations on the southeastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau. We deploy a high-resolution TanDEM-X Digital Elevation Model (12 m resolution) to produce maps of glacial and proglacial fluvial landforms in unprecedented detail. Geomorphological and sedimentological field observations complement the mapping while cosmogenic nuclide exposure dating of quartz samples from boulders on end moraines detail the timing of local glacier expansion. Additionally, samples for optically stimulated luminescence dating were taken from extensive and distinct terraces located in pull-apart basins downstream of the end moraines to determine their formation time. We compare this new dataset with new and published electron spin resonance ages from terraces. Temporal coherence between the different chronometers strengthens the geochronological record while divergence highlights limitations in the applicability of the chronometers to glacial research or in our conceptual understanding of landscape changes in tectonic regions. Results highlight our current understanding of paleoglaciation, landscape development, and paleoclimate on the SE Tibetan Plateau.</p>

scholarly journals Sensitivity of Limiting Hurricane Intensity to SST in the Atlantic from Observations and GCMs

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (16) ◽  
pp. 5949-5957 ◽  
Author(s):  
James B. Elsner ◽  
Sarah E. Strazzo ◽  
Thomas H. Jagger ◽  
Timothy LaRow ◽  
Ming Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
North Atlantic Ocean ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Lower Sensitivity ◽  
Hurricane Intensity ◽  
University Center ◽  
The North ◽  
Low Sensitivity

Abstract A statistical model for the intensity of the strongest hurricanes has been developed and a new methodology introduced for estimating the sensitivity of the strongest hurricanes to changes in sea surface temperature. Here, the authors use this methodology on observed hurricanes and hurricanes generated from two global climate models (GCMs). Hurricanes over the North Atlantic Ocean during the period 1981–2010 show a sensitivity of 7.9 ± 1.19 m s−1 K−1 (standard error; SE) when over seas warmer than 25°C. In contrast, hurricanes over the same region and period generated from the GFDL High Resolution Atmospheric Model (HiRAM) show a significantly lower sensitivity with the highest at 1.8 ± 0.42 m s−1 K−1 (SE). Similar weaker sensitivity is found using hurricanes generated from the Florida State University Center for Ocean–Atmospheric Prediction Studies (FSU-COAPS) model with the highest at 2.9 ± 2.64 m s−1 K−1 (SE). A statistical refinement of HiRAM-generated hurricane intensities heightens the sensitivity to a maximum of 6.9 ± 3.33 m s−1 K−1 (SE), but the increase is offset by additional uncertainty associated with the refinement. Results suggest that the caution that should be exercised when interpreting GCM scenarios of future hurricane intensity stems from the low sensitivity of limiting GCM-generated hurricane intensity to ocean temperature.

scholarly journals European daily precipitation according to EURO-CORDEX regional climate models (RCMs) and high-resolution global climate models (GCMs) from the High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP)

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 5485-5506
Author(s):  
Marie-Estelle Demory ◽  
Ségolène Berthou ◽  
Jesús Fernández ◽  
Silje L. Sørland ◽  
Roman Brogli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Daily Precipitation ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Regional Climate ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Model Intercomparison ◽  
Grid Spacing ◽  
Intercomparison Project ◽  
Horizontal Grid

Abstract. In this study, we evaluate a set of high-resolution (25–50 km horizontal grid spacing) global climate models (GCMs) from the High-Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP), developed as part of the EU-funded PRIMAVERA (Process-based climate simulation: Advances in high resolution modelling and European climate risk assessment) project, and from the EURO-CORDEX (Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment) regional climate models (RCMs) (12–50 km horizontal grid spacing) over a European domain. It is the first time that an assessment of regional climate information using ensembles of both GCMs and RCMs at similar horizontal resolutions has been possible. The focus of the evaluation is on the distribution of daily precipitation at a 50 km scale under current climate conditions. Both the GCM and RCM ensembles are evaluated against high-quality gridded observations in terms of spatial resolution and station density. We show that both ensembles outperform GCMs from the 5th Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), which cannot capture the regional-scale precipitation distribution properly because of their coarse resolutions. PRIMAVERA GCMs generally simulate precipitation distributions within the range of EURO-CORDEX RCMs. Both ensembles perform better in summer and autumn in most European regions but tend to overestimate precipitation in winter and spring. PRIMAVERA shows improvements in the latter by reducing moderate-precipitation rate biases over central and western Europe. The spatial distribution of mean precipitation is also improved in PRIMAVERA. Finally, heavy precipitation simulated by PRIMAVERA agrees better with observations in most regions and seasons, while CORDEX overestimates precipitation extremes. However, uncertainty exists in the observations due to a potential undercatch error, especially during heavy-precipitation events. The analyses also confirm previous findings that, although the spatial representation of precipitation is improved, the effect of increasing resolution from 50 to 12 km horizontal grid spacing in EURO-CORDEX daily precipitation distributions is, in comparison, small in most regions and seasons outside mountainous regions and coastal regions. Our results show that both high-resolution GCMs and CORDEX RCMs provide adequate information to end users at a 50 km scale.

scholarly journals Simulations of the 1979–88 polar climates by global climate models

1995 ◽  
Vol 21 ◽  
pp. 83-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Biao Chen ◽  
David H. Bromwich ◽  
Keith M. Hines ◽  
Xuguang Pan
Keyword(s):  
Climate Models ◽  
Comprehensive Evaluation ◽  
Global Climate ◽  
Precipitable Water ◽  
Atmospheric Model ◽  
Horizontal Resolution ◽  
Global Climate Models ◽  
Atmospheric Models ◽  
Sea Level Pressure ◽  
Polar Climate

The simulation of the northern and southern polar climates for 1979–88 by 14 global climate models (GCMs), using the observed monthly averaged sea-surface temperatures and sea-ice extents as boundary conditions, is part of an international effort to determine the systematic errors of atmospheric models under realistic conditions, the so-called Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project (AMIP), In this study, intercomparison of the models’ simulation of polar climate is discussed in terms of selected surface and vertically integrated monthly averaged quantities, such as sea-level pressure, cloudiness, precipitable water, precipitation and evaporation/sublimation. The results suggest that the accuracy of model-simulated climate features in high latitudes primarily depends on the horizontal resolution and the treatment of physical processes in the GCMs. AMIP offers an unprecedented opportunity for the comprehensive evaluation and validation of current atmospheric models and provides valuable information for model improvement.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document